LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
MITRE ATT&CK® Campaign

C0006: Operation Honeybee

Operation Honeybee was a campaign that targeted humanitarian aid and inter-Korean affairs organizations from at least late 2017 through early 2018. Operation Honeybee initially targeted South Korea, but expanded to include Vietnam, Singapore, Japan, Indonesia, Argentina, and Canada. Security researchers assessed the threat actors were likely Korean speakers based on metadata used in both lure documents and executables, and named the campaign "Honeybee" after the author name discovered in malicious Word documents.[1]

EnterpriseC0006CampaignObject v1.1Modified
Glexia's Take · Automated analysis

Security context for executives and security teams

Automation confidenceMedium

C0006: Operation Honeybee describes [Operation Honeybee](https://attack.mitre.org/campaigns/C0006) was a campaign that targeted humanitarian aid and inter-Korean affairs organizations from at least late 2017 through early 2018. [Operation Honeybee](https://attack.mitre.org/campaigns/C0006) initially targeted South Korea, but expanded to include Vietnam, Singapore, Japan, Indonesia, Argentina, and Canada. Security researchers assessed the threat actors were likely Korean speakers based on metadata used in both lure documents and executables, and named...

Executive priority

C0006: Operation Honeybee is an official MITRE ATT&CK campaign. Glexia treats it as defensive behavior context for prioritizing monitoring, control validation, and response planning without using the object by itself as an attribution claim.

Technical view

Security teams should validate C0006: Operation Honeybee by reviewing the official ATT&CK relationships, mapped tactics (the mapped ATT&CK tactic context), supported platforms (the platforms named in the official object), and available local telemetry before making detection or mitigation decisions.

Likely telemetry

  • Official ATT&CK relationships and object metadata

Detection direction

  • Validate whether C0006: Operation Honeybee appears in your detection coverage and tabletop scenarios.
  • Use the object to align executive risk language with SOC, incident response, and detection engineering work.
  • Do not treat ATT&CK relationship context as attribution without corroborating evidence.

Mitigation priorities

  • Map the object to existing controls and identify missing telemetry or response ownership.
  • Prioritize mitigations that reduce exposure on the listed platforms and tactics.
  • Review adjacent ATT&CK relationships before changing policy, detections, or reporting language.
Additional notes and limits

Baseline Glexia take generated from the official MITRE ATT&CK STIX object, source hash, tactics, platforms, and detection fields. It is safe to replace with a richer model-generated take for the same source hash later.

This baseline take is source-grounded and schema-validated, but it does not include environment-specific telemetry, incident evidence, or threat-intelligence corroboration.

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Official MITRE ATT&CK definition

Operation Honeybee

Operation Honeybee was a campaign that targeted humanitarian aid and inter-Korean affairs organizations from at least late 2017 through early 2018. Operation Honeybee initially targeted South Korea, but expanded to include Vietnam, Singapore, Japan, Indonesia, Argentina, and Canada. Security researchers assessed the threat actors were likely Korean speakers based on metadata used in both lure documents and executables, and named the campaign "Honeybee" after the author name discovered in malicious Word documents.[1]

View the same entry on attack.mitre.org (MITRE-hosted reference; in-page links above use the Glexia ATT&CK library.)

Glexia analysis

How security teams should use this page

Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.

ATT&CK relationship table

Techniques used

This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.

28 rows
DomainIDNameRelationship / procedure
EnterpriseT1585.002Email AccountsSub-technique

During Operation Honeybee, attackers created email addresses to register for a free account for a control server used for the implants.[1]

EnterpriseT1083File and Directory Discovery

During Operation Honeybee, the threat actors used a malicious DLL to search for files with specific keywords.[1]

EnterpriseT1106Native API

During Operation Honeybee, the threat actors deployed malware that used API calls, including `CreateProcessAsUser`.[1]

EnterpriseT1070.004File DeletionSub-technique

During Operation Honeybee, the threat actors used batch files that reduced their fingerprint on a compromised system by deleting malware-related files.[1]

EnterpriseT1074.001Local Data StagingSub-technique

During Operation Honeybee, stolen data was copied into a text file using the format `From (- --).txt` prior to compression, encoding, and exfiltration.[1]

EnterpriseT1583.001DomainsSub-technique

During Operation Honeybee, threat actors registered domains for C2.[1]

EnterpriseT1027.013Encrypted/Encoded FileSub-technique

During Operation Honeybee, the threat actors used Base64 to encode files with a custom key.[1]

EnterpriseT1553.002Code SigningSub-technique

During Operation Honeybee, the threat actors deployed the MaoCheng dropper with a stolen Adobe Systems digital signature.[1]

EnterpriseT1041Exfiltration Over C2 Channel

During Operation Honeybee, the threat actors uploaded stolen files to their C2 servers.[1]

EnterpriseT1112Modify Registry

During Operation Honeybee, the threat actors used batch files that modified registry keys.[1]

EnterpriseT1059.003Windows Command ShellSub-technique

During Operation Honeybee, various implants used batch scripting and `cmd.exe` for execution.[1]

EnterpriseT1082System Information Discovery

During Operation Honeybee, the threat actors collected the computer name, OS, and other system information using `cmd /c systeminfo > %temp%\ temp.ini`.[1]

EnterpriseT1569.002Service ExecutionSub-technique

During Operation Honeybee, threat actors ran sc start to start the COMSysApp as part of the service hijacking and sc stop to stop and reconfigure the COMSysApp.[1]

EnterpriseT1560.001Archive via UtilitySub-technique

During Operation Honeybee, the threat actors uses zip to pack collected files before exfiltration.[1]

EnterpriseT1574.011Services Registry Permissions WeaknessSub-technique

During Operation Honeybee, the threat actors used a batch file that modified the COMSysApp service to load a malicious ipnet.dll payload and to load a DLL into the `svchost.exe` process.[1]

EnterpriseT1588.004Digital CertificatesSub-technique

For Operation Honeybee, the threat actors stole a digital signature from Adobe Systems to use with their MaoCheng dropper.[1]

EnterpriseT1071.002File Transfer ProtocolsSub-technique

During Operation Honeybee, the threat actors had the ability to use FTP for C2.[1]

EnterpriseT1548.002Bypass User Account ControlSub-technique

During Operation Honeybee, the threat actors used the malicious NTWDBLIB.DLL and `cliconfig.exe` to bypass UAC protections.[1]

EnterpriseT1005Data from Local System

During Operation Honeybee, the threat actors collected data from compromised hosts.[1]

EnterpriseT1543.003Windows ServiceSub-technique

During Operation Honeybee, threat actors installed DLLs and backdoors as Windows services.[1]

EnterpriseT1583.004ServerSub-technique

For Operation Honeybee, at least one identified persona was used to register for a free account for a control server.[1]

EnterpriseT1036.005Match Legitimate Resource Name or LocationSub-technique

During Operation Honeybee, the threat actors used a legitimate Windows executable and secure directory for their payloads to bypass UAC.[1]

EnterpriseT1204.002Malicious FileSub-technique

During Operation Honeybee, threat actors relied on a victim to enable macros within a malicious Word document.[1]

EnterpriseT1105Ingress Tool Transfer

During Operation Honeybee, the threat actors downloaded additional malware and malicious scripts onto a compromised host.[1]

EnterpriseT1059.005Visual BasicSub-technique

For Operation Honeybee, the threat actors used a Visual Basic script embedded within a Word document to download an implant.[1]

EnterpriseT1057Process Discovery

During Operation Honeybee, the threat actors obtained a list of running processes on a victim machine using `cmd /c tasklist > %temp%\temp.ini`.[1]

EnterpriseT1140Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information

During Operation Honeybee, malicious files were decoded prior to execution.[1]

EnterpriseT1036Masquerading

During Operation Honeybee, the threat actors modified the MaoCheng dropper so its icon appeared as a Word document.[1]

Associated objects

Groups, software, and campaigns

ToolEnterprise

S0075: Reg

Reg is a Windows utility used to interact with the Windows Registry. It can be used at the command-line interface to query, add, modify, and remove information. [1]

Utilities such as Reg are known to be used by persistent threats. [2]

Windows
ToolEnterprise

S0057: Tasklist

The Tasklist utility displays a list of applications and services with their Process IDs (PID) for all tasks running on either a local or a remote computer. It is packaged with Windows operating systems and can be executed from the command-line interface. [1]

ToolEnterprise

S0106: cmd

cmd is the Windows command-line interpreter that can be used to interact with systems and execute other processes and utilities. [1]

Cmd.exe contains native functionality to perform many operations to interact with the system, including listing files in a directory (e.g., dir [2]), deleting files (e.g., del [3]), and copying files (e.g., copy [4]).

Windows
Relationship explorer

All related ATT&CK context

Change history

Object version and sync metadata

The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates.

ATT&CK release
19.2
Object version
1.1
Created
Modified
Raw hash
b5ce5df3534523d6...
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases(2)
ReleaseBundle importedObject versionModifiedStatusRaw hash
19.21.1Current bundleb5ce5df35345…
19.11.1Older bundlee91e1bb369de…
Raw source

Mirrored ATT&CK source object

The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.

Source references

External references and citations

MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.

  1. [1]
    McAfee Honeybee

    Sherstobitoff, R. (2018, March 02). McAfee Uncovers Operation Honeybee, a Malicious Document Campaign Targeting Humanitarian Aid Groups. Retrieved May 16, 2018.

    Open source URL
  2. [2]
    mitre-attackC0006
    Open source URL
Source and licensing

Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.