LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-14469: Theme Editor <= 3.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to CSS Modification

The Theme Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the ms_update AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify child theme CSS styles via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A malicious party could alter a WordPress site's child-theme CSS by persuading a logged-in administrator to open a crafted link or page. This can change the site's appearance or presentation but, based on the supplied evidence, does not directly expose data or disrupt availability.

Executive priority

Prioritize routine remediation for internet-facing or high-visibility WordPress sites, especially where administrators browse external content while authenticated. Escalate if unauthorized CSS changes are discovered. Current evidence does not justify emergency treatment, but presentation integrity and brand risk warrant timely action.

Technical view

Theme Editor through version 3.1 lacks nonce validation for the ms_update AJAX action, creating a cross-site request forgery condition. Exploitation requires administrator interaction and permits child-theme CSS modification. The supplied CVSS 3.1 score is 4.3, reflecting low integrity impact without stated confidentiality or availability impact.

Likely exposure

WordPress sites using Theme Editor version 3.1 or earlier may be exposed when an authenticated administrator can be induced to visit attacker-controlled content. The bundle's structured affected-version metadata is inconsistent with its description, so inventories should be confirmed directly.

Exploitation context

The attacker need not authenticate, but exploitation depends on a logged-in administrator performing an attacker-influenced action. The supplied bundle says the CVE is not in KEV and provides no evidence of active exploitation. CSS manipulation could support misleading presentation, defacement, or interface changes, but further impacts are not established.

Researcher notes

CWE-352 applies because ms_update reportedly lacks nonce validation. The attack has network reachability, low complexity, no required attacker privileges, and required victim interaction. Source review should distinguish nonce protection from capability checks. A confirmed fixed version is not identified in the supplied evidence, and the affected-version metadata conflicts with the narrative.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify Theme Editor installations and versions across all WordPress sites.
  • Check WordPress and vendor guidance for a version containing verified nonce validation.
  • Update to a vendor-confirmed fixed release when one is identified.
  • Disable the plugin where operationally acceptable until remediation is verified.
  • Warn administrators against opening untrusted links while authenticated to WordPress.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Theme Editor version 3.1 or earlier is installed or active.
  • Review child-theme CSS for unexpected or unauthorized modifications.
  • Review relevant WordPress and web logs for unexpected ms_update AJAX requests.
  • Verify the remediated action enforces nonce validation and appropriate authorization checks.
  • Document sites where the plugin is absent, disabled, or vendor-confirmed fixed.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-14469 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Wordfence

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-14469Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. Source timelineWordfence

    Vendor Notified

  3. Source timelineWordfence

    Disclosed

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
mndpsingh287Theme Editor0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.