LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
MITRE ATT&CK® Malware

S0568: EVILNUM

EVILNUM is fully capable backdoor that was first identified in 2018. EVILNUM is used by the APT group Evilnum which has the same name.[1][2]

EnterpriseS0568MalwareObject v1.0Modified
Glexia's Take · Automated analysis

Security context for executives and security teams

Automation confidenceMedium

EVILNUM matters because ATT&CK describes it as a Windows backdoor associated with the Evilnum threat group, with related behaviors spanning discovery, persistence, command-and-control, exfiltration, defense evasion, and session-cookie theft. For leaders, the decision value is not the malware name alone; it is whether the organization can prove it would see a Windows host being profiled, made persistent through registry/startup mechanisms, proxy-executing code through trusted Windows binaries, communicating through C2, and moving data out over that same channel.

Executive priority

Prioritize EVILNUM as a coverage-validation case for Windows endpoint resilience, identity/session protection, and SOC/IR readiness. The ATT&CK relationships point to risks that affect continuity and incident decision-making: persistent backdoor access, security-tool discovery, registry modification, use of trusted Windows utilities, web session cookie theft, and exfiltration over C2. Executives should ask whether the SOC can correlate endpoint, registry, process, WMI, browser/session, and network evidence into a defensible incident narrative for audit, containment, and risk acceptance.

Technical view

ATT&CK provides no dedicated detection text for EVILNUM, so defenders should validate coverage against the related techniques on Windows: System Owner/User Discovery, System Information Discovery, Security Software Discovery, WMI execution, Modify Registry, Registry Run Keys/Startup Folder persistence, Regsvr32 and Rundll32 proxy execution, Timestomp, Indicator Removal, Ingress Tool Transfer, One-Way Communication, Exfiltration Over C2 Channel, and Steal Web Session Cookie. Detection engineering should focus on behavior chains rather than a single indicator: discovery followed by registry persistence or proxy execution, then external communications and possible data transfer.

Likely telemetry

  • Windows endpoint process creation and command-line telemetry, especially for wmic/WMI activity, regsvr32.exe, rundll32.exe, reg.exe, and suspicious child-process relationships
  • Windows Registry auditing or EDR registry-change telemetry for Run keys, startup folder references, and other persistence-related modifications
  • WMI event logs and remote/local WMI execution traces where collected
  • File system metadata telemetry that can support timestomp or suspicious file-change analysis
  • Endpoint security product events, including evidence of security software discovery or tampering attempts where available

Detection direction

  • Build detections around sequences: host/user/system discovery followed by registry modification, startup persistence, proxy execution via regsvr32 or rundll32, and outbound communications.
  • Tune trusted-binary detections carefully. Regsvr32 and rundll32 are legitimate Windows utilities, so prioritize unusual command lines, unexpected parent processes, uncommon paths, unsigned or suspicious modules, and execution from user-writable locations.
  • Validate that WMI execution is visible. Many environments log process starts but miss WMI context, remote origin, or command content, creating a common blind spot.
  • Correlate endpoint and network evidence for C2 and exfiltration. ATT&CK links EVILNUM to one-way communication, ingress tool transfer, and exfiltration over C2, so network-only or endpoint-only views may be insufficient.
  • Include identity/session context because the related behavior includes web session cookie theft. Confirm whether browser/session artifacts and anomalous authenticated use can be investigated without over-collecting sensitive data.

Mitigation priorities

  • Harden Windows persistence paths first: monitor and restrict unauthorized Run key, startup folder, and registry modifications according to business need.
  • Reduce abuse of trusted Windows utilities by applying application control or policy restrictions where feasible, especially for regsvr32, rundll32, and script/proxy execution patterns.
  • Improve least-privilege and administrative control over WMI and registry access, including review of who can execute management actions locally or remotely.
  • Strengthen endpoint and network logging retention so indicator removal or timestamp manipulation does not eliminate the only available evidence.
  • Protect web sessions through identity controls, session governance, and investigation playbooks for suspected cookie theft or anomalous authenticated access.
Additional notes and limits

The ATT&CK object identifies EVILNUM as a fully capable backdoor first identified in 2018 and used by the Evilnum group, which ATT&CK describes as financially motivated and active since at least 2018. The strongest defensive value comes from the relationship set: the malware is mapped to Windows-relevant discovery, persistence, proxy execution, registry modification, C2, exfiltration, and credential/session-access behaviors.

ATT&CK provides no official detection guidance for this software object and no object-level tactics are specified. Some related ATT&CK techniques list platforms beyond Windows, but the EVILNUM object itself is supplied with Windows as its platform, so local validation should focus on Windows unless other environment evidence justifies broader scope. This take does not assert current exploitation, customer exposure, or guaranteed detection coverage.

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Official MITRE ATT&CK definition

EVILNUM

EVILNUM is fully capable backdoor that was first identified in 2018. EVILNUM is used by the APT group Evilnum which has the same name.[1][2]

View the same entry on attack.mitre.org (MITRE-hosted reference; in-page links above use the Glexia ATT&CK library.)

Glexia analysis

How security teams should use this page

Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.

ATT&CK relationship table

Techniques used

This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.

14 rows
DomainIDNameRelationship / procedure
EnterpriseT1102.003One-Way CommunicationSub-technique

EVILNUM has used a one-way communication method via GitLab and Digital Point to perform C2.[2]

EnterpriseT1547.001Registry Run Keys / Startup FolderSub-technique

EVILNUM can achieve persistence through the Registry Run key.[1][2]

EnterpriseT1070Indicator Removal

EVILNUM has a function called "DeleteLeftovers" to remove certain artifacts of the attack.[2]

EnterpriseT1082System Information Discovery

EVILNUM can obtain the computer name from the victim's system.[2]

EnterpriseT1041Exfiltration Over C2 Channel

EVILNUM can upload files over the C2 channel from the infected host.[2]

EnterpriseT1539Steal Web Session Cookie

EVILNUM can harvest cookies and upload them to the C2 server.[2]

EnterpriseT1070.006TimestompSub-technique

EVILNUM has changed the creation date of files.[2]

EnterpriseT1112Modify Registry

EVILNUM can make modifications to the Regsitry for persistence.[2]

EnterpriseT1105Ingress Tool Transfer

EVILNUM can download and upload files to the victim's computer.[1][2]

EnterpriseT1033System Owner/User Discovery

EVILNUM can obtain the username from the victim's machine.[2]

EnterpriseT1218.011Rundll32Sub-technique

EVILNUM can execute commands and scripts through rundll32.[2]

EnterpriseT1518.001Security Software DiscoverySub-technique

EVILNUM can search for anti-virus products on the system.[2]

EnterpriseT1218.010Regsvr32Sub-technique

EVILNUM can run a remote scriptlet that drops a file and executes it via regsvr32.exe.[1]

EnterpriseT1047Windows Management Instrumentation

EVILNUM has used the Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) tool to enumerate infected machines.[2]

Associated objects

Groups, software, and campaigns

Relationship explorer

All related ATT&CK context

Change history

Object version and sync metadata

The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates.

ATT&CK release
19.1
Object version
1.0
Created
Modified
Raw hash
981233a34729dceb...
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases(1)
ReleaseBundle importedObject versionModifiedStatusRaw hash
19.11.0Current bundle981233a34729…
Raw source

Mirrored ATT&CK source object

The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.

Source references

External references and citations

MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.

  1. [1]
    ESET EvilNum July 2020

    Porolli, M. (2020, July 9). More evil: A deep look at Evilnum and its toolset. Retrieved January 22, 2021.

    Open source URL
  2. [2]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  3. [3]
    ESET EvilNum July 2020

    Porolli, M. (2020, July 9). More evil: A deep look at Evilnum and its toolset. Retrieved January 22, 2021.

    Open source URL
  4. [4]
    ESET EvilNum July 2020

    Porolli, M. (2020, July 9). More evil: A deep look at Evilnum and its toolset. Retrieved January 22, 2021.

    Open source URL
  5. [5]
    EVILNUM

    (Citation: Prevailion EvilNum May 2020)(Citation: ESET EvilNum July 2020)

  6. [6]
    EVILNUM

    (Citation: Prevailion EvilNum May 2020)(Citation: ESET EvilNum July 2020)

  7. [7]
    EVILNUM

    (Citation: Prevailion EvilNum May 2020)(Citation: ESET EvilNum July 2020)

  8. [8]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  9. [9]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  10. [10]
    mitre-attackS0568
    Open source URL
  11. [11]
    mitre-attackS0568
    Open source URL
  12. [12]
    mitre-attackS0568
    Open source URL
  13. [13]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  14. [14]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  15. [15]
    ESET EvilNum July 2020

    Porolli, M. (2020, July 9). More evil: A deep look at Evilnum and its toolset. Retrieved January 22, 2021.

    Open source URL
  16. [16]
    ESET EvilNum July 2020

    Porolli, M. (2020, July 9). More evil: A deep look at Evilnum and its toolset. Retrieved January 22, 2021.

    Open source URL
  17. [17]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  18. [18]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  19. [19]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  20. [20]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  21. [21]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  22. [22]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  23. [23]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  24. [24]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  25. [25]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  26. [26]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  27. [27]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  28. [28]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  29. [29]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  30. [30]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  31. [31]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  32. [32]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  33. [33]
    ESET EvilNum July 2020

    Porolli, M. (2020, July 9). More evil: A deep look at Evilnum and its toolset. Retrieved January 22, 2021.

    Open source URL
  34. [34]
    ESET EvilNum July 2020

    Porolli, M. (2020, July 9). More evil: A deep look at Evilnum and its toolset. Retrieved January 22, 2021.

    Open source URL
  35. [35]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  36. [36]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  37. [37]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  38. [38]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  39. [39]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  40. [40]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  41. [41]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  42. [42]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  43. [43]
    ESET EvilNum July 2020

    Porolli, M. (2020, July 9). More evil: A deep look at Evilnum and its toolset. Retrieved January 22, 2021.

    Open source URL
  44. [44]
    Prevailion EvilNum May 2020

    Adamitis, D. (2020, May 6). Phantom in the Command Shell. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
Source and licensing

Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.