LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
MITRE ATT&CK® Technique

T1513: Screen Capture

Adversaries may use screen capture to collect additional information about a target device, such as applications running in the foreground, user data, credentials, or other sensitive information. Applications running in the background can capture screenshots or videos of another application running in the foreground by using the Android `MediaProjectionManager` (generally requires the device user to grant consent).[1][2] Background applications can also use Android accessibility services to capture screen contents being displayed by a foreground application.[3] An adversary with root access or Android Debug Bridge (adb) access could call the Android `screencap` or `screenrecord` commands.[4][5]

MobileT1513TechniqueObject v1.3Modified
Glexia's Take · Automated analysis

Security context for executives and security teams

Automation confidenceHigh

Screen Capture on Android matters because it can turn a mobile device into a source of visible business and personal secrets: foreground apps, messages, credentials, banking or wallet data, and other sensitive content. MITRE notes several paths: user-consented MediaProjectionManager use, accessibility service abuse, or screencap/screenrecord through root or Android Debug Bridge access. For leaders, the issue is less “screenshots” and more whether managed mobile devices, high-risk users, and sensitive apps can prevent or reveal unauthorized capture of what users are seeing.

Executive priority

Prioritize this where Android devices are used for privileged access, banking, cryptocurrency, executive communications, regulated data, or incident response workflows. The relationship set links this technique to numerous Android spyware, surveillanceware, information stealers, and banking trojans, making it relevant to mobile security policy, user guidance, application security requirements, and evidence for mobile device governance. Executives should ask whether EMM/MDM policy, accessibility-service control, debugging restrictions, and user training are actually enforced and auditable on corporate Android devices.

Technical view

SOC, mobile security, and IR teams should validate Android-focused visibility for screen capture risk. ATT&CK provides no official detection text for this technique, but a related detection strategy, DET0668 Detection of Screen Capture, is mapped. Practical validation should focus on events and state changes around MediaProjectionManager consent/use, suspicious accessibility-service enablement, root indicators, ADB/debugging exposure, and invocation or artifacts associated with screencap or screenrecord. Because tactics are not specified in the supplied object, detection engineering should anchor logic to the Android platform and observed collection behavior rather than a tactic label.

Likely telemetry

  • Android application permission and consent events related to screen capture or media projection where available
  • Accessibility service enablement, configuration changes, and app/service inventory
  • EMM/MDM compliance state, device policy settings, and managed configuration evidence
  • Android debugging/ADB enabled state and device developer-option posture
  • Root/jailbreak indicators and device integrity signals

Detection direction

  • Confirm whether DET0668 or equivalent mobile detection content is enabled, tested, and mapped to Android devices in scope.
  • Tune for high-risk combinations: newly enabled accessibility services plus sensitive-app use, media projection prompts from unfamiliar apps, ADB enabled on managed devices, or root indicators with screen capture artifacts.
  • Treat user consent as a blind spot: MediaProjectionManager generally requires the device user to grant consent, so telemetry should distinguish legitimate remote support, conferencing, or productivity tools from unexpected background collection.
  • Correlate with the related software context: multiple mapped Android malware families are spyware, surveillanceware, information stealers, or banking trojans, so screen capture signals should be investigated with credential, financial-app, and data-exfiltration hypotheses.
  • Account for false positives from legitimate screen recording, remote assistance, testing, accessibility, and employee monitoring tools; local allowlists and business justification are required.

Mitigation priorities

  • Use enterprise policy through EMM/MDM to restrict risky device behavior where supported, including debugging exposure, unmanaged app installation, and required compliance posture.
  • Provide user guidance so users understand screen-capture consent prompts, risky accessibility-service requests, and why enabling unknown services can expose sensitive app content.
  • Apply application developer guidance for sensitive Android apps, especially those handling credentials, financial transactions, regulated data, or privileged business workflows, so screen exposure risks are considered during secure design and SDLC review.
  • Prioritize mobile controls for executives, administrators, finance users, and other roles whose screens may expose high-value data.
  • Ensure IR playbooks include mobile evidence collection for accessibility abuse, ADB/root state, suspicious apps, and screen capture indicators before wiping or re-enrolling devices.
Additional notes and limits

The strongest decision value is governance and validation: determine which Android devices can capture sensitive screens, which apps can request or abuse capture paths, and whether SOC/IR teams can see it. The relationship context is broad, including SpyDealer, Exodus, Monokle, FlexiSpy, GolfSpy, Anubis, Ginp, TrickMo, EventBot, DEFENSOR ID, Mandrake, WolfRAT, GoldenEagle, Tiktok Pro, BusyGasper, Drinik, S.O.V.A., TangleBot, Hornbill, and BOULDSPY using this technique. That breadth supports treating screen capture as a recurring mobile surveillance and fraud-enablement behavior, not a niche feature.

ATT&CK supplies no official detection text and no tactic mapping for this object. The platform is Android only in the supplied fields. This take does not assert active exploitation, customer exposure, attribution, or guaranteed detection. Actual coverage depends on local Android version mix, EMM/MDM capabilities, mobile threat telemetry, app inventory, privacy constraints, and whether devices are corporate-managed or user-owned.

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Official MITRE ATT&CK definition

Screen Capture

Adversaries may use screen capture to collect additional information about a target device, such as applications running in the foreground, user data, credentials, or other sensitive information. Applications running in the background can capture screenshots or videos of another application running in the foreground by using the Android `MediaProjectionManager` (generally requires the device user to grant consent).[1][2] Background applications can also use Android accessibility services to capture screen contents being displayed by a foreground application.[3] An adversary with root access or Android Debug Bridge (adb) access could call the Android `screencap` or `screenrecord` commands.[4][5]

View the same entry on attack.mitre.org (MITRE-hosted reference; in-page links above use the Glexia ATT&CK library.)

Glexia analysis

How security teams should use this page

Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.

Associated objects

Groups, software, and campaigns

MalwareMobile

S0479: DEFENSOR ID

DEFENSOR ID is a banking trojan capable of clearing a victim’s bank account or cryptocurrency wallet and taking over email or social media accounts. DEFENSOR ID performs the majority of its malicious functionality by abusing Android’s accessibility service.[1]

Android
ToolMobile

S0408: FlexiSpy

FlexiSpy is sophisticated surveillanceware for iOS and Android. Publicly-available, comprehensive analysis has only been found for the Android version.[1][2]

FlexiSpy markets itself as a parental control and employee monitoring application.[3]

Android
MalwareMobile

S1094: BRATA

BRATA (Brazilian Remote Access Tool, Android), is an evolving Android malware strain, detected in late 2018 and again in late 2021. Originating in Brazil, BRATA was later also found in the UK, Poland, Italy, Spain, and USA, where it is believed to have targeted financial institutions such as banks. There are currently three known variants of BRATA.[1][2][3]

Android
MalwareMobile

S1062: S.O.V.A.

S.O.V.A. is an Android banking trojan that was first identified in August 2021 and has subsequently been found in a variety of applications, including banking, cryptocurrency wallet/exchange, and shopping apps. S.O.V.A., which is Russian for "owl", contains features not commonly found in Android malware, such as session cookie theft.[1][2]

Android
MalwareMobile

S0407: Monokle

Monokle is targeted, sophisticated mobile surveillanceware. It is developed for Android, but there are some code artifacts that suggests an iOS version may be in development.[1]

Android
MalwareMobile

S0423: Ginp

Ginp is an Android banking trojan that has been used to target Spanish banks. Some of the code was taken directly from Anubis.[1]

Android
MalwareMobile

S0485: Mandrake

Mandrake is a sophisticated Android espionage platform that has been active in the wild since at least 2016. Mandrake is very actively maintained, with sophisticated features and attacks that are executed with surgical precision.

Mandrake has gone undetected for several years by providing legitimate, ad-free applications with social media and real reviews to back the apps. The malware is only activated when the operators issue a specific command.[1]

Android
MalwareMobile

S1069: TangleBot

TangleBot is SMS malware that was initially observed in September 2021, primarily targeting mobile users in the United States and Canada. TangleBot has used SMS text message lures about COVID-19 regulations and vaccines to trick mobile users into downloading the malware, similar to FluBot Android malware campaigns.[1]

Android
MalwareMobile

S1083: Chameleon

Chameleon is an Android banking trojan that can leverage Android’s Accessibility Services to perform malicious activities. Believed to have been first active in January 2023, Chameleon has been observed targeting users in Australia and Poland by masquerading as official applications. A new variant of Chameleon has expanded its targets to include Android users in the United Kingdom and Italy.[1][2]

Android
Relationship explorer

All related ATT&CK context

Mitigations

Mitigation direction

Change history

Object version and sync metadata

The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates.

ATT&CK release
19.1
Object version
1.3
Created
Modified
Raw hash
c6805ee8ecf31856...
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases(1)
ReleaseBundle importedObject versionModifiedStatusRaw hash
19.11.3Current bundlec6805ee8ecf3…
Raw source

Mirrored ATT&CK source object

The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.

Source references

External references and citations

MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.

  1. [1]
    Fortinet screencap July 2019

    Dario Durando. (2019, July 3). BianLian: A New Wave Emerges. Retrieved September 4, 2019.

    Open source URL
  2. [2]
    Android ScreenCap1 2019

    Android Developers. (n.d.). Android MediaProjectionManager. Retrieved August 8, 2019.

    Open source URL
  3. [3]
    Lookout-Monokle

    Bauer A., Kumar A., Hebeisen C., et al. (2019, July). Monokle: The Mobile Surveillance Tooling of the Special Technology Center. Retrieved September 4, 2019.

    Open source URL
  4. [4]
    Android ScreenCap2 2019

    Android Developers. (n.d.). Android Debug Bridge (adb). Retrieved August 8, 2019.

    Open source URL
  5. [5]
    Trend Micro ScreenCap July 2015

    Zhang, V. (2015, July 21). Hacking Team RCSAndroid Spying Tool Listens to Calls; Roots Devices to Get In. Retrieved August 8, 2019.

    Open source URL
  6. [6]
    ESET DEFENSOR ID

    L. Stefanko. (2020, May 22). Insidious Android malware gives up all malicious features but one to gain stealth. Retrieved June 26, 2020.

    Open source URL
  7. [7]
    FlexiSpy-Features

    FlexiSpy. (n.d.). FlexiSpy Monitoring Features. Retrieved September 4, 2019.

    Open source URL
  8. [8]
    securelist_brata_0819

    Securelist. (2019, August 29). Fully equipped Spying Android RAT from Brazil: BRATA. Retrieved December 18, 2023.

    Open source URL
  9. [9]
    mcafee_brata_0421

    Fernando Ruiz. (2021, April 12). BRATA Keeps Sneaking into Google Play, Now Targeting USA and Spain. Retrieved December 18, 2023.

    Open source URL
  10. [10]
    lookout_hornbill_sunbird_0221

    Apurva Kumar, Kristin Del Rosso. (2021, February 10). Novel Confucius APT Android Spyware Linked to India-Pakistan Conflict. Retrieved June 9, 2023.

    Open source URL
  11. [11]
    cleafy_sova_1122

    Francesco Lubatti, Federico Valentini. (2022, November 8). SOVA malware is back and is evolving rapidly. Retrieved March 30, 2023.

    Open source URL
  12. [12]
    Talos-WolfRAT

    W. Mercer, P. Rascagneres, V. Ventura. (2020, May 19). The wolf is back... . Retrieved July 20, 2020.

    Open source URL
  13. [13]
    PaloAlto-SpyDealer

    Wenjun Hu, Cong Zheng and Zhi Xu. (2017, July 6). SpyDealer: Android Trojan Spying on More Than 40 Apps. Retrieved September 18, 2018.

    Open source URL
  14. [14]
    ThreatFabric Ginp

    ThreatFabric. (2019, November). Ginp - A malware patchwork borrowing from Anubis. Retrieved April 8, 2020.

    Open source URL
  15. [15]
    Bitdefender Mandrake

    R. Gevers, M. Tivadar, R. Bleotu, A. M. Barbatei, et al.. (2020, May 14). Uprooting Mandrake: The Story of an Advanced Android Spyware Framework That Went Undetected for 4 Years. Retrieved July 15, 2020.

    Open source URL
  16. [16]
    cloudmark_tanglebot_0921

    Felipe Naves, Andrew Conway, W. Stuart Jones, Adam McNeil . (2021, September 23). TangleBot: New Advanced SMS Malware Targets Mobile Users Across U.S. and Canada with COVID-19 Lures. Retrieved February 28, 2023.

    Open source URL
  17. [17]
    ThreatFabric_Chameleon_Dec2023

    ThreatFabric. (2023, December 21). Android Banking Trojan Chameleon can now bypass any Biometric Authentication. Retrieved July 7, 2025.

    Open source URL
  18. [18]
    cyble_drinik_1022

    Cyble. (2022, October 27). Drinik Malware Returns With Advanced Capabilities Targeting Indian Taxpayers. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  19. [19]
    lookout_bouldspy_0423

    Kyle Schmittle, Alemdar Islamoglu, Paul Shunk, Justin Albrecht. (2023, April 27). Lookout Discovers Android Spyware Tied to Iranian Police Targeting Minorities: BouldSpy. Retrieved July 21, 2023.

    Open source URL
  20. [20]
    Zscaler TikTok Spyware

    S. Desai. (2020, September 8). TikTok Spyware. Retrieved January 5, 2021.

    Open source URL
  21. [21]
    Cofense Anubis

    M. Feller. (2020, February 5). Infostealer, Keylogger, and Ransomware in One: Anubis Targets More than 250 Android Applications. Retrieved September 25, 2024.

    Open source URL
  22. [22]
    Cybereason EventBot

    D. Frank, L. Rochberger, Y. Rimmer, A. Dahan. (2020, April 30). EventBot: A New Mobile Banking Trojan is Born. Retrieved June 26, 2020.

    Open source URL
  23. [23]
    welivesecurity_ahrat_0523

    Lukas Stefanko. (2023, May 23). Android app breaking bad: From legitimate screen recording to file exfiltration within a year. Retrieved December 18, 2023.

    Open source URL
  24. [24]
    SecurityIntelligence TrickMo

    P. Asinovsky. (2020, March 24). TrickBot Pushing a 2FA Bypass App to Bank Customers in Germany. Retrieved April 24, 2020.

    Open source URL
  25. [25]
    ThreatFabric_Crocodilus_March2025

    ThreatFabric. (2025, March 28). Exposing Crocodilus: New Device Takeover Malware Targeting Android Devices. Retrieved November 24, 2025.

    Open source URL
  26. [26]
    Threatfabric LightSpy 2024

    ThreatFabric. (2024, October 29). LightSpy: Implant for iOS. Retrieved January 30, 2025.

    Open source URL
  27. [27]
    LinkedIn Dmitry LightSpy 2025

    Dmitry Bestuzhev. (2025, April 7). The Coordinated Kill Switch: LightSpy's iOS Destructive Plugin Architecture Manages Device Disablement. Retrieved April 14, 2025.

    Open source URL
  28. [28]
    welivesecurity_apt-c-23

    Stefanko, L. (2020, September 30). APT‑C‑23 group evolves its Android spyware. Retrieved March 4, 2024.

    Open source URL
  29. [29]
    sophos_android_apt_spyware

    Kohli, P. (2021, November 23). Android APT spyware, targeting Middle East victims, enhances evasiveness. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  30. [30]
    Lookout Uyghur Campaign

    A. Kumar, K. Del Rosso, J. Albrecht, C. Hebeisen. (2020, June 1). Mobile APT Surveillance Campaigns Targeting Uyghurs - A collection of long-running Android tooling connected to a Chinese mAPT actor. Retrieved November 10, 2020.

    Open source URL
  31. [31]
    Trend Micro Bouncing Golf 2019

    E. Xu, G. Guo. (2019, June 28). Mobile Cyberespionage Campaign ‘Bouncing Golf’ Affects Middle East. Retrieved January 27, 2020.

    Open source URL
  32. [32]
    SecureList BusyGasper

    Alexey Firsh. (2018, August 29). BusyGasper – the unfriendly spy. Retrieved October 1, 2021.

    Open source URL
  33. [33]
    Nightwatch screencap April 2016

    Nightwatch Cybersecurity. (2016, April 13). Research: Securing Android Applications from Screen Capture (FLAG_SECURE). Retrieved November 5, 2019.

    Open source URL
  34. [34]
    SWB Exodus March 2019

    Security Without Borders. (2019, March 29). Exodus: New Android Spyware Made in Italy. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  35. [35]
    Android ScreenCap1 2019

    Android Developers. (n.d.). Android MediaProjectionManager. Retrieved August 8, 2019.

    Open source URL
  36. [36]
    Android ScreenCap2 2019

    Android Developers. (n.d.). Android Debug Bridge (adb). Retrieved August 8, 2019.

    Open source URL
  37. [37]
    Fortinet screencap July 2019

    Dario Durando. (2019, July 3). BianLian: A New Wave Emerges. Retrieved September 4, 2019.

    Open source URL
  38. [38]
    Lookout-Monokle

    Bauer A., Kumar A., Hebeisen C., et al. (2019, July). Monokle: The Mobile Surveillance Tooling of the Special Technology Center. Retrieved September 4, 2019.

    Open source URL
  39. [39]
    NIST Mobile Threat CatalogueAPP-40
    Open source URL
  40. [40]
    NIST Mobile Threat CatalogueAPP-40
    Open source URL
  41. [41]
    Trend Micro ScreenCap July 2015

    Zhang, V. (2015, July 21). Hacking Team RCSAndroid Spying Tool Listens to Calls; Roots Devices to Get In. Retrieved August 8, 2019.

    Open source URL
  42. [42]
    mitre-attackT1513
    Open source URL
  43. [43]
    mitre-attackT1513
    Open source URL
  44. [44]
    Lookout-Monokle

    Bauer A., Kumar A., Hebeisen C., et al. (2019, July). Monokle: The Mobile Surveillance Tooling of the Special Technology Center. Retrieved September 4, 2019.

    Open source URL
  45. [45]
    lookout_hornbill_sunbird_0221

    Apurva Kumar, Kristin Del Rosso. (2021, February 10). Novel Confucius APT Android Spyware Linked to India-Pakistan Conflict. Retrieved June 9, 2023.

    Open source URL
Source and licensing

Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.