G1045: Salt Typhoon
Salt Typhoon is a People's Republic of China (PRC) state-backed actor that has been active since at least 2019 and responsible for numerous compromises of network infrastructure at major U.S. telecommunication and internet service providers (ISP). Salt Typhoon has targeted and leveraged public facing network edge devices to gain access to victim environments. Salt Typhoon has been publicly associated with activities resembling other security industry reported activity groups to include OPERATOR PANDA, RedMike, GhostEmperor, and UNC5807.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]
Security context for executives and security teams
G1045: Salt Typhoon describes [Salt Typhoon](https://attack.mitre.org/groups/G1045) is a People's Republic of China (PRC) state-backed actor that has been active since at least 2019 and responsible for numerous compromises of network infrastructure at major U.S. telecommunication and internet service providers (ISP). [Salt Typhoon](https://attack.mitre.org/groups/G1045) has targeted and leveraged public facing network edge devices to gain access to victim environments. [Salt Typhoon](https://attack.mitre.org/groups/G1045) has been publicly asso...
Executive priority
G1045: Salt Typhoon is an official MITRE ATT&CK group. Glexia treats it as defensive behavior context for prioritizing monitoring, control validation, and response planning without using the object by itself as an attribution claim.
Technical view
Security teams should validate G1045: Salt Typhoon by reviewing the official ATT&CK relationships, mapped tactics (the mapped ATT&CK tactic context), supported platforms (the platforms named in the official object), and available local telemetry before making detection or mitigation decisions.
Likely telemetry
- Official ATT&CK relationships and object metadata
Detection direction
- Validate whether G1045: Salt Typhoon appears in your detection coverage and tabletop scenarios.
- Use the object to align executive risk language with SOC, incident response, and detection engineering work.
- Do not treat ATT&CK relationship context as attribution without corroborating evidence.
Mitigation priorities
- Map the object to existing controls and identify missing telemetry or response ownership.
- Prioritize mitigations that reduce exposure on the listed platforms and tactics.
- Review adjacent ATT&CK relationships before changing policy, detections, or reporting language.
Additional notes and limits
Baseline Glexia take generated from the official MITRE ATT&CK STIX object, source hash, tactics, platforms, and detection fields. It is safe to replace with a richer model-generated take for the same source hash later.
This baseline take is source-grounded and schema-validated, but it does not include environment-specific telemetry, incident evidence, or threat-intelligence corroboration.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Salt Typhoon
Salt Typhoon is a People's Republic of China (PRC) state-backed actor that has been active since at least 2019 and responsible for numerous compromises of network infrastructure at major U.S. telecommunication and internet service providers (ISP). Salt Typhoon has targeted and leveraged public facing network edge devices to gain access to victim environments. Salt Typhoon has been publicly associated with activities resembling other security industry reported activity groups to include OPERATOR PANDA, RedMike, GhostEmperor, and UNC5807.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]
How security teams should use this page
Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.
Techniques used
This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.
| Domain | ID | Name | Relationship / procedure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | T1584.008 | Network DevicesSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has leveraged compromised routers to facilitate operations.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1070.007 | Clear Network Connection History and ConfigurationsSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has reverted or modified network configuration files to remove traces of activity.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1016 | System Network Configuration Discovery | Salt Typhoon has discovered and modified network configurations of victim devices.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1685.006 | Clear Linux or Mac System LogsSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has cleared logs including .bash_history, auth.log, lastlog, wtmp, and btmp.[2] |
| Enterprise | T1686.002 | Network Device FirewallSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has modified the network firewalls access control lists to add IP addresses to bypass security policies and maintain access.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1082 | System Information Discovery | Salt Typhoon has discovered system information details utilizing CLI on network devices.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1552.001 | Credentials In FilesSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has collected credentials stored in configuration files.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1590.004 | Network TopologySub-technique | Salt Typhoon has used configuration files from exploited network devices to help discover upstream and downstream network segments.[2][3] |
| Enterprise | T1046 | Network Service Discovery | Salt Typhoon has scanned open ports and services within the victim environment.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1610 | Deploy Container | Salt Typhoon has enabled Linux containers in victim network device environments using `guestshell enable`.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1556 | Modify Authentication Process | Salt Typhoon has modified the Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting (AAA) configurations forcing devices to use less secure authentication methods and to send information to their infrastructure.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1070.009 | Clear PersistenceSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has removed persistence within victim devices through disabling and uninstalling artifacts.[3] Salt Typhoon has leveraged the commands `guestshell disable` and `guestshell destroy` to deactivate and uninstall Guest Shell containers and return all resources to the system to remove evidence of persistence.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1572 | Protocol Tunneling | Salt Typhoon has modified device configurations to create and use Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) tunnels.[2] |
| Enterprise | T1095 | Non-Application Layer Protocol | Salt Typhoon has used Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) and IPsec tunnels to connect to C2 over non-application layer protocols.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1021.001 | Remote Desktop ProtocolSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has opened and conducted operations utilizing RDP within victim environments.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1090.003 | Multi-hop ProxySub-technique | Salt Typhoon has leveraged multi-hop proxies for command-and-control infrastructure.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1569 | System Services | Salt Typhoon has utilized SNMP daemon to execute commands to include SNMPwalk.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1027.010 | Command ObfuscationSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has obfuscated target pathways with double encoding to bypass security solutions.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1548.003 | Sudo and Sudo CachingSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has elevated privileges of local user accounts by editing `/etc/sudoers` or adding a file under `/etc/sudoers.d/`.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1587.001 | MalwareSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has used custom tooling including JumbledPath.[2] |
| Enterprise | T1602.001 | SNMP (MIB Dump)Sub-technique | Salt Typhoon has enumerated device configuration using SNMP and gathered data stored in the Managed Information Base on target devices.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1048.003 | Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 ProtocolSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has exfiltrated configuration files from exploited network devices over FTP and TFTP.[2][3] |
| Enterprise | T1098.004 | SSH Authorized KeysSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has added SSH authorized_keys under root or other users at the Linux level on compromised network devices.[2][3] |
| Enterprise | T1595 | Active Scanning | Salt Typhoon has scanned victim environments for open ports and services.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1020.001 | Traffic DuplicationSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has enabled traffic mirroring to exfiltrate data.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1078 | Valid Accounts | Salt Typhoon has used logged into accounts on Cisco devices by cracking weak hashed passwords from configuration files.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1070.003 | Clear Command HistorySub-technique | Salt Typhoon has deleted and cleared logs to avoid detection.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1040 | Network Sniffing | Salt Typhoon has used a variety of tools and techniques to capture packet data between network interfaces.[2][3] |
| Enterprise | T1583.003 | Virtual Private ServerSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has utilized virtual private servers (VPS) for C2 infrastructure.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1602.002 | Network Device Configuration DumpSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has attempted to acquire credentials by dumping network device configurations.[2][3] Salt Typhoon has also obtained data using RANCID.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1571 | Non-Standard Port | Salt Typhoon has leveraged non-standard ports to evade detection by security monitoring.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1090 | Proxy | Salt Typhoon has utilized virtual private servers and compromised routers as proxies for malicious communications.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1110.002 | Password CrackingSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has cracked passwords for accounts with weak encryption obtained from the configuration files of compromised network devices.[2] Salt Typhoon has cracked weak hashed passwords stolen from configuration files.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1059.008 | Network Device CLISub-technique | Salt Typhoon has executed commands on network devices using the native command line interface.[3] Salt Typhoon has leveraged Tcl scripts on Cisco IOS devices to include `TCLprox.tcl` and `map.tcl` when `tclsh` was available.[3] Salt Typhoon also leveraged TACACS+ and RADIUS to modify victim network devices.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1136.001 | Local AccountSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has created local user accounts to utilize in victim environments.[3] Salt Typhoon has also created administrative accounts within compromised environments.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1059.004 | Unix ShellSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has utilized a bash shell to execute Linux commands.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1072 | Software Deployment Tools | Salt Typhoon has abused network management tools to include RANCID to facilitate actions in victims’ environments.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1543.005 | Container ServiceSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has modified container service configurations using `Guest Shell`.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1587 | Develop Capabilities | Salt Typhoon has hosted and attended formal training programs for foreign-made IT products to include Cisco Network Academy.[4] |
| Enterprise | T1071.001 | Web ProtocolsSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has utilized HTTP and HTTPS in C2 communications.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1021.004 | SSHSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has modified the loopback address on compromised switches and used them as the source of SSH connections to additional devices within the target environment, allowing them to bypass access control lists (ACLs).[2] Salt Typhoon has also enabled SSH to allow remote access.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1071.002 | File Transfer ProtocolsSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has leveraged SFTP for C2 communications.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1018 | Remote System Discovery | Salt Typhoon has used SNMPwalk to enumerate devices.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1686 | Disable or Modify System Firewall | Salt Typhoon has made changes to the Access Control List (ACL) and loopback interface address on compromised devices.[2] |
| Enterprise | T1005 | Data from Local System | Salt Typhoon has gathered data from victim devices.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1588.005 | ExploitsSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has obtained and utilized numerous exploits that target network edge devices to include Cisco IOS, Palo Alto Pan-OS Global Protect, and Ivanti Connect Secure.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1110.001 | Password GuessingSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has used weak credentials to gain access to victim devices.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1105 | Ingress Tool Transfer | Salt Typhoon has downloaded additional payloads and files to victim devices.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1585.001 | Social Media AccountsSub-technique | Salt Typhoon members have created and maintained professional accounts on social media to include LinkedIn.[4] |
| Enterprise | T1059.006 | PythonSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has used Python scripts to execute commands on victim hosts.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1685 | Disable or Modify Tools | Salt Typhoon has disabled logging and disabled the distribution of logs to log aggregators.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1599 | Network Boundary Bridging | Salt Typhoon has abused peer connections to exfiltrate data.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1588.002 | ToolSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has used publicly available tooling to exploit vulnerabilities.[2][3] Salt Typhoon has also obtained and utilized open-source tools for creating backdoors and multi-hop proxies to include STOWAWAY.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1132.001 | Standard EncodingSub-technique | Salt Typhoon has utilized double encoding with hexadecimals in attempts to obfuscate requested command paths.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1059.013 | Container CLI/APISub-technique | Salt Typhoon has leveraged Cisco Guest Shell to interact with a Linux Container on network devices.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1136 | Create Account | Salt Typhoon has created Linux-level users on compromised network devices through modification of `/etc/shadow` and `/etc/passwd`.[2] |
| Enterprise | T1199 | Trusted Relationship | Salt Typhoon has leveraged compromised devices associated with trusted connections or those associated with private interconnections to include provider-to-provider or provider-to-customer relationships in order to pivot to target networks.[3] |
| Enterprise | T1190 | Exploit Public-Facing Application | Salt Typhoon has leveraged vulnerabilities in public facing applications and network edge devices including Cisco IOS and IOS XE through CVE-2018-0171, Ivanti Connect Secure through CVE-2023-46805, and Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect through CVE-2024-3400.[2][3][4] |
Groups, software, and campaigns
S1206: JumbledPath
JumbledPath is a custom-built utility written in GO that has been used by Salt Typhoon since at least 2024 for packet capture on remote Cisco devices. JumbledPath is compiled as an ELF binary using x86-64 architecture which makes it potentially useable across Linux operating systems and network devices from multiple vendors.[1]
All related ATT&CK context
Object version and sync metadata
The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates.
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases(3)
| Release | Bundle imported | Object version | Modified | Status | Raw hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.0 | 2.0 | Current bundle | 93defc977e49… | ||
| 19.2 | 1.0 | Older bundle | 95c7f845f53b… | ||
| 19.1 | 1.0 | Older bundle | 5c05e0a01561… |
Mirrored ATT&CK source object
The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.
External references and citations
MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.
- [1]US Dept. of Treasury Salt Typhoon JAN 2025
US Department of Treasury. (2025, January 17). Treasury Sanctions Company Associated with Salt Typhoon and Hacker Associated with Treasury Compromise. Retrieved February 24, 2025.
Open source URL - [2]Cisco Salt Typhoon FEB 2025
Cisco Talos. (2025, February 20). Weathering the storm: In the midst of a Typhoon. Retrieved February 24, 2025.
Open source URL - [3]CISA_AA25-239ASaltTyphoon_Sept2025
CISA. (2025, September 3). Countering Chinese State-Sponsored Actors Compromise of Networks Worldwide to Feed Global Espionage System. Retrieved September 22, 2026.
Open source URL - [4]CarySentinelLabs_CiscoSaltTyphoon_Dec2025
Cary, D. (2025, December 10). Malicious Apprentice | How Two Hackers Went From Cisco Academy to Cisco CVEs. Retrieved September 22, 2026.
Open source URL - [5]CrowdStrike_OperatorPanda_NoDate
CrowdStrike. (n.d.). Operator Panda. Retrieved September 22, 2026.
Open source URL - [6]RF_SaltTyphoon_Feb2025
Insikt Group. (2025, February 13). RedMike (Salt Typhoon) Exploits Cisco Vulnerabilities for Cyber Espionage. Retrieved September 22, 2026.
Open source URL - [7]Microsoft_ThreatActorNaming_NoDate
Microsoft. (n.d.). How Microsoft names threat actors. Retrieved September 22, 2026.
Open source URL - [8]Mandiant_M-Trends2026_Mar2026
Kutscher, J. (2026, March 23). M-Trends 2026: Data, Insights, and Strategies From the Frontlines. Retrieved September 22, 2026.
Open source URL - [9]mitre-attackG1045Open source URL
Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.
