LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
MITRE ATT&CK® Malware

S0462: CARROTBAT

CARROTBAT is a customized dropper that has been in use since at least 2017. CARROTBAT has been used to install SYSCON and has infrastructure overlap with KONNI.[1][2]

EnterpriseS0462MalwareObject v1.2Modified
Glexia's Take · Automated analysis

Security context for executives and security teams

Automation confidenceMedium

CARROTBAT matters because it is described as a Windows dropper: its value to an adversary is enabling follow-on malware installation, including SYSCON, rather than being the final objective itself. For leaders, the practical question is whether defenses can spot early-stage delivery and staging behavior before additional tools are installed and evidence is deleted or obfuscated.

Executive priority

Prioritize this as a readiness and resilience issue, not just a malware-name issue. Because ATT&CK provides no official detection guidance and no tactic list for the malware object, teams should validate coverage against the mapped behaviors: command execution, obfuscation, encoded files, file transfer, system discovery, and file deletion. This supports incident decision-making, audit evidence for endpoint monitoring, and budget decisions around Windows endpoint visibility and response capability.

Technical view

CARROTBAT is a Windows malware object mapped to use Command Obfuscation, Encrypted/Encoded File, Windows Command Shell, File Deletion, System Information Discovery, and Ingress Tool Transfer. SOC and IR teams should test whether they can correlate suspicious cmd.exe activity with encoded or obfuscated artifacts, newly introduced files, host discovery commands, and subsequent cleanup. Because the official object does not provide detections, analytics should be behavior-based and validated against local baselines rather than relying only on CARROTBAT signatures.

Likely telemetry

  • Windows endpoint process creation telemetry, especially command-line arguments for cmd.exe
  • File creation, modification, encoding/encryption indicators, and deletion events on Windows hosts
  • Endpoint detection logs showing dropped executables, scripts, or non-native files
  • Network or proxy evidence of externally transferred tools or files where available
  • Host inventory and system information query activity

Detection direction

  • Validate detections for suspicious Windows Command Shell execution with obfuscated or unusual command-line content.
  • Correlate encoded/encrypted files with process execution and subsequent file deletion to reduce dependence on static signatures.
  • Look for staging patterns: external file transfer followed by execution, discovery, and cleanup on the same host.
  • Tune for false positives from administrative scripts, software deployment tools, and legitimate cleanup jobs by using signer, parent process, user context, and change window context.
  • Treat CARROTBAT family naming as enrichment; coverage should be measured against the mapped ATT&CK behaviors because MITRE provides no official detection text for this object.

Mitigation priorities

  • Ensure Windows endpoints collect process, command-line, file, and deletion telemetry needed for investigation.
  • Harden and monitor script and command-shell use, especially where business workflows do not require interactive shell activity.
  • Restrict unauthorized tool transfer paths and review egress controls where they can provide evidence of external file retrieval.
  • Maintain endpoint prevention and response controls capable of blocking or containing suspicious droppers and follow-on payload installation.
  • Prepare IR playbooks to preserve volatile evidence quickly, since mapped behavior includes file deletion and obfuscation.
Additional notes and limits

The supplied ATT&CK description identifies CARROTBAT as a customized dropper in use since at least 2017, used to install SYSCON, with infrastructure overlap with KONNI. The relationship set is the main source of defensive value here because it shows the behaviors defenders should validate even when malware-specific detection content is absent.

ATT&CK does not provide official detection guidance, aliases, labels, or tactics for the CARROTBAT malware object in the supplied fields. The external references are campaign reports, but this summary does not infer current activity, attribution, targeting, or guaranteed detection coverage. Local telemetry, asset exposure, and incident evidence are required to determine relevance in a specific environment.

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Official MITRE ATT&CK definition

CARROTBAT

CARROTBAT is a customized dropper that has been in use since at least 2017. CARROTBAT has been used to install SYSCON and has infrastructure overlap with KONNI.[1][2]

View the same entry on attack.mitre.org (MITRE-hosted reference; in-page links above use the Glexia ATT&CK library.)

Glexia analysis

How security teams should use this page

Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.

ATT&CK relationship table

Techniques used

This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.

6 rows
DomainIDNameRelationship / procedure
EnterpriseT1082System Information Discovery

CARROTBAT has the ability to determine the operating system of the compromised host and whether Windows is being run with x86 or x64 architecture.[1][2]

EnterpriseT1059.003Windows Command ShellSub-technique

CARROTBAT has the ability to execute command line arguments on a compromised host.[2]

EnterpriseT1027.010Command ObfuscationSub-technique

CARROTBAT has the ability to execute obfuscated commands on the infected host.[1]

EnterpriseT1105Ingress Tool Transfer

CARROTBAT has the ability to download and execute a remote file via certutil.[1]

EnterpriseT1070.004File DeletionSub-technique

CARROTBAT has the ability to delete downloaded files from a compromised host.[1]

EnterpriseT1027.013Encrypted/Encoded FileSub-technique

CARROTBAT has the ability to download a base64 encoded payload.[1]

Relationship explorer

All related ATT&CK context

Change history

Object version and sync metadata

The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates.

ATT&CK release
19.1
Object version
1.2
Created
Modified
Raw hash
d71058e9dfdc4e20...
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases(1)
ReleaseBundle importedObject versionModifiedStatusRaw hash
19.11.2Current bundled71058e9dfdc…
Raw source

Mirrored ATT&CK source object

The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.

Source references

External references and citations

MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.

  1. [1]
    Unit 42 CARROTBAT November 2018

    Grunzweig, J. and Wilhoit, K. (2018, November 29). The Fractured Block Campaign: CARROTBAT Used to Deliver Malware Targeting Southeast Asia. Retrieved June 2, 2020.

    Open source URL
  2. [2]
    Unit 42 CARROTBAT January 2020

    McCabe, A. (2020, January 23). The Fractured Statue Campaign: U.S. Government Agency Targeted in Spear-Phishing Attacks. Retrieved June 2, 2020.

    Open source URL
  3. [3]
    Unit 42 CARROTBAT January 2020

    McCabe, A. (2020, January 23). The Fractured Statue Campaign: U.S. Government Agency Targeted in Spear-Phishing Attacks. Retrieved June 2, 2020.

    Open source URL
  4. [4]
    Unit 42 CARROTBAT January 2020

    McCabe, A. (2020, January 23). The Fractured Statue Campaign: U.S. Government Agency Targeted in Spear-Phishing Attacks. Retrieved June 2, 2020.

    Open source URL
  5. [5]
    Unit 42 CARROTBAT November 2018

    Grunzweig, J. and Wilhoit, K. (2018, November 29). The Fractured Block Campaign: CARROTBAT Used to Deliver Malware Targeting Southeast Asia. Retrieved June 2, 2020.

    Open source URL
  6. [6]
    Unit 42 CARROTBAT November 2018

    Grunzweig, J. and Wilhoit, K. (2018, November 29). The Fractured Block Campaign: CARROTBAT Used to Deliver Malware Targeting Southeast Asia. Retrieved June 2, 2020.

    Open source URL
  7. [7]
    mitre-attackS0462
    Open source URL
  8. [8]
    mitre-attackS0462
    Open source URL
  9. [9]
    mitre-attackS0462
    Open source URL
  10. [10]
    Unit 42 CARROTBAT January 2020

    McCabe, A. (2020, January 23). The Fractured Statue Campaign: U.S. Government Agency Targeted in Spear-Phishing Attacks. Retrieved June 2, 2020.

    Open source URL
  11. [11]
    Unit 42 CARROTBAT January 2020

    McCabe, A. (2020, January 23). The Fractured Statue Campaign: U.S. Government Agency Targeted in Spear-Phishing Attacks. Retrieved June 2, 2020.

    Open source URL
  12. [12]
    Unit 42 CARROTBAT November 2018

    Grunzweig, J. and Wilhoit, K. (2018, November 29). The Fractured Block Campaign: CARROTBAT Used to Deliver Malware Targeting Southeast Asia. Retrieved June 2, 2020.

    Open source URL
  13. [13]
    Unit 42 CARROTBAT November 2018

    Grunzweig, J. and Wilhoit, K. (2018, November 29). The Fractured Block Campaign: CARROTBAT Used to Deliver Malware Targeting Southeast Asia. Retrieved June 2, 2020.

    Open source URL
  14. [14]
    Unit 42 CARROTBAT January 2020

    McCabe, A. (2020, January 23). The Fractured Statue Campaign: U.S. Government Agency Targeted in Spear-Phishing Attacks. Retrieved June 2, 2020.

    Open source URL
  15. [15]
    Unit 42 CARROTBAT January 2020

    McCabe, A. (2020, January 23). The Fractured Statue Campaign: U.S. Government Agency Targeted in Spear-Phishing Attacks. Retrieved June 2, 2020.

    Open source URL
  16. [16]
    Unit 42 CARROTBAT November 2018

    Grunzweig, J. and Wilhoit, K. (2018, November 29). The Fractured Block Campaign: CARROTBAT Used to Deliver Malware Targeting Southeast Asia. Retrieved June 2, 2020.

    Open source URL
  17. [17]
    Unit 42 CARROTBAT November 2018

    Grunzweig, J. and Wilhoit, K. (2018, November 29). The Fractured Block Campaign: CARROTBAT Used to Deliver Malware Targeting Southeast Asia. Retrieved June 2, 2020.

    Open source URL
  18. [18]
    Unit 42 CARROTBAT November 2018

    Grunzweig, J. and Wilhoit, K. (2018, November 29). The Fractured Block Campaign: CARROTBAT Used to Deliver Malware Targeting Southeast Asia. Retrieved June 2, 2020.

    Open source URL
  19. [19]
    Unit 42 CARROTBAT November 2018

    Grunzweig, J. and Wilhoit, K. (2018, November 29). The Fractured Block Campaign: CARROTBAT Used to Deliver Malware Targeting Southeast Asia. Retrieved June 2, 2020.

    Open source URL
  20. [20]
    Unit 42 CARROTBAT November 2018

    Grunzweig, J. and Wilhoit, K. (2018, November 29). The Fractured Block Campaign: CARROTBAT Used to Deliver Malware Targeting Southeast Asia. Retrieved June 2, 2020.

    Open source URL
  21. [21]
    Unit 42 CARROTBAT November 2018

    Grunzweig, J. and Wilhoit, K. (2018, November 29). The Fractured Block Campaign: CARROTBAT Used to Deliver Malware Targeting Southeast Asia. Retrieved June 2, 2020.

    Open source URL
Source and licensing

Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.