LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
MITRE ATT&CK® Campaign

C0018: C0018

C0018 was a month-long ransomware intrusion that successfully deployed AvosLocker onto a compromised network. The unidentified actors gained initial access to the victim network through an exposed server and used a variety of open-source tools prior to executing AvosLocker.[1][2]

EnterpriseC0018CampaignObject v1.0Modified
Discuss defensive coverageBack to ATT&CK
Glexia's Take · Automated analysis

Security context for executives and security teams

Automation confidenceHigh

C0018 matters because it shows a ransomware intrusion pattern that moved from an exposed server to internal discovery, credential access tooling, remote access/C2 frameworks, lateral movement, and eventual AvosLocker deployment. For leaders, the decision value is not the campaign name itself; it is whether exposed services, administrative tooling, remote desktop paths, credential controls, and ransomware impact readiness are governed and evidenced well enough to stop or contain a similar month-long intrusion before encryption.

Executive priority

Prioritize this as a ransomware resilience and exposed-attack-surface validation case. Executives should ask whether public-facing systems are continuously inventoried and remediated, whether privileged credential exposure is monitored, whether RDP/WMI/software deployment tools are controlled, and whether incident response can prove lateral movement and tool staging activity quickly. Because ATT&CK provides no official detection text for this campaign, coverage should be demonstrated through local telemetry, control testing, and incident playbooks rather than assumed from ATT&CK alone.

Technical view

SOC, detection engineering, and IR teams should validate coverage across the relationship chain supplied by ATT&CK: initial access via Exploit Public-Facing Application, discovery such as network configuration, user, and service discovery, execution through PowerShell, WMI, rundll32, and software deployment tools, C2/tooling involving Cobalt Strike, Sliver, web protocols, non-standard ports, remote desktop software, and file transfer, credential risk through Mimikatz, lateral activity via RDP and lateral tool transfer, and impact through data encryption. Focus on correlations that connect exposed-server compromise to internal administration abuse and ransomware staging, not isolated tool-name alerts only.

Likely telemetry

  • Internet-facing server inventory, vulnerability, and application logs for exposed services
  • Endpoint process creation and command-line telemetry, including PowerShell, WMI, rundll32, netsh, ping, and renamed or masqueraded binaries
  • Authentication and session logs for RDP and other remote access activity
  • Windows security, PowerShell, and WMI operational logs where applicable
  • EDR detections and file events for tool transfer, staging directories, suspicious DLL execution, and ransomware-related file activity

Detection direction

  • Build detection around behavior clusters: exposed-server access followed by discovery commands, tool ingress, credential dumping indicators, remote execution, lateral transfer, and encryption activity.
  • Tune carefully for dual-use tools. Ping, netsh, PowerShell, WMI, rundll32, RDP, remote desktop software, and software deployment systems are common in administration; prioritize unusual parent-child process chains, rare hosts, new administrative paths, abnormal timing, and newly observed binaries.
  • Validate visibility for Cobalt Strike and Sliver-like C2 using network behavior, process lineage, and file staging evidence, not only static signatures.
  • Look for command obfuscation and masquerading by comparing command patterns, binary paths, names, hashes, signer information, and execution locations against enterprise baselines.
  • Confirm that ransomware-impact detections include early indicators such as tool staging and lateral movement, not only final encryption events.

Mitigation priorities

  • Reduce initial access risk by maintaining an accurate inventory of Internet-facing applications and remediating exposed server vulnerabilities or misconfigurations based on risk.
  • Restrict and monitor administrative pathways such as RDP, WMI, software deployment tooling, and remote desktop software; require strong authentication and limit privileged access where applicable.
  • Harden credential protections and monitor for credential dumping behavior associated with tools such as Mimikatz.
  • Control script and command execution through least privilege, logging, and policy enforcement for PowerShell, rundll32, and administrative utilities.
  • Segment critical systems and limit lateral file transfer paths to reduce ransomware propagation opportunities.
Additional notes and limits

This object is a campaign entry, not a full procedure report. ATT&CK states the intrusion lasted about a month, began through an exposed server, used open-source tools, and deployed AvosLocker. The relationship set is valuable because it maps the defensive validation surface: public-facing exploitation, discovery, credential dumping, remote execution, C2, lateral movement, and data encryption. Local environment baselines are essential because many related tools and techniques overlap heavily with legitimate administration.

Official detection is not provided, the campaign platforms are not specified, and the actors are unidentified in the supplied description. Related software and technique platform fields indicate where those objects may apply, but they should not be treated as confirmed campaign platform scope without local evidence. This take does not assert active exploitation, attribution, customer exposure, or guaranteed detection coverage.

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Official MITRE ATT&CK definition

C0018

C0018 was a month-long ransomware intrusion that successfully deployed AvosLocker onto a compromised network. The unidentified actors gained initial access to the victim network through an exposed server and used a variety of open-source tools prior to executing AvosLocker.[1][2]

View the same entry on attack.mitre.org (MITRE-hosted reference; in-page links above use the Glexia ATT&CK library.)

Glexia analysis

How security teams should use this page

Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.

ATT&CK relationship table

Techniques used

This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.

19 rows
DomainIDNameRelationship / procedure
EnterpriseT1190Exploit Public-Facing Application

During C0018, the threat actors exploited VMWare Horizon Unified Access Gateways that were vulnerable to several Log4Shell vulnerabilities, including CVE-2021-44228, CVE-2021-45046, CVE-2021-45105, and CVE-2021-44832.[2]

EnterpriseT1036.005Match Legitimate Resource Name or LocationSub-technique

For C0018, the threat actors renamed a Sliver payload to `vmware_kb.exe`.[2]

EnterpriseT1571Non-Standard Port

During C0018, the threat actors opened a variety of ports, including ports 28035, 32467, 41578, and 46892, to establish RDP connections.[1]

EnterpriseT1021.001Remote Desktop ProtocolSub-technique

During C0018, the threat actors opened a variety of ports to establish RDP connections, including ports 28035, 32467, 41578, and 46892.[1]

EnterpriseT1219.002Remote Desktop SoftwareSub-technique

During C0018, the threat actors used AnyDesk to transfer tools between systems.[2][1]

EnterpriseT1570Lateral Tool Transfer

During C0018, the threat actors transferred the SoftPerfect Network Scanner and other tools to machines in the network using AnyDesk and PDQ Deploy.[2][1]

EnterpriseT1033System Owner/User Discovery

During C0018, the threat actors collected `whoami` information via PowerShell scripts.[1]

EnterpriseT1486Data Encrypted for Impact

During C0018, the threat actors used AvosLocker ransomware to encrypt files on the compromised network.[2][1]

EnterpriseT1046Network Service Discovery

During C0018, the threat actors used the SoftPerfect Network Scanner for network scanning.[2]

EnterpriseT1059.001PowerShellSub-technique

During C0018, the threat actors used encoded PowerShell scripts for execution.[2][1]

EnterpriseT1027.010Command ObfuscationSub-technique

During C0018, the threat actors used Base64 to encode their PowerShell scripts.[2][1]

EnterpriseT1016System Network Configuration Discovery

During C0018, the threat actors ran `nslookup` and Advanced IP Scanner on the target network.[1]

EnterpriseT1588.002ToolSub-technique

For C0018, the threat actors acquired a variety of open source tools, including Mimikatz, Sliver, SoftPerfect Network Scanner, AnyDesk, and PDQ Deploy.[2][1]

EnterpriseT1071.001Web ProtocolsSub-technique

During C0018, the threat actors used HTTP for C2 communications.[1]

EnterpriseT1072Software Deployment Tools

During C0018, the threat actors used PDQ Deploy to move AvosLocker and tools across the network.[2]

EnterpriseT1105Ingress Tool Transfer

During C0018, the threat actors downloaded additional tools, such as Mimikatz and Sliver, as well as Cobalt Strike and AvosLocker ransomware onto the victim network.[2][1]

EnterpriseT1036Masquerading

During C0018, AvosLocker was disguised using the victim company name as the filename.[2]

EnterpriseT1047Windows Management Instrumentation

During C0018, the threat actors used WMIC to modify administrative settings on both a local and a remote host, likely as part of the first stages for their lateral movement; they also used WMI Provider Host (`wmiprvse.exe`) to execute a variety of encoded PowerShell scripts using the `DownloadString` method.[2][1]

EnterpriseT1218.011Rundll32Sub-technique

During C0018, the threat actors used `rundll32` to run Mimikatz.[1]

Associated objects

Groups, software, and campaigns

ToolEnterprise

S0633: Sliver

Sliver is an open source, cross-platform, red team command and control (C2) framework written in Golang. Sliver includes its own package manager, "armory," for staging and downloading additional tools and payloads to the primary C2 framework.[1][2]

WindowsLinuxmacOS
ToolEnterprise

S0108: netsh

netsh is a scripting utility used to interact with networking components on local or remote systems. [1]

Windows
ToolEnterprise

S0097: Ping

Ping is an operating system utility commonly used to troubleshoot and verify network connections. [1]

MalwareEnterprise

S1053: AvosLocker

AvosLocker is ransomware written in C++ that has been offered via the Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) model. It was first observed in June 2021 and has been used against financial services, critical manufacturing, government facilities, and other critical infrastructure sectors in the United States. As of March 2022, AvosLocker had also been used against organizations in Belgium, Canada, China, Germany, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Syria, Taiwan, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom.[1][2][3]

LinuxWindows
ToolEnterprise

S0002: Mimikatz

Mimikatz is a credential dumper capable of obtaining plaintext Windows account logins and passwords, along with many other features that make it useful for testing the security of networks. [1] [2]

Windows
MalwareEnterprise

S0154: Cobalt Strike

Cobalt Strike is a commercial, full-featured, remote access tool that bills itself as “adversary simulation software designed to execute targeted attacks and emulate the post-exploitation actions of advanced threat actors”. Cobalt Strike’s interactive post-exploit capabilities cover the full range of ATT&CK tactics, all executed within a single, integrated system.[1]

In addition to its own capabilities, Cobalt Strike leverages the capabilities of other well-known tools such as Metasploit and Mimikatz.[1]

LinuxmacOSWindows
Relationship explorer

All related ATT&CK context

uses · ToolS0633: SliverEnterpriseuses · ToolS0108: netshEnterpriseuses · ToolS0097: PingEnterpriseuses · TechniqueT1190: Exploit Public-Facing ApplicationEnterpriseuses · TechniqueT1036.005: Match Legitimate Resource Name or LocationEnterpriseuses · TechniqueT1571: Non-Standard PortEnterpriseuses · TechniqueT1021.001: Remote Desktop ProtocolEnterpriseuses · TechniqueT1219.002: Remote Desktop SoftwareEnterpriseuses · TechniqueT1570: Lateral Tool TransferEnterpriseuses · TechniqueT1033: System Owner/User DiscoveryEnterpriseuses · MalwareS1053: AvosLockerEnterpriseuses · TechniqueT1486: Data Encrypted for ImpactEnterpriseuses · TechniqueT1046: Network Service DiscoveryEnterpriseuses · TechniqueT1059.001: PowerShellEnterpriseuses · ToolS0002: MimikatzEnterpriseuses · TechniqueT1027.010: Command ObfuscationEnterpriseuses · MalwareS0154: Cobalt StrikeEnterpriseuses · TechniqueT1016: System Network Configuration DiscoveryEnterpriseuses · TechniqueT1588.002: ToolEnterpriseuses · TechniqueT1071.001: Web ProtocolsEnterpriseuses · TechniqueT1072: Software Deployment ToolsEnterpriseuses · TechniqueT1105: Ingress Tool TransferEnterpriseuses · TechniqueT1036: MasqueradingEnterpriseuses · TechniqueT1047: Windows Management InstrumentationEnterprise
Change history

Object version and sync metadata

The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates.

ATT&CK release
19.1
Object version
1.0
Created
Modified
Raw hash
b8aa3fa0dcc059a0...
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases(1)
ReleaseBundle importedObject versionModifiedStatusRaw hash
19.11.0Current bundleb8aa3fa0dcc0…
Raw source

Mirrored ATT&CK source object

The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.

Open mirrored raw JSONOpen MITRE-hosted copy
Source references

External references and citations

MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.

  1. [1]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  2. [2]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  3. [3]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  4. [4]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  5. [5]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  6. [6]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  7. [7]
    mitre-attackC0018
    Open source URL
  8. [8]
    mitre-attackC0018
    Open source URL
  9. [9]
    mitre-attackC0018
    Open source URL
  10. [10]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  11. [11]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  12. [12]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  13. [13]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  14. [14]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  15. [15]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  16. [16]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  17. [17]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  18. [18]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  19. [19]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  20. [20]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  21. [21]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  22. [22]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  23. [23]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  24. [24]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  25. [25]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  26. [26]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  27. [27]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  28. [28]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  29. [29]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  30. [30]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  31. [31]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  32. [32]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  33. [33]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  34. [34]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  35. [35]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  36. [36]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  37. [37]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  38. [38]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  39. [39]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  40. [40]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  41. [41]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  42. [42]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  43. [43]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  44. [44]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  45. [45]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  46. [46]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  47. [47]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  48. [48]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  49. [49]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  50. [50]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  51. [51]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  52. [52]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  53. [53]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  54. [54]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  55. [55]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  56. [56]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  57. [57]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  58. [58]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  59. [59]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  60. [60]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  61. [61]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  62. [62]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  63. [63]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  64. [64]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  65. [65]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  66. [66]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  67. [67]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  68. [68]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  69. [69]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  70. [70]
    Cisco Talos Avos Jun 2022

    Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  71. [71]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
  72. [72]
    Costa AvosLocker May 2022

    Costa, F. (2022, May 1). RaaS AvosLocker Incident Response Analysis. Retrieved January 11, 2023.

    Open source URL
Source and licensing

Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.

Official MITRE ATT&CK siteOfficial STIX data repositoryMITRE ATT&CK terms of use