C0014: Operation Wocao
Operation Wocao was a cyber espionage campaign that targeted organizations around the world, including in Brazil, China, France, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The suspected China-based actors compromised government organizations and managed service providers, as well as aviation, construction, energy, finance, health care, insurance, offshore engineering, software development, and transportation companies.[1]
Security researchers assessed the Operation Wocao actors used similar TTPs and tools as APT20, suggesting a possible overlap. Operation Wocao was named after an observed command line entry by one of the threat actors, possibly out of frustration from losing webshell access.[1]
Security context for executives and security teams
C0014: Operation Wocao describes [Operation Wocao](https://attack.mitre.org/campaigns/C0014) was a cyber espionage campaign that targeted organizations around the world, including in Brazil, China, France, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The suspected China-based actors compromised government organizations and managed service providers, as well as aviation, construction, energy, finance, health care, insurance, offshore engineering, software development, and transportation companies.(Citation: Fo...
Executive priority
C0014: Operation Wocao is an official MITRE ATT&CK campaign. Glexia treats it as defensive behavior context for prioritizing monitoring, control validation, and response planning without using the object by itself as an attribution claim.
Technical view
Security teams should validate C0014: Operation Wocao by reviewing the official ATT&CK relationships, mapped tactics (the mapped ATT&CK tactic context), supported platforms (the platforms named in the official object), and available local telemetry before making detection or mitigation decisions.
Likely telemetry
- Official ATT&CK relationships and object metadata
Detection direction
- Validate whether C0014: Operation Wocao appears in your detection coverage and tabletop scenarios.
- Use the object to align executive risk language with SOC, incident response, and detection engineering work.
- Do not treat ATT&CK relationship context as attribution without corroborating evidence.
Mitigation priorities
- Map the object to existing controls and identify missing telemetry or response ownership.
- Prioritize mitigations that reduce exposure on the listed platforms and tactics.
- Review adjacent ATT&CK relationships before changing policy, detections, or reporting language.
Additional notes and limits
Baseline Glexia take generated from the official MITRE ATT&CK STIX object, source hash, tactics, platforms, and detection fields. It is safe to replace with a richer model-generated take for the same source hash later.
This baseline take is source-grounded and schema-validated, but it does not include environment-specific telemetry, incident evidence, or threat-intelligence corroboration.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Operation Wocao
Operation Wocao was a cyber espionage campaign that targeted organizations around the world, including in Brazil, China, France, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The suspected China-based actors compromised government organizations and managed service providers, as well as aviation, construction, energy, finance, health care, insurance, offshore engineering, software development, and transportation companies.[1]
Security researchers assessed the Operation Wocao actors used similar TTPs and tools as APT20, suggesting a possible overlap. Operation Wocao was named after an observed command line entry by one of the threat actors, possibly out of frustration from losing webshell access.[1]
How security teams should use this page
Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.
Techniques used
This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.
| Domain | ID | Name | Relationship / procedure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | T1012 | Query Registry | During Operation Wocao, the threat actors executed `/c cd /d c:\windows\temp\ & reg query HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\\PuTTY\Sessions\` to detect recent PuTTY sessions, likely to further lateral movement.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1003.001 | LSASS MemorySub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used ProcDump to dump credentials from memory.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1056.001 | KeyloggingSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors obtained the password for the victim's password manager via a custom keylogger.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1518.001 | Security Software DiscoverySub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used scripts to detect security software.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1018 | Remote System Discovery | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used `nbtscan` and `ping` to discover remote systems, as well as `dsquery subnet` on a domain controller to retrieve all subnets in the Active Directory.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1573.002 | Asymmetric CryptographySub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors' proxy implementation "Agent" upgraded the socket in use to a TLS socket.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1587.001 | MalwareSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors developed their own custom webshells to upload to compromised servers.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1059.003 | Windows Command ShellSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors spawned a new `cmd.exe` process to execute commands.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1555.005 | Password ManagersSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors accessed and collected credentials from password managers.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1552.004 | Private KeysSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used Mimikatz to dump certificates and private keys from the Windows certificate store.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1119 | Automated Collection | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used a script to collect information about the infected system.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1049 | System Network Connections Discovery | During Operation Wocao, threat actors collected a list of open connections on the infected system using `netstat` and checks whether it has an internet connection.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1585.002 | Email AccountsSub-technique | For Operation Wocao, the threat actors registered email accounts to use during the campaign.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1124 | System Time Discovery | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used the `time` command to retrieve the current time of a compromised system.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1571 | Non-Standard Port | During Operation Wocao, the threat actors used uncommon high ports for its backdoor C2, including ports 25667 and 47000.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1686.003 | Windows Host FirewallSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used PowerShell to add and delete rules in the Windows firewall.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1111 | Multi-Factor Authentication Interception | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used a custom collection method to intercept two-factor authentication soft tokens.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1190 | Exploit Public-Facing Application | During Operation Wocao, threat actors gained initial access by exploiting vulnerabilities in JBoss webservers.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1090.003 | Multi-hop ProxySub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors executed commands through the installed web shell via Tor exit nodes.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1074.001 | Local Data StagingSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors staged archived files in a temporary directory prior to exfiltration.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1033 | System Owner/User Discovery | During Operation Wocao, threat actors enumerated sessions and users on a remote host, and identified privileged users logged into a targeted system.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1071.001 | Web ProtocolsSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors’ XServer tool communicated using HTTP and HTTPS.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1569.002 | Service ExecutionSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors created services on remote systems for execution purposes.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1005 | Data from Local System | During Operation Wocao, threat actors exfiltrated files and directories of interest from the targeted system.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1115 | Clipboard Data | During Operation Wocao, threat actors collected clipboard data in plaintext.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1583.004 | ServerSub-technique | For Operation Wocao, the threat actors purchased servers with Bitcoin to use during the operation.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1560.001 | Archive via UtilitySub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors archived collected files with WinRAR, prior to exfiltration.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1106 | Native API | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used the `CreateProcessA` and `ShellExecute` API functions to launch commands after being injected into a selected process.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1069.001 | Local GroupsSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used the command `net localgroup administrators` to list all administrators part of a local group.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1078 | Valid Accounts | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used valid VPN credentials to gain initial access.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1135 | Network Share Discovery | During Operation Wocao, threat actors discovered network disks mounted to the system using netstat.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1070.004 | File DeletionSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, the threat actors consistently removed traces of their activity by first overwriting a file using `/c cd /d c:\windows\temp\ & copy \\\c$\windows\system32\devmgr.dll \\\c$\windows\temp\LMAKSW.ps1 /y` and then deleting the overwritten file using `/c cd /d c:\windows\temp\ & del \\\c$\windows\temp\LMAKSW.ps1`.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1685.005 | Clear Windows Event LogsSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, the threat actors deleted all Windows system and security event logs using `/Q /c wevtutil cl system` and `/Q /c wevtutil cl security`.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1001 | Data Obfuscation | During Operation Wocao, threat actors encrypted IP addresses used for "Agent" proxy hops with RC4.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1588.002 | ToolSub-technique | For Operation Wocao, the threat actors obtained a variety of open source tools, including JexBoss, KeeThief, and BloodHound.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1558.003 | KerberoastingSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used PowerSploit's `Invoke-Kerberoast` module to request encrypted service tickets and bruteforce the passwords of Windows service accounts offline.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1021.002 | SMB/Windows Admin SharesSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used Impacket's smbexec.py as well as accessing the C$ and IPC$ shares to move laterally.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1570 | Lateral Tool Transfer | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used SMB to copy files to and from target systems.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1059.005 | Visual BasicSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used VBScript to conduct reconnaissance on targeted systems.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1016.001 | Internet Connection DiscoverySub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used a Visual Basic script that checked for internet connectivity.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1087.002 | Domain AccountSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used the `net` command to retrieve information about domain accounts.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1078.002 | Domain AccountsSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used domain credentials, including domain admin, for lateral movement and privilege escalation.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1055 | Process Injection | During Operation Wocao, threat actors injected code into a selected process, which in turn launches a command as a child process of the original.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1083 | File and Directory Discovery | During Operation Wocao, threat actors gathered a recursive directory listing to find files and directories of interest.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1589 | Gather Victim Identity Information | During Operation Wocao, threat actors targeted people based on their organizational roles and privileges.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1059.006 | PythonSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors' backdoors were written in Python and compiled with py2exe.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1112 | Modify Registry | During Operation Wocao, the threat actors enabled Wdigest by changing the `HKLM\SYSTEM\\ControlSet001\\Control\\SecurityProviders\\WDigest` registry value from 0 (disabled) to 1 (enabled).[1] |
| Enterprise | T1090.001 | Internal ProxySub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors proxied traffic through multiple infected systems.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1090 | Proxy | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used a custom proxy tool called "Agent" which has support for multiple hops.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1041 | Exfiltration Over C2 Channel | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used the XServer backdoor to exfiltrate data.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1036.005 | Match Legitimate Resource Name or LocationSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, the threat actors renamed some tools and executables to appear as legitimate programs.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1007 | System Service Discovery | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used the `tasklist` command to search for one of its backdoors.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1120 | Peripheral Device Discovery | During Operation Wocao, threat actors discovered removable disks attached to a system.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1003.006 | DCSyncSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used Mimikatz's DCSync to dump credentials from the memory of the targeted system.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1027.005 | Indicator Removal from ToolsSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors edited variable names within the Impacket suite to avoid automated detection.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1053.005 | Scheduled TaskSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used scheduled tasks to execute malicious PowerShell code on remote systems.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1082 | System Information Discovery | During Operation Wocao, threat actors discovered the OS versions of systems connected to a targeted network.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1027.010 | Command ObfuscationSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors executed PowerShell commands which were encoded or compressed using Base64, zlib, and XOR.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1059.001 | PowerShellSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used PowerShell on compromised systems.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1047 | Windows Management Instrumentation | During Operation Wocao, threat actors has used WMI to execute commands.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1046 | Network Service Discovery | During Operation Wocao, threat actors scanned for open ports and used nbtscan to find NETBIOS nameservers.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1095 | Non-Application Layer Protocol | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used a custom protocol for command and control.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1016 | System Network Configuration Discovery | During Operation Wocao, threat actors discovered the local network configuration with `ipconfig`.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1133 | External Remote Services | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used stolen credentials to connect to the victim's network via VPN.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1505.003 | Web ShellSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used their own web shells, as well as those previously placed on target systems by other threat actors, for reconnaissance and lateral movement.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1518 | Software Discovery | During Operation Wocao, threat actors collected a list of installed software on the infected system.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1680 | Local Storage Discovery | During Operation Wocao, threat actors discovered the local disks attached to the system and their hardware information including manufacturer and model.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1105 | Ingress Tool Transfer | During Operation Wocao, threat actors downloaded additional files to the infected system.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1078.003 | Local AccountsSub-technique | During Operation Wocao, threat actors used local account credentials found during the intrusion for lateral movement and privilege escalation.[1] |
| Enterprise | T1057 | Process Discovery | During Operation Wocao, the threat actors used `tasklist` to collect a list of running processes on an infected system.[1] |
Groups, software, and campaigns
S0104: netstat
S0521: BloodHound
BloodHound is an Active Directory (AD) reconnaissance tool that can reveal hidden relationships and identify attack paths within an AD environment.[1][2][3]
S0002: Mimikatz
S0183: Tor
Tor is a software suite and network that provides increased anonymity on the Internet. It creates a multi-hop proxy network and utilizes multilayer encryption to protect both the message and routing information. Tor utilizes "Onion Routing," in which messages are encrypted with multiple layers of encryption; at each step in the proxy network, the topmost layer is decrypted and the contents forwarded on to the next node until it reaches its destination. [1]
S0645: Wevtutil
S0194: PowerSploit
PowerSploit is an open source, offensive security framework comprised of PowerShell modules and scripts that perform a wide range of tasks related to penetration testing such as code execution, persistence, bypassing anti-virus, recon, and exfiltration. [1] [2] [3]
S0105: dsquery
dsquery is a command-line utility that can be used to query Active Directory for information from a system within a domain. [1] It is typically installed only on Windows Server versions but can be installed on non-server variants through the Microsoft-provided Remote Server Administration Tools bundle.
S0029: PsExec
S0357: Impacket
All related ATT&CK context
Object version and sync metadata
The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates.
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases(3)
| Release | Bundle imported | Object version | Modified | Status | Raw hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.0 | 1.2 | Current bundle | 3cdc52372a6e… | ||
| 19.2 | 1.2 | Older bundle | 3cdc52372a6e… | ||
| 19.1 | 1.2 | Older bundle | d82019da2797… |
Mirrored ATT&CK source object
The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.
External references and citations
MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.
- [1]FoxIT Wocao December 2019
Dantzig, M. v., Schamper, E. (2019, December 19). Operation Wocao: Shining a light on one of China’s hidden hacking groups. Retrieved October 8, 2020.
Open source URL - [2]mitre-attackC0014Open source URL
Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.
