T1078.004: Cloud Accounts
Valid accounts in cloud environments may allow adversaries to perform actions to achieve Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Cloud accounts are those created and configured by an organization for use by users, remote support, services, or for administration of resources within a cloud service provider or SaaS application. Cloud Accounts can exist solely in the cloud; alternatively, they may be hybrid-joined between on-premises systems and the cloud through syncing or federation with other identity sources such as Windows Active Directory.[1][2][3]
Service or user accounts may be targeted by adversaries through Brute Force, Phishing, or various other means to gain access to the environment. Federated or synced accounts may be a pathway for the adversary to affect both on-premises systems and cloud environments - for example, by leveraging shared credentials to log onto Remote Services. High privileged cloud accounts, whether federated, synced, or cloud-only, may also allow pivoting to on-premises environments by leveraging SaaS-based Software Deployment Tools to run commands on hybrid-joined devices.
An adversary may create long lasting Additional Cloud Credentials on a compromised cloud account to maintain persistence in the environment. Such credentials may also be used to bypass security controls such as multi-factor authentication.
Cloud accounts may also be able to assume Temporary Elevated Cloud Access or other privileges through various means within the environment. Misconfigurations in role assignments or role assumption policies may allow an adversary to use these mechanisms to leverage permissions outside the intended scope of the account. Such over privileged accounts may be used to harvest sensitive data from online storage accounts and databases through Cloud API or other methods. For example, in Azure environments, adversaries may target Azure Managed Identities, which allow associated Azure resources to request access tokens. By compromising a resource with an attached Managed Identity, such as an Azure VM, adversaries may be able to Steal Application Access Tokens to move laterally across the cloud environment.[4]
Security context for executives and security teams
Cloud accounts matter because they are often the front door, the persistence mechanism, and the privilege path in modern SaaS, identity provider, and IaaS environments. If an adversary obtains a valid cloud, federated, synced, service, or highly privileged account, normal login and API activity can blend with legitimate administration while enabling access across cloud and, in hybrid environments, on-premises resources.
Executive priority
Treat this as an identity resilience and cloud governance priority, not only a SOC alerting problem. Leaders should ask whether the organization can prove who owns cloud and service accounts, which accounts are privileged, where federation or synchronization connects cloud to Active Directory, whether MFA and account-use policies are enforced, and whether audit evidence exists for role assumption, credential creation, and privileged cloud activity. The ATT&CK relationships to multiple campaigns, groups, and tools make this technique a recurring tradecraft concern, but local exposure depends on the organization’s cloud identity design and logging maturity.
Technical view
For SOC, detection engineering, and IR teams, validate coverage across IaaS, identity provider, Office Suite, and SaaS platforms for the ATT&CK tactics of initial access, persistence, privilege escalation, and stealth. Because MITRE does not provide object-specific detection text here, use the related detection strategy DET0546 as a starting point for identifying abused or compromised cloud accounts. Prioritize analytics and investigation playbooks around unusual sign-ins, service account use, federation or sync abuse paths, creation of additional cloud credentials, MFA-related changes or bypass indicators, temporary elevated access, role assumption outside expected scope, cloud API access to sensitive storage or databases, and managed identity token activity where applicable.
Likely telemetry
- Cloud identity provider sign-in and authentication logs
- MFA challenge, enrollment, reset, and policy evaluation logs
- Cloud audit and administrative activity logs for IaaS, SaaS, and Office Suite platforms
- Role assignment, role assumption, and temporary elevation events
- Service account, managed identity, and application credential creation or use records
Detection direction
- Confirm logs cover both human and non-human accounts, including service accounts, managed identities, cloud-only accounts, and federated or synced accounts.
- Tune detections for account behavior that is valid in form but abnormal in context: new locations, new devices, unusual API patterns, unexpected privilege use, or access outside normal business or automation patterns.
- Correlate cloud identity events with role changes, additional credential creation, MFA changes, and sensitive data access rather than relying on single login events.
- Account for legitimate administrator, remote support, and automation activity to reduce false positives; require baselines and ownership metadata for high-value accounts.
- Review hybrid blind spots where a compromised synced or federated account can affect both cloud and on-premises environments.
Mitigation priorities
- Start with user account management: maintain ownership, lifecycle controls, deactivation processes, and least-privilege access for cloud and federated accounts.
- Apply privileged account management to administrative, service, and high-impact cloud identities, including scope limitation and monitoring of privileged usage.
- Enforce multi-factor authentication for critical cloud access while recognizing that additional cloud credentials may require separate review and control.
- Strengthen password policies and account-use policies, including lockout, usage restrictions, and inactivity controls where appropriate.
- Review Active Directory and federation configuration because synced or federated accounts can create cross-environment risk.
Additional notes and limits
This sub-technique is part of Valid Accounts and is specifically scoped to cloud accounts across IaaS, identity provider, Office Suite, and SaaS environments. The object highlights cloud-only, federated, synced, service, remote support, and administrative accounts, including risks from additional cloud credentials, temporary elevated access, cloud APIs, and managed identities. ATT&CK relationships show use by several campaigns, groups, and tools, which supports prioritization for threat-informed defense without implying current targeting of any specific organization.
MITRE does not provide official detection text for this object, so detection recommendations must be validated against local cloud providers, identity architecture, retention, and logging capabilities. The supplied fields do not establish organization-specific exposure, active exploitation, or guaranteed detection coverage.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Cloud Accounts
Valid accounts in cloud environments may allow adversaries to perform actions to achieve Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion. Cloud accounts are those created and configured by an organization for use by users, remote support, services, or for administration of resources within a cloud service provider or SaaS application. Cloud Accounts can exist solely in the cloud; alternatively, they may be hybrid-joined between on-premises systems and the cloud through syncing or federation with other identity sources such as Windows Active Directory.[1][2][3]
Service or user accounts may be targeted by adversaries through Brute Force, Phishing, or various other means to gain access to the environment. Federated or synced accounts may be a pathway for the adversary to affect both on-premises systems and cloud environments - for example, by leveraging shared credentials to log onto Remote Services. High privileged cloud accounts, whether federated, synced, or cloud-only, may also allow pivoting to on-premises environments by leveraging SaaS-based Software Deployment Tools to run commands on hybrid-joined devices.
An adversary may create long lasting Additional Cloud Credentials on a compromised cloud account to maintain persistence in the environment. Such credentials may also be used to bypass security controls such as multi-factor authentication.
Cloud accounts may also be able to assume Temporary Elevated Cloud Access or other privileges through various means within the environment. Misconfigurations in role assignments or role assumption policies may allow an adversary to use these mechanisms to leverage permissions outside the intended scope of the account. Such over privileged accounts may be used to harvest sensitive data from online storage accounts and databases through Cloud API or other methods. For example, in Azure environments, adversaries may target Azure Managed Identities, which allow associated Azure resources to request access tokens. By compromising a resource with an attached Managed Identity, such as an Azure VM, adversaries may be able to Steal Application Access Tokens to move laterally across the cloud environment.[4]
How security teams should use this page
Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.
Related techniques
This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.
| Domain | ID | Name | Relationship / procedure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | T1078 | Valid Accounts | This object subtechnique of Valid Accounts. |
Groups, software, and campaigns
G0016: APT29
APT29 is threat group that has been attributed to Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR).[1][2] They have operated since at least 2008, often targeting government networks in Europe and NATO member countries, research institutes, and think tanks. APT29 reportedly compromised the Democratic National Committee starting in the summer of 2015.[3][4][5][6]
In April 2021, the US and UK governments attributed the SolarWinds Compromise to the SVR; public statements included citations to APT29, Cozy Bear, and The Dukes.[7][8] Industry reporting also referred to the actors involved in this campaign as UNC2452, NOBELIUM, StellarParticle, Dark Halo, and SolarStorm.[9][10][11][12][13][14]
G1023: APT5
APT5 is a China-based espionage actor that has been active since at least 2007 primarily targeting the telecommunications, aerospace, and defense industries throughout the U.S., Europe, and Asia. APT5 has displayed advanced tradecraft and significant interest in compromising networking devices and their underlying software including through the use of zero-day exploits.[1][2][3][4][5][6]
G0007: APT28
APT28 is a threat group that has been attributed to Russia's General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) 85th Main Special Service Center (GTsSS) military unit 26165.[1][2] This group has been active since at least 2004.[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]
APT28 reportedly compromised the Hillary Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee, and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in 2016 in an attempt to interfere with the U.S. presidential election.[5] In 2018, the US indicted five GRU Unit 26165 officers associated with APT28 for cyber operations (including close-access operations) conducted between 2014 and 2018 against the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), the US Anti-Doping Agency, a US nuclear facility, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), the Spiez Swiss Chemicals Laboratory, and other organizations.[14] Some of these were conducted with the assistance of GRU Unit 74455, which is also referred to as Sandworm Team.
G1053: Storm-0501
Storm-0501 is a financially motivated cyber criminal group that uses commodity and open-source tools to conduct ransomware operations. Storm-0501 has been active since 2021 and has previously been affiliated with Sabbath Ransomware and other Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) variants such as Hive, BlackCat, Hunters International, LockBit 3.0, and Embargo ransomware.[1][2][3][4]
G1055: VOID MANTICORE
VOID MANTICORE is a threat group assessed to operate on behalf of Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS).[1] Active since at least mid-2022, VOID MANTICORE has targeted government entities, critical infrastructure, and private sector organizations across Albania, Israel, and the United States.[1][2] VOID MANTICORE conducts destructive cyber operations, combining wiper attacks with hack-and-leak campaigns. The group has operated under multiple public-facing personas, including HomeLand Justice in operations against Albania, Karma and Karma Below in campaigns targeting Israeli organizations, and Handala Hack, its current primary persona, which has claimed activity against Israeli and U.S. entities, including a March 2026 attack against Stryker Corporation.[1][3] VOID MANTICORE has been observed collaborating with Scarred Manticore, which has been linked to initial access operations preceding VOID MANTICORE’s activity.[4]
G0125: HAFNIUM
HAFNIUM is a likely state-sponsored cyber espionage group operating out of China that has been active since at least January 2021. HAFNIUM primarily targets entities in the US across a number of industry sectors, including infectious disease researchers, law firms, higher education institutions, defense contractors, policy think tanks, and NGOs. HAFNIUM has targeted remote management tools and cloud software for intial access and has demonstrated an ability to quickly operationalize exploits for identified vulnerabilities in edge devices.[1][2][3]
G1015: Scattered Spider
Scattered Spider is a native English-speaking cybercriminal group active since at least 2022. [1] [2] The group initially targeted customer relationship management (CRM) providers, business process outsourcing (BPO) firms, and telecommunications and technology companies before expanding in 2023 to gaming, hospitality, retail, managed service provider (MSP), manufacturing, and financial sectors. [2] Scattered Spider relies heavily on social engineering, including impersonating IT and help-desk staff, to gain initial access, bypass multi-factor authentication (MFA), and compromise enterprise networks. The group has adapted its tooling to evade endpoint detection and response (EDR) defenses and used ransomware for financial gain. [3] [4] [5] Scattered Spider had expanded into hybrid cloud and identity environments, using help-desk impersonation and MFA bypass to obtain administrator access in Okta, AWS, and Office 365. [6]
G0064: APT33
G1004: LAPSUS$
LAPSUS$ is cyber criminal threat group that has been active since at least mid-2021. LAPSUS$ specializes in large-scale social engineering and extortion operations, including destructive attacks without the use of ransomware. The group has targeted organizations globally, including in the government, manufacturing, higher education, energy, healthcare, technology, telecommunications, and media sectors.[1][2][3]
G0004: Ke3chang
S9008: Shai-Hulud
Shai-Hulud is a supply chain worm, first reported in September 2025, that spreads through code repositories, including GitHub and NPM packages. It exploits CI/CD pipeline dependencies to propagate to victims and poisons the supply chain by publishing malicious packages. Once inside a victim environment, Shai-Hulud steals credentials and access tokens from compromised repository accounts and exfiltrates them to attacker-controlled servers via encoded GitHub Actions workflows.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]
S0684: ROADTools
S0683: Peirates
S9009: TruffleHog
TruffleHog is an open-source secrets-discovery tool that is used to search for credentials, API keys, and encryption keys across a variety of data sources and environments.[1][2] TruffleHog has the ability to discover credentials and secrets stored in code repositories, git history, CI/CD pipelines, among other common storage locations to include filesystems and cloud storage buckets.[1][3][2] TruffleHog was first released by its author in 2016.[2]
S1091: Pacu
Pacu is an open-source AWS exploitation framework. The tool is written in Python and publicly available on GitHub.[1]
C0024: SolarWinds Compromise
The SolarWinds Compromise was a sophisticated supply chain cyber operation conducted by APT29 that was discovered in mid-December 2020. APT29 used customized malware to inject malicious code into the SolarWinds Orion software build process that was later distributed through a normal software update; they also used password spraying, token theft, API abuse, spear phishing, and other supply chain attacks to compromise user accounts and leverage their associated access. Victims of this campaign included government, consulting, technology, telecom, and other organizations in North America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. This activity has been labled the StellarParticle campaign in industry reporting.[1] Industry reporting also initially referred to the actors involved in this campaign as UNC2452, NOBELIUM, Dark Halo, and SolarStorm.[2][3][4][5][1][6][7][8]
In April 2021, the US and UK governments attributed the SolarWinds Compromise to Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR); public statements included citations to APT29, Cozy Bear, and The Dukes.[9][10][11] The US government assessed that of the approximately 18,000 affected public and private sector customers of Solar Winds’ Orion product, a much smaller number were compromised by follow-on APT29 activity on their systems.[12]
C0027: C0027
C0027 was a financially-motivated campaign linked to Scattered Spider that targeted telecommunications and business process outsourcing (BPO) companies from at least June through December of 2022. During C0027 Scattered Spider used various forms of social engineering, performed SIM swapping, and attempted to leverage access from victim environments to mobile carrier networks.[1]
C0063: 2025 Poland Wiper Attacks
2025 Poland Wiper Attacks is a Russian state-sponsored campaign that conducted destructive cyberattacks against Polish energy infrastructure in December 2025. Targets included more than 30 wind and photovoltaic farms, a combined heat and power (CHP) plant, and a manufacturing sector company. The attacks on the distributed energy resources (DER) disrupted communications between affected facilities and the distribution system operator, but did not impact electricity generation or heat supply. Across the campaign, threat actors deployed two previously undocumented wiper tools, DynoWiper, a Windows-based wiper and LazyWiper, a PowerShell wiper, distributed via malicious Group Policy Objects. At the CHP plant, threat actors had maintained access since at least March 2025, using that foothold to obtain credentials and move laterally before attempting wiper deployment. Some reporting has assessed the activity to be consistent with Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) threat activity group Dragonfly, also tracked as STATIC TUNDRA, while other reporting attributes the destructive wiper activities to the Russian General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) threat activity group ELECTRUM, also tracked as Sandworm Team.[1][2][3][4]
All related ATT&CK context
Mitigation direction
Object version and sync metadata
The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates.
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases(1)
| Release | Bundle imported | Object version | Modified | Status | Raw hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.1 | 2.0 | Current bundle | 6112d838a29c… |
Mirrored ATT&CK source object
The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.
External references and citations
MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.
- [1]AWS Identity Federation
Amazon. (n.d.). Identity Federation in AWS. Retrieved March 13, 2020.
Open source URL - [2]Google Federating GC
Google. (n.d.). Federating Google Cloud with Active Directory. Retrieved March 13, 2020.
Open source URL - [3]Microsoft Deploying AD Federation
Microsoft. (n.d.). Deploying Active Directory Federation Services in Azure. Retrieved March 13, 2020.
Open source URL - [4]SpecterOps Managed Identity 2022
Andy Robbins. (2022, June 6). Managed Identity Attack Paths, Part 1: Automation Accounts. Retrieved March 18, 2025.
Open source URL - [5]CrowdStrike StellarParticle January 2022
CrowdStrike. (2022, January 27). Early Bird Catches the Wormhole: Observations from the StellarParticle Campaign. Retrieved February 7, 2022.
Open source URL - [6]AWS - IAM Console Best Practices
Moncur, Rob. (2020, July 5). New Information in the AWS IAM Console Helps You Follow IAM Best Practices. Retrieved August 4, 2020.
Open source URL - [7]Mandiant APT29 Microsoft 365 2022
Douglas Bienstock. (2022, August 18). You Can’t Audit Me: APT29 Continues Targeting Microsoft 365. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
Open source URL - [8]Mandiant APT29 Eye Spy Email Nov 22
Mandiant. (2022, May 2). UNC3524: Eye Spy on Your Email. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
Open source URL - [9]TechNet Credential Theft
Microsoft. (2016, April 15). Attractive Accounts for Credential Theft. Retrieved June 3, 2016.
Open source URL - [10]TechNet Least Privilege
Microsoft. (2016, April 16). Implementing Least-Privilege Administrative Models. Retrieved June 3, 2016.
Open source URL - [11]Microsoft Azure security baseline for Azure Active Directory
Microsoft. (2022, November 14). Azure security baseline for Azure Active Directory. Retrieved February 21, 2023.
Open source URL - [12]Microsoft Security Alerts for Azure AD Roles
Microsoft. (2022, November 14). Configure security alerts for Azure AD roles in Privileged Identity Management. Retrieved February 21, 2023.
Open source URL - [13]Aikido Shai-Hulud September 2025
Charlie Eriksen. (2025, September 16). S1ngularity/nx attackers strike again. Retrieved April 9, 2026.
Open source URL - [14]Netskope Shai-Hulud November 2025
Gianpietro Cutolo. (2025, November 26). Shai-Hulud 2.0: Aggressive, Automated, and Fast Spreading. Retrieved April 9, 2026.
Open source URL - [15]Palo Alto Unit 42 Shai-Hulud November 2025
Justin Moore. (2025, November 25). "Shai-Hulud" Worm Compromises npm Ecosystem in Supply Chain Attack (Updated November 26). Retrieved April 9, 2026.
Open source URL - [16]Wiz Shai-Hulud September 2025
Merav Bar, Rami McCarthy, Barak Sharoni. (2025, September 16). Shai-Hulud: Ongoing Package Supply Chain Worm Delivering Data-Stealing Malware. Retrieved April 9, 2026.
Open source URL - [17]Microsoft Shai-Hulud December 2025
Microsoft Defender Security Team. (n.d.). Shai-Hulud 2.0: Guidance for detecting, investigating, and defending against the supply chain attack. Retrieved April 9, 2026.
Open source URL - [18]Mandiant Pulse Secure Update May 2021
Perez, D. et al. (2021, May 27). Re-Checking Your Pulse: Updates on Chinese APT Actors Compromising Pulse Secure VPN Devices. Retrieved February 5, 2024.
Open source URL - [19]Roadtools
Dirk-jan Mollema. (2020, April 16). Introducing ROADtools - The Azure AD exploration framework. Retrieved January 31, 2022.
Open source URL - [20]Cybersecurity Advisory GRU Brute Force Campaign July 2021
NSA, CISA, FBI, NCSC. (2021, July). Russian GRU Conducting Global Brute Force Campaign to Compromise Enterprise and Cloud Environments. Retrieved July 26, 2021.
Open source URL - [21]Microsoft Storm-501 Sabbath Ransomware Embargo September 2024
Microsoft Threat Intelligence. (2024, September 26). Storm-0501: Ransomware attacks expanding to hybrid cloud environments. Retrieved October 19, 2025.
Open source URL - [22]Microsoft Storm-0501 Embargo Ransomware August 2025
Microsoft Threat Intelligence. (2025, August 27). Storm-0501’s evolving techniques lead to cloud-based ransomware. Retrieved October 19, 2025.
Open source URL - [23]Crowdstrike TELCO BPO Campaign December 2022
Parisi, T. (2022, December 2). Not a SIMulation: CrowdStrike Investigations Reveal Intrusion Campaign Targeting Telco and BPO Companies. Retrieved June 30, 2023.
Open source URL - [24]CERT Polska
CERT Polska. (2026, January 30). Energy Sector Incident Report – 29 December. Retrieved April 22, 2026.
Open source URL - [25]Palo Alto VOID MANTICORE Iran Cyber Threats March 2026
Justin Moore. (2026, March 16). Iranian Cyber Threat Evolution: From MBR Wipers to Identity Weaponization. Retrieved April 20, 2026.
Open source URL - [26]SEC 8-K Stryker Corporation Filing Handala Hack March 2026
Stryker Corporation. (2026, March 23). SEC 8-K Stryker Corporation. Retrieved April 20, 2026.
Open source URL - [27]Microsoft Common Conditional Access Policies
Microsoft. (2022, December 14). Conditional Access templates. Retrieved February 21, 2023.
Open source URL - [28]Peirates GitHub
InGuardians. (2022, January 5). Peirates GitHub. Retrieved February 8, 2022.
Open source URL - [29]Microsoft Silk Typhoon MAR 2025
Microsoft Threat Intelligence . (2025, March 5). Silk Typhoon targeting IT supply chain. Retrieved March 20, 2025.
Open source URL - [30]Github TruffleSecurity Trufflehog April 2025
Trufflesecurity. (2026, April 8). TruffleHog Enterprise. Retrieved April 15, 2026.
Open source URL - [31]CrowdStrike Scattered Spider JUL 2025
Counter Adversary Operations. (2025, July 2). CrowdStrike Services Observes SCATTERED SPIDER Escalate Attacks Across Industries. Retrieved October 13, 2025.
Open source URL - [32]GitHub Pacu
Rhino Security Labs. (2019, August 22). Pacu. Retrieved October 17, 2019.
Open source URL - [33]Microsoft Holmium June 2020
Microsoft Threat Protection Intelligence Team. (2020, June 18). Inside Microsoft Threat Protection: Mapping attack chains from cloud to endpoint. Retrieved June 22, 2020.
Open source URL - [34]MSTIC DEV-0537 Mar 2022
MSTIC, DART, M365 Defender. (2022, March 24). DEV-0537 Criminal Actor Targeting Organizations for Data Exfiltration and Destruction. Retrieved May 17, 2022.
Open source URL - [35]Microsoft NICKEL December 2021
MSTIC. (2021, December 6). NICKEL targeting government organizations across Latin America and Europe. Retrieved March 18, 2022.
Open source URL - [36]AWS Identity Federation
Amazon. (n.d.). Identity Federation in AWS. Retrieved March 13, 2020.
Open source URL - [37]AWS Identity Federation
Amazon. (n.d.). Identity Federation in AWS. Retrieved March 13, 2020.
Open source URL - [38]Google Federating GC
Google. (n.d.). Federating Google Cloud with Active Directory. Retrieved March 13, 2020.
Open source URL - [39]Google Federating GC
Google. (n.d.). Federating Google Cloud with Active Directory. Retrieved March 13, 2020.
Open source URL - [40]Microsoft Deploying AD Federation
Microsoft. (n.d.). Deploying Active Directory Federation Services in Azure. Retrieved March 13, 2020.
Open source URL - [41]Microsoft Deploying AD Federation
Microsoft. (n.d.). Deploying Active Directory Federation Services in Azure. Retrieved March 13, 2020.
Open source URL - [42]SpecterOps Managed Identity 2022
Andy Robbins. (2022, June 6). Managed Identity Attack Paths, Part 1: Automation Accounts. Retrieved March 18, 2025.
Open source URL - [43]SpecterOps Managed Identity 2022
Andy Robbins. (2022, June 6). Managed Identity Attack Paths, Part 1: Automation Accounts. Retrieved March 18, 2025.
Open source URL - [44]mitre-attackT1078.004Open source URL
- [45]mitre-attackT1078.004Open source URL
- [46]mitre-attackT1078.004Open source URL
- [47]CrowdStrike StellarParticle January 2022
CrowdStrike. (2022, January 27). Early Bird Catches the Wormhole: Observations from the StellarParticle Campaign. Retrieved February 7, 2022.
Open source URL - [48]AWS - IAM Console Best Practices
Moncur, Rob. (2020, July 5). New Information in the AWS IAM Console Helps You Follow IAM Best Practices. Retrieved August 4, 2020.
Open source URL - [49]Mandiant APT29 Eye Spy Email Nov 22
Mandiant. (2022, May 2). UNC3524: Eye Spy on Your Email. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
Open source URL - [50]Mandiant APT29 Microsoft 365 2022
Douglas Bienstock. (2022, August 18). You Can’t Audit Me: APT29 Continues Targeting Microsoft 365. Retrieved February 23, 2023.
Open source URL - [51]Microsoft Azure security baseline for Azure Active Directory
Microsoft. (2022, November 14). Azure security baseline for Azure Active Directory. Retrieved February 21, 2023.
Open source URL - [52]Microsoft Security Alerts for Azure AD Roles
Microsoft. (2022, November 14). Configure security alerts for Azure AD roles in Privileged Identity Management. Retrieved February 21, 2023.
Open source URL - [53]TechNet Credential Theft
Microsoft. (2016, April 15). Attractive Accounts for Credential Theft. Retrieved June 3, 2016.
Open source URL - [54]TechNet Least Privilege
Microsoft. (2016, April 16). Implementing Least-Privilege Administrative Models. Retrieved June 3, 2016.
Open source URL - [55]Aikido Shai-Hulud September 2025
Charlie Eriksen. (2025, September 16). S1ngularity/nx attackers strike again. Retrieved April 9, 2026.
Open source URL - [56]Microsoft Shai-Hulud December 2025
Microsoft Defender Security Team. (n.d.). Shai-Hulud 2.0: Guidance for detecting, investigating, and defending against the supply chain attack. Retrieved April 9, 2026.
Open source URL - [57]Netskope Shai-Hulud November 2025
Gianpietro Cutolo. (2025, November 26). Shai-Hulud 2.0: Aggressive, Automated, and Fast Spreading. Retrieved April 9, 2026.
Open source URL - [58]Palo Alto Unit 42 Shai-Hulud November 2025
Justin Moore. (2025, November 25). "Shai-Hulud" Worm Compromises npm Ecosystem in Supply Chain Attack (Updated November 26). Retrieved April 9, 2026.
Open source URL - [59]Wiz Shai-Hulud September 2025
Merav Bar, Rami McCarthy, Barak Sharoni. (2025, September 16). Shai-Hulud: Ongoing Package Supply Chain Worm Delivering Data-Stealing Malware. Retrieved April 9, 2026.
Open source URL - [60]Mandiant Pulse Secure Update May 2021
Perez, D. et al. (2021, May 27). Re-Checking Your Pulse: Updates on Chinese APT Actors Compromising Pulse Secure VPN Devices. Retrieved February 5, 2024.
Open source URL - [61]Roadtools
Dirk-jan Mollema. (2020, April 16). Introducing ROADtools - The Azure AD exploration framework. Retrieved January 31, 2022.
Open source URL - [62]AWS - IAM Console Best Practices
Moncur, Rob. (2020, July 5). New Information in the AWS IAM Console Helps You Follow IAM Best Practices. Retrieved August 4, 2020.
Open source URL - [63]AWS - IAM Console Best Practices
Moncur, Rob. (2020, July 5). New Information in the AWS IAM Console Helps You Follow IAM Best Practices. Retrieved August 4, 2020.
Open source URL - [64]Cybersecurity Advisory GRU Brute Force Campaign July 2021
NSA, CISA, FBI, NCSC. (2021, July). Russian GRU Conducting Global Brute Force Campaign to Compromise Enterprise and Cloud Environments. Retrieved July 26, 2021.
Open source URL - [65]Microsoft Storm-0501 Embargo Ransomware August 2025
Microsoft Threat Intelligence. (2025, August 27). Storm-0501’s evolving techniques lead to cloud-based ransomware. Retrieved October 19, 2025.
Open source URL - [66]Microsoft Storm-501 Sabbath Ransomware Embargo September 2024
Microsoft Threat Intelligence. (2024, September 26). Storm-0501: Ransomware attacks expanding to hybrid cloud environments. Retrieved October 19, 2025.
Open source URL - [67]Crowdstrike TELCO BPO Campaign December 2022
Parisi, T. (2022, December 2). Not a SIMulation: CrowdStrike Investigations Reveal Intrusion Campaign Targeting Telco and BPO Companies. Retrieved June 30, 2023.
Open source URL - [68]CERT Polska
CERT Polska. (2026, January 30). Energy Sector Incident Report – 29 December. Retrieved April 22, 2026.
Open source URL - [69]Palo Alto VOID MANTICORE Iran Cyber Threats March 2026
Justin Moore. (2026, March 16). Iranian Cyber Threat Evolution: From MBR Wipers to Identity Weaponization. Retrieved April 20, 2026.
Open source URL - [70]SEC 8-K Stryker Corporation Filing Handala Hack March 2026
Stryker Corporation. (2026, March 23). SEC 8-K Stryker Corporation. Retrieved April 20, 2026.
Open source URL - [71]Microsoft Common Conditional Access Policies
Microsoft. (2022, December 14). Conditional Access templates. Retrieved February 21, 2023.
Open source URL - [72]Peirates GitHub
InGuardians. (2022, January 5). Peirates GitHub. Retrieved February 8, 2022.
Open source URL - [73]Microsoft Silk Typhoon MAR 2025
Microsoft Threat Intelligence . (2025, March 5). Silk Typhoon targeting IT supply chain. Retrieved March 20, 2025.
Open source URL
Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.
