LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
MITRE ATT&CK® Malware

S0503: FrameworkPOS

FrameworkPOS is a point of sale (POS) malware used by FIN6 to steal payment card data from sytems that run physical POS devices.[1]

EnterpriseS0503MalwareObject v1.0Modified
Glexia's Take · Automated analysis

Security context for executives and security teams

Automation confidenceMedium

FrameworkPOS matters because it is malware described by ATT&CK as targeting physical point-of-sale environments to steal payment card data. For executives and security leaders, the decision value is not just malware awareness; it is whether retail or hospitality payment environments have enough segmentation, monitoring, incident response readiness, and evidence collection to prove that card-data theft behaviors would be noticed and contained.

Executive priority

Prioritize this as a payment-data and business-continuity risk where physical POS systems are in scope. Leaders should ask whether POS networks are isolated, whether logs from POS-adjacent systems and egress points are retained, whether incident responders can quickly determine if payment data was collected or staged locally, and whether compliance evidence can support payment-card investigation and notification decisions. ATT&CK links this malware to FIN6 and to collection, discovery, staging, archiving, and exfiltration behaviors, making it relevant to SOC readiness, IR playbooks, and control validation around payment environments.

Technical view

ATT&CK provides no official detection text and no malware-specific platform list for FrameworkPOS, so defenders should validate coverage through the related behaviors: Data from Local System, Process Discovery, Local Data Staging, Archive via Custom Method, and Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol. SOC and IR teams should focus on whether POS-connected systems generate usable endpoint, process, file, and network telemetry; whether local staging or unusual archive-like artifacts can be investigated; and whether outbound traffic from payment environments is tightly baselined. Because the object is associated with physical POS devices and payment-card theft, environment-specific baselines are essential.

Likely telemetry

  • Endpoint process execution and process inventory data from POS-connected systems where available
  • File creation, modification, and access telemetry for local directories that could be used for data collection or staging
  • Evidence of archive, compression, encryption, or custom-packed data artifacts prior to transfer
  • Network egress logs from POS segments, including protocol, destination, volume, and timing metadata
  • Firewall, proxy, DNS, and other boundary-control logs capable of showing alternative-protocol exfiltration paths

Detection direction

  • Do not rely on a FrameworkPOS-specific analytic unless it is locally validated; ATT&CK does not provide official detection guidance for this object.
  • Map detections to the related ATT&CK behaviors: process discovery, local data access, local staging, custom archiving, and exfiltration over nonstandard or unexpected protocols.
  • Tune for POS environment context: false positives may come from legitimate payment applications, maintenance tools, backups, diagnostics, or vendor support activity.
  • Validate that POS network egress is baselined and that unusual destinations, protocols, or transfer volumes can be investigated quickly.
  • Review whether local staging indicators would be visible if malware collected payment data before exfiltration; many gaps appear when POS endpoints have limited logging or are treated as appliances.

Mitigation priorities

  • Inventory systems that run or directly support physical POS devices and define what telemetry is mandatory for investigation.
  • Segment POS environments and restrict outbound communication to approved destinations and protocols.
  • Harden and monitor endpoint and file-system activity on POS-supporting systems to the extent operationally feasible.
  • Establish SOC playbooks for payment-data collection, local staging, archive creation, and alternative-protocol exfiltration scenarios.
  • Retain network and endpoint evidence long enough to support payment-card incident response, compliance review, and legal decision-making.
Additional notes and limits

The most useful defensive interpretation comes from the relationships: FrameworkPOS is associated with FIN6 and uses techniques covering local collection, process discovery, local staging, custom archiving, and exfiltration over alternative protocols. This supports a practical control-review path for POS environments without assuming any specific current campaign, victim exposure, or guaranteed detection method.

The supplied ATT&CK object has no official detection text, no aliases, no labels, no tactics listed directly on the malware object, and no malware-specific platforms. Platform details appear only on related techniques and should not be treated as confirmed FrameworkPOS platform coverage. Local POS architecture, logging depth, vendor constraints, and network design are required to assess real exposure and detection readiness.

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Official MITRE ATT&CK definition

FrameworkPOS

FrameworkPOS is a point of sale (POS) malware used by FIN6 to steal payment card data from sytems that run physical POS devices.[1]

View the same entry on attack.mitre.org (MITRE-hosted reference; in-page links above use the Glexia ATT&CK library.)

Glexia analysis

How security teams should use this page

Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.

ATT&CK relationship table

Techniques used

This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.

5 rows
DomainIDNameRelationship / procedure
EnterpriseT1005Data from Local System

FrameworkPOS can collect elements related to credit card data from process memory.[1]

EnterpriseT1048Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol

FrameworkPOS can use DNS tunneling for exfiltration of credit card data.[1]

EnterpriseT1074.001Local Data StagingSub-technique

FrameworkPOS can identifiy payment card track data on the victim and copy it to a local file in a subdirectory of C:\Windows\.[4]

EnterpriseT1057Process Discovery

FrameworkPOS can enumerate and exclude selected processes on a compromised host to speed execution of memory scraping.[1]

EnterpriseT1560.003Archive via Custom MethodSub-technique

FrameworkPOS can XOR credit card information before exfiltration.[1]

Associated objects

Groups, software, and campaigns

GroupEnterprise

G0037: FIN6

FIN6 is a cyber crime group that has stolen payment card data and sold it for profit on underground marketplaces. This group has aggressively targeted and compromised point of sale (PoS) systems in the hospitality and retail sectors.[1][2]

Relationship explorer

All related ATT&CK context

Change history

Object version and sync metadata

The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates.

ATT&CK release
19.1
Object version
1.0
Created
Modified
Raw hash
c8d4e1ab06d8699f...
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases(1)
ReleaseBundle importedObject versionModifiedStatusRaw hash
19.11.0Current bundlec8d4e1ab06d8…
Raw source

Mirrored ATT&CK source object

The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.

Source references

External references and citations

MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.

  1. [1]
    SentinelOne FrameworkPOS September 2019

    Kremez, V. (2019, September 19). FIN6 “FrameworkPOS”: Point-of-Sale Malware Analysis & Internals. Retrieved September 8, 2020.

    Open source URL
  2. [2]
    Crowdstrike Global Threat Report Feb 2018

    CrowdStrike. (2018, February 26). CrowdStrike 2018 Global Threat Report. Retrieved October 10, 2018.

    Open source URL
  3. [3]
    Visa FIN6 Feb 2019

    Visa Public. (2019, February). FIN6 Cybercrime Group Expands Threat to eCommerce Merchants. Retrieved September 16, 2019.

    Open source URL
  4. [4]
    FireEye FIN6 April 2016

    FireEye Threat Intelligence. (2016, April). Follow the Money: Dissecting the Operations of the Cyber Crime Group FIN6. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  5. [5]
    SentinelOne FrameworkPOS September 2019

    Kremez, V. (2019, September 19). FIN6 “FrameworkPOS”: Point-of-Sale Malware Analysis & Internals. Retrieved September 8, 2020.

    Open source URL
  6. [6]
    SentinelOne FrameworkPOS September 2019

    Kremez, V. (2019, September 19). FIN6 “FrameworkPOS”: Point-of-Sale Malware Analysis & Internals. Retrieved September 8, 2020.

    Open source URL
  7. [7]
    Trinity

    (Citation: SentinelOne FrameworkPOS September 2019)

  8. [8]
    Trinity

    (Citation: SentinelOne FrameworkPOS September 2019)

  9. [9]
    Trinity

    (Citation: SentinelOne FrameworkPOS September 2019)

  10. [10]
    mitre-attackS0503
    Open source URL
  11. [11]
    mitre-attackS0503
    Open source URL
  12. [12]
    mitre-attackS0503
    Open source URL
  13. [13]
    Crowdstrike Global Threat Report Feb 2018

    CrowdStrike. (2018, February 26). CrowdStrike 2018 Global Threat Report. Retrieved October 10, 2018.

    Open source URL
  14. [14]
    SentinelOne FrameworkPOS September 2019

    Kremez, V. (2019, September 19). FIN6 “FrameworkPOS”: Point-of-Sale Malware Analysis & Internals. Retrieved September 8, 2020.

    Open source URL
  15. [15]
    SentinelOne FrameworkPOS September 2019

    Kremez, V. (2019, September 19). FIN6 “FrameworkPOS”: Point-of-Sale Malware Analysis & Internals. Retrieved September 8, 2020.

    Open source URL
  16. [16]
    Visa FIN6 Feb 2019

    Visa Public. (2019, February). FIN6 Cybercrime Group Expands Threat to eCommerce Merchants. Retrieved September 16, 2019.

    Open source URL
  17. [17]
    SentinelOne FrameworkPOS September 2019

    Kremez, V. (2019, September 19). FIN6 “FrameworkPOS”: Point-of-Sale Malware Analysis & Internals. Retrieved September 8, 2020.

    Open source URL
  18. [18]
    SentinelOne FrameworkPOS September 2019

    Kremez, V. (2019, September 19). FIN6 “FrameworkPOS”: Point-of-Sale Malware Analysis & Internals. Retrieved September 8, 2020.

    Open source URL
  19. [19]
    SentinelOne FrameworkPOS September 2019

    Kremez, V. (2019, September 19). FIN6 “FrameworkPOS”: Point-of-Sale Malware Analysis & Internals. Retrieved September 8, 2020.

    Open source URL
  20. [20]
    SentinelOne FrameworkPOS September 2019

    Kremez, V. (2019, September 19). FIN6 “FrameworkPOS”: Point-of-Sale Malware Analysis & Internals. Retrieved September 8, 2020.

    Open source URL
  21. [21]
    FireEye FIN6 April 2016

    FireEye Threat Intelligence. (2016, April). Follow the Money: Dissecting the Operations of the Cyber Crime Group FIN6. Retrieved November 17, 2024.

    Open source URL
  22. [22]
    SentinelOne FrameworkPOS September 2019

    Kremez, V. (2019, September 19). FIN6 “FrameworkPOS”: Point-of-Sale Malware Analysis & Internals. Retrieved September 8, 2020.

    Open source URL
  23. [23]
    SentinelOne FrameworkPOS September 2019

    Kremez, V. (2019, September 19). FIN6 “FrameworkPOS”: Point-of-Sale Malware Analysis & Internals. Retrieved September 8, 2020.

    Open source URL
  24. [24]
    SentinelOne FrameworkPOS September 2019

    Kremez, V. (2019, September 19). FIN6 “FrameworkPOS”: Point-of-Sale Malware Analysis & Internals. Retrieved September 8, 2020.

    Open source URL
Source and licensing

Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.