LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
MITRE ATT&CK® Malware

S0165: OSInfo

OSInfo is a custom tool used by APT3 to do internal discovery on a victim's computer and network. [1]

EnterpriseS0165MalwareObject v1.1Modified
Glexia's Take · Automated analysis

Security context for executives and security teams

Automation confidenceMedium

OSInfo is a Windows custom discovery tool described by MITRE as used by APT3 to collect internal information about a victim computer and network. Its business significance is not the tool name itself, but the reconnaissance pattern: account, group, registry, system, network connection, remote system, and share discovery can help an intruder understand where valuable data and privileged paths exist before lateral movement or collection.

Executive priority

Treat OSInfo-style activity as an early warning that an endpoint may be in the mapping phase of an intrusion. Leadership should ask whether Windows endpoint, identity, and network-share telemetry can show who queried systems, accounts, groups, registry data, network connections, and shares; whether privileged account exposure is measurable; and whether incident responders can quickly distinguish legitimate administration from suspicious discovery. This supports resilience planning, audit evidence for monitoring, and prioritization of identity and endpoint visibility controls.

Technical view

MITRE provides no dedicated detection text for OSInfo, so SOC validation should pivot from the software object to its relationships: Query Registry, System Network Configuration Discovery, Remote System Discovery, System Network Connections Discovery, Local and Domain Groups, System Information Discovery, Local and Domain Account Discovery, and Network Share Discovery. On Windows, detection engineering should validate visibility into command/process execution, registry queries, account and group enumeration, domain lookups, network connection listing, remote host enumeration, and SMB/share discovery. Analysts should correlate bursts of these discovery behaviors from the same host, user, or process lineage, especially when performed outside normal administrative context.

Likely telemetry

  • Windows endpoint process creation and command-line telemetry
  • Registry access or registry query telemetry
  • Local user and local group enumeration evidence
  • Domain user and domain group query evidence from endpoints and directory services
  • Network connection enumeration evidence from the host

Detection direction

  • Build detections around clusters of discovery behaviors rather than the OSInfo name alone, since the official object does not provide indicators or detection logic.
  • Baseline legitimate administrative discovery tools and scripts to reduce false positives from help desk, IT operations, inventory, and vulnerability management activity.
  • Correlate account/group enumeration with network and share discovery from the same Windows endpoint to identify reconnaissance chains.
  • Validate whether EDR, Windows logging, and directory telemetry preserve command line, parent process, user, host, and remote target context needed for triage.
  • Review blind spots around unmanaged Windows hosts, limited command-line logging, missing registry telemetry, and incomplete SMB/share visibility.

Mitigation priorities

  • Prioritize visibility first: ensure Windows endpoint and identity logs can capture the discovery behaviors represented by the related ATT&CK techniques.
  • Reduce excessive local and domain privileges so account and group discovery yields less useful escalation information.
  • Harden and review network shares, especially broadly accessible shares that could guide follow-on collection or lateral movement.
  • Segment networks and limit unnecessary host-to-host discovery paths where operationally feasible.
  • Prepare incident response playbooks for discovery-stage alerts, including rapid host isolation criteria, account review, and scoping of related enumeration activity.
Additional notes and limits

The supplied ATT&CK object identifies OSInfo as a Windows custom tool used by APT3 for internal discovery, with relationships to multiple discovery techniques. Because the object lacks aliases, labels, tactics, indicators, and official detection guidance, defensive value comes from mapping the related techniques to local telemetry and normal administrative behavior.

This take is limited to the supplied MITRE fields, external reference, and relationships. It does not establish current activity, customer exposure, exploitability, or guaranteed detection. Local environment baselines are required to separate authorized administration from suspicious discovery.

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Official MITRE ATT&CK definition

OSInfo

OSInfo is a custom tool used by APT3 to do internal discovery on a victim's computer and network. [1]

View the same entry on attack.mitre.org (MITRE-hosted reference; in-page links above use the Glexia ATT&CK library.)

Glexia analysis

How security teams should use this page

Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.

ATT&CK relationship table

Techniques used

This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.

10 rows
DomainIDNameRelationship / procedure
EnterpriseT1087.001Local AccountSub-technique

OSInfo enumerates local and domain users[1]

EnterpriseT1012Query Registry

OSInfo queries the registry to look for information about Terminal Services.[1]

EnterpriseT1082System Information Discovery

OSInfo discovers information about the infected machine.[1]

EnterpriseT1049System Network Connections Discovery

OSInfo enumerates the current network connections similar to net use .[1]

EnterpriseT1018Remote System Discovery

OSInfo performs a connection test to discover remote systems in the network[1]

EnterpriseT1069.002Domain GroupsSub-technique

OSInfo specifically looks for Domain Admins and power users within the domain.[1]

EnterpriseT1087.002Domain AccountSub-technique

OSInfo enumerates local and domain users[1]

EnterpriseT1069.001Local GroupsSub-technique

OSInfo has enumerated the local administrators group.[1]

EnterpriseT1135Network Share Discovery

OSInfo discovers shares on the network[1]

EnterpriseT1016System Network Configuration Discovery

OSInfo discovers the current domain information.[1]

Associated objects

Groups, software, and campaigns

GroupEnterprise

G0022: APT3

APT3 is a China-based threat group that researchers have attributed to China's Ministry of State Security.[1][2] This group is responsible for the campaigns known as Operation Clandestine Fox, Operation Clandestine Wolf, and Operation Double Tap.[1][3] As of June 2015, the group appears to have shifted from targeting primarily US victims to primarily political organizations in Hong Kong.[4]

Relationship explorer

All related ATT&CK context

Change history

Object version and sync metadata

The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates.

ATT&CK release
19.1
Object version
1.1
Created
Modified
Raw hash
9716c073ee5566af...
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases(1)
ReleaseBundle importedObject versionModifiedStatusRaw hash
19.11.1Current bundle9716c073ee55…
Raw source

Mirrored ATT&CK source object

The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.

Source references

External references and citations

MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.

  1. [1]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  2. [2]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  3. [3]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  4. [4]
    mitre-attackS0165
    Open source URL
  5. [5]
    mitre-attackS0165
    Open source URL
  6. [6]
    mitre-attackS0165
    Open source URL
  7. [7]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  8. [8]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  9. [9]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  10. [10]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  11. [11]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  12. [12]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  13. [13]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  14. [14]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  15. [15]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  16. [16]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  17. [17]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  18. [18]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  19. [19]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  20. [20]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  21. [21]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  22. [22]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  23. [23]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  24. [24]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  25. [25]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  26. [26]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  27. [27]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
  28. [28]
    Symantec Buckeye

    Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.

    Open source URL
Source and licensing

Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.