G0051: FIN10
Analyst context for executives and security teams
FIN10 matters because ATT&CK describes it as a financially motivated group that used stolen, exfiltrated victim data for extortion against North American organizations during the 2013–2016 period. For leaders, the decision value is less about a current campaign claim and more about validating whether the organization can detect and respond to credential abuse, remote access, lateral movement, persistence, and data-theft-driven extortion behaviors.
Executive priority
Treat this as a readiness lens for data extortion risk. Executives should ask whether identity controls, RDP governance, endpoint logging, incident response playbooks, and evidence needed for legal/compliance decisions are strong enough to support rapid containment and fact-finding if stolen-data extortion is alleged. Budget and control priorities should focus on account abuse, remote access paths, Windows execution and persistence mechanisms, and defensible investigation evidence.
Technical view
ATT&CK provides no group-specific detection text and no platforms for FIN10, so SOC validation should be driven by the related behaviors: Empire use; RDP; system/user discovery; scheduled tasks; PowerShell and Windows command shell execution; file deletion; valid and local account abuse; registry run keys/startup folder persistence; lateral tool transfer; and acquisition/use of tools. The strongest defensive validation is whether teams can correlate identity logons, remote desktop activity, process/script execution, persistence changes, file movement, and cleanup activity into a single intrusion timeline.
Likely telemetry
- Authentication and account-use logs, including local account activity where applicable
- Remote Desktop Protocol session and logon records on Windows systems
- PowerShell execution and script logging where enabled
- Windows command shell process creation and command-line telemetry
- Scheduled task creation, modification, and execution events
Detection direction
- Do not rely on a FIN10-specific signature; ATT&CK does not provide detection guidance for this group object.
- Validate correlation across valid-account logons, RDP sessions, command execution, and persistence changes, since these behaviors can appear administrative in isolation.
- Tune detections for PowerShell, cmd.exe, scheduled tasks, registry startup changes, and file deletion with attention to administrator false positives.
- Review whether local accounts and reused administrative credentials are visible in logs; these are common blind spots for Valid Accounts and Local Accounts coverage.
- Test whether lateral tool transfer between internal systems is observable, not just initial ingress or internet-facing activity.
Mitigation priorities
- Prioritize governance and monitoring of valid accounts, local accounts, and remote access paths such as RDP.
- Reduce unnecessary exposure and use of remote desktop and administrative access mechanisms.
- Harden and monitor Windows persistence locations including scheduled tasks, Run Keys, and Startup Folders.
- Improve endpoint visibility for PowerShell, Windows command shell, file movement, and file deletion activity.
- Maintain incident response procedures for data-theft extortion scenarios, including evidence preservation and executive/legal escalation paths.
Analyst notes and limits
The supplied ATT&CK object identifies FIN10 as financially motivated and tied to data extortion, with a cited FireEye report as the primary external reference. The relationship set is useful for defensive planning because it shows the behaviors ATT&CK associates with the group, especially credential abuse, RDP, Windows execution, persistence, lateral movement, and tool use.
ATT&CK provides no official detection text, no group-level platforms or tactics, and the description covers activity since at least 2013 through 2016. This summary does not claim current activity, customer exposure, or guaranteed detection. Local telemetry, architecture, and incident evidence are required to determine actual risk and coverage.
FIN10
How security teams should use this page
Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.
Techniques used
This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.
| Domain | ID | Name | Relationship / procedure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | T1070.004 | File Deletion Sub-technique | |
| Enterprise | T1570 | Lateral Tool Transfer | |
| Enterprise | T1033 | System Owner/User Discovery | |
| Enterprise | T1059.003 | Windows Command Shell Sub-technique | |
| Enterprise | T1078.003 | Local Accounts Sub-technique | |
| Enterprise | T1547.001 | Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder Sub-technique | |
| Enterprise | T1053.005 | Scheduled Task Sub-technique | |
| Enterprise | T1588.002 | Tool Sub-technique | |
| Enterprise | T1021.001 | Remote Desktop Protocol Sub-technique | |
| Enterprise | T1059.001 | PowerShell Sub-technique | |
| Enterprise | T1078 | Valid Accounts |
Groups, software, and campaigns
S0363: Empire
Empire is an open-source, cross-platform remote administration and post-exploitation framework that is publicly available on GitHub. While the tool itself is primarily written in Python, the post-exploitation agents are written in pure PowerShell for Windows and Python for Linux/macOS. Empire was one of five tools singled out by a joint report on public hacking tools being widely used by adversaries.[1][2][3]
All related ATT&CK context
Object version and sync metadata
The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates .
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases (1)
| Release | Bundle imported | Object version | Modified | Status | Raw hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.1 | 1.3 | Current bundle | f4f65bf9578e… |
Mirrored ATT&CK source object
The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.
External references and citations
MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.
-
[1]
FireEye FIN10 June 2017
FireEye iSIGHT Intelligence. (2017, June 16). FIN10: Anatomy of a Cyber Extortion Operation. Retrieved November 17, 2024.
Open source URL -
[2]
FIN10
(Citation: FireEye FIN10 June 2017)
-
[3]
mitre-attack G0051Open source URL
Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.