LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
MITRE ATT&CK® Technique

T1020: Automated Exfiltration

Adversaries may exfiltrate data, such as sensitive documents, through the use of automated processing after being gathered during Collection.[1]

When automated exfiltration is used, other exfiltration techniques likely apply as well to transfer the information out of the network, such as Exfiltration Over C2 Channel and Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol.

EnterpriseT1020TechniqueObject v1.3Modified
Glexia's Take · Automated analysis

Security context for executives and security teams

Automation confidenceMedium

Automated Exfiltration matters because it turns data theft from a manual action into a repeatable process after Collection. For leaders, the risk is not only that sensitive documents leave the environment, but that the theft can continue until the automation, transfer path, or compromised host/network device is found. ATT&CK notes that other exfiltration methods, such as exfiltration over a C2 channel or alternative protocol, often apply as the actual transfer mechanism.

Executive priority

Prioritize this as a resilience and evidence issue: can the organization prove it would notice repeated or scheduled movement of sensitive data from Windows, Linux, macOS, or network-device environments? This technique is especially relevant to SOC readiness, incident response scoping, data-loss investigation, and control validation around outbound traffic and sensitive-data handling. The relationship to Traffic Duplication also makes network-device and cloud/IaaS monitoring governance important where those environments exist.

Technical view

SOC and IR teams should validate detection around automated, repeated, or policy-violating outbound data transfer after suspected Collection activity. Because MITRE provides no official detection text for T1020, coverage should be tested against the related detection strategy DET0397 and against adjacent exfiltration paths named by ATT&CK, especially C2-channel and alternative-protocol transfer. For network devices, review whether traffic mirroring or forwarding configuration changes could create automated exfiltration paths, as represented by sub-technique T1020.001 Traffic Duplication.

Likely telemetry

  • Outbound network flow and session metadata from endpoints, servers, and network devices
  • Proxy, firewall, and secure web gateway records showing repeated or unusual external transfers
  • C2-channel or alternative-protocol transfer evidence where such monitoring exists
  • Endpoint file access, staging, compression, or process activity associated with gathered sensitive documents
  • Network-device configuration and audit logs, especially for traffic mirroring or forwarding behavior

Detection direction

  • Do not treat a single large transfer as the only signal; validate analytics for recurring, automated, or scheduled exfiltration patterns.
  • Correlate outbound transfer behavior with prior Collection activity and access to sensitive document stores.
  • Tune for expected business automation such as backups, replication, and monitoring pipelines to reduce false positives.
  • Review network-device and IaaS traffic mirroring controls because legitimate analysis features can become exfiltration paths under T1020.001.
  • Use the existence of DET0397 as a pointer to detection strategy coverage, but verify local telemetry and rule logic because the ATT&CK object itself provides no official detection guidance.

Mitigation priorities

  • Establish visibility first: confirm collection of outbound network, endpoint, and network-device configuration telemetry across the supported platforms in scope.
  • Restrict and monitor outbound transfer paths, including C2-like channels and alternative protocols, according to business need.
  • Apply governance and change control to traffic mirroring, forwarding, and duplication features on network devices and IaaS environments.
  • Protect sensitive document repositories with access controls and logging so Collection-to-exfiltration sequences can be reconstructed.
  • Exercise IR playbooks for suspected automated data theft, including containment of transfer paths and scoping of previously gathered data.
Additional notes and limits

The relationship set shows this behavior across multiple campaigns, groups, and software entries, including espionage-oriented tools and campaigns as well as a Salesforce data exfiltration campaign. That breadth supports treating T1020 as a cross-environment detection and response concern rather than a single malware signature. However, local relevance depends on the organization’s platforms, sensitive-data locations, network architecture, and logging maturity.

MITRE does not provide official detection text for this object. Telemetry and control recommendations are defensive validation directions derived from the ATT&CK description, platforms, tactic, cited related techniques, and relationships; they are not proof of active exploitation or guaranteed detection coverage.

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Official MITRE ATT&CK definition

Automated Exfiltration

Adversaries may exfiltrate data, such as sensitive documents, through the use of automated processing after being gathered during Collection.[1]

When automated exfiltration is used, other exfiltration techniques likely apply as well to transfer the information out of the network, such as Exfiltration Over C2 Channel and Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol.

View the same entry on attack.mitre.org (MITRE-hosted reference; in-page links above use the Glexia ATT&CK library.)

Glexia analysis

How security teams should use this page

Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.

ATT&CK relationship table

Related techniques

This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.

1 rows
DomainIDNameRelationship / procedure
EnterpriseT1020.001Traffic DuplicationSub-techniqueTraffic Duplication subtechnique of this object.
Associated objects

Groups, software, and campaigns

GroupEnterprise

G0094: Kimsuky

Kimsuky is a Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK)-based cyber espionage group that has been active since at least 2012. The group initially targeted South Korean government agencies, think tanks, and subject-matter experts in various fields. Its operations expanded to include the United Nations and organizations in the government, education, business services, and manufacturing sectors across the United States, Japan, Russia, and Europe. Kimsuky has focused collection on foreign policy and national security issues tied to the Korean Peninsula, nuclear policy, and sanctions. Kimsuky operations have overlapped with those of other North Korean state-sponsored cyber espionage actors as a result of ad hoc collaborations or other limited resource sharing.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

Kimsuky was assessed to be responsible for the 2014 Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co. compromise; other notable campaigns include Operation STOLEN PENCIL (2018), Operation Kabar Cobra (2019), and Operation Smoke Screen (2019).[7][8][9] In 2023, Kimsuky was observed using commercial large language models (LLMs) to assist with vulnerability research, scripting, social engineering and reconnaissance.[10]

DPRK threat actor cluster boundaries overlap in open source reporting, with some security researchers consolidating all attributed North Korean state-sponsored cyber activity under Lazarus Group, rather than tracking operationally distinct subgroups.

GroupEnterprise

G0121: Sidewinder

Sidewinder is a suspected Indian threat actor group that has been active since at least 2012. They have been observed targeting government, military, and business entities throughout Asia, primarily focusing on Pakistan, China, Nepal, and Afghanistan.[1][2][3]

GroupEnterprise

G0004: Ke3chang

Ke3chang is a threat group attributed to actors operating out of China. Ke3chang has targeted oil, government, diplomatic, military, and NGOs in Central and South America, the Caribbean, Europe, and North America since at least 2010.[1][2][3][4]

GroupEnterprise

G1039: RedCurl

RedCurl is a threat actor active since 2018 notable for corporate espionage targeting a variety of locations, including Ukraine, Canada and the United Kingdom, and a variety of industries, including but not limited to travel agencies, insurance companies, and banks.[1] RedCurl is allegedly a Russian-speaking threat actor.[1][2] The group’s operations typically start with spearphishing emails to gain initial access, then the group executes discovery and collection commands and scripts to find corporate data. The group concludes operations by exfiltrating files to the C2 servers.

GroupEnterprise

G1035: Winter Vivern

Winter Vivern is a group linked to Russian and Belorussian interests active since at least 2020 targeting various European government and NGO entities, along with sporadic targeting of Indian and US victims. The group leverages a combination of document-based phishing activity and server-side exploitation for initial access, leveraging adversary-controlled and -created infrastructure for follow-on command and control.[1][2][3][4][5]

GroupEnterprise

G0081: Tropic Trooper

Tropic Trooper is an unaffiliated threat group that has led targeted campaigns against targets in Taiwan, the Philippines, and Hong Kong. Tropic Trooper focuses on targeting government, healthcare, transportation, and high-tech industries and has been active since 2011.[1][2][3]

GroupEnterprise

G0047: Gamaredon Group

Gamaredon Group is a suspected Russian cyber espionage group that has targeted military, law enforcement, judiciary, non-profit, and non-governmental organizations in Ukraine since at least 2013. The name Gamaredon Group derives from a misspelling of the word "Armageddon," found in early campaigns.[1][2][3][4][5]

In November 2021, the Ukrainian government publicly attributed Gamaredon Group to Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) Center 18, an assessment later supported by multiple independent cybersecurity researchers. [6][5]

MalwareEnterprise

S0395: LightNeuron

LightNeuron is a sophisticated backdoor that has targeted Microsoft Exchange servers since at least 2014. LightNeuron has been used by Turla to target diplomatic and foreign affairs-related organizations. The presence of certain strings in the malware suggests a Linux variant of LightNeuron exists.[1]

WindowsLinux
ToolEnterprise

S0363: Empire

Empire is an open-source, cross-platform remote administration and post-exploitation framework that is publicly available on GitHub. While the tool itself is primarily written in Python, the post-exploitation agents are written in pure PowerShell for Windows and Python for Linux/macOS. Empire was one of five tools singled out by a joint report on public hacking tools being widely used by adversaries.[1][2][3]

LinuxmacOSWindows
MalwareEnterprise

S0600: Doki

Doki is a backdoor that uses a unique Dogecoin-based Domain Generation Algorithm and was first observed in July 2020. Doki was used in conjunction with the ngrok Mining Botnet in a campaign that targeted Docker servers in cloud platforms. [1]

LinuxContainers
MalwareEnterprise

S0090: Rover

Rover is malware suspected of being used for espionage purposes. It was used in 2015 in a targeted email sent to an Indian Ambassador to Afghanistan. [1]

Windows
MalwareEnterprise

S0377: Ebury

Ebury is an OpenSSH backdoor and credential stealer targeting Linux servers and container hosts developed by Windigo. Ebury is primarily installed through modifying shared libraries (`.so` files) executed by the legitimate OpenSSH program. First seen in 2009, Ebury has been used to maintain a botnet of servers, deploy additional malware, and steal cryptocurrency wallets, credentials, and credit card details.[1][2][3][4]

Linux
MalwareEnterprise

S1148: Raccoon Stealer

Raccoon Stealer is an information stealer malware family active since at least 2019 as a malware-as-a-service offering sold in underground forums. Raccoon Stealer has experienced two periods of activity across two variants, from 2019 to March 2022, then resurfacing in a revised version in June 2022.[1][2]

Windows
CampaignEnterprise

C0001: Frankenstein

Frankenstein was described by security researchers as a highly-targeted campaign conducted by moderately sophisticated and highly resourceful threat actors in early 2019. The unidentified actors primarily relied on open source tools, including Empire. The campaign name refers to the actors' ability to piece together several unrelated open-source tool components.[1]

CampaignEnterprise

C0046: ArcaneDoor

ArcaneDoor is a campaign targeting networking devices from Cisco and other vendors between July 2023 and April 2024, primarily focused on government and critical infrastructure networks. ArcaneDoor is associated with the deployment of the custom backdoors Line Runner and Line Dancer. ArcaneDoor is attributed to a group referred to as UAT4356 or STORM-1849, and is assessed to be a state-sponsored campaign.[1][2]

CampaignEnterprise

C0059: Salesforce Data Exfiltration

The Salesforce Data Exfiltration campaign began in October 2024 with financially-motivated threat actor UNC6040 using Spearphishing Voice (vishing) to compromise corporate Salesforce instances for large-scale data theft and extortion. Following the initial data theft, victim organizations received extortion demands from a separate threat actor, UNC6240, who claimed to be the “ShinyHunters” group. The observed infrastructure and TTPs used during the Salesforce Data Exfiltration campaign overlap with those used by threat groups with suspected ties to the broader collective known as "The Com.” These overlaps could plausibly be the result of associated actors operating within the same communities and are not necessarily an indication of a direct operational relationship.[1][2]

Relationship explorer

All related ATT&CK context

Change history

Object version and sync metadata

The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates.

ATT&CK release
19.1
Object version
1.3
Created
Modified
Raw hash
83d908f9d63eeaab...
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases(1)
ReleaseBundle importedObject versionModifiedStatusRaw hash
19.11.3Current bundle83d908f9d63e…
Raw source

Mirrored ATT&CK source object

The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.

Source references

External references and citations

MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.

  1. [1]
    ESET Gamaredon June 2020

    Boutin, J. (2020, June 11). Gamaredon group grows its game. Retrieved June 16, 2020.

    Open source URL
  2. [2]
    Talos Promethium June 2020

    Mercer, W. et al. (2020, June 29). PROMETHIUM extends global reach with StrongPity3 APT. Retrieved July 20, 2020.

    Open source URL
  3. [3]
    Bitdefender StrongPity June 2020

    Tudorica, R. et al. (2020, June 30). StrongPity APT - Revealing Trojanized Tools, Working Hours and Infrastructure. Retrieved July 20, 2020.

    Open source URL
  4. [4]
    Aryaka Kimsuky July 2025

    Varadharajan Krishnasamy, Aditya K Sood. (2025, July 29). From Reconnaissance to Control: The Operational Blueprint of Kimsuky APT for Cyber Espionage. Retrieved April 18, 2026.

    Open source URL
  5. [5]
    ESET LightNeuron May 2019

    Faou, M. (2019, May). Turla LightNeuron: One email away from remote code execution. Retrieved June 24, 2019.

    Open source URL
  6. [6]
    Talos Frankenstein June 2019

    Adamitis, D. et al. (2019, June 4). It's alive: Threat actors cobble together open-source pieces into monstrous Frankenstein campaign. Retrieved May 11, 2020.

    Open source URL
  7. [7]
    ATT Sidewinder January 2021

    Hegel, T. (2021, January 13). A Global Perspective of the SideWinder APT. Retrieved January 27, 2021.

    Open source URL
  8. [8]
    Intezer Doki July 20

    Fishbein, N., Kajiloti, M.. (2020, July 28). Watch Your Containers: Doki Infecting Docker Servers in the Cloud. Retrieved March 30, 2021.

    Open source URL
  9. [9]
    CCCS ArcaneDoor 2024

    Canadian Centre for Cyber Security. (2024, April 24). Cyber Activity Impacting CISCO ASA VPNs. Retrieved January 6, 2025.

    Open source URL
  10. [10]
    Palo Alto Rover

    Ray, V., Hayashi, K. (2016, February 29). New Malware ‘Rover’ Targets Indian Ambassador to Afghanistan. Retrieved February 29, 2016.

  11. [11]
    Palo Alto Unit 42 OutSteel SaintBot February 2022

    Unit 42. (2022, February 25). Spear Phishing Attacks Target Organizations in Ukraine, Payloads Include the Document Stealer OutSteel and the Downloader SaintBot. Retrieved June 9, 2022.

    Open source URL
  12. [12]
    Proofpoint Operation Transparent Tribe March 2016

    Huss, D. (2016, March 1). Operation Transparent Tribe. Retrieved June 8, 2016.

    Open source URL
  13. [13]
    ESET Machete July 2019

    ESET. (2019, July). MACHETE JUST GOT SHARPER Venezuelan government institutions under attack. Retrieved September 13, 2019.

    Open source URL
  14. [14]
    ESET Windigo Mar 2014

    Bilodeau, O., Bureau, M., Calvet, J., Dorais-Joncas, A., Léveillé, M., Vanheuverzwijn, B. (2014, March 18). Operation Windigo – the vivisection of a large Linux server‑side credential‑stealing malware campaign. Retrieved February 10, 2021.

    Open source URL
  15. [15]
    ESET Ebury May 2024

    Marc-Etienne M.Léveillé. (2024, May 1). Ebury is alive but unseen. Retrieved May 21, 2024.

    Open source URL
  16. [16]
    S2W Racoon 2022

    S2W TALON. (2022, June 16). Raccoon Stealer is Back with a New Version. Retrieved August 1, 2024.

    Open source URL
  17. [17]
    Sekoia Raccoon1 2022

    Quentin Bourgue, Pierre le Bourhis, & Sekoia TDR. (2022, June 28). Raccoon Stealer v2 - Part 1: The return of the dead. Retrieved August 1, 2024.

    Open source URL
  18. [18]
    Sekoia Raccoon2 2022

    Pierre Le Bourhis, Quentin Bourgue, & Sekoia TDR. (2022, June 29). Raccoon Stealer v2 - Part 2: In-depth analysis. Retrieved August 1, 2024.

    Open source URL
  19. [19]
    ESET OilRig Campaigns Sep 2023

    Hromcova, Z. and Burgher, A. (2023, September 21). OilRig’s Outer Space and Juicy Mix: Same ol’ rig, new drill pipes. Retrieved November 21, 2024.

    Open source URL
  20. [20]
    Symantec Bilbug 2022

    Symntec Threat Hunter Team. (2022, November 12). Billbug: State-sponsored Actor Targets Cert Authority, Government Agencies in Multiple Asian Countries. Retrieved March 15, 2025.

    Open source URL
  21. [21]
    Microsoft NICKEL December 2021

    MSTIC. (2021, December 6). NICKEL targeting government organizations across Latin America and Europe. Retrieved March 18, 2022.

    Open source URL
  22. [22]
    group-ib_redcurl1

    Group-IB. (2020, August). RedCurl: The Pentest You Didn’t Know About. Retrieved August 9, 2024.

    Open source URL
  23. [23]
    group-ib_redcurl2

    Group-IB. (2021, November). RedCurl: The Awakening. Retrieved August 14, 2024.

    Open source URL
  24. [24]
    Kaspersky TajMahal April 2019

    GReAT. (2019, April 10). Project TajMahal – a sophisticated new APT framework. Retrieved October 14, 2019.

    Open source URL
  25. [25]
    CERT-UA WinterVivern 2023

    CERT-UA. (2023, February 1). UAC-0114 aka Winter Vivern to target Ukrainian and Polish GOV entities (CERT-UA#5909). Retrieved July 29, 2024.

    Open source URL
  26. [26]
    FBI Salesforce Data Theft SEP 2025

    FBI Cyber Division. (2025, September 12). Cyber Criminal Groups UNC6040 and UNC6395 Compromising Salesforce Instances for Data Theft and Extortion. Retrieved October 22, 2025.

    Open source URL
  27. [27]
    ESET Sednit USBStealer 2014

    Calvet, J. (2014, November 11). Sednit Espionage Group Attacking Air-Gapped Networks. Retrieved January 4, 2017.

  28. [28]
    ESET Crutch December 2020

    Faou, M. (2020, December 2). Turla Crutch: Keeping the “back door” open. Retrieved December 4, 2020.

    Open source URL
  29. [29]
    TrendMicro Tropic Trooper May 2020

    Chen, J.. (2020, May 12). Tropic Trooper’s Back: USBferry Attack Targets Air gapped Environments. Retrieved May 20, 2020.

    Open source URL
  30. [30]
    FOX-IT May 2016 Mofang

    Yonathan Klijnsma. (2016, May 17). Mofang: A politically motivated information stealing adversary. Retrieved May 12, 2020.

    Open source URL
  31. [31]
    F-Secure Cosmicduke

    F-Secure Labs. (2014, July). COSMICDUKE Cosmu with a twist of MiniDuke. Retrieved July 3, 2014.

    Open source URL
  32. [32]
    ESET Attor Oct 2019

    Hromcova, Z. (2019, October). AT COMMANDS, TOR-BASED COMMUNICATIONS: MEET ATTOR, A FANTASY CREATURE AND ALSO A SPY PLATFORM. Retrieved May 6, 2020.

    Open source URL
  33. [33]
    DCSO StrelaStealer 2022

    DCSO CyTec Blog. (2022, November 8). #ShortAndMalicious: StrelaStealer aims for mail credentials. Retrieved December 31, 2024.

    Open source URL
  34. [34]
    IBM StrelaStealer 2024

    Golo Mühr, Joe Fasulo & Charlotte Hammond, IBM X-Force. (2024, November 12). Strela Stealer: Today’s invoice is tomorrow’s phish. Retrieved December 31, 2024.

    Open source URL
  35. [35]
    Forcepoint Monsoon

    Settle, A., et al. (2016, August 8). MONSOON - Analysis Of An APT Campaign. Retrieved September 22, 2016.

    Open source URL
  36. [36]
    ESET Gamaredon June 2020

    Boutin, J. (2020, June 11). Gamaredon group grows its game. Retrieved June 16, 2020.

    Open source URL
  37. [37]
    ESET Gamaredon June 2020

    Boutin, J. (2020, June 11). Gamaredon group grows its game. Retrieved June 16, 2020.

    Open source URL
  38. [38]
    mitre-attackT1020
    Open source URL
  39. [39]
    mitre-attackT1020
    Open source URL
  40. [40]
    mitre-attackT1020
    Open source URL
  41. [41]
    Bitdefender StrongPity June 2020

    Tudorica, R. et al. (2020, June 30). StrongPity APT - Revealing Trojanized Tools, Working Hours and Infrastructure. Retrieved July 20, 2020.

    Open source URL
  42. [42]
    Talos Promethium June 2020

    Mercer, W. et al. (2020, June 29). PROMETHIUM extends global reach with StrongPity3 APT. Retrieved July 20, 2020.

    Open source URL
  43. [43]
    Aryaka Kimsuky July 2025

    Varadharajan Krishnasamy, Aditya K Sood. (2025, July 29). From Reconnaissance to Control: The Operational Blueprint of Kimsuky APT for Cyber Espionage. Retrieved April 18, 2026.

    Open source URL
  44. [44]
    ESET LightNeuron May 2019

    Faou, M. (2019, May). Turla LightNeuron: One email away from remote code execution. Retrieved June 24, 2019.

    Open source URL
  45. [45]
    Talos Frankenstein June 2019

    Adamitis, D. et al. (2019, June 4). It's alive: Threat actors cobble together open-source pieces into monstrous Frankenstein campaign. Retrieved May 11, 2020.

    Open source URL
  46. [46]
    ATT Sidewinder January 2021

    Hegel, T. (2021, January 13). A Global Perspective of the SideWinder APT. Retrieved January 27, 2021.

    Open source URL
  47. [47]
    Talos Frankenstein June 2019

    Adamitis, D. et al. (2019, June 4). It's alive: Threat actors cobble together open-source pieces into monstrous Frankenstein campaign. Retrieved May 11, 2020.

    Open source URL
  48. [48]
    Talos Frankenstein June 2019

    Adamitis, D. et al. (2019, June 4). It's alive: Threat actors cobble together open-source pieces into monstrous Frankenstein campaign. Retrieved May 11, 2020.

    Open source URL
  49. [49]
    Intezer Doki July 20

    Fishbein, N., Kajiloti, M.. (2020, July 28). Watch Your Containers: Doki Infecting Docker Servers in the Cloud. Retrieved March 30, 2021.

    Open source URL
  50. [50]
    CCCS ArcaneDoor 2024

    Canadian Centre for Cyber Security. (2024, April 24). Cyber Activity Impacting CISCO ASA VPNs. Retrieved January 6, 2025.

    Open source URL
  51. [51]
    Palo Alto Rover

    Ray, V., Hayashi, K. (2016, February 29). New Malware ‘Rover’ Targets Indian Ambassador to Afghanistan. Retrieved February 29, 2016.

  52. [52]
    Palo Alto Unit 42 OutSteel SaintBot February 2022

    Unit 42. (2022, February 25). Spear Phishing Attacks Target Organizations in Ukraine, Payloads Include the Document Stealer OutSteel and the Downloader SaintBot. Retrieved June 9, 2022.

    Open source URL
  53. [53]
    Proofpoint Operation Transparent Tribe March 2016

    Huss, D. (2016, March 1). Operation Transparent Tribe. Retrieved June 8, 2016.

    Open source URL
  54. [54]
    ESET Machete July 2019

    ESET. (2019, July). MACHETE JUST GOT SHARPER Venezuelan government institutions under attack. Retrieved September 13, 2019.

    Open source URL
  55. [55]
    ESET Ebury May 2024

    Marc-Etienne M.Léveillé. (2024, May 1). Ebury is alive but unseen. Retrieved May 21, 2024.

    Open source URL
  56. [56]
    ESET Windigo Mar 2014

    Bilodeau, O., Bureau, M., Calvet, J., Dorais-Joncas, A., Léveillé, M., Vanheuverzwijn, B. (2014, March 18). Operation Windigo – the vivisection of a large Linux server‑side credential‑stealing malware campaign. Retrieved February 10, 2021.

    Open source URL
  57. [57]
    S2W Racoon 2022

    S2W TALON. (2022, June 16). Raccoon Stealer is Back with a New Version. Retrieved August 1, 2024.

    Open source URL
  58. [58]
    Sekoia Raccoon1 2022

    Quentin Bourgue, Pierre le Bourhis, & Sekoia TDR. (2022, June 28). Raccoon Stealer v2 - Part 1: The return of the dead. Retrieved August 1, 2024.

    Open source URL
  59. [59]
    Sekoia Raccoon2 2022

    Pierre Le Bourhis, Quentin Bourgue, & Sekoia TDR. (2022, June 29). Raccoon Stealer v2 - Part 2: In-depth analysis. Retrieved August 1, 2024.

    Open source URL
  60. [60]
    ESET OilRig Campaigns Sep 2023

    Hromcova, Z. and Burgher, A. (2023, September 21). OilRig’s Outer Space and Juicy Mix: Same ol’ rig, new drill pipes. Retrieved November 21, 2024.

    Open source URL
  61. [61]
    Symantec Bilbug 2022

    Symntec Threat Hunter Team. (2022, November 12). Billbug: State-sponsored Actor Targets Cert Authority, Government Agencies in Multiple Asian Countries. Retrieved March 15, 2025.

    Open source URL
  62. [62]
    Microsoft NICKEL December 2021

    MSTIC. (2021, December 6). NICKEL targeting government organizations across Latin America and Europe. Retrieved March 18, 2022.

    Open source URL
  63. [63]
    group-ib_redcurl1

    Group-IB. (2020, August). RedCurl: The Pentest You Didn’t Know About. Retrieved August 9, 2024.

    Open source URL
  64. [64]
    group-ib_redcurl2

    Group-IB. (2021, November). RedCurl: The Awakening. Retrieved August 14, 2024.

    Open source URL
  65. [65]
    Kaspersky TajMahal April 2019

    GReAT. (2019, April 10). Project TajMahal – a sophisticated new APT framework. Retrieved October 14, 2019.

    Open source URL
  66. [66]
    CERT-UA WinterVivern 2023

    CERT-UA. (2023, February 1). UAC-0114 aka Winter Vivern to target Ukrainian and Polish GOV entities (CERT-UA#5909). Retrieved July 29, 2024.

    Open source URL
  67. [67]
    FBI Salesforce Data Theft SEP 2025

    FBI Cyber Division. (2025, September 12). Cyber Criminal Groups UNC6040 and UNC6395 Compromising Salesforce Instances for Data Theft and Extortion. Retrieved October 22, 2025.

    Open source URL
  68. [68]
    ESET Sednit USBStealer 2014

    Calvet, J. (2014, November 11). Sednit Espionage Group Attacking Air-Gapped Networks. Retrieved January 4, 2017.

  69. [69]
    ESET Crutch December 2020

    Faou, M. (2020, December 2). Turla Crutch: Keeping the “back door” open. Retrieved December 4, 2020.

    Open source URL
  70. [70]
    TrendMicro Tropic Trooper May 2020

    Chen, J.. (2020, May 12). Tropic Trooper’s Back: USBferry Attack Targets Air gapped Environments. Retrieved May 20, 2020.

    Open source URL
  71. [71]
    ESET Gamaredon June 2020

    Boutin, J. (2020, June 11). Gamaredon group grows its game. Retrieved June 16, 2020.

    Open source URL
  72. [72]
    ESET Gamaredon June 2020

    Boutin, J. (2020, June 11). Gamaredon group grows its game. Retrieved June 16, 2020.

    Open source URL
  73. [73]
    FOX-IT May 2016 Mofang

    Yonathan Klijnsma. (2016, May 17). Mofang: A politically motivated information stealing adversary. Retrieved May 12, 2020.

    Open source URL
  74. [74]
    F-Secure Cosmicduke

    F-Secure Labs. (2014, July). COSMICDUKE Cosmu with a twist of MiniDuke. Retrieved July 3, 2014.

    Open source URL
Source and licensing

Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.