LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE archive

April 2025

Browse CVE records published in April 2025, with severity, affected products, CWE, KEV, and source-backed vulnerability context.

Search all CVEsKnown exploited

Showing 50 of 3966 matching CVEs · Page 1 of 80.

Critical · CVSS 9.1

CVE-2025-41118: Sensitive COS `SecretKey` exposed in plaintext via configuration API due to missing type protection

Pyroscope is an open-source continuous profiling database. The database supports various storage backends, including Tencent Cloud Object Storage (COS). If the database is configured to use Tencent COS as the storage backend, an attacker could extract the secret_key configuration value from the Pyroscope API. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker needs direct access to the Pyroscope API. We highly recommend limiting the public internet exposure of all our databases, such that they are only accessible by trusted users or internal systems. This vulnerability is fixed in versions: 1.15.x: 1.15.2 and above. 1.16.x: 1.16.1 and above. 1.17.x: 1.17.0 and above (i.e. all versions). Thanks to Théo Cusnir for reporting this vulnerability to us via our bug bounty program.

Published Apr 15, 2026 · Updated Aug 27, 2026

Medium · CVSS 6.4

CVE-2025-57847: Ansible-automation-platform: privilege escalation via excessive group writable /etc/passwd permissions

A container privilege escalation flaw was found in certain Ansible Automation Platform images. This issue arises from the /etc/passwd file being created with group-writable permissions during the build process. In certain conditions, an attacker who can execute commands within an affected container, even as a non-root user, can leverage their membership in the root group to modify the /etc/passwd file. This vulnerability allows an attacker to add a new user with any arbitrary UID, including UID 0, gaining full root privileges within the container.

Published Apr 8, 2026 · Updated Aug 27, 2026

Critical · CVSS 9.3

CVE-2025-14813: GOSTCTR implementation unable to process more than 255 blocks correctly

: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BC-JAVA bcprov on all (core modules). This vulnerability is associated with program files G3413CTRBlockCipher. This issue affects BC-JAVA: from 1.59 before 1.80.2, from 1.81 before 1.81.1, from 1.82 before 1.84.

Published Apr 15, 2026 · Updated Aug 27, 2026

High · CVSS 7.5

CVE-2025-3511: Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric Corporation CC-Link...

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric Corporation CC-Link IE TSN Remote I/O module, CC-Link IE TSN Analog-Digital Converter module, CC-Link IE TSN Digital-Analog Converter module, CC-Link IE TSN FPGA module, CC-Link IE TSN Remote Station Communication LSI CP620 with GbE-PHY, MELSEC iQ-R Series CC-Link IE TSN Master/Local Module, MELSEC iQ-R Series Ethernet Interface Module, CC-Link IE TSN Master/Local Station Communication LSI CP610, MELSEC iQ-F Series FX5 CC-Link IE TSN Master/Local Module, MELSEC iQ-F Series FX5 Ethernet Module, MELSEC iQ-F Series FX5-ENET/IP Ethernet Module, and MELSEC iQ-R Series CPU module allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service condition in the products by sending specially crafted UDP packets.

Published Apr 25, 2025 · Updated Aug 27, 2026

High · CVSS 7.5

CVE-2025-48431: Apache Thrift: Specially crafted input can crash a c_glib Thrift server with invalid pointer error.

Mismatched Memory Management Routines vulnerability in Apache Thrift c_glib language bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.23.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.23.0, which fixes the issue. Description: Specially crafted requests can crash an c_glib-based Thrift server with a clean but fatal "free(): invalid pointer" error message.

Published Apr 28, 2026 · Updated Aug 26, 2026

High · CVSS 7

CVE-2025-62718: Axios has a NO_PROXY Hostname Normalization Bypass that Leads to SSRF

Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 1.15.0 and 0.31.0, Axios does not correctly handle hostname normalization when checking NO_PROXY rules. Requests to loopback addresses like localhost. (with a trailing dot) or [::1] (IPv6 literal) skip NO_PROXY matching and go through the configured proxy. This goes against what developers expect and lets attackers force requests through a proxy, even if NO_PROXY is set up to protect loopback or internal services. This issue leads to the possibility of proxy bypass and SSRF vulnerabilities allowing attackers to reach sensitive loopback or internal services despite the configured protections. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.0 and 0.31.0.

Published Apr 9, 2026 · Updated Aug 25, 2026

Medium · CVSS 4.3

CVE-2025-2842: Tempo-operator: tempo operator token exposition lead to read sensitive data

A flaw was found in the Tempo Operator. When the Jaeger UI Monitor Tab functionality is enabled in a Tempo instance managed by the Tempo Operator, the Operator creates a ClusterRoleBinding for the Service Account of the Tempo instance to grant the cluster-monitoring-view ClusterRole. This can be exploited if a user has 'create' permissions on TempoStack and 'get' permissions on Secret in a namespace (for example, a user has ClusterAdmin permissions for a specific namespace), as the user can read the token of the Tempo service account and therefore has access to see all cluster metrics.

Published Apr 2, 2025 · Updated Aug 25, 2026

Medium · CVSS 4.3

CVE-2025-2786: Tempo-operator: serviceaccount token exposure leading to token and subject access reviews in openshift tempo operator

A flaw was found in Tempo Operator, where it creates a ServiceAccount, ClusterRole, and ClusterRoleBinding when a user deploys a TempoStack or TempoMonolithic instance. This flaw allows a user with full access to their namespace to extract the ServiceAccount token and use it to submit TokenReview and SubjectAccessReview requests, potentially revealing information about other users' permissions. While this does not allow privilege escalation or impersonation, it exposes information that could aid in gathering information for further attacks.

Published Apr 2, 2025 · Updated Aug 25, 2026

High · CVSS 7.8

CVE-2025-14821: Libssh: libssh: insecure default configuration leads to local man-in-the-middle attacks on windows

A flaw was found in libssh. This vulnerability allows local man-in-the-middle attacks, security downgrades of SSH (Secure Shell) connections, and manipulation of trusted host information, posing a significant risk to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of SSH communications via an insecure default configuration on Windows systems where the library automatically loads configuration files from the C:\etc directory, which can be created and modified by unprivileged local users.

Published Apr 7, 2026 · Updated Aug 21, 2026

Medium · CVSS 5.9

CVE-2025-3576: Krb5: kerberos rc4-hmac-md5 checksum vulnerability enabling message spoofing via md5 collisions

A vulnerability in the MIT Kerberos implementation allows GSSAPI-protected messages using RC4-HMAC-MD5 to be spoofed due to weaknesses in the MD5 checksum design. If RC4 is preferred over stronger encryption types, an attacker could exploit MD5 collisions to forge message integrity codes. This may lead to unauthorized message tampering.

Published Apr 15, 2025 · Updated Aug 21, 2026

Medium · CVSS 6.2

CVE-2025-2251: Org.jboss.eap:wildfly-ejb3: improper deserialization in jboss marshalling allows remote code execution

A security flaw exists in WildFly and JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) within the Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB) remote invocation mechanism. This vulnerability stems from untrusted data deserialization handled by JBoss Marshalling. This flaw allows an attacker to send a specially crafted serialized object, leading to remote code execution without requiring authentication.

Published Apr 7, 2025 · Updated Aug 19, 2026

High · CVSS 8.1

CVE-2025-54550: Apache Airflow: RCE by race condition in example_xcom dag

The example example_xcom that was included in airflow documentation implemented unsafe pattern of reading value from xcom in the way that could be exploited to allow UI user who had access to modify XComs to perform arbitrary execution of code on the worker. Since the UI users are already highly trusted, this is a Low severity vulnerability. It does not affect Airflow release - example_dags are not supposed to be enabled in production environment, however users following the example could replicate the bad pattern. Documentation of Airflow 3.2.0 contains version of the example with improved resiliance for that case. Users who followed that pattern are advised to adjust their implementations accordingly.

Published Apr 15, 2026 · Updated Aug 12, 2026

Medium · CVSS 6.5

CVE-2025-61848: An improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fo...

An improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiAnalyzer 7.2 all versions, FortiAnalyzer 7.0 all versions, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.6.2 through 7.6.3, FortiAnalyzer-BigData 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, FortiAnalyzer-BigData 7.4.0 through 7.4.5, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiManager 7.2 all versions, FortiManager 7.0 all versions, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.2 through 7.6.4 may allow a privileged authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via JSON RPC API

Published Apr 14, 2026 · Updated Aug 12, 2026

High · CVSS 8.9

CVE-2025-40899: Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Assets and Nodes in Guardian/CMC before 26.0.0

A Stored Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability was discovered in the Assets and Nodes functionality due to improper validation of an input parameter. An authenticated user with custom fields privileges can define a malicious custom field containing a JavaScript payload. When the victim views the Assets or Nodes pages, the XSS executes in their browser context, allowing the attacker to perform unauthorized actions as the victim, such as modify application data, disrupt application availability, and access limited sensitive information.

Published Apr 15, 2026 · Updated Aug 11, 2026

High · CVSS 8.1

CVE-2025-40897: Incorrect authorization for Threat Intelligence in Guardian/CMC before 26.0.0

An access control vulnerability was discovered in the Threat Intelligence functionality due to a specific access restriction not being properly enforced for users with view-only privileges. An authenticated user with view-only privileges for the Threat Intelligence functionality can perform administrative actions on it, altering the rules configuration, and/or affecting their availability.

Published Apr 15, 2026 · Updated Aug 11, 2026