LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE archive

2025 CVE Archive

Browse CVE records published in 2025 CVE Archive, with severity, affected products, CWE, KEV, and source-backed vulnerability context.

Showing 50 of 43310 matching CVEs · Page 32 of 867.

High · CVSS 7.5

CVE-2025-4330: Extraction filter bypass for linking outside extraction directory

Allows the extraction filter to be ignored, allowing symlink targets to point outside the destination directory, and the modification of some file metadata. You are affected by this vulnerability if using the tarfile module to extract untrusted tar archives using TarFile.extractall() or TarFile.extract() using the filter= parameter with a value of "data" or "tar". See the tarfile extraction filters documentation https://docs.python.org/3/library/tarfile.html#tarfile-extraction-filter  for more information. Note that for Python 3.14 or later the default value of filter= changed from "no filtering" to `"data", so if you are relying on this new default behavior then your usage is also affected. Note that none of these vulnerabilities significantly affect the installation of source distributions which are tar archives as source distributions already allow arbitrary code execution during the build process. However when evaluating source distributions it's important to avoid installing source distributions with suspicious links.

Published Jun 3, 2025 · Updated Aug 4, 2026

Critical · CVSS 9.4

CVE-2025-4517: Arbitrary writes via tarfile realpath overflow

Allows arbitrary filesystem writes outside the extraction directory during extraction with filter="data". You are affected by this vulnerability if using the tarfile module to extract untrusted tar archives using TarFile.extractall() or TarFile.extract() using the filter= parameter with a value of "data" or "tar". See the tarfile extraction filters documentation https://docs.python.org/3/library/tarfile.html#tarfile-extraction-filter  for more information. Note that for Python 3.14 or later the default value of filter= changed from "no filtering" to `"data", so if you are relying on this new default behavior then your usage is also affected. Note that none of these vulnerabilities significantly affect the installation of source distributions which are tar archives as source distributions already allow arbitrary code execution during the build process. However when evaluating source distributions it's important to avoid installing source distributions with suspicious links.

Published Jun 3, 2025 · Updated Aug 4, 2026

Medium · CVSS 5.4

CVE-2025-0604: Keycloak-ldap-federation: authentication bypass due to missing ldap bind after password reset in keycloak

A flaw was found in Keycloak. When an Active Directory user resets their password, the system updates it without performing an LDAP bind to validate the new credentials against AD. This vulnerability allows users whose AD accounts are expired or disabled to regain access in Keycloak, bypassing AD restrictions. The issue enables authentication bypass and could allow unauthorized access under certain conditions.

Published Jan 22, 2025 · Updated Aug 4, 2026

Medium · CVSS 6

CVE-2025-14777: Keycloak: keycloak idor in realm client creating/deleting

A flaw was found in Keycloak. An IDOR (Broken Access Control) vulnerability exists in the admin API endpoints for authorization resource management, specifically in ResourceSetService and PermissionTicketService. The system checks authorization against the resourceServer (client) ID provided in the API request, but the backend database lookup and modification operations (findById, delete) only use the resourceId. This mismatch allows an authenticated attacker with fine-grained admin permissions for one client (e.g., Client A) to delete or update resources belonging to another client (Client B) within the same realm by supplying a valid resource ID.

Published Dec 16, 2025 · Updated Aug 4, 2026

Critical · CVSS 10 · CISA KEV

CVE-2025-55182: A pre-authentication remote code execution vulnerability exists in React Server Components versions 19.0.0,...

A pre-authentication remote code execution vulnerability exists in React Server Components versions 19.0.0, 19.1.0, 19.1.1, and 19.2.0 including the following packages: react-server-dom-parcel, react-server-dom-turbopack, and react-server-dom-webpack. The vulnerable code unsafely deserializes payloads from HTTP requests to Server Function endpoints.

Published Dec 3, 2025 · Updated Aug 4, 2026

High · CVSS 7.5 · CISA KEV

CVE-2025-61884: Vulnerability in the Oracle Configurator product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Runtime UI).

Vulnerability in the Oracle Configurator product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Runtime UI). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.14. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Configurator. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Configurator accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).

Published Oct 12, 2025 · Updated Aug 4, 2026

Critical · CVSS 9.8 · CISA KEV

CVE-2025-61882: Vulnerability in the Oracle Concurrent Processing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: BI Publish...

Vulnerability in the Oracle Concurrent Processing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: BI Publisher Integration). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.14. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Concurrent Processing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Concurrent Processing. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published Oct 5, 2025 · Updated Aug 4, 2026

Critical · CVSS 9.8 · CISA KEV

CVE-2025-26399: SolarWinds Web Help Desk Deserialization of Untrusted Data Privilege Escalation Vulnerability

SolarWinds Web Help Desk was found to be susceptible to an unauthenticated AjaxProxy deserialization remote code execution vulnerability that, if exploited, would allow an attacker to run commands on the host machine. This vulnerability is a patch bypass of CVE-2024-28988, which in turn is a patch bypass of CVE-2024-28986.

Published Sep 23, 2025 · Updated Aug 4, 2026

Critical · CVSS 9.8 · CISA KEV

CVE-2025-53770: Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Deserialization of untrusted data in on-premises Microsoft SharePoint Server allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. Microsoft is aware that an exploit for CVE-2025-53770 exists in the wild. Microsoft is preparing and fully testing a comprehensive update to address this vulnerability. In the meantime, please make sure that the mitigation provided in this CVE documentation is in place so that you are protected from exploitation.

Published Jul 20, 2025 · Updated Aug 4, 2026

Critical · CVSS 10 · CISA KEV

CVE-2025-31324: Missing Authorization check in SAP NetWeaver (Visual Composer development server)

SAP NetWeaver Visual Composer Metadata Uploader is not protected with a proper authorization, allowing unauthenticated agent to upload potentially malicious executable binaries that could severely harm the host system. This could significantly affect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the targeted system.

Published Apr 24, 2025 · Updated Aug 4, 2026

Low · CVSS 2

CVE-2025-71402: better-auth before 1.4.0 Session Revocation via Forged Cookie

better-auth versions greater than 1.3.34 and before 1.4.0 contain a vulnerability in the multi-session plugin's /sign-out after-hook, which trusts raw multi-session cookies and forwards extracted values to internalAdapter.deleteSessions without verifying the cookie signature (e.g., via getSignedCookie). An attacker can supply a forged _multi-* cookie to trigger deletion of arbitrary session tokens.

Published Aug 1, 2026 · Updated Aug 3, 2026

Medium · CVSS 5.3

CVE-2025-14073: WooCommerce PayPal Payments <= 3.3.2 - Unauthenticated Sensitive Information Disclosure

The WooCommerce PayPal Payments plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Disclosure due to an Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.2 via the `enqueue_paypal_insights_script_on_order_received()` function due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to obtain sensitive order information including order keys, which can then be leveraged to access full customer billing details (name, email, phone, address) via the WooCommerce Store API within a 10-minute grace period after order creation.

Published Aug 1, 2026 · Updated Aug 3, 2026

Medium · CVSS 4.8

CVE-2025-15669: Bit Form < 3.1.4 - Admin+ Stored XSS via Conversational Form Progress Label

The Bit Form WordPress plugin before 3.1.4 does not sanitise one of its conversational-form display settings before rendering it on the public-facing form, allowing high-privilege users (such as administrators, who do not hold the unfiltered_html capability on multisite) to store JavaScript that executes in the browser of any visitor who views the form.

Published Aug 1, 2026 · Updated Aug 3, 2026

Medium · CVSS 6.9

CVE-2025-15544: Weak Credential Protection During TP-Link Omada Device Adoption

A cryptographic weakness exists in the Omada device adoption process.  During adoption, authentication credentials associated with site management are transmitted using a weak hashing algorithm that does not provide sufficient protection. An attacker who successfully intercepts adoption-related authentication traffic may be able to recover valid credentials and gain unauthorized access to managed devices or controller-managed environments.

Published Aug 3, 2026 · Updated Aug 3, 2026

Medium · CVSS 6.9

CVE-2025-15627: Hardcoded Cryptographic Keys in TP-Link Omada Adoption Protocol Authentication

A cryptographic weakness exists in the Omada adoption protocol.  The protocol relies on hard-coded cryptographic keys to establish trust and protect authentication exchanges between controllers and managed devices during device adoption. An attacker may be able to impersonate trusted controllers or managed devices and gain access to sensitive adoption-related communications.

Published Aug 3, 2026 · Updated Aug 3, 2026

High · CVSS 8.2

CVE-2025-15628: Hardcoded Certificates in TP-Link Omada Device Communications

Affected Omada devices rely on embedded certificates that are shared across deployments to establish trust between controllers and managed devices. An attacker who obtains the embedded certificates may be able to impersonate trusted controllers or devices and intercept affected communications.

Published Aug 3, 2026 · Updated Aug 3, 2026

Medium · CVSS 6.9

CVE-2025-15629: Weak Session Key Generation in TP-Link Omada Adoption Protocol

A cryptographic weakness exists in the Omada adoption protocol where session encryption keys used to protect communications between controllers and managed devices may be predictable due to insufficient entropy in session key generation. An attacker who successfully intercepts adoption-related communications may be able to recover session encryption keys and decrypt affected communications.

Published Aug 3, 2026 · Updated Aug 3, 2026

Medium · CVSS 5.8

CVE-2025-15630: Device Provisioning Race Condition in TP-Link Omada Adoption Workflow

A race condition exists in the cloud-based Omada device adoption process when an attacker may be able to interact with the adoption workflow before a legitimate device completes registration, resulting in provisioning information being delivered to an attacker. Successful exploitation may allow disclosure of provisioning information intended for a legitimate device.

Published Aug 3, 2026 · Updated Aug 3, 2026

Medium · CVSS 5.7

CVE-2025-15631: Weak Credential Storage in TP-Link Omada Devices

A cryptographic weakness exists in affected Omada devices where site credentials are protected using a legacy hashing algorithm that does not provide sufficient protection. An attacker who obtains access to stored credential data may be able to recover valid credentials to gain unauthorized access to affected devices or management environments.

Published Aug 3, 2026 · Updated Aug 3, 2026

High · CVSS 7.1

CVE-2025-71403: better-auth before 1.1.20 Open Redirect via trustedOrigins Bypass

better-auth versions before 1.1.20 contain a bypass vulnerability in trustedOrigins validation logic affecting absolute URLs and wildcard domains. Attackers can construct malicious callbackURL parameters that pass origin checks and trigger open redirects to steal sensitive tokens for account takeover.

Published Aug 1, 2026 · Updated Aug 3, 2026

Medium · CVSS 4.8

CVE-2025-15675: Charitable < 1.8.5.3 - Admin+ Stored XSS via Photo Field ALT Text

The Charitable WordPress plugin before 1.8.5.3 does not sanitise and escape one of its campaign image text fields before outputting it in an HTML attribute, allowing users with a high-privilege campaign-management role to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks that execute on the front-end campaign page.

Published Aug 2, 2026 · Updated Aug 3, 2026

High · CVSS 8.8

CVE-2025-71399: Better Auth before 1.4.5 Path Normalization Bypass via rou3

Better Auth relies on better-call, which uses the rou3 router library. In affected versions of rou3, paths are normalized by removing empty segments, so /path, //path, and ///path resolve to the same route. In Better Auth versions prior to 1.4.5 (which bundles the fixed rou3), this can allow attackers to bypass disabledPaths configuration and path-based rate limits by submitting requests with extra slashes in the URL path. The issue does not apply in deployments where the proxy or platform normalizes URLs by collapsing multiple slashes.

Published Aug 2, 2026 · Updated Aug 3, 2026

Medium · CVSS 4.3

CVE-2025-14469: Theme Editor <= 3.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to CSS Modification

The Theme Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the ms_update AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify child theme CSS styles via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

Published Aug 1, 2026 · Updated Aug 3, 2026

Medium · CVSS 5.1

CVE-2025-71404: better-auth before 1.1.16 Reflected XSS via error parameter

better-auth versions after v0.0.2 and before 1.1.16 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability on the /api/auth/error page, where the value of the 'error' URL parameter is reflected as HTML without proper neutralization. An attacker who coerces a user into visiting a specially-crafted URL can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the user's browser. The issue is fixed in version 1.1.16.

Published Aug 1, 2026 · Updated Aug 3, 2026

High · CVSS 7.1

CVE-2025-71400: better-auth passkey before 1.4.0 IDOR via delete-passkey

better-auth passkey versions before 1.4.0 contain an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the passkey deletion endpoint that allows authenticated users to delete arbitrary passkeys by ID. Attackers with valid sessions can submit crafted requests to the delete-passkey endpoint with enumerated passkey IDs to remove other users' passkeys.

Published Aug 2, 2026 · Updated Aug 3, 2026

Critical · CVSS 9.3

CVE-2025-71401: better-auth before 1.4.2 basePath Modification DoS

better-auth (npm) before 1.4.2 allows an external request to configure baseURL when it is not otherwise defined (e.g., BETTER_AUTH_URL is unset). An attacker able to make the very first request to the server after startup can poison the router's base path, causing all routes to return 404 for all users (denial of service). The issue is not reachable when baseURL is explicitly configured or on typical managed hosting platforms.

Published Aug 2, 2026 · Updated Aug 3, 2026

Unknown · CVSS Not scored

CVE-2025-68299: afs: Fix delayed allocation of a cell's anonymous key

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: afs: Fix delayed allocation of a cell's anonymous key The allocation of a cell's anonymous key is done in a background thread along with other cell setup such as doing a DNS upcall. In the reported bug, this is triggered by afs_parse_source() parsing the device name given to mount() and calling afs_lookup_cell() with the name of the cell. The normal key lookup then tries to use the key description on the anonymous authentication key as the reference for request_key() - but it may not yet be set and so an oops can happen. This has been made more likely to happen by the fix for dynamic lookup failure. Fix this by firstly allocating a reference name and attaching it to the afs_cell record when the record is created. It can share the memory allocation with the cell name (unfortunately it can't just overlap the cell name by prepending it with "afs@" as the cell name already has a '.' prepended for other purposes). This reference name is then passed to request_key(). Secondly, the anon key is now allocated on demand at the point a key is requested in afs_request_key() if it is not already allocated. A mutex is used to prevent multiple allocation for a cell. Thirdly, make afs_request_key_rcu() return NULL if the anonymous key isn't yet allocated (if we need it) and then the caller can return -ECHILD to drop out of RCU-mode and afs_request_key() can be called. Note that the anonymous key is kind of necessary to make the key lookup cache work as that doesn't currently cache a negative lookup, but it's probably worth some investigation to see if NULL can be used instead.

Published Dec 16, 2025 · Updated Aug 3, 2026

Unknown · CVSS Not scored

CVE-2025-40098: ALSA: hda: cs35l41: Fix NULL pointer dereference in cs35l41_get_acpi_mute_state()

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ALSA: hda: cs35l41: Fix NULL pointer dereference in cs35l41_get_acpi_mute_state() Return value of a function acpi_evaluate_dsm() is dereferenced without checking for NULL, but it is usually checked for this function. acpi_evaluate_dsm() may return NULL, when acpi_evaluate_object() returns acpi_status other than ACPI_SUCCESS, so add a check to prevent the crach. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Published Oct 30, 2025 · Updated Aug 3, 2026

Unknown · CVSS Not scored

CVE-2025-38299: ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: Set ETDM1/2 IN/OUT to COMP_DUMMY()

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: Set ETDM1/2 IN/OUT to COMP_DUMMY() ETDM2_IN_BE and ETDM1_OUT_BE are defined as COMP_EMPTY(), in the case the codec dai_name will be null. Avoid a crash if the device tree is not assigning a codec to these links. [ 1.179936] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 [ 1.181065] Mem abort info: [ 1.181420] ESR = 0x0000000096000004 [ 1.181892] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 1.182576] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 1.182964] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 1.183367] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ 1.183983] Data abort info: [ 1.184406] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 1.185097] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 1.185766] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 1.186439] [0000000000000000] user address but active_mm is swapper [ 1.187239] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 1.188029] Modules linked in: [ 1.188420] CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 70 Comm: kworker/u32:1 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc4-next-20250226+ #85 [ 1.189515] Hardware name: Radxa NIO 12L (DT) [ 1.190065] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func [ 1.190808] pstate: 40400009 (nZcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 1.191683] pc : __pi_strcmp+0x24/0x140 [ 1.192170] lr : mt8195_mt6359_soc_card_probe+0x224/0x7b0 [ 1.192854] sp : ffff800083473970 [ 1.193271] x29: ffff800083473a10 x28: 0000000000001008 x27: 0000000000000002 [ 1.194168] x26: ffff800082408960 x25: ffff800082417db0 x24: ffff800082417d88 [ 1.195065] x23: 000000000000001e x22: ffff800082dbf480 x21: ffff800082dc07b8 [ 1.195961] x20: 0000000000000000 x19: 0000000000000013 x18: 00000000ffffffff [ 1.196858] x17: 000000040044ffff x16: 005000f2b5503510 x15: 0000000000000006 [ 1.197755] x14: ffff800082407af0 x13: 6e6f69737265766e x12: 692d6b636f6c6374 [ 1.198651] x11: 0000000000000002 x10: ffff80008240b920 x9 : 0000000000000018 [ 1.199547] x8 : 0101010101010101 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 1.200443] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 8080808080000000 x3 : 303933383978616d [ 1.201339] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff80008240b920 x0 : 0000000000000000 [ 1.202236] Call trace: [ 1.202545] __pi_strcmp+0x24/0x140 (P) [ 1.203029] mtk_soundcard_common_probe+0x3bc/0x5b8 [ 1.203644] platform_probe+0x70/0xe8 [ 1.204106] really_probe+0xc8/0x3a0 [ 1.204556] __driver_probe_device+0x84/0x160 [ 1.205104] driver_probe_device+0x44/0x130 [ 1.205630] __device_attach_driver+0xc4/0x170 [ 1.206189] bus_for_each_drv+0x8c/0xf8 [ 1.206672] __device_attach+0xa8/0x1c8 [ 1.207155] device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x30 [ 1.207681] bus_probe_device+0xb0/0xc0 [ 1.208165] deferred_probe_work_func+0xa4/0x100 [ 1.208747] process_one_work+0x158/0x3e0 [ 1.209254] worker_thread+0x2c4/0x3e8 [ 1.209727] kthread+0x134/0x1f0 [ 1.210136] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 1.210589] Code: 54000401 b50002c6 d503201f f86a6803 (f8408402) [ 1.211355] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Published Jul 10, 2025 · Updated Aug 3, 2026

High · CVSS 8.8

CVE-2025-2843: Observability-operator: observability operator privilege escalation

A flaw was found in the Observability Operator. The Operator creates a ServiceAccount with *ClusterRole* upon deployment of the *Namespace-Scoped* Custom Resource MonitorStack. This issue allows an adversarial Kubernetes Account with only namespaced-level roles, for example, a tenant controlling a namespace, to create a MonitorStack in the authorized namespace and then elevate permission to the cluster level by impersonating the ServiceAccount created by the Operator, resulting in privilege escalation and other issues.

Published Nov 12, 2025 · Updated Aug 1, 2026

Medium · CVSS 5.4

CVE-2025-36298: Security Vulnerability in Ebics server affects IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and IBM Sterling File Gateway

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 6.1.2.0 through 6.1.2.7_2, 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.5_2, 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.1_2, and 6.2.2.0 through 6.2.2.0_1 and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.1.2.0 through 6.1.2.7_2, 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.5_2, 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.1_2, and 6.2.2.0 through 6.2.2.0_1 Ebics server component is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.

Published Jul 30, 2026 · Updated Jul 31, 2026

Medium · CVSS 6.9

CVE-2025-67651: CSRF in PHP Jabbers scripts

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been identified in multiple PHP Jabbers scripts. The lack of CSRF tokens or appropriate SameSite attributes allows an attacker to send unauthorized requests in the context of an authenticated user, leading to unauthorized administrative actions, such as creating new admin accounts. This issue was fixed in the versions specified in the affected products list.

Published Jul 31, 2026 · Updated Jul 31, 2026

High · CVSS 8.6

CVE-2025-67650: Authenticated SQL Injection in PHP Jabbers scripts

An authenticated SQL injection vulnerability has been identified in multiple PHP Jabbers scripts. Improper neutralization of input provided by an authenticated user into parameters responsible for sorting functions allows an attacker to perform SQL Injection attacks. This issue was fixed in the versions specified in the affected products list.

Published Jul 31, 2026 · Updated Jul 31, 2026