LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
MITRE ATT&CK® Technique

T1567.002: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage

Adversaries may exfiltrate data to a cloud storage service rather than over their primary command and control channel. Cloud storage services allow for the storage, edit, and retrieval of data from a remote cloud storage server over the Internet.

Examples of cloud storage services include Dropbox and Google Docs. Exfiltration to these cloud storage services can provide a significant amount of cover to the adversary if hosts within the network are already communicating with the service.

EnterpriseT1567.002Sub-techniqueObject v1.3Modified
Glexia's Take · Automated analysis

Security context for executives and security teams

Automation confidenceMedium

Exfiltration to Cloud Storage matters because it can blend data theft into normal Internet use. If Dropbox, Google Docs, or similar services are already allowed, an adversary may avoid using a noisier command-and-control channel and instead move sensitive data through services the business depends on.

Executive priority

Treat this as a data-loss and resilience control question, not only a malware detection problem. Leaders should ask which cloud storage services are approved, which are blocked or monitored, and whether the organization can produce evidence of large or unusual uploads from ESXi, Linux, macOS, and Windows environments. The ATT&CK relationships show this behavior is relevant across espionage and financially motivated contexts, so prioritization should focus on high-value data stores, regulated data, and systems where cloud storage access is business-justified but risky.

Technical view

This is an exfiltration sub-technique of Exfiltration Over Web Service. MITRE does not provide technique-specific detection text, but a related ATT&CK detection strategy, DET0570, is mapped to it. SOC and detection teams should validate whether outbound web traffic to cloud storage services can be distinguished from normal collaboration activity, especially where SSL/TLS and pre-approved firewall or proxy rules reduce visibility. Investigations should correlate endpoint activity, file access or staging, process-to-network behavior, DNS/proxy/firewall events, and cloud/SaaS audit records where available.

Likely telemetry

  • Web proxy and URL filtering logs for access to cloud storage categories or specific services
  • Firewall and network egress metadata, including destination, volume, timing, and session characteristics
  • DNS queries for cloud storage service domains
  • Endpoint process and network telemetry from ESXi, Linux, macOS, and Windows systems
  • File access, archive creation, or staging indicators on endpoints and servers

Detection direction

  • Inventory sanctioned versus unsanctioned cloud storage services and tune detections around unauthorized destinations or unusual upload patterns.
  • Baseline normal business use so alerts distinguish expected collaboration from anomalous volume, timing, host, user, or destination combinations.
  • Correlate network egress with endpoint file activity; cloud-storage traffic alone can be high-volume and benign.
  • Pay special attention to systems that normally should not upload data to consumer or external storage services.
  • Account for blind spots from encrypted web traffic and broad allow rules that permit popular cloud services.

Mitigation priorities

  • Apply M1021 Restrict Web-Based Content by limiting access to unauthorized cloud storage services through web proxy filtering and related web controls.
  • Define policy for approved cloud storage use and enforce it consistently across endpoints and server platforms.
  • Prioritize controls around repositories containing regulated, sensitive, or operationally critical data.
  • Review browser behavior, downloads, scripts, and extensions where web-based content controls are used as part of the organization’s mitigation approach.
  • Maintain exceptions for legitimate business services, but require monitoring and evidence for upload activity to those services.
Additional notes and limits

ATT&CK maps this technique to multiple groups and campaigns, including C0015, Operation Dream Job, APT41 DUST, Turla, FIN7, Wizard Spider, and others. This supports treating the behavior as broadly relevant, but it does not prove activity in any specific environment. The key local question is whether defenders can separate normal cloud collaboration from suspicious outbound data movement.

Official MITRE detection guidance for this object is not provided, and the related DET0570 strategy details are not included in the supplied fields. Telemetry and control recommendations therefore depend on local architecture, approved cloud services, proxy and endpoint visibility, and business process baselines.

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Official MITRE ATT&CK definition

Exfiltration to Cloud Storage

Adversaries may exfiltrate data to a cloud storage service rather than over their primary command and control channel. Cloud storage services allow for the storage, edit, and retrieval of data from a remote cloud storage server over the Internet.

Examples of cloud storage services include Dropbox and Google Docs. Exfiltration to these cloud storage services can provide a significant amount of cover to the adversary if hosts within the network are already communicating with the service.

View the same entry on attack.mitre.org (MITRE-hosted reference; in-page links above use the Glexia ATT&CK library.)

Glexia analysis

How security teams should use this page

Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.

ATT&CK relationship table

Related techniques

This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.

1 rows
DomainIDNameRelationship / procedure
EnterpriseT1567Exfiltration Over Web ServiceThis object subtechnique of Exfiltration Over Web Service.
Associated objects

Groups, software, and campaigns

GroupEnterprise

G0065: Leviathan

Leviathan is a Chinese state-sponsored cyber espionage group that has been attributed to the Ministry of State Security's (MSS) Hainan State Security Department and an affiliated front company.[1] Active since at least 2009, Leviathan has targeted the following sectors: academia, aerospace/aviation, biomedical, defense industrial base, government, healthcare, manufacturing, maritime, and transportation across the US, Canada, Australia, Europe, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia.[1][2][3][4]

GroupEnterprise

G1024: Akira

Akira is a ransomware variant and ransomware deployment entity active since at least March 2023.[1] Akira uses compromised credentials to access single-factor external access mechanisms such as VPNs for initial access, then various publicly-available tools and techniques for lateral movement.[1][2] Akira operations are associated with "double extortion" ransomware activity, where data is exfiltrated from victim environments prior to encryption, with threats to publish files if a ransom is not paid. Technical analysis of Akira ransomware indicates variants capable of targeting Windows or VMWare ESXi hypervisors and multiple overlaps with Conti ransomware.[3][4][5]

GroupEnterprise

G1014: LuminousMoth

LuminousMoth is a Chinese-speaking cyber espionage group that has been active since at least October 2020. LuminousMoth has targeted high-profile organizations, including government entities, in Myanmar, the Philippines, Thailand, and other parts of Southeast Asia. Some security researchers have concluded there is a connection between LuminousMoth and Mustang Panda based on similar targeting and TTPs, as well as network infrastructure overlaps.[1][2]

GroupEnterprise

G0094: Kimsuky

Kimsuky is a Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK)-based cyber espionage group that has been active since at least 2012. The group initially targeted South Korean government agencies, think tanks, and subject-matter experts in various fields. Its operations expanded to include the United Nations and organizations in the government, education, business services, and manufacturing sectors across the United States, Japan, Russia, and Europe. Kimsuky has focused collection on foreign policy and national security issues tied to the Korean Peninsula, nuclear policy, and sanctions. Kimsuky operations have overlapped with those of other North Korean state-sponsored cyber espionage actors as a result of ad hoc collaborations or other limited resource sharing.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

Kimsuky was assessed to be responsible for the 2014 Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co. compromise; other notable campaigns include Operation STOLEN PENCIL (2018), Operation Kabar Cobra (2019), and Operation Smoke Screen (2019).[7][8][9] In 2023, Kimsuky was observed using commercial large language models (LLMs) to assist with vulnerability research, scripting, social engineering and reconnaissance.[10]

DPRK threat actor cluster boundaries overlap in open source reporting, with some security researchers consolidating all attributed North Korean state-sponsored cyber activity under Lazarus Group, rather than tracking operationally distinct subgroups.

GroupEnterprise

G0027: Threat Group-3390

Threat Group-3390 is a Chinese threat group that has extensively used strategic Web compromises to target victims.[1] The group has been active since at least 2010 and has targeted organizations in the aerospace, government, defense, technology, energy, manufacturing and gambling/betting sectors.[2][3][4]

GroupEnterprise

G0129: Mustang Panda

Mustang Panda is a China-based cyber espionage threat actor that has been conducting operations since at least 2012. Mustang Panda has been known to use tailored phishing lures and decoy documents to deliver malicious payloads. Mustang Panda has targeted government, diplomatic, and non-governmental organizations, including think tanks, religious institutions, and research entities, across the United States, Europe, and Asia, with notable activity in Russia, Mongolia, Myanmar, Pakistan, and Vietnam. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]

GroupEnterprise

G0142: Confucius

Confucius is a cyber espionage group that has primarily targeted military personnel, high-profile personalities, business persons, and government organizations in South Asia since at least 2013. Security researchers have noted similarities between Confucius and Patchwork, particularly in their respective custom malware code and targets.[1][2][3]

GroupEnterprise

G1005: POLONIUM

POLONIUM is a Lebanon-based group that has primarily targeted Israeli organizations, including critical manufacturing, information technology, and defense industry companies, since at least February 2022. Security researchers assess POLONIUM has coordinated their operations with multiple actors affiliated with Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS), based on victim overlap as well as common techniques and tooling.[1]

GroupEnterprise

G1001: HEXANE

HEXANE is a cyber espionage threat group that has targeted oil & gas, telecommunications, aviation, and internet service provider organizations since at least 2017. Targeted companies have been located in the Middle East and Africa, including Israel, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Morocco, and Tunisia. HEXANE's TTPs appear similar to APT33 and OilRig but due to differences in victims and tools it is tracked as a separate entity.[1][2][3][4]

GroupEnterprise

G1051: Medusa Group

Medusa Group has been active since at least 2021 and was initially operated as a closed ransomware group before evolving into a Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) operation. Some reporting indicates that certain attacks may still be conducted directly by the ransomware’s core developers. Public sources have also referred to the group as “Spearwing” or “Medusa Actors.” [1] [2] Medusa Group employs living-off-the-land techniques, frequently leveraging publicly available tools and common remote management software to conduct operations. The group engages in double extortion tactics, exfiltrating data prior to encryption and threatening to publish stolen information if ransom demands are not met. [3] For initial access, Medusa Group has exploited publicly known vulnerabilities, conducted phishing campaigns, and used credentials or access purchased from Initial Access Brokers (IABs). The group is opportunistic and has targeted a wide range of sectors globally. [4]

GroupEnterprise

G1021: Cinnamon Tempest

Cinnamon Tempest is a China-based threat group that has been active since at least 2021 deploying multiple strains of ransomware based on the leaked Babuk source code. Cinnamon Tempest does not operate their ransomware on an affiliate model or purchase access but appears to act independently in all stages of the attack lifecycle. Based on victimology, the short lifespan of each ransomware variant, and use of malware attributed to government-sponsored threat groups, Cinnamon Tempest may be motivated by intellectual property theft or cyberespionage rather than financial gain.[1][2][3][4]

GroupEnterprise

G1053: Storm-0501

Storm-0501 is a financially motivated cyber criminal group that uses commodity and open-source tools to conduct ransomware operations. Storm-0501 has been active since 2021 and has previously been affiliated with Sabbath Ransomware and other Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) variants such as Hive, BlackCat, Hunters International, LockBit 3.0, and Embargo ransomware.[1][2][3][4]

MalwareEnterprise

S9034: Tsundere Botnet

Tsundere Botnet is a botnet first reported in mid-2025 that is delivered via MSI installer or a PowerShell script. It leverages Node.js and JavaScript for payload delivery and execution, and uses smart contracts on the blockchain to host command and control (C2) addresses. Tsundere Botnet is attributed to a likely Russian-speaking threat actor.

A variant named DinDoor has been linked to MuddyWater operations and uses the Deno runtime for execution rather than Node.js.[1][2][3][4]

LinuxmacOSWindows
ToolEnterprise

S1040: Rclone

Rclone is a command line program for syncing files with cloud storage services such as Dropbox, Google Drive, Amazon S3, and MEGA. Rclone has been used in a number of ransomware campaigns, including those associated with the Conti and DarkSide Ransomware-as-a-Service operations.[1][2][3][4][5]

LinuxWindowsmacOS
MalwareEnterprise

S1023: CreepyDrive

CreepyDrive is a custom implant has been used by POLONIUM since at least early 2022 for C2 with and exfiltration to actor-controlled OneDrive accounts.[1]

POLONIUM has used a similar implant called CreepyBox that relies on actor-controlled DropBox accounts.[1]

WindowsOffice Suite
MalwareEnterprise

S1170: ODAgent

ODAgent is a C#/.NET downloader that has been used by OilRig since at least 2022 including against target organizations in Israel to download and execute payloads and to exfiltrate staged files.[1]

Windows
MalwareEnterprise

S1172: OilBooster

OilBooster is a downloader written in Microsoft Visual C/C++ that has been used by OilRig since at least 2022 including against target organizations in Israel to download and execute files and for exfiltration.[1]

Windows
ToolEnterprise

S0363: Empire

Empire is an open-source, cross-platform remote administration and post-exploitation framework that is publicly available on GitHub. While the tool itself is primarily written in Python, the post-exploitation agents are written in pure PowerShell for Windows and Python for Linux/macOS. Empire was one of five tools singled out by a joint report on public hacking tools being widely used by adversaries.[1][2][3]

LinuxmacOSWindows
CampaignEnterprise

C0015: C0015

C0015 was a ransomware intrusion during which the unidentified attackers used Bazar, Cobalt Strike, and Conti, along with other tools, over a 5 day period. Security researchers assessed the actors likely used the widely-circulated Conti ransomware playbook based on the observed pattern of activity and operator errors.[1]

CampaignEnterprise

C0022: Operation Dream Job

Operation Dream Job was a cyber espionage operation likely conducted by Lazarus Group that targeted the defense, aerospace, government, and other sectors in the United States, Israel, Australia, Russia, and India. In at least one case, the cyber actors tried to monetize their network access to conduct a business email compromise (BEC) operation. In 2020, security researchers noted overlapping TTPs, to include fake job lures and code similarities, between Operation Dream Job, Operation North Star, and Operation Interception; by 2022 security researchers described Operation Dream Job as an umbrella term covering both Operation Interception and Operation North Star.[1][2][3][4]

Relationship explorer

All related ATT&CK context

Mitigations

Mitigation direction

Change history

Object version and sync metadata

The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates.

ATT&CK release
19.1
Object version
1.3
Created
Modified
Raw hash
d05f06594c411826...
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases(1)
ReleaseBundle importedObject versionModifiedStatusRaw hash
19.11.3Current bundled05f06594c41…
Raw source

Mirrored ATT&CK source object

The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.

Source references

External references and citations

MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.

  1. [1]
    Proofpoint Leviathan Oct 2017

    Axel F, Pierre T. (2017, October 16). Leviathan: Espionage actor spearphishes maritime and defense targets. Retrieved February 15, 2018.

    Open source URL
  2. [2]
    FireEye Periscope March 2018

    FireEye. (2018, March 16). Suspected Chinese Cyber Espionage Group (TEMP.Periscope) Targeting U.S. Engineering and Maritime Industries. Retrieved April 11, 2018.

    Open source URL
  3. [3]
    Secureworks GOLD SAHARA

    Secureworks. (n.d.). GOLD SAHARA. Retrieved February 20, 2024.

    Open source URL
  4. [4]
    Bitdefender LuminousMoth July 2021

    Botezatu, B and etl. (2021, July 21). LuminousMoth - PlugX, File Exfiltration and Persistence Revisited. Retrieved October 20, 2022.

    Open source URL
  5. [5]
    Checkpoint_MOISCyberCrime_Mar2026

    CheckPoint Research. (2026, March 10). Iranian MOIS Actors & the Cyber Crime Connection. Retrieved March 12, 2026.

    Open source URL
  6. [6]
    Rclone

    Nick Craig-Wood. (n.d.). Rclone syncs your files to cloud storage. Retrieved August 30, 2022.

    Open source URL
  7. [7]
    DFIR Conti Bazar Nov 2021

    DFIR Report. (2021, November 29). CONTInuing the Bazar Ransomware Story. Retrieved September 29, 2022.

    Open source URL
  8. [8]
    Bitdefender Naikon April 2021

    Vrabie, V. (2021, April 23). NAIKON – Traces from a Military Cyber-Espionage Operation. Retrieved June 29, 2021.

    Open source URL
  9. [9]
    Microsoft POLONIUM June 2022

    Microsoft. (2022, June 2). Exposing POLONIUM activity and infrastructure targeting Israeli organizations. Retrieved July 1, 2022.

    Open source URL
  10. [10]
    FireEye APT29

    FireEye Labs. (2015, July). HAMMERTOSS: Stealthy Tactics Define a Russian Cyber Threat Group. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  11. [11]
    Talos Kimsuky Nov 2021

    An, J and Malhotra, A. (2021, November 10). North Korean attackers use malicious blogs to deliver malware to high-profile South Korean targets. Retrieved December 29, 2021.

    Open source URL
  12. [12]
    Securonix Kimsuky February 2025

    Den Iuzvyk, Tim Peck. (2025, February 13). Analyzing DEEP#DRIVE: North Korean Threat Actors Observed Exploiting Trusted Platforms for Targeted Attacks. Retrieved August 19, 2025.

    Open source URL
  13. [13]
    Trend Micro DRBControl February 2020

    Lunghi, D. et al. (2020, February). Uncovering DRBControl. Retrieved November 12, 2021.

    Open source URL
  14. [14]
    ESET OilRig Downloaders DEC 2023

    Hromcova, Z. and Burgher, A. (2023, December 14). OilRig’s persistent attacks using cloud service-powered downloaders. Retrieved November 26, 2024.

    Open source URL
  15. [15]
    Palo Alto Unit42 STATELY TAURUS TONESHELL September 2023

    Lior Rochberger, Tom Fakterman, Robert Falcone. (2023, September 22). Cyberespionage Attacks Against Southeast Asian Government Linked to Stately Taurus, Aka Mustang Panda. Retrieved September 9, 2025.

    Open source URL
  16. [16]
    Unit42 Chinese VSCode 06 September 2024

    Tom Fakterman. (2024, September 6). Chinese APT Abuses VSCode to Target Government in Asia. Retrieved March 24, 2025.

    Open source URL
  17. [17]
    TrendMicro Confucius APT Feb 2018

    Lunghi, D and Horejsi, J. (2018, February 13). Deciphering Confucius: A Look at the Group's Cyberespionage Operations. Retrieved December 26, 2021.

    Open source URL
  18. [18]
    Google Cloud Mandiant UNC3886 2024

    Punsaen Boonyakarn, Shawn Chew, Logeswaran Nadarajan, Mathew Potaczek, Jakub Jozwiak, and Alex Marvi. (2024, June 18). Cloaked and Covert: Uncovering UNC3886 Espionage Operations. Retrieved September 24, 2024.

    Open source URL
  19. [19]
    Talent-Jump Clambling February 2020

    Chen, T. and Chen, Z. (2020, February 17). CLAMBLING - A New Backdoor Base On Dropbox. Retrieved November 12, 2021.

    Open source URL
  20. [20]
    CISA Medusa Group Medusa Ransomware March 2025

    Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. (2025, March 12). AA25-071A #StopRansomware: Medusa Ransomware. Retrieved October 15, 2025.

    Open source URL
  21. [21]
    Broadcom Medusa Ransomware Medusa Group March 2025

    Threat Hunter Team Symantec and Carbon Black. (2025, March 6). Medusa Ransomware Activity Continues to Increase. Retrieved October 15, 2025.

    Open source URL
  22. [22]
    Sygnia Emperor Dragonfly October 2022

    Biderman, O. et al. (2022, October 3). REVEALING EMPEROR DRAGONFLY: NIGHT SKY AND CHEERSCRYPT - A SINGLE RANSOMWARE GROUP. Retrieved December 6, 2023.

    Open source URL
  23. [23]
    Google Mandiant Storm-0501 Sabbath Ransomware November 2021

    Tyler McLellan, Brandan Schondorfer. (2021, November 29). Kitten.gif: Meet the Sabbath Ransomware Affiliate Program, Again. Retrieved October 19, 2025.

    Open source URL
  24. [24]
    Microsoft Storm-501 Sabbath Ransomware Embargo September 2024

    Microsoft Threat Intelligence. (2024, September 26). Storm-0501: Ransomware attacks expanding to hybrid cloud environments. Retrieved October 19, 2025.

    Open source URL
  25. [25]
    Microsoft Storm-0501 Embargo Ransomware August 2025

    Microsoft Threat Intelligence. (2025, August 27). Storm-0501’s evolving techniques lead to cloud-based ransomware. Retrieved October 19, 2025.

    Open source URL
  26. [26]
    ESET Crutch December 2020

    Faou, M. (2020, December 2). Turla Crutch: Keeping the “back door” open. Retrieved December 4, 2020.

    Open source URL
  27. [27]
    ESET Nomadic Octopus 2018

    Cherepanov, A. (2018, October 4). Nomadic Octopus Cyber espionage in Central Asia. Retrieved October 13, 2021.

    Open source URL
  28. [28]
    Mandiant FIN12 Oct 2021

    Shilko, J., et al. (2021, October 7). FIN12: The Prolific Ransomware Intrusion Threat Actor That Has Aggressively Pursued Healthcare Targets. Retrieved June 15, 2023.

    Open source URL
  29. [29]
    Mandiant_UNC2165

    Mandiant Intelligence. (2022, June 2). To HADES and Back: UNC2165 Shifts to LOCKBIT to Evade Sanctions. Retrieved July 29, 2024.

    Open source URL
  30. [30]
    Symantec Waterbug Jun 2019

    Symantec DeepSight Adversary Intelligence Team. (2019, June 20). Waterbug: Espionage Group Rolls Out Brand-New Toolset in Attacks Against Governments. Retrieved July 8, 2019.

    Open source URL
  31. [31]
    ESET ComRAT May 2020

    Faou, M. (2020, May). From Agent.btz to ComRAT v4: A ten-year journey. Retrieved June 15, 2020.

    Open source URL
  32. [32]
    Microsoft HAFNIUM March 2020

    MSTIC. (2021, March 2). HAFNIUM targeting Exchange Servers with 0-day exploits. Retrieved March 3, 2021.

    Open source URL
  33. [33]
    SOCRadar_MuddyWaterDindoor_Mar2026

    SOCRadar. (2026, March 9). MuddyWater Uses Dindoor Malware Targeting U.S. Networks. Retrieved March 12, 2026.

    Open source URL
  34. [34]
    Sekoia ClickFake 2025

    Amaury G., Coline Chavane, Felix Aimé and Sekoia TDR. (2025, March 31). From Contagious to ClickFake Interview: Lazarus leveraging the ClickFix tactic. Retrieved April 1, 2025.

    Open source URL
  35. [35]
    Github PowerShell Empire

    Schroeder, W., Warner, J., Nelson, M. (n.d.). Github PowerShellEmpire. Retrieved April 28, 2016.

    Open source URL
  36. [36]
    TrendMicro EarthLusca 2022

    Chen, J., et al. (2022). Delving Deep: An Analysis of Earth Lusca’s Operations. Retrieved July 1, 2022.

    Open source URL
  37. [37]
    CISA GRU29155 2024

    US Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency et al. (2024, September 5). Russian Military Cyber Actors Target U.S. and Global Critical Infrastructure. Retrieved September 6, 2024.

    Open source URL
  38. [38]
    Kaspersky ToddyCat Check Logs October 2023

    Dedola, G. et al. (2023, October 12). ToddyCat: Keep calm and check logs. Retrieved January 3, 2024.

    Open source URL
  39. [39]
    Zscaler APT31 Covid-19 October 2020

    Singh, S. and Antil, S. (2020, October 27). APT-31 Leverages COVID-19 Vaccine Theme and Abuses Legitimate Online Services. Retrieved March 24, 2021.

    Open source URL
  40. [40]
    Google Cloud APT41 2024

    Mike Stokkel et al. (2024, July 18). APT41 Has Arisen From the DUST. Retrieved September 16, 2024.

    Open source URL
  41. [41]
    Checkpoint IndigoZebra July 2021

    CheckPoint Research. (2021, July 1). IndigoZebra APT continues to attack Central Asia with evolving tools. Retrieved September 24, 2021.

    Open source URL
  42. [42]
    ESET Lazarus Jun 2020

    Breitenbacher, D and Osis, K. (2020, June 17). OPERATION IN(TER)CEPTION: Targeted Attacks Against European Aerospace and Military Companies. Retrieved December 20, 2021.

    Open source URL
  43. [43]
    ClearSky Lazarus Aug 2020

    ClearSky Research Team. (2020, August 13). Operation 'Dream Job' Widespread North Korean Espionage Campaign. Retrieved December 20, 2021.

    Open source URL
  44. [44]
    NCC Group Chimera January 2021

    Jansen, W . (2021, January 12). Abusing cloud services to fly under the radar. Retrieved September 12, 2024.

    Open source URL
  45. [45]
    CISA Scattered Spider Advisory November 2023

    CISA. (2023, November 16). Cybersecurity Advisory: Scattered Spider (AA23-320A). Retrieved March 18, 2024.

    Open source URL
  46. [46]
    MSTIC Octo Tempest Operations October 2023

    Microsoft. (2023, October 25). Octo Tempest crosses boundaries to facilitate extortion, encryption, and destruction. Retrieved March 18, 2024.

    Open source URL
  47. [47]
    CrowdStrike Scattered Spider JUL 2025

    Counter Adversary Operations. (2025, July 2). CrowdStrike Services Observes SCATTERED SPIDER Escalate Attacks Across Industries. Retrieved October 13, 2025.

    Open source URL
  48. [48]
    Malwarebytes RokRAT VBA January 2021

    Jazi, Hossein. (2021, January 6). Retrohunting APT37: North Korean APT used VBA self decode technique to inject RokRat. Retrieved March 22, 2022.

    Open source URL
  49. [49]
    Volexity InkySquid RokRAT August 2021

    Cash, D., Grunzweig, J., Adair, S., Lancaster, T. (2021, August 25). North Korean BLUELIGHT Special: InkySquid Deploys RokRAT. Retrieved October 1, 2021.

    Open source URL
  50. [50]
    MSTIC Nobelium Toolset May 2021

    MSTIC. (2021, May 28). Breaking down NOBELIUM’s latest early-stage toolset. Retrieved August 4, 2021.

    Open source URL
  51. [51]
    CrowdStrike Carbon Spider August 2021

    Loui, E. and Reynolds, J. (2021, August 30). CARBON SPIDER Embraces Big Game Hunting, Part 1. Retrieved September 20, 2021.

    Open source URL
  52. [52]
    mitre-attackT1567.002
    Open source URL
  53. [53]
    mitre-attackT1567.002
    Open source URL
  54. [54]
    mitre-attackT1567.002
    Open source URL
  55. [55]
    FireEye Periscope March 2018

    FireEye. (2018, March 16). Suspected Chinese Cyber Espionage Group (TEMP.Periscope) Targeting U.S. Engineering and Maritime Industries. Retrieved April 11, 2018.

    Open source URL
  56. [56]
    Proofpoint Leviathan Oct 2017

    Axel F, Pierre T. (2017, October 16). Leviathan: Espionage actor spearphishes maritime and defense targets. Retrieved February 15, 2018.

    Open source URL
  57. [57]
    Secureworks GOLD SAHARA

    Secureworks. (n.d.). GOLD SAHARA. Retrieved February 20, 2024.

    Open source URL
  58. [58]
    Bitdefender LuminousMoth July 2021

    Botezatu, B and etl. (2021, July 21). LuminousMoth - PlugX, File Exfiltration and Persistence Revisited. Retrieved October 20, 2022.

    Open source URL
  59. [59]
    Checkpoint_MOISCyberCrime_Mar2026

    CheckPoint Research. (2026, March 10). Iranian MOIS Actors & the Cyber Crime Connection. Retrieved March 12, 2026.

    Open source URL
  60. [60]
    DFIR Conti Bazar Nov 2021

    DFIR Report. (2021, November 29). CONTInuing the Bazar Ransomware Story. Retrieved September 29, 2022.

    Open source URL
  61. [61]
    Rclone

    Nick Craig-Wood. (n.d.). Rclone syncs your files to cloud storage. Retrieved August 30, 2022.

    Open source URL
  62. [62]
    Bitdefender Naikon April 2021

    Vrabie, V. (2021, April 23). NAIKON – Traces from a Military Cyber-Espionage Operation. Retrieved June 29, 2021.

    Open source URL
  63. [63]
    Microsoft POLONIUM June 2022

    Microsoft. (2022, June 2). Exposing POLONIUM activity and infrastructure targeting Israeli organizations. Retrieved July 1, 2022.

    Open source URL
  64. [64]
    FireEye APT29

    FireEye Labs. (2015, July). HAMMERTOSS: Stealthy Tactics Define a Russian Cyber Threat Group. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  65. [65]
    Securonix Kimsuky February 2025

    Den Iuzvyk, Tim Peck. (2025, February 13). Analyzing DEEP#DRIVE: North Korean Threat Actors Observed Exploiting Trusted Platforms for Targeted Attacks. Retrieved August 19, 2025.

    Open source URL
  66. [66]
    Talos Kimsuky Nov 2021

    An, J and Malhotra, A. (2021, November 10). North Korean attackers use malicious blogs to deliver malware to high-profile South Korean targets. Retrieved December 29, 2021.

    Open source URL
  67. [67]
    Trend Micro DRBControl February 2020

    Lunghi, D. et al. (2020, February). Uncovering DRBControl. Retrieved November 12, 2021.

    Open source URL
  68. [68]
    ESET OilRig Downloaders DEC 2023

    Hromcova, Z. and Burgher, A. (2023, December 14). OilRig’s persistent attacks using cloud service-powered downloaders. Retrieved November 26, 2024.

    Open source URL
  69. [69]
    Palo Alto Unit42 STATELY TAURUS TONESHELL September 2023

    Lior Rochberger, Tom Fakterman, Robert Falcone. (2023, September 22). Cyberespionage Attacks Against Southeast Asian Government Linked to Stately Taurus, Aka Mustang Panda. Retrieved September 9, 2025.

    Open source URL
  70. [70]
    Unit42 Chinese VSCode 06 September 2024

    Tom Fakterman. (2024, September 6). Chinese APT Abuses VSCode to Target Government in Asia. Retrieved March 24, 2025.

    Open source URL
  71. [71]
    TrendMicro Confucius APT Feb 2018

    Lunghi, D and Horejsi, J. (2018, February 13). Deciphering Confucius: A Look at the Group's Cyberespionage Operations. Retrieved December 26, 2021.

    Open source URL
  72. [72]
    Microsoft POLONIUM June 2022

    Microsoft. (2022, June 2). Exposing POLONIUM activity and infrastructure targeting Israeli organizations. Retrieved July 1, 2022.

    Open source URL
  73. [73]
    Microsoft POLONIUM June 2022

    Microsoft. (2022, June 2). Exposing POLONIUM activity and infrastructure targeting Israeli organizations. Retrieved July 1, 2022.

    Open source URL
  74. [74]
    Microsoft POLONIUM June 2022

    Microsoft. (2022, June 2). Exposing POLONIUM activity and infrastructure targeting Israeli organizations. Retrieved July 1, 2022.

    Open source URL
  75. [75]
    Microsoft POLONIUM June 2022

    Microsoft. (2022, June 2). Exposing POLONIUM activity and infrastructure targeting Israeli organizations. Retrieved July 1, 2022.

    Open source URL
  76. [76]
    Google Cloud Mandiant UNC3886 2024

    Punsaen Boonyakarn, Shawn Chew, Logeswaran Nadarajan, Mathew Potaczek, Jakub Jozwiak, and Alex Marvi. (2024, June 18). Cloaked and Covert: Uncovering UNC3886 Espionage Operations. Retrieved September 24, 2024.

    Open source URL
  77. [77]
    DFIR Conti Bazar Nov 2021

    DFIR Report. (2021, November 29). CONTInuing the Bazar Ransomware Story. Retrieved September 29, 2022.

    Open source URL
  78. [78]
    DFIR Conti Bazar Nov 2021

    DFIR Report. (2021, November 29). CONTInuing the Bazar Ransomware Story. Retrieved September 29, 2022.

    Open source URL
  79. [79]
    Talent-Jump Clambling February 2020

    Chen, T. and Chen, Z. (2020, February 17). CLAMBLING - A New Backdoor Base On Dropbox. Retrieved November 12, 2021.

    Open source URL
  80. [80]
    Trend Micro DRBControl February 2020

    Lunghi, D. et al. (2020, February). Uncovering DRBControl. Retrieved November 12, 2021.

    Open source URL
  81. [81]
    Trend Micro DRBControl February 2020

    Lunghi, D. et al. (2020, February). Uncovering DRBControl. Retrieved November 12, 2021.

    Open source URL
  82. [82]
    Broadcom Medusa Ransomware Medusa Group March 2025

    Threat Hunter Team Symantec and Carbon Black. (2025, March 6). Medusa Ransomware Activity Continues to Increase. Retrieved October 15, 2025.

    Open source URL
  83. [83]
    CISA Medusa Group Medusa Ransomware March 2025

    Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. (2025, March 12). AA25-071A #StopRansomware: Medusa Ransomware. Retrieved October 15, 2025.

    Open source URL
  84. [84]
    Sygnia Emperor Dragonfly October 2022

    Biderman, O. et al. (2022, October 3). REVEALING EMPEROR DRAGONFLY: NIGHT SKY AND CHEERSCRYPT - A SINGLE RANSOMWARE GROUP. Retrieved December 6, 2023.

    Open source URL
  85. [85]
    Google Mandiant Storm-0501 Sabbath Ransomware November 2021

    Tyler McLellan, Brandan Schondorfer. (2021, November 29). Kitten.gif: Meet the Sabbath Ransomware Affiliate Program, Again. Retrieved October 19, 2025.

    Open source URL
  86. [86]
    Microsoft Storm-0501 Embargo Ransomware August 2025

    Microsoft Threat Intelligence. (2025, August 27). Storm-0501’s evolving techniques lead to cloud-based ransomware. Retrieved October 19, 2025.

    Open source URL
  87. [87]
    Microsoft Storm-501 Sabbath Ransomware Embargo September 2024

    Microsoft Threat Intelligence. (2024, September 26). Storm-0501: Ransomware attacks expanding to hybrid cloud environments. Retrieved October 19, 2025.

    Open source URL
  88. [88]
    ESET Crutch December 2020

    Faou, M. (2020, December 2). Turla Crutch: Keeping the “back door” open. Retrieved December 4, 2020.

    Open source URL
  89. [89]
    ESET OilRig Downloaders DEC 2023

    Hromcova, Z. and Burgher, A. (2023, December 14). OilRig’s persistent attacks using cloud service-powered downloaders. Retrieved November 26, 2024.

    Open source URL
  90. [90]
    ESET OilRig Downloaders DEC 2023

    Hromcova, Z. and Burgher, A. (2023, December 14). OilRig’s persistent attacks using cloud service-powered downloaders. Retrieved November 26, 2024.

    Open source URL
  91. [91]
    ESET Nomadic Octopus 2018

    Cherepanov, A. (2018, October 4). Nomadic Octopus Cyber espionage in Central Asia. Retrieved October 13, 2021.

    Open source URL
  92. [92]
    Mandiant FIN12 Oct 2021

    Shilko, J., et al. (2021, October 7). FIN12: The Prolific Ransomware Intrusion Threat Actor That Has Aggressively Pursued Healthcare Targets. Retrieved June 15, 2023.

    Open source URL
  93. [93]
    Mandiant_UNC2165

    Mandiant Intelligence. (2022, June 2). To HADES and Back: UNC2165 Shifts to LOCKBIT to Evade Sanctions. Retrieved July 29, 2024.

    Open source URL
  94. [94]
    ESET ComRAT May 2020

    Faou, M. (2020, May). From Agent.btz to ComRAT v4: A ten-year journey. Retrieved June 15, 2020.

    Open source URL
  95. [95]
    Symantec Waterbug Jun 2019

    Symantec DeepSight Adversary Intelligence Team. (2019, June 20). Waterbug: Espionage Group Rolls Out Brand-New Toolset in Attacks Against Governments. Retrieved July 8, 2019.

    Open source URL
  96. [96]
    Microsoft HAFNIUM March 2020

    MSTIC. (2021, March 2). HAFNIUM targeting Exchange Servers with 0-day exploits. Retrieved March 3, 2021.

    Open source URL
  97. [97]
    SOCRadar_MuddyWaterDindoor_Mar2026

    SOCRadar. (2026, March 9). MuddyWater Uses Dindoor Malware Targeting U.S. Networks. Retrieved March 12, 2026.

    Open source URL
  98. [98]
    Sekoia ClickFake 2025

    Amaury G., Coline Chavane, Felix Aimé and Sekoia TDR. (2025, March 31). From Contagious to ClickFake Interview: Lazarus leveraging the ClickFix tactic. Retrieved April 1, 2025.

    Open source URL
  99. [99]
    Github PowerShell Empire

    Schroeder, W., Warner, J., Nelson, M. (n.d.). Github PowerShellEmpire. Retrieved April 28, 2016.

    Open source URL
  100. [100]
    TrendMicro EarthLusca 2022

    Chen, J., et al. (2022). Delving Deep: An Analysis of Earth Lusca’s Operations. Retrieved July 1, 2022.

    Open source URL
  101. [101]
    CISA GRU29155 2024

    US Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency et al. (2024, September 5). Russian Military Cyber Actors Target U.S. and Global Critical Infrastructure. Retrieved September 6, 2024.

    Open source URL
  102. [102]
    Kaspersky ToddyCat Check Logs October 2023

    Dedola, G. et al. (2023, October 12). ToddyCat: Keep calm and check logs. Retrieved January 3, 2024.

    Open source URL
  103. [103]
    Zscaler APT31 Covid-19 October 2020

    Singh, S. and Antil, S. (2020, October 27). APT-31 Leverages COVID-19 Vaccine Theme and Abuses Legitimate Online Services. Retrieved March 24, 2021.

    Open source URL
  104. [104]
    Google Cloud APT41 2024

    Mike Stokkel et al. (2024, July 18). APT41 Has Arisen From the DUST. Retrieved September 16, 2024.

    Open source URL
  105. [105]
    Checkpoint IndigoZebra July 2021

    CheckPoint Research. (2021, July 1). IndigoZebra APT continues to attack Central Asia with evolving tools. Retrieved September 24, 2021.

    Open source URL
  106. [106]
    ClearSky Lazarus Aug 2020

    ClearSky Research Team. (2020, August 13). Operation 'Dream Job' Widespread North Korean Espionage Campaign. Retrieved December 20, 2021.

    Open source URL
  107. [107]
    ESET Lazarus Jun 2020

    Breitenbacher, D and Osis, K. (2020, June 17). OPERATION IN(TER)CEPTION: Targeted Attacks Against European Aerospace and Military Companies. Retrieved December 20, 2021.

    Open source URL
  108. [108]
    Kaspersky ToddyCat Check Logs October 2023

    Dedola, G. et al. (2023, October 12). ToddyCat: Keep calm and check logs. Retrieved January 3, 2024.

    Open source URL
  109. [109]
    Kaspersky ToddyCat Check Logs October 2023

    Dedola, G. et al. (2023, October 12). ToddyCat: Keep calm and check logs. Retrieved January 3, 2024.

    Open source URL
  110. [110]
    NCC Group Chimera January 2021

    Jansen, W . (2021, January 12). Abusing cloud services to fly under the radar. Retrieved September 12, 2024.

    Open source URL
  111. [111]
    CISA Scattered Spider Advisory November 2023

    CISA. (2023, November 16). Cybersecurity Advisory: Scattered Spider (AA23-320A). Retrieved March 18, 2024.

    Open source URL
  112. [112]
    CrowdStrike Scattered Spider JUL 2025

    Counter Adversary Operations. (2025, July 2). CrowdStrike Services Observes SCATTERED SPIDER Escalate Attacks Across Industries. Retrieved October 13, 2025.

    Open source URL
  113. [113]
    MSTIC Octo Tempest Operations October 2023

    Microsoft. (2023, October 25). Octo Tempest crosses boundaries to facilitate extortion, encryption, and destruction. Retrieved March 18, 2024.

    Open source URL
  114. [114]
    Malwarebytes RokRAT VBA January 2021

    Jazi, Hossein. (2021, January 6). Retrohunting APT37: North Korean APT used VBA self decode technique to inject RokRat. Retrieved March 22, 2022.

    Open source URL
  115. [115]
    Volexity InkySquid RokRAT August 2021

    Cash, D., Grunzweig, J., Adair, S., Lancaster, T. (2021, August 25). North Korean BLUELIGHT Special: InkySquid Deploys RokRAT. Retrieved October 1, 2021.

    Open source URL
Source and licensing

Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.