Live Active security incident? Get immediate response
MITRE ATT&CK® Technique

T1685: Disable or Modify Tools

Adversaries may disable, degrade, or tamper with security tools or applications (e.g., endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools, intrusion detection systems (IDS), antivirus, logging agents, sensors, etc.) to impair or reduce visibility of defensive capabilities. This may include stopping specific services, killing processes, modifying or deleting tool configuration files and Registry keys, or preventing tools from updating. This may also include impairing defenses more broadly by disrupting preventative, detection, and response mechanisms across host, network, and cloud environments.[1]

In addition to directly targeting tools, adversaries may block or manipulate indicators and telemetry used for detection. This includes maliciously disabling or redirecting sensors such as Event Tracing for Windows (ETW), modifying event log configurations (e.g., redirecting Security logs), or interfering with logging pipelines and forwarding mechanisms (e.g., SIEM ingestion).[2][3]

More advanced techniques include leveraging legitimate drivers or debugging mechanisms to render tools non-functional, bypassing anti-tampering protections, and targeting specific defenses such as Sysmon or cloud monitoring agents. Adversaries may also disrupt broader defensive operations, including update mechanisms, logging infrastructure (e.g., syslog), or event aggregation, further degrading an organization’s ability to detect and respond to malicious activity.[4]

EnterpriseT1685TechniqueObject v1.0 Modified
Glexia's Take

Analyst context for executives and security teams

Analyst confidence High

Disable or Modify Tools is a defense-impairment technique: adversaries tamper with security tooling, logging, sensors, update mechanisms, or telemetry pipelines so responders lose visibility at the moment they need it most. For leaders, the practical issue is not only whether EDR, IDS, cloud logs, or SIEM forwarding exist, but whether the organization can prove they remain trustworthy during an intrusion.

Executive priority

Prioritize this as an operational resilience and audit-evidence risk. If security tools, event logs, cloud logging, or SIEM ingestion can be stopped or altered by compromised accounts or local administrators without rapid detection, incident response timelines, regulatory evidence, and recovery decisions become less reliable. The ATT&CK relationships also connect this behavior to campaigns involving energy, supply chain compromise, VPN appliances, and critical infrastructure contexts, making it relevant to both enterprise and cyber-physical risk discussions where those environments exist.

Technical view

Validate coverage across the listed platforms: Windows, Linux, macOS, ESXi, IaaS, containers, and network devices. SOC and IR teams should test whether they can detect service stops, killed security processes, configuration or registry changes, logging changes, update disruption, ETW or event-log tampering, syslog or SIEM forwarding failure, cloud monitoring-agent changes, and mismatches between security-tool UI health and underlying telemetry. Because ATT&CK provides no official detection text for this technique, use the related detection strategy DET0497 as a pointer and map validation to the sub-techniques for Windows Event Log, cloud logs, Linux audit logs, log clearing, and tool UI manipulation.

Likely telemetry

  • Endpoint security tool health and tamper events
  • Process creation, process termination, and service-control events
  • File integrity and permission changes for security-tool configurations and logging paths
  • Windows Registry changes for security, logging, and startup-related keys
  • Windows Event Log, ETW, and audit policy configuration events

Detection direction

  • Alert on unexpected disabling, stopping, deletion, or configuration changes to defensive tools and logging components.
  • Monitor for gaps: missing heartbeats, sudden ingestion drops, log-source silence, or telemetry redirection can be as important as explicit tamper alerts.
  • Correlate tool-health events with privileged account activity because several mitigations depend on limiting who can change tools, files, directories, registry keys, and logging settings.
  • Tune for authorized maintenance windows, software upgrades, and administrator troubleshooting to reduce false positives while preserving high-severity handling for unscheduled or multi-system impairment.
  • Validate sub-technique coverage separately for Windows Event Log changes, cloud log changes, Linux audit changes, Windows log clearing, Linux/macOS log clearing, and security-tool UI spoofing or inconsistency.

Mitigation priorities

  • Enforce least privilege and strong user account management for accounts able to administer security tools, logging, cloud monitoring, and SIEM integrations.
  • Restrict file, directory, and registry permissions around security tooling, logging configurations, startup locations, and audit settings.
  • Use execution prevention to limit unauthorized code, scripts, drivers, or tooling that could impair defenses.
  • Remove or disable unnecessary software, features, or services that increase the number of components defenders must protect and monitor.
  • Harden software configurations for endpoint, cloud, network, and logging tools, including update and tamper-resistance settings where available.
Analyst notes and limits

This object consolidates older ATT&CK coverage for disabling security tools, indicator blocking, and broader impair-defense behavior. The sub-techniques provide the most useful scoping for engineering work: Windows logs, cloud logs, Linux audit logs, log clearing on Windows/Linux/macOS, and tool UI manipulation. The campaign relationships show this behavior has appeared in notable ATT&CK-documented campaigns, but local relevance depends on the organization’s platforms, logging architecture, and administrative model.

ATT&CK does not provide official detection analytics for this object in the supplied fields. The guidance above is derived from the official description, listed platforms, tactic, mitigations, detection-strategy relationship, and related sub-techniques; it does not prove any environment has detection coverage or exposure. Local validation is required to determine which tools, logs, accounts, and pipelines can be modified and whether independent monitoring would catch impairment.

Official MITRE ATT&CK definition

Disable or Modify Tools

Adversaries may disable, degrade, or tamper with security tools or applications (e.g., endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools, intrusion detection systems (IDS), antivirus, logging agents, sensors, etc.) to impair or reduce visibility of defensive capabilities. This may include stopping specific services, killing processes, modifying or deleting tool configuration files and Registry keys, or preventing tools from updating. This may also include impairing defenses more broadly by disrupting preventative, detection, and response mechanisms across host, network, and cloud environments.[1]

In addition to directly targeting tools, adversaries may block or manipulate indicators and telemetry used for detection. This includes maliciously disabling or redirecting sensors such as Event Tracing for Windows (ETW), modifying event log configurations (e.g., redirecting Security logs), or interfering with logging pipelines and forwarding mechanisms (e.g., SIEM ingestion).[2][3]

More advanced techniques include leveraging legitimate drivers or debugging mechanisms to render tools non-functional, bypassing anti-tampering protections, and targeting specific defenses such as Sysmon or cloud monitoring agents. Adversaries may also disrupt broader defensive operations, including update mechanisms, logging infrastructure (e.g., syslog), or event aggregation, further degrading an organization’s ability to detect and respond to malicious activity.[4]

View the same entry on attack.mitre.org (MITRE-hosted reference; in-page links above use the Glexia ATT&CK library.)

Glexia analysis

How security teams should use this page

Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.

ATT&CK relationship table

Related techniques

This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.

6 rows
Domain ID Name Relationship / procedure
Enterprise T1685.002 Disable or Modify Cloud Log Sub-technique Disable or Modify Cloud Log subtechnique of this object.
Enterprise T1562.001 Disable or Modify Tools Sub-technique Disable or Modify Tools revoked by this object.
Enterprise T1685.001 Disable or Modify Windows Event Log Sub-technique Disable or Modify Windows Event Log subtechnique of this object.
Enterprise T1562.006 Indicator Blocking Sub-technique Indicator Blocking revoked by this object.
Enterprise T1685.006 Clear Linux or Mac System Logs Sub-technique Clear Linux or Mac System Logs subtechnique of this object.
Enterprise T1685.005 Clear Windows Event Logs Sub-technique Clear Windows Event Logs subtechnique of this object.
Associated objects

Groups, software, and campaigns

Group Enterprise

G1015: Scattered Spider

Scattered Spider is a native English-speaking cybercriminal group active since at least 2022. [1] [2] The group initially targeted customer relationship management (CRM) providers, business process outsourcing (BPO) firms, and telecommunications and technology companies before expanding in 2023 to gaming, hospitality, retail, managed service provider (MSP), manufacturing, and financial sectors. [2] Scattered Spider relies heavily on social engineering, including impersonating IT and help-desk staff, to gain initial access, bypass multi-factor authentication (MFA), and compromise enterprise networks. The group has adapted its tooling to evade endpoint detection and response (EDR) defenses and used ransomware for financial gain. [3] [4] [5] Scattered Spider had expanded into hybrid cloud and identity environments, using help-desk impersonation and MFA bypass to obtain administrator access in Okta, AWS, and Office 365. [6]

Group Enterprise

G0094: Kimsuky

Kimsuky is a Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK)-based cyber espionage group that has been active since at least 2012. The group initially targeted South Korean government agencies, think tanks, and subject-matter experts in various fields. Its operations expanded to include the United Nations and organizations in the government, education, business services, and manufacturing sectors across the United States, Japan, Russia, and Europe. Kimsuky has focused collection on foreign policy and national security issues tied to the Korean Peninsula, nuclear policy, and sanctions. Kimsuky operations have overlapped with those of other North Korean state-sponsored cyber espionage actors as a result of ad hoc collaborations or other limited resource sharing.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

Kimsuky was assessed to be responsible for the 2014 Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co. compromise; other notable campaigns include Operation STOLEN PENCIL (2018), Operation Kabar Cobra (2019), and Operation Smoke Screen (2019).[7][8][9] In 2023, Kimsuky was observed using commercial large language models (LLMs) to assist with vulnerability research, scripting, social engineering and reconnaissance.[10]

DPRK threat actor cluster boundaries overlap in open source reporting, with some security researchers consolidating all attributed North Korean state-sponsored cyber activity under Lazarus Group, rather than tracking operationally distinct subgroups.

Group Enterprise

G0078: Gorgon Group

Gorgon Group is a threat group consisting of members who are suspected to be Pakistan-based or have other connections to Pakistan. The group has performed a mix of criminal and targeted attacks, including campaigns against government organizations in the United Kingdom, Spain, Russia, and the United States. [1]

Group Enterprise

G0037: FIN6

FIN6 is a cyber crime group that has stolen payment card data and sold it for profit on underground marketplaces. This group has aggressively targeted and compromised point of sale (PoS) systems in the hospitality and retail sectors.[1][2]

Group Enterprise

G1054: MirrorFace

MirrorFace is a People's Republic of China (PRC)-aligned cyberespionage actor believed to be a subgroup under the menuPass umbrella based on targeting, tools, and infrastructure overlaps. MirrorFace has been active since at least 2019, at first exclusively targeting Japanese organizations across the media, defense, diplomatic, financial, manufacturing, and academic sectors. Subsequent MirrorFace operations included targets in Central Europe and featured use of LODEINFO, HiddenFace, and UPPERCUT malware.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

Group Enterprise

G1030: Agrius

Agrius is an Iranian threat actor active since 2020 notable for a series of ransomware and wiper operations in the Middle East, with an emphasis on Israeli targets.[1][2] Public reporting has linked Agrius to Iran's Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS).[3]

Group Enterprise

G1023: APT5

APT5 is a China-based espionage actor that has been active since at least 2007 primarily targeting the telecommunications, aerospace, and defense industries throughout the U.S., Europe, and Asia. APT5 has displayed advanced tradecraft and significant interest in compromising networking devices and their underlying software including through the use of zero-day exploits.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

Group Enterprise

G1018: TA2541

TA2541 is a cybercriminal group that has been targeting the aviation, aerospace, transportation, manufacturing, and defense industries since at least 2017. TA2541 campaigns are typically high volume and involve the use of commodity remote access tools obfuscated by crypters and themes related to aviation, transportation, and travel.[1][2]

Group Enterprise

G1043: BlackByte

BlackByte is a ransomware threat actor operating since at least 2021. BlackByte is associated with several versions of ransomware also labeled BlackByte Ransomware. BlackByte ransomware operations initially used a common encryption key allowing for the development of a universal decryptor, but subsequent versions such as BlackByte 2.0 Ransomware use more robust encryption mechanisms. BlackByte is notable for operations targeting critical infrastructure entities among other targets across North America.[1][2][3][4][5]

Group Enterprise

G0082: APT38

APT38 is a North Korean state-sponsored threat group that specializes in financial cyber operations; it has been attributed to the Reconnaissance General Bureau.[1] Active since at least 2014, APT38 has targeted banks, financial institutions, casinos, cryptocurrency exchanges, SWIFT system endpoints, and ATMs in at least 38 countries worldwide. Significant operations include the 2016 Bank of Bangladesh heist, during which APT38 stole $81 million, as well as attacks against Bancomext [2] and Banco de Chile [2]; some of their attacks have been destructive.[1][2][3][4]

North Korean group definitions are known to have significant overlap, and some security researchers report all North Korean state-sponsored cyber activity under the name Lazarus Group instead of tracking clusters or subgroups.

Malware Enterprise

S1048: macOS.OSAMiner

macOS.OSAMiner is a Monero mining trojan that was first observed in 2018; security researchers assessed macOS.OSAMiner may have been circulating since at least 2015. macOS.OSAMiner is known for embedding one run-only AppleScript into another, which helped the malware evade full analysis for five years due to a lack of Apple event (AEVT) analysis tools.[1][2]

macOS
Malware Enterprise

S0638: Babuk

Babuk is a Ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) malware that has been used since at least 2021. The operators of Babuk employ a "Big Game Hunting" approach to targeting major enterprises and operate a leak site to post stolen data as part of their extortion scheme.[1][2][3]

WindowsLinux
Malware Enterprise

S1130: Raspberry Robin

Raspberry Robin is initial access malware first identified in September 2021, and active through early 2024. The malware is notable for spreading via infected USB devices containing a malicious LNK object that, on execution, retrieves remote hosted payloads for installation. Raspberry Robin has been widely used against various industries and geographies, and as a precursor to information stealer, ransomware, and other payloads such as SocGholish, Cobalt Strike, IcedID, and Bumblebee.[1][2][3] The DLL componenet in the Raspberry Robin infection chain is also referred to as "Roshtyak."[4] The name "Raspberry Robin" is used to refer to both the malware as well as the threat actor associated with its use, although the Raspberry Robin operators are also tracked as Storm-0856 by some vendors.[5]

Windows
Malware Enterprise

S0697: HermeticWiper

HermeticWiper is a data wiper that has been used since at least early 2022, primarily against Ukraine with additional activity observed in Latvia and Lithuania. Some sectors targeted include government, financial, defense, aviation, and IT services.[1][2][3][4][5]

Windows
Malware Enterprise

S0689: WhisperGate

WhisperGate is a multi-stage wiper designed to look like ransomware that has been used against multiple government, non-profit, and information technology organizations in Ukraine since at least January 2022.[1][2][3]

Windows
Malware Enterprise

S0670: WarzoneRAT

WarzoneRAT is a malware-as-a-service remote access tool (RAT) written in C++ that has been publicly available for purchase since at least late 2018.[1][2]

Windows
Campaign Enterprise

C0055: Quad7 Activity

Quad7 Activity, also known as CovertNetwork-1658 or the 7777 Botnet, is a network of compromised small office/home office (SOHO) routers. [1] [2] The botnet was initially composed primarily of TP-Link routers and was named Quad7 due to compromised devices exposing TCP port 7777 with the distinctive banner xlogin. Later activity showed a significant increase in compromised Asus routers and the addition of new ports and banners, including TCP port 63256 displaying alogin. Quad7 infrastructure functions as a collection of egress IPs that various China-affiliated threat actors have used to conduct password-spraying and brute-force operations. [1][3] Microsoft has reported that Storm-0940 leveraged credentials obtained through Quad7 Activity to target organizations in North America and Europe, including government agencies, non-governmental organizations, think tanks, law firms, energy firms, IT providers, and defense industrial base entities. [2]

Campaign Enterprise

C0029: Cutting Edge

Cutting Edge was a campaign conducted by suspected China-nexus espionage actors, variously identified as UNC5221/UTA0178 and UNC5325, that began as early as December 2023 with the exploitation of zero-day vulnerabilities in Ivanti Connect Secure (previously Pulse Secure) VPN appliances. Cutting Edge targeted the U.S. defense industrial base and multiple sectors globally including telecommunications, financial, aerospace, and technology. Cutting Edge featured the use of defense evasion and living-off-the-land (LoTL) techniques along with the deployment of web shells and other custom malware.[1][2][3][4][5]

Campaign Enterprise

C0035: KV Botnet Activity

KV Botnet Activity consisted of exploitation of primarily “end-of-life” small office-home office (SOHO) equipment from manufacturers such as Cisco, NETGEAR, and DrayTek. KV Botnet Activity was used by Volt Typhoon to obfuscate connectivity to victims in multiple critical infrastructure segments, including energy and telecommunication companies and entities based on the US territory of Guam. While the KV Botnet is the most prominent element of this campaign, it overlaps with another botnet cluster referred to as the JDY cluster.[1] This botnet was disrupted by US law enforcement entities in early 2024 after periods of activity from October 2022 through January 2024.[2]

Relationship explorer

All related ATT&CK context

Mitigations

Mitigation direction

Change history

Object version and sync metadata

The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates .

ATT&CK release
19.1
Object version
1.0
Created
Modified
Raw hash
79447f4605264fdd...
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases (1)
Release Bundle imported Object version Modified Status Raw hash
19.1 1.0 Current bundle 79447f460526…
Raw source

Mirrored ATT&CK source object

The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.

Source references

External references and citations

MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.

  1. [1]
    SCADAfence_ransomware

    Shaked, O. (2020, January 20). Anatomy of a Targeted Ransomware Attack. Retrieved June 18, 2022.

    Open source URL
  2. [2]
    Microsoft Lamin Sept 2017

    Microsoft. (2009, May 17). Backdoor:Win32/Lamin.A. Retrieved September 6, 2018.

    Open source URL
  3. [3]
    ETW Palantir

    Palantir. (2018, December 24). Tampering with Windows Event Tracing: Background, Offense, and Defense. Retrieved April 15, 2026.

    Open source URL
  4. [4]
    Cocomazzi FIN7 Reboot

    Cocomazzi, Antonio. (2024, July 17). FIN7 Reboot | Cybercrime Gang Enhances Ops with New EDR Bypasses and Automated Attacks. Retrieved September 24, 2025.

    Open source URL
  5. [5]
    mitre-attack T1685
    Open source URL
Source and licensing

Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.