LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
MITRE ATT&CK® Malware

S1062: S.O.V.A.

S.O.V.A. is an Android banking trojan that was first identified in August 2021 and has subsequently been found in a variety of applications, including banking, cryptocurrency wallet/exchange, and shopping apps. S.O.V.A., which is Russian for "owl", contains features not commonly found in Android malware, such as session cookie theft.[1][2]

MobileS1062MalwareObject v1.0Modified
Glexia's Take · Automated analysis

Security context for executives and security teams

Automation confidenceHigh

S.O.V.A. matters because it represents Android banking malware aimed at sensitive financial and commerce activity, including banking, cryptocurrency wallet/exchange, and shopping application contexts. The ATT&CK relationships show a broad mobile risk profile: credential and input capture, notification and SMS access, application and system discovery, web-based command communication, persistence or concealment behaviors, and potential impact behaviors such as file encryption or network denial of service. For leaders, the key question is whether mobile devices used for workforce access, financial workflows, or customer-facing operations are governed with enough visibility and response capability to detect and contain this class of Android threat.

Executive priority

Prioritize S.O.V.A. as a mobile security readiness and fraud-resilience issue rather than only a malware signature issue. It is relevant to identity assurance because related behaviors include keylogging, GUI input capture, notification access, SMS message access/control, and session-cookie theft noted in the official description. It is relevant to business continuity because ATT&CK maps it to data encryption for impact and network denial of service. Executives should ask whether Android devices that access corporate, financial, or regulated systems are enrolled, monitored, patch-governed, and removable from trust quickly during an incident.

Technical view

S.O.V.A. is an Android malware object in ATT&CK for Mobile with no official detection guidance provided. Defensive validation should therefore be behavior-led using the mapped techniques: software packing, stored application data access, keylogging, GUI input capture, installed software and system information discovery, web protocol communications, screen capture, input injection through accessibility abuse, notification access, SMS access/control, icon suppression, prevention of app removal, malicious self-uninstall, adversary-in-the-middle positioning, transmitted data manipulation, data encryption for impact, and network denial of service. SOC and IR teams should confirm whether their mobile telemetry can expose suspicious permission grants, accessibility service abuse, SMS and notification access, MediaProjection/screen-capture consent events, device administrator or device owner abuse, hidden launcher icons, unusual app inventory changes, and network communications over HTTP/HTTPS to untrusted infrastructure.

Likely telemetry

  • Android mobile device management or enterprise mobility management inventory and compliance state
  • Installed application inventory, package metadata, signing/certificate reputation, and app visibility in launcher
  • Android permission grants, especially SMS, notification access, accessibility services, screen capture/media projection, VPN, and device administration where available
  • Mobile threat defense alerts for packed or obfuscated applications and suspicious app behavior
  • Application install, uninstall, self-removal, and failed removal events

Detection direction

  • Because MITRE provides no official detection text, validate coverage against the related techniques rather than relying on the S.O.V.A. name alone.
  • Tune detections for combinations of risky Android behaviors: accessibility service enablement plus input injection-like activity, notification/SMS access plus financial app presence, screen capture consent plus foreground sensitive apps, or device administrator use plus uninstall resistance.
  • Review mobile app vetting for packing or obfuscation because the object is related to Software Packing, which can reduce effectiveness of signature-only controls.
  • Monitor for suspicious web protocol communications from newly installed or high-risk Android apps, while accounting for high false-positive volume from normal mobile HTTP/HTTPS traffic.
  • Correlate app discovery and system discovery behavior with follow-on access to stored application data, SMS, notifications, or GUI input capture to reduce noise.

Mitigation priorities

  • Establish or validate mobile device governance for Android devices that access business, financial, identity, or regulated services, including enrollment, compliance checks, and rapid trust revocation.
  • Restrict or closely monitor high-risk permissions and capabilities such as accessibility services, notification access, SMS permissions, screen capture, VPN configuration, and device administration where business policy allows.
  • Use mobile application vetting and allow/deny controls for applications used in sensitive workflows, with attention to packed or obfuscated apps and apps impersonating banking, cryptocurrency, exchange, shopping, or security tools.
  • Strengthen identity controls so mobile compromise does not equal account compromise: phishing-resistant authentication where feasible, session risk monitoring, and rapid session/cookie invalidation procedures.
  • Prepare IR playbooks for suspected Android banking trojan activity, including device isolation, credential/session reset, financial fraud review, preservation of mobile telemetry, and re-enrollment or rebuild decisions.
Additional notes and limits

The strongest defensive value comes from mapping S.O.V.A. to observable Android behaviors and control gaps. The object description specifically identifies S.O.V.A. as an Android banking trojan observed in banking, cryptocurrency wallet/exchange, and shopping app contexts and notes session cookie theft. The relationship set is unusually broad, so prioritization should focus on the behaviors most relevant to the organization’s mobile use cases: identity access, financial applications, regulated data, and operational dependency on mobile devices.

The supplied ATT&CK object does not provide official detection text, aliases, labels, or tactics, and the relationship descriptions are technique-level context rather than confirmed event telemetry for every environment. This take does not assert current activity, attribution, customer exposure, or guaranteed detectability. Local Android management capabilities, privacy model, BYOD policy, mobile threat defense coverage, and network visibility will determine practical detection and response options.

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Official MITRE ATT&CK definition

S.O.V.A.

S.O.V.A. is an Android banking trojan that was first identified in August 2021 and has subsequently been found in a variety of applications, including banking, cryptocurrency wallet/exchange, and shopping apps. S.O.V.A., which is Russian for "owl", contains features not commonly found in Android malware, such as session cookie theft.[1][2]

View the same entry on attack.mitre.org (MITRE-hosted reference; in-page links above use the Glexia ATT&CK library.)

Glexia analysis

How security teams should use this page

Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.

ATT&CK relationship table

Techniques used

This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.

19 rows
DomainIDNameRelationship / procedure
MobileT1418Software Discovery

S.O.V.A. can search for installed applications that match a list of targets.[2]

MobileT1516Input Injection

S.O.V.A. can programmatically tap the screen or swipe.[2]

MobileT1417.002GUI Input CaptureSub-technique

S.O.V.A. can use overlays capture banking credentials and credit card information, and can open arbitrary WebViews from the C2.[1]

MobileT1636.004SMS MessagesSub-technique

S.O.V.A. can intercept and read SMS messages.[1]

MobileT1409Stored Application Data

S.O.V.A. can gather session cookies from infected devices. S.O.V.A. can also abuse Accessibility Services to steal Google Authenticator tokens.[1][2]

MobileT1513Screen Capture

S.O.V.A. can take screenshots and abuse the Android Screen Cast feature to capture screen data.[2]

MobileT1464Network Denial of Service

S.O.V.A. has C2 commands to add an infected device to a DDoS pool.[1]

MobileT1630.001Uninstall Malicious ApplicationSub-technique

S.O.V.A. can uninstall itself.[1]

MobileT1417.001KeyloggingSub-technique

S.O.V.A. can use keylogging to capture user input.[1]

MobileT1628.001Suppress Application IconSub-technique

S.O.V.A. can hide its application icon.[1]

MobileT1426System Information Discovery

S.O.V.A. can gather data about the device.[1]

MobileT1517Access Notifications

S.O.V.A. can silently intercept and manipulate notifications. S.O.V.A. can also inject cookies via push notifications.[1]

MobileT1406.002Software PackingSub-technique

S.O.V.A. has been distributed in obfuscated and packed form.[1]

MobileT1641.001Transmitted Data ManipulationSub-technique

S.O.V.A. can manipulate clipboard data to replace cryptocurrency addresses.[1]

MobileT1471Data Encrypted for Impact

S.O.V.A. has code to encrypt device data with AES.[2]

MobileT1582SMS Control

S.O.V.A. can send SMS messages.[1]

MobileT1629.001Prevent Application RemovalSub-technique

S.O.V.A. can resist removal by going to the home screen during uninstall.[1]

MobileT1437.001Web ProtocolsSub-technique

S.O.V.A. can use the open-source project RetroFit for C2 communication.[1]

MobileT1638Adversary-in-the-Middle

S.O.V.A. has included adversary-in-the-middle capabilities.[1]

Relationship explorer

All related ATT&CK context

Change history

Object version and sync metadata

The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates.

ATT&CK release
19.1
Object version
1.0
Created
Modified
Raw hash
a4142bab43ad4245...
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases(1)
ReleaseBundle importedObject versionModifiedStatusRaw hash
19.11.0Current bundlea4142bab43ad…
Raw source

Mirrored ATT&CK source object

The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.

Source references

External references and citations

MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.

  1. [1]
    threatfabric_sova_0921

    ThreatFabric. (2021, September 9). S.O.V.A. - A new Android Banking trojan with fowl intentions. Retrieved February 6, 2023.

    Open source URL
  2. [2]
    cleafy_sova_1122

    Francesco Lubatti, Federico Valentini. (2022, November 8). SOVA malware is back and is evolving rapidly. Retrieved March 30, 2023.

    Open source URL
  3. [3]
    cleafy_sova_1122

    Francesco Lubatti, Federico Valentini. (2022, November 8). SOVA malware is back and is evolving rapidly. Retrieved March 30, 2023.

    Open source URL
  4. [4]
    mitre-attackS1062
    Open source URL
  5. [5]
    mitre-attackS1062
    Open source URL
  6. [6]
    threatfabric_sova_0921

    ThreatFabric. (2021, September 9). S.O.V.A. - A new Android Banking trojan with fowl intentions. Retrieved February 6, 2023.

    Open source URL
  7. [7]
    cleafy_sova_1122

    Francesco Lubatti, Federico Valentini. (2022, November 8). SOVA malware is back and is evolving rapidly. Retrieved March 30, 2023.

    Open source URL
  8. [8]
    cleafy_sova_1122

    Francesco Lubatti, Federico Valentini. (2022, November 8). SOVA malware is back and is evolving rapidly. Retrieved March 30, 2023.

    Open source URL
  9. [9]
    threatfabric_sova_0921

    ThreatFabric. (2021, September 9). S.O.V.A. - A new Android Banking trojan with fowl intentions. Retrieved February 6, 2023.

    Open source URL
  10. [10]
    threatfabric_sova_0921

    ThreatFabric. (2021, September 9). S.O.V.A. - A new Android Banking trojan with fowl intentions. Retrieved February 6, 2023.

    Open source URL
  11. [11]
    cleafy_sova_1122

    Francesco Lubatti, Federico Valentini. (2022, November 8). SOVA malware is back and is evolving rapidly. Retrieved March 30, 2023.

    Open source URL
  12. [12]
    threatfabric_sova_0921

    ThreatFabric. (2021, September 9). S.O.V.A. - A new Android Banking trojan with fowl intentions. Retrieved February 6, 2023.

    Open source URL
  13. [13]
    cleafy_sova_1122

    Francesco Lubatti, Federico Valentini. (2022, November 8). SOVA malware is back and is evolving rapidly. Retrieved March 30, 2023.

    Open source URL
  14. [14]
    threatfabric_sova_0921

    ThreatFabric. (2021, September 9). S.O.V.A. - A new Android Banking trojan with fowl intentions. Retrieved February 6, 2023.

    Open source URL
  15. [15]
    threatfabric_sova_0921

    ThreatFabric. (2021, September 9). S.O.V.A. - A new Android Banking trojan with fowl intentions. Retrieved February 6, 2023.

    Open source URL
  16. [16]
    threatfabric_sova_0921

    ThreatFabric. (2021, September 9). S.O.V.A. - A new Android Banking trojan with fowl intentions. Retrieved February 6, 2023.

    Open source URL
  17. [17]
    threatfabric_sova_0921

    ThreatFabric. (2021, September 9). S.O.V.A. - A new Android Banking trojan with fowl intentions. Retrieved February 6, 2023.

    Open source URL
  18. [18]
    threatfabric_sova_0921

    ThreatFabric. (2021, September 9). S.O.V.A. - A new Android Banking trojan with fowl intentions. Retrieved February 6, 2023.

    Open source URL
  19. [19]
    threatfabric_sova_0921

    ThreatFabric. (2021, September 9). S.O.V.A. - A new Android Banking trojan with fowl intentions. Retrieved February 6, 2023.

    Open source URL
  20. [20]
    threatfabric_sova_0921

    ThreatFabric. (2021, September 9). S.O.V.A. - A new Android Banking trojan with fowl intentions. Retrieved February 6, 2023.

    Open source URL
  21. [21]
    threatfabric_sova_0921

    ThreatFabric. (2021, September 9). S.O.V.A. - A new Android Banking trojan with fowl intentions. Retrieved February 6, 2023.

    Open source URL
  22. [22]
    cleafy_sova_1122

    Francesco Lubatti, Federico Valentini. (2022, November 8). SOVA malware is back and is evolving rapidly. Retrieved March 30, 2023.

    Open source URL
  23. [23]
    threatfabric_sova_0921

    ThreatFabric. (2021, September 9). S.O.V.A. - A new Android Banking trojan with fowl intentions. Retrieved February 6, 2023.

    Open source URL
  24. [24]
    threatfabric_sova_0921

    ThreatFabric. (2021, September 9). S.O.V.A. - A new Android Banking trojan with fowl intentions. Retrieved February 6, 2023.

    Open source URL
  25. [25]
    threatfabric_sova_0921

    ThreatFabric. (2021, September 9). S.O.V.A. - A new Android Banking trojan with fowl intentions. Retrieved February 6, 2023.

    Open source URL
  26. [26]
    threatfabric_sova_0921

    ThreatFabric. (2021, September 9). S.O.V.A. - A new Android Banking trojan with fowl intentions. Retrieved February 6, 2023.

    Open source URL
Source and licensing

Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.