T1069.001: Local Groups
Adversaries may attempt to find local system groups and permission settings. The knowledge of local system permission groups can help adversaries determine which groups exist and which users belong to a particular group. Adversaries may use this information to determine which users have elevated permissions, such as the users found within the local administrators group.
Commands such as net localgroup of the Net utility, dscl . -list /Groups on macOS, and groups on Linux can list local groups.
Security context for executives and security teams
Local Groups is a discovery behavior where an intruder checks which local groups exist on a Linux, macOS, or Windows host and who belongs to them. The business significance is not the query itself; it is that the result helps an attacker identify local administrators or other elevated users to guide follow-on access decisions.
Executive priority
Treat this as an early warning behavior for privilege and lateral-movement risk. Security leaders should ask whether SOC coverage can see local group enumeration consistently across Windows, macOS, and Linux, and whether local administrator membership is governed well enough to limit the value of this discovery. It is also useful audit evidence for least-privilege, endpoint monitoring, and incident response readiness.
Technical view
ATT&CK lists this sub-technique under Discovery and ties it to Permission Groups Discovery. Validate telemetry for native enumeration commands such as Windows Net utility usage with `net localgroup`, macOS `dscl . -list /Groups`, and Linux `groups`. Because official detection text is not provided, use the related DET0114 detection strategy as context, then tune locally around command execution, parent process, user context, host role, and whether the activity is interactive administration, scripted management, or unusual post-compromise discovery. Relationship context shows this behavior is used by multiple campaigns, groups, and software entries, including Net and Cobalt Strike, so it should not be treated as niche.
Likely telemetry
- Endpoint process creation telemetry with command-line arguments
- Shell or terminal execution records on Linux, macOS, and Windows
- EDR telemetry showing parent process, user, integrity/privilege context, and host
- Local group and local administrator membership data for comparison and baselining
- Administrative script or remote management execution logs where available
Detection direction
- Confirm that command-line logging captures `net localgroup`, `dscl . -list /Groups`, and `groups` across supported platforms.
- Baseline legitimate help desk, configuration management, and administrative scripts that enumerate groups to reduce false positives.
- Prioritize alerts when enumeration occurs from unusual users, newly compromised endpoints, non-administrative workstations, remote shells, or processes associated with suspicious post-exploitation activity.
- Correlate group enumeration with adjacent discovery and credential/privilege activity rather than relying on a single command as definitive evidence.
- Account for blind spots where command-line arguments, macOS/Linux shell activity, or unmanaged endpoints are not centrally collected.
Mitigation priorities
- Reduce the payoff of this behavior by reviewing and minimizing local administrator and other elevated local group membership.
- Standardize endpoint logging so local group discovery is visible across Windows, macOS, and Linux.
- Document approved administrative use cases for local group enumeration and route them through managed tooling where possible.
- Use incident response playbooks to treat unexpected local group enumeration as a pivot point for checking privilege exposure and follow-on discovery.
- Where compliance evidence is required, retain proof of local privilege governance, endpoint telemetry coverage, and alert tuning decisions.
Additional notes and limits
This object has no official ATT&CK detection text, but it is linked to DET0114, Behavioral Detection of Local Group Enumeration Across OS Platforms. The relationship set includes campaigns, groups, and software that use this technique, indicating broad relevance without implying current activity in any specific environment.
Assessment is limited to the supplied ATT&CK fields, external reference, and relationship context. Local prevalence, severity, and detection quality depend on endpoint logging, administrative baselines, operating system mix, and actual local group membership risk.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Local Groups
Adversaries may attempt to find local system groups and permission settings. The knowledge of local system permission groups can help adversaries determine which groups exist and which users belong to a particular group. Adversaries may use this information to determine which users have elevated permissions, such as the users found within the local administrators group.
Commands such as net localgroup of the Net utility, dscl . -list /Groups on macOS, and groups on Linux can list local groups.
How security teams should use this page
Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.
Related techniques
This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.
| Domain | ID | Name | Relationship / procedure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | T1069 | Permission Groups Discovery | This object subtechnique of Permission Groups Discovery. |
Groups, software, and campaigns
G0010: Turla
Turla is a cyber espionage threat group that has been attributed to Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB). They have compromised victims in over 50 countries since at least 2004, spanning a range of industries including government, embassies, military, education, research and pharmaceutical companies. Turla is known for conducting watering hole and spearphishing campaigns, and leveraging in-house tools and malware, such as Uroburos.[1][2][3][4][5]
G0131: Tonto Team
Tonto Team is a suspected Chinese state-sponsored cyber espionage threat group that has primarily targeted South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and the United States since at least 2009; by 2020 they expanded operations to include other Asian as well as Eastern European countries. Tonto Team has targeted government, military, energy, mining, financial, education, healthcare, and technology organizations, including through the Heartbeat Campaign (2009-2012) and Operation Bitter Biscuit (2017).[1][2][3][4][5][6]
G1001: HEXANE
HEXANE is a cyber espionage threat group that has targeted oil & gas, telecommunications, aviation, and internet service provider organizations since at least 2017. Targeted companies have been located in the Middle East and Africa, including Israel, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Morocco, and Tunisia. HEXANE's TTPs appear similar to APT33 and OilRig but due to differences in victims and tools it is tracked as a separate entity.[1][2][3][4]
G0018: admin@338
admin@338 is a China-based cyber threat group. It has previously used newsworthy events as lures to deliver malware and has primarily targeted organizations involved in financial, economic, and trade policy, typically using publicly available RATs such as PoisonIvy, as well as some non-public backdoors. [1]
G0114: Chimera
G1017: Volt Typhoon
Volt Typhoon is a People's Republic of China (PRC) state-sponsored actor that has been active since at least 2021, primarily targeting critical infrastructure organizations in the US and its territories including Guam. Volt Typhoon's targeting and pattern of behavior have been assessed as pre-positioning to enable lateral movement to operational technology (OT) assets for potential destructive or disruptive attacks. Volt Typhoon has emphasized stealth in operations using web shells, living-off-the-land (LOTL) binaries, hands on keyboard activities, and stolen credentials.[1][2][3][4]. The group has leveraged compromised SOHO routers to proxy command and control traffic and obscure its infrastructure, activity associated with the KV botnet.[5].
Reporting indicates a separate initial access cluster, SYLVANITE, has been observed exploiting internet-facing edge devices and transferring access to Volt Typhoon, also tracked as VOLTZITE, for follow-on operations. [6]
G0049: OilRig
OilRig is a suspected Iranian threat group that has targeted Middle Eastern and international victims since at least 2014. The group has targeted a variety of sectors, including financial, government, energy, chemical, and telecommunications. It appears the group carries out supply chain attacks, leveraging the trust relationship between organizations to attack their primary targets. The group works on behalf of the Iranian government based on infrastructure details that contain references to Iran, use of Iranian infrastructure, and targeting that aligns with nation-state interests.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]
S0201: JPIN
S0060: Sys10
S0521: BloodHound
BloodHound is an Active Directory (AD) reconnaissance tool that can reveal hidden relationships and identify attack paths within an AD environment.[1][2][3]
S0692: SILENTTRINITY
SILENTTRINITY is an open source remote administration and post-exploitation framework primarily written in Python that includes stagers written in Powershell, C, and Boo. SILENTTRINITY was used in a 2019 campaign against Croatian government agencies by unidentified cyber actors.[1][2]
S1179: Exbyte
S0184: POWRUNER
S0650: QakBot
S0154: Cobalt Strike
Cobalt Strike is a commercial, full-featured, remote access tool that bills itself as “adversary simulation software designed to execute targeted attacks and emulate the post-exploitation actions of advanced threat actors”. Cobalt Strike’s interactive post-exploit capabilities cover the full range of ATT&CK tactics, all executed within a single, integrated system.[1]
In addition to its own capabilities, Cobalt Strike leverages the capabilities of other well-known tools such as Metasploit and Mimikatz.[1]
S0039: Net
The Net utility is a component of the Windows operating system. It is used in command-line operations for control of users, groups, services, and network connections. [1]
Net has a great deal of functionality, [2] much of which is useful for an adversary, such as gathering system and network information for Discovery, moving laterally through SMB/Windows Admin Shares using net use commands, and interacting with services. The net1.exe utility is executed for certain functionality when net.exe is run and can be used directly in commands such as net1 user.
S0378: PoshC2
PoshC2 is an open source remote administration and post-exploitation framework that is publicly available on GitHub. The server-side components of the tool are primarily written in Python, while the implants are written in PowerShell. Although PoshC2 is primarily focused on Windows implantation, it does contain a basic Python dropper for Linux/macOS.[1]
S0265: Kazuar
S0082: Emissary
Emissary is a Trojan that has been used by Lotus Blossom. It shares code with Elise, with both Trojans being part of a malware group referred to as LStudio.[1]
C0015: C0015
C0015 was a ransomware intrusion during which the unidentified attackers used Bazar, Cobalt Strike, and Conti, along with other tools, over a 5 day period. Security researchers assessed the actors likely used the widely-circulated Conti ransomware playbook based on the observed pattern of activity and operator errors.[1]
C0014: Operation Wocao
Operation Wocao was a cyber espionage campaign that targeted organizations around the world, including in Brazil, China, France, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The suspected China-based actors compromised government organizations and managed service providers, as well as aviation, construction, energy, finance, health care, insurance, offshore engineering, software development, and transportation companies.[1]
Security researchers assessed the Operation Wocao actors used similar TTPs and tools as APT20, suggesting a possible overlap. Operation Wocao was named after an observed command line entry by one of the threat actors, possibly out of frustration from losing webshell access.[1]
C0012: Operation CuckooBees
Operation CuckooBees was a cyber espionage campaign targeting technology and manufacturing companies in East Asia, Western Europe, and North America since at least 2019. Security researchers noted the goal of Operation CuckooBees, which was still ongoing as of May 2022, was likely the theft of proprietary information, research and development documents, source code, and blueprints for various technologies. Researchers assessed Operation CuckooBees was conducted by actors affiliated with Winnti Group, APT41, and BARIUM.[1]
C0061: Operation Digital Eye
Operation Digital Eye was conducted in June and July of 2024 by suspected People's Republic of China (PRC)-nexus threat actors targeting business-to-business IT service providers in Southern Europe. Operation Digital Eye activity included the use of Visual Studio Code tunnels for command and control (C2) and custom lateral movement capabilities. Overlaps in tooling between Digital Eye and previous China-nexus campaigns, Operation Soft Cell and Operation Tainted Love, indicate the potential use of shared vendors or digital quartermasters.[1]
All related ATT&CK context
Object version and sync metadata
The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates.
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases(1)
| Release | Bundle imported | Object version | Modified | Status | Raw hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.1 | 1.2 | Current bundle | 3080821a22ef… |
Mirrored ATT&CK source object
The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.
External references and citations
MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.
- [1]ESET ComRAT May 2020
Faou, M. (2020, May). From Agent.btz to ComRAT v4: A ten-year journey. Retrieved June 15, 2020.
Open source URL - [2]Microsoft PLATINUM April 2016
Windows Defender Advanced Threat Hunting Team. (2016, April 29). PLATINUM: Targeted attacks in South and Southeast Asia. Retrieved February 15, 2018.
Open source URL - [3]Baumgartner Naikon 2015
Baumgartner, K., Golovkin, M.. (2015, May). The MsnMM Campaigns: The Earliest Naikon APT Campaigns. Retrieved April 10, 2019.
Open source URL - [4]CrowdStrike BloodHound April 2018
Red Team Labs. (2018, April 24). Hidden Administrative Accounts: BloodHound to the Rescue. Retrieved October 28, 2020.
Open source URL - [5]GitHub SILENTTRINITY Modules July 2019
Salvati, M. (2019, August 6). SILENTTRINITY Modules. Retrieved March 24, 2022.
Open source URL - [6]Microsoft BlackByte 2023
Microsoft Incident Response. (2023, July 6). The five-day job: A BlackByte ransomware intrusion case study. Retrieved December 16, 2024.
Open source URL - [7]TrendMicro Tonto Team October 2020
Daniel Lughi, Jaromir Horejsi. (2020, October 2). Tonto Team - Exploring the TTPs of an advanced threat actor operating a large infrastructure. Retrieved October 17, 2021.
Open source URL - [8]FireEye APT34 Dec 2017
Sardiwal, M, et al. (2017, December 7). New Targeted Attack in the Middle East by APT34, a Suspected Iranian Threat Group, Using CVE-2017-11882 Exploit. Retrieved December 20, 2017.
Open source URL - [9]DFIR Conti Bazar Nov 2021
DFIR Report. (2021, November 29). CONTInuing the Bazar Ransomware Story. Retrieved September 29, 2022.
Open source URL - [10]Kaspersky Lyceum October 2021
Kayal, A. et al. (2021, October). LYCEUM REBORN: COUNTERINTELLIGENCE IN THE MIDDLE EAST. Retrieved June 14, 2022.
Open source URL - [11]FoxIT Wocao December 2019
Dantzig, M. v., Schamper, E. (2019, December 19). Operation Wocao: Shining a light on one of China’s hidden hacking groups. Retrieved October 8, 2020.
Open source URL - [12]Kaspersky QakBot September 2021
Kuzmenko, A. et al. (2021, September 2). QakBot technical analysis. Retrieved September 27, 2021.
Open source URL - [13]Trend Micro Black Basta October 2022
Kenefick, I. et al. (2022, October 12). Black Basta Ransomware Gang Infiltrates Networks via QAKBOT, Brute Ratel, and Cobalt Strike. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
Open source URL - [14]Cobalt Strike Manual 4.3 November 2020
Strategic Cyber LLC. (2020, November 5). Cobalt Strike: Advanced Threat Tactics for Penetration Testers. Retrieved April 13, 2021.
Open source URL - [15]Savill 1999
Savill, J. (1999, March 4). Net.exe reference. Retrieved September 22, 2015.
Open source URL - [16]GitHub PoshC2
Nettitude. (2018, July 23). Python Server for PoshC2. Retrieved April 23, 2019.
Open source URL - [17]Unit 42 Kazuar May 2017
Levene, B, et al. (2017, May 03). Kazuar: Multiplatform Espionage Backdoor with API Access. Retrieved July 17, 2018.
Open source URL - [18]FireEye admin@338
FireEye Threat Intelligence. (2015, December 1). China-based Cyber Threat Group Uses Dropbox for Malware Communications and Targets Hong Kong Media Outlets. Retrieved December 4, 2015.
Open source URL - [19]Emissary Trojan Feb 2016
Falcone, R. and Miller-Osborn, J. (2016, February 3). Emissary Trojan Changelog: Did Operation Lotus Blossom Cause It to Evolve?. Retrieved February 15, 2016.
- [20]NTT Security Flagpro new December 2021
Hada, H. (2021, December 28). Flagpro The new malware used by BlackTech. Retrieved March 25, 2022.
Open source URL - [21]Cybereason OperationCuckooBees May 2022
Cybereason Nocturnus. (2022, May 4). Operation CuckooBees: Deep-Dive into Stealthy Winnti Techniques. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
Open source URL - [22]NCC Group Chimera January 2021
Jansen, W . (2021, January 12). Abusing cloud services to fly under the radar. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
Open source URL - [23]ClearSky Lebanese Cedar Jan 2021
ClearSky Cyber Security. (2021, January). “Lebanese Cedar” APT Global Lebanese Espionage Campaign Leveraging Web Servers. Retrieved February 10, 2021.
Open source URL - [24]ESET Turla Lunar toolset May 2024
Jurčacko, F. (2024, May 15). To the Moon and back(doors): Lunar landing in diplomatic missions. Retrieved June 26, 2024.
Open source URL - [25]Unit 42 Playbook Dec 2017
Unit 42. (2017, December 15). Unit 42 Playbook Viewer. Retrieved December 20, 2017.
Open source URL - [26]Kaspersky Turla Aug 2014
Kaspersky Lab's Global Research & Analysis Team. (2014, August 06). The Epic Turla Operation: Solving some of the mysteries of Snake/Uroboros. Retrieved November 7, 2018.
Open source URL - [27]Symantec Buckeye
Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.
Open source URL - [28]Joint Cybersecurity Advisory Volt Typhoon June 2023
NSA et al. (2023, May 24). People's Republic of China State-Sponsored Cyber Actor Living off the Land to Evade Detection. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
Open source URL - [29]Palo Alto OilRig May 2016
Falcone, R. and Lee, B.. (2016, May 26). The OilRig Campaign: Attacks on Saudi Arabian Organizations Deliver Helminth Backdoor. Retrieved May 3, 2017.
- [30]Symantec Crambus OCT 2023
Symantec Threat Hunter Team. (2023, October 19). Crambus: New Campaign Targets Middle Eastern Government. Retrieved November 27, 2024.
Open source URL - [31]Symantec Troll Stealer 2024
Symantec Threat Hunter Team. (2024, May 16). Springtail: New Linux Backdoor Added to Toolkit. Retrieved January 17, 2025.
Open source URL - [32]sentinelone operationDigitalEye Dec 2024
Aleksandar Milenkoski, Luigi Martire. (2024, December 10). Operation Digital Eye | Chinese APT Compromises Critical Digital Infrastructure via Visual Studio Code Tunnels. Retrieved February 27, 2025.
Open source URL - [33]Proofpoint TA505 Mar 2018
Proofpoint Staff. (2018, March 7). Leaked Ammyy Admin Source Code Turned into Malware. Retrieved May 28, 2019.
Open source URL - [34]Korean FSI TA505 2020
Financial Security Institute. (2020, February 28). Profiling of TA505 Threat Group That Continues to Attack the Financial Sector. Retrieved July 14, 2022.
Open source URL - [35]Symantec Orangeworm April 2018
Symantec Security Response Attack Investigation Team. (2018, April 23). New Orangeworm attack group targets the healthcare sector in the U.S., Europe, and Asia. Retrieved May 8, 2018.
Open source URL - [36]mitre-attackT1069.001Open source URL
- [37]mitre-attackT1069.001Open source URL
- [38]mitre-attackT1069.001Open source URL
- [39]ESET ComRAT May 2020
Faou, M. (2020, May). From Agent.btz to ComRAT v4: A ten-year journey. Retrieved June 15, 2020.
Open source URL - [40]Microsoft PLATINUM April 2016
Windows Defender Advanced Threat Hunting Team. (2016, April 29). PLATINUM: Targeted attacks in South and Southeast Asia. Retrieved February 15, 2018.
Open source URL - [41]Baumgartner Naikon 2015
Baumgartner, K., Golovkin, M.. (2015, May). The MsnMM Campaigns: The Earliest Naikon APT Campaigns. Retrieved April 10, 2019.
Open source URL - [42]CrowdStrike BloodHound April 2018
Red Team Labs. (2018, April 24). Hidden Administrative Accounts: BloodHound to the Rescue. Retrieved October 28, 2020.
Open source URL - [43]GitHub SILENTTRINITY Modules July 2019
Salvati, M. (2019, August 6). SILENTTRINITY Modules. Retrieved March 24, 2022.
Open source URL - [44]Microsoft BlackByte 2023
Microsoft Incident Response. (2023, July 6). The five-day job: A BlackByte ransomware intrusion case study. Retrieved December 16, 2024.
Open source URL - [45]TrendMicro Tonto Team October 2020
Daniel Lughi, Jaromir Horejsi. (2020, October 2). Tonto Team - Exploring the TTPs of an advanced threat actor operating a large infrastructure. Retrieved October 17, 2021.
Open source URL - [46]FireEye APT34 Dec 2017
Sardiwal, M, et al. (2017, December 7). New Targeted Attack in the Middle East by APT34, a Suspected Iranian Threat Group, Using CVE-2017-11882 Exploit. Retrieved December 20, 2017.
Open source URL - [47]DFIR Conti Bazar Nov 2021
DFIR Report. (2021, November 29). CONTInuing the Bazar Ransomware Story. Retrieved September 29, 2022.
Open source URL - [48]Kaspersky Lyceum October 2021
Kayal, A. et al. (2021, October). LYCEUM REBORN: COUNTERINTELLIGENCE IN THE MIDDLE EAST. Retrieved June 14, 2022.
Open source URL - [49]FoxIT Wocao December 2019
Dantzig, M. v., Schamper, E. (2019, December 19). Operation Wocao: Shining a light on one of China’s hidden hacking groups. Retrieved October 8, 2020.
Open source URL - [50]Kaspersky QakBot September 2021
Kuzmenko, A. et al. (2021, September 2). QakBot technical analysis. Retrieved September 27, 2021.
Open source URL - [51]Trend Micro Black Basta October 2022
Kenefick, I. et al. (2022, October 12). Black Basta Ransomware Gang Infiltrates Networks via QAKBOT, Brute Ratel, and Cobalt Strike. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
Open source URL - [52]Cobalt Strike Manual 4.3 November 2020
Strategic Cyber LLC. (2020, November 5). Cobalt Strike: Advanced Threat Tactics for Penetration Testers. Retrieved April 13, 2021.
Open source URL - [53]Savill 1999
Savill, J. (1999, March 4). Net.exe reference. Retrieved September 22, 2015.
Open source URL - [54]GitHub PoshC2
Nettitude. (2018, July 23). Python Server for PoshC2. Retrieved April 23, 2019.
Open source URL - [55]Unit 42 Kazuar May 2017
Levene, B, et al. (2017, May 03). Kazuar: Multiplatform Espionage Backdoor with API Access. Retrieved July 17, 2018.
Open source URL - [56]FireEye admin@338
FireEye Threat Intelligence. (2015, December 1). China-based Cyber Threat Group Uses Dropbox for Malware Communications and Targets Hong Kong Media Outlets. Retrieved December 4, 2015.
Open source URL - [57]Emissary Trojan Feb 2016
Falcone, R. and Miller-Osborn, J. (2016, February 3). Emissary Trojan Changelog: Did Operation Lotus Blossom Cause It to Evolve?. Retrieved February 15, 2016.
- [58]NTT Security Flagpro new December 2021
Hada, H. (2021, December 28). Flagpro The new malware used by BlackTech. Retrieved March 25, 2022.
Open source URL - [59]Cybereason OperationCuckooBees May 2022
Cybereason Nocturnus. (2022, May 4). Operation CuckooBees: Deep-Dive into Stealthy Winnti Techniques. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
Open source URL - [60]NCC Group Chimera January 2021
Jansen, W . (2021, January 12). Abusing cloud services to fly under the radar. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
Open source URL - [61]ClearSky Lebanese Cedar Jan 2021
ClearSky Cyber Security. (2021, January). “Lebanese Cedar” APT Global Lebanese Espionage Campaign Leveraging Web Servers. Retrieved February 10, 2021.
Open source URL - [62]ESET Turla Lunar toolset May 2024
Jurčacko, F. (2024, May 15). To the Moon and back(doors): Lunar landing in diplomatic missions. Retrieved June 26, 2024.
Open source URL - [63]Unit 42 Playbook Dec 2017
Unit 42. (2017, December 15). Unit 42 Playbook Viewer. Retrieved December 20, 2017.
Open source URL - [64]Kaspersky Turla Aug 2014
Kaspersky Lab's Global Research & Analysis Team. (2014, August 06). The Epic Turla Operation: Solving some of the mysteries of Snake/Uroboros. Retrieved November 7, 2018.
Open source URL - [65]Symantec Buckeye
Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.
Open source URL - [66]Joint Cybersecurity Advisory Volt Typhoon June 2023
NSA et al. (2023, May 24). People's Republic of China State-Sponsored Cyber Actor Living off the Land to Evade Detection. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
Open source URL - [67]Palo Alto OilRig May 2016
Falcone, R. and Lee, B.. (2016, May 26). The OilRig Campaign: Attacks on Saudi Arabian Organizations Deliver Helminth Backdoor. Retrieved May 3, 2017.
- [68]Symantec Crambus OCT 2023
Symantec Threat Hunter Team. (2023, October 19). Crambus: New Campaign Targets Middle Eastern Government. Retrieved November 27, 2024.
Open source URL - [69]Symantec Troll Stealer 2024
Symantec Threat Hunter Team. (2024, May 16). Springtail: New Linux Backdoor Added to Toolkit. Retrieved January 17, 2025.
Open source URL - [70]sentinelone operationDigitalEye Dec 2024
Aleksandar Milenkoski, Luigi Martire. (2024, December 10). Operation Digital Eye | Chinese APT Compromises Critical Digital Infrastructure via Visual Studio Code Tunnels. Retrieved February 27, 2025.
Open source URL
Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.