LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-71399: Better Auth before 1.4.5 Path Normalization Bypass via rou3

Better Auth relies on better-call, which uses the rou3 router library. In affected versions of rou3, paths are normalized by removing empty segments, so /path, //path, and ///path resolve to the same route. In Better Auth versions prior to 1.4.5 (which bundles the fixed rou3), this can allow attackers to bypass disabledPaths configuration and path-based rate limits by submitting requests with extra slashes in the URL path. The issue does not apply in deployments where the proxy or platform normalizes URLs by collapsing multiple slashes.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Better Auth versions before 1.4.5 may treat URLs containing extra path separators as equivalent to normal URLs while applying security rules inconsistently. An unauthenticated remote attacker could bypass disabled-path restrictions or path-based rate limits, potentially exposing blocked functions or increasing service-disruption risk.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for public authentication services using affected versions, especially where disabled routes or rate limits protect sensitive or resource-intensive operations. Upgrade promptly and verify deployment artifacts. Lower urgency only after confirming reliable URL normalization across every ingress path.

Technical view

Better Auth depends on better-call and the rou3 router. Affected rou3 behavior removes empty path segments during routing, allowing differently formatted paths to reach the same handler. Before Better Auth 1.4.5, disabledPaths and rate-limit checks could be bypassed unless an upstream proxy or platform collapses multiple separators first.

Likely exposure

Internet-facing applications using Better Auth before 1.4.5 are potentially exposed when they depend on disabledPaths or path-based rate limits. Deployments are not affected through this path when their proxy or platform reliably normalizes URLs by collapsing multiple separators.

Exploitation context

The supplied record describes a network-accessible, low-complexity attack requiring no privileges or user interaction. It does not identify confirmed exploitation in the wild, and the CVE is not marked as present in KEV. Public proof-of-concept availability is not established by the bundle.

Researcher notes

The weakness is path canonicalization inconsistency involving Better Auth, better-call, and rou3, categorized as CWE-20. The bundle identifies 1.4.5 as fixed, although the VulnCheck reference title says “before 1.4.4.” Treat 1.4.5 as the remediation threshold stated by the CVE description and vendor advisory, while noting that source-label discrepancy.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Better Auth to version 1.4.5 or later, which bundles the corrected rou3 behavior.
  • Confirm all deployed instances and lockfiles resolve to the fixed dependency versions.
  • Where immediate upgrading is impossible, verify the proxy or platform collapses multiple path separators.
  • Review vendor guidance before relying on upstream normalization as a compensating control.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Better Auth versions across production, staging, serverless functions, and container images.
  • Confirm dependency resolution and deployed artifacts contain Better Auth 1.4.5 or later.
  • Test that disabled routes remain blocked when controlled requests contain repeated path separators.
  • Verify rate limits treat normalized and repeated-separator path variants as the same route.
  • Review proxy behavior end-to-end, including alternate ingress paths that might bypass normalization.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-71399 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck
8.6CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H3.94.7VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.8High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-71399Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
better-authbetter-auth0, 1.4.5unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.