LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
MITRE ATT&CK® Malware

S0343: Exaramel for Windows

Exaramel for Windows is a backdoor used for targeting Windows systems. The Linux version is tracked separately under Exaramel for Linux.[1]

EnterpriseS0343MalwareObject v2.2Modified
Glexia's Take · Automated analysis

Security context for executives and security teams

Automation confidenceMedium

Exaramel for Windows is an ATT&CK-tracked Windows backdoor. Its decision value is less about a single malware name and more about the behaviors ATT&CK associates with it: Windows services, Registry changes, command shell and Visual Basic execution, fileless storage, local staging, and archiving of collected data. For leaders, this is a useful test case for whether Windows endpoint monitoring can prove persistence, stealth, collection preparation, and operator activity quickly enough to support incident response decisions.

Executive priority

Prioritize this as a Windows backdoor readiness scenario, especially because ATT&CK relates it to Sandworm Team. Do not assume exposure or active exploitation from this object alone, but use it to validate whether SOC and IR teams can answer: which Windows systems had suspicious service or Registry changes, what accounts made them, whether data was staged or archived locally, and whether evidence is retained for audit and incident timelines. For organizations where Windows systems support operational or business-critical environments, these checks matter to continuity and cyber-physical risk triage.

Technical view

ATT&CK provides no official detection text for this malware, so defensive validation should be built from the related techniques. Confirm coverage for Windows service creation or modification, masqueraded service/task names, Registry modification, cmd.exe execution, Visual Basic execution, fileless storage locations such as Registry, event logs, or WMI repository, local data staging, and archive creation. Detection engineering should correlate these behaviors by host, account, parent process, and time sequence rather than relying only on malware signatures.

Likely telemetry

  • Windows service creation, modification, configuration, and service start events
  • Windows Registry modification telemetry, especially persistence- or service-related keys
  • Process creation telemetry for cmd.exe and Visual Basic-related execution
  • EDR or host telemetry showing parent-child process chains from services or scripts
  • File and directory activity showing local staging of collected data

Detection direction

  • Build behavior-based detections around the related ATT&CK techniques rather than depending on a named Exaramel signature.
  • Tune for unusual Windows service names, display names, descriptions, or binary paths that resemble legitimate services but deviate from baselines.
  • Correlate service or Registry changes with subsequent cmd.exe or Visual Basic execution.
  • Review local staging and archive creation in unusual directories or by unusual service-launched processes.
  • Account for false positives from legitimate administration, software deployment, backup, and endpoint management tools; baselining approved service and Registry change sources is essential.

Mitigation priorities

  • Restrict who can create or modify Windows services and sensitive Registry locations using least privilege and administrative control review.
  • Baseline legitimate services, scheduled tasks, service paths, and Registry persistence locations so masquerading is easier to identify.
  • Harden and monitor script and command shell usage, especially when launched by services or unusual parent processes.
  • Ensure endpoint logging and EDR policies capture process creation, service changes, Registry changes, and file/archive activity.
  • Prepare IR playbooks for Windows backdoor investigations that include service inventory, Registry review, staged data search, and account scoping.
Additional notes and limits

The supplied ATT&CK object is sparse: it identifies Exaramel for Windows as a Windows backdoor, cites ESET reporting, and provides relationships to techniques and to Sandworm Team. The most defensible Glexia value is to translate those relationships into control validation and telemetry requirements. The Sandworm relationship raises prioritization context, but this summary does not claim current activity, customer exposure, or guaranteed detection.

No official ATT&CK detection text, malware labels, aliases, or tactics are provided for the object itself. Network indicators, command-and-control details, file names, hashes, and specific Registry or service artifacts are not supplied here. Local environment baselines and incident evidence are required before drawing conclusions about compromise.

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Official MITRE ATT&CK definition

Exaramel for Windows

Exaramel for Windows is a backdoor used for targeting Windows systems. The Linux version is tracked separately under Exaramel for Linux.[1]

View the same entry on attack.mitre.org (MITRE-hosted reference; in-page links above use the Glexia ATT&CK library.)

Glexia analysis

How security teams should use this page

Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.

ATT&CK relationship table

Techniques used

This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.

8 rows
DomainIDNameRelationship / procedure
EnterpriseT1560Archive Collected Data

Exaramel for Windows automatically encrypts files before sending them to the C2 server.[1]

EnterpriseT1059.005Visual BasicSub-technique

Exaramel for Windows has a command to execute VBS scripts on the victim’s machine.[1]

EnterpriseT1027.011Fileless StorageSub-technique

Exaramel for Windows stores the backdoor's configuration in the Registry in XML format.[1]

EnterpriseT1543.003Windows ServiceSub-technique

The Exaramel for Windows dropper creates and starts a Windows service named wsmprovav with the description “Windows Check AV.”[1]

EnterpriseT1112Modify Registry

Exaramel for Windows adds the configuration to the Registry in XML format.[1]

EnterpriseT1059.003Windows Command ShellSub-technique

Exaramel for Windows has a command to launch a remote shell and executes commands on the victim’s machine.[1]

EnterpriseT1036.004Masquerade Task or ServiceSub-technique

The Exaramel for Windows dropper creates and starts a Windows service named wsmprovav with the description “Windows Check AV” in an apparent attempt to masquerade as a legitimate service.[1]

EnterpriseT1074.001Local Data StagingSub-technique

Exaramel for Windows specifies a path to store files scheduled for exfiltration.[1]

Associated objects

Groups, software, and campaigns

GroupEnterprise

G0034: Sandworm Team

Sandworm Team is a destructive threat group that has been attributed to Russia's General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) Main Center for Special Technologies (GTsST) military unit 74455.[1][2] This group has been active since at least 2009.[3][4][5][6]

In October 2020, the US indicted six GRU Unit 74455 officers associated with Sandworm Team for the following cyber operations: the 2015 and 2016 attacks against Ukrainian electrical companies and government organizations, the 2017 worldwide NotPetya attack, targeting of the 2017 French presidential campaign, the 2018 Olympic Destroyer attack against the Winter Olympic Games, the 2018 operation against the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, and attacks against the country of Georgia in 2018 and 2019.[1][2] Some of these were conducted with the assistance of GRU Unit 26165, which is also referred to as APT28.[7]

Relationship explorer

All related ATT&CK context

Change history

Object version and sync metadata

The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates.

ATT&CK release
19.1
Object version
2.2
Created
Modified
Raw hash
c90ccd7d0a8afacf...
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases(1)
ReleaseBundle importedObject versionModifiedStatusRaw hash
19.12.2Current bundlec90ccd7d0a8a…
Raw source

Mirrored ATT&CK source object

The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.

Source references

External references and citations

MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.

  1. [1]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  2. [2]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  3. [3]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  4. [4]
    Exaramel for Windows

    (Citation: ESET TeleBots Oct 2018)

  5. [5]
    Exaramel for Windows

    (Citation: ESET TeleBots Oct 2018)

  6. [6]
    Exaramel for Windows

    (Citation: ESET TeleBots Oct 2018)

  7. [7]
    mitre-attackS0343
    Open source URL
  8. [8]
    mitre-attackS0343
    Open source URL
  9. [9]
    mitre-attackS0343
    Open source URL
  10. [10]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  11. [11]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  12. [12]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  13. [13]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  14. [14]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  15. [15]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  16. [16]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  17. [17]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  18. [18]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  19. [19]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  20. [20]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  21. [21]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  22. [22]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  23. [23]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  24. [24]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  25. [25]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  26. [26]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
  27. [27]
    ESET TeleBots Oct 2018

    Cherepanov, A., Lipovsky, R. (2018, October 11). New TeleBots backdoor: First evidence linking Industroyer to NotPetya. Retrieved November 27, 2018.

    Open source URL
Source and licensing

Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.