LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-22457: A stack-based buffer overflow in Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.6, Ivanti Policy Secure before...

A stack-based buffer overflow in Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.6, Ivanti Policy Secure before version 22.7R1.4, and Ivanti ZTA Gateways before version 22.8R2.2 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution.

CriticalCVSS 9Known exploitedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw lets an unauthenticated remote attacker take control of vulnerable Ivanti security gateways. Successful compromise could expose protected traffic, credentials, configurations, and connected systems, while disrupting remote access. Because CISA lists the vulnerability as known exploited, affected organizations should treat it as an urgent incident-response concern, not merely a routine patching issue.

Executive priority

Immediate priority. Identify affected gateways, upgrade them, and initiate compromise assessment, beginning with externally reachable systems. Confirm completion through version evidence and security review. If remediation cannot occur promptly, escalate the exposure and follow Ivanti's current vendor guidance for risk reduction rather than relying on attack complexity.

Technical view

CVE-2025-22457 is a stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121) enabling remote code execution without authentication or user interaction. It affects Ivanti Connect Secure before 22.7R2.6, Policy Secure before 22.7R1.4, and Neurons for ZTA gateways before 22.8R2.2. CVSS 3.1 rates it 9.0; exploitation requires high attack complexity but can severely affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Likely exposure

Exposure exists where affected Ivanti appliances run versions below the stated thresholds and are reachable by potential attackers. Internet-accessible Connect Secure gateways warrant particular attention because their remote-access role commonly requires external connectivity. The bundle does not identify affected deployment counts or configurations that might reduce exposure.

Exploitation context

Active exploitation is supported by CISA's inclusion of CVE-2025-22457 in the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. The supplied evidence does not describe attacker identities, exploitation scale, indicators of compromise, or whether every affected product has been targeted. High attack complexity should not be treated as meaningful protection given confirmed exploitation.

Researcher notes

The vulnerability crosses a security boundary and permits unauthenticated remote code execution, explaining the CVSS scope change and high impact ratings. The source bundle provides no vulnerable function, protocol, proof of concept, indicators, or root-cause detail beyond CWE-121. Version language in the description should govern: products before the listed releases are affected.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Connect Secure to 22.7R2.6 or later, following Ivanti guidance.
  • Upgrade Policy Secure to 22.7R1.4 or later, following Ivanti guidance.
  • Upgrade Neurons for ZTA gateways to 22.8R2.2 or later, following Ivanti guidance.
  • Prioritize externally reachable appliances and apply any additional Ivanti advisory measures.
  • Investigate vulnerable appliances for compromise; patching alone may not remove an established attacker.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all Ivanti Connect Secure, Policy Secure, and Neurons for ZTA gateway deployments.
  • Verify installed versions against each product's stated fixed-version threshold.
  • Confirm updates completed successfully and appliances now report supported, non-vulnerable versions.
  • Review relevant telemetry and Ivanti guidance for evidence of compromise around vulnerable appliances.
  • Document unreachable, retired, or otherwise exempt systems with supporting evidence and ownership.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-121: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-22457 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
Yes
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

CISA KEV status

Status
Known exploited
Source
CISA-ADP
Date added
KEV reference

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: activeAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H2.26ivanti

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-22457Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. Added to KEVCISA-ADP

    CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities metadata lists this CVE as known exploited.

  4. ADP timelineCISA-ADP

    CVE-2025-22457 added to CISA KEV

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvcother:kev
  • 2025-04-04T00:00:00.000Z: CVE-2025-22457 added to CISA KEV
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
IvantiConnect Secure22.7R2.6affected
IvantiPolicy Secure22.7R1.4affected
IvantiNeurons for ZTA gateways22.8R2.2affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-121 · source CWE mapping

Stack-based Buffer Overflow

Stack-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.