T1422: System Network Configuration Discovery
Adversaries may look for details about the network configuration and settings, such as IP and/or MAC addresses, of devices they access or through information discovery of remote systems.
Adversaries may use the information from System Network Configuration Discovery during automated discovery to shape follow-on behaviors, including determining certain access within the target network and what actions to do next.
On Android, details of onboard network interfaces are accessible to apps through the `java.net.NetworkInterface` class.[1] Previously, the Android `TelephonyManager` class could be used to gather telephony-related device identifiers, information such as the IMSI, IMEI, and phone number. However, starting with Android 10, only preloaded, carrier, the default SMS, or device and profile owner applications can access the telephony-related device identifiers.[2]
On iOS, gathering network configuration information is not possible without root access.
Adversaries may use the information from System Network Configuration Discovery during automated discovery to shape follow-on behaviors, including determining certain access within the target network and what actions to do next.
Analyst context for executives and security teams
System Network Configuration Discovery matters because mobile malware or implants can use basic network details, such as IP or MAC address information, to understand where a device sits and decide what to do next. For executives and security leaders, the risk is not the discovery action alone; it is that mobile device context can help an adversary adapt follow-on activity, including connectivity checks, Wi-Fi-related discovery, or command-and-control preparation.
Executive priority
Treat this as a mobile security and incident-response readiness issue. Leadership should ask whether Android and iOS devices that handle sensitive business data are kept on recent OS versions, whether jailbroken/rooted devices are controlled, and whether the SOC can investigate suspicious mobile applications that collect network configuration information. This technique is associated in ATT&CK with multiple Android and iOS malware/software entries and with Operation Triangulation, so mobile telemetry and device hygiene should be part of resilience and audit evidence discussions where mobile devices are in scope.
Technical view
For Android, validate visibility into applications accessing network interface details through normal platform APIs such as java.net.NetworkInterface, and account for Android 10+ restrictions around telephony identifiers through TelephonyManager. For iOS, ATT&CK notes that gathering network configuration information is not possible without root access, making jailbreak/root indicators and unusual privilege context important investigative pivots. Because ATT&CK provides no official detection text for T1422, detection engineering should use the related DET0634 strategy as a starting point and enrich it with local mobile EDR/MDM, application inventory, OS version, permission, network, and jailbreak/root evidence. Subtechniques T1422.001 Internet Connection Discovery and T1422.002 Wi-Fi Discovery should be reviewed together because they represent common adjacent discovery behaviors.
Likely telemetry
- Mobile device OS version and patch level from MDM/UEM
- Installed mobile application inventory and application provenance
- Mobile security/EDR alerts for suspicious app behavior
- Android application behavior involving network interface or telephony-related API access where available
- Permission, device owner/profile owner, default SMS app, carrier/preloaded app status on Android
Detection direction
- Validate whether DET0634 or equivalent local analytics are implemented for mobile network configuration discovery behavior.
- Tune Android detections to distinguish expected network-aware apps from suspicious or unexpected collection of device/network identifiers.
- Use OS version context because Android 10+ restricts access to telephony-related device identifiers to specific application categories.
- On iOS, prioritize alerts involving jailbreak/root conditions or suspicious privileged execution because ATT&CK states network configuration gathering is not possible without root access.
- Correlate this technique with Internet Connection Discovery and Wi-Fi Discovery rather than treating isolated network-detail collection as high confidence by itself.
Mitigation priorities
- Prioritize M1006: keep mobile operating systems on recent versions to benefit from security architecture improvements and restrictions on sensitive identifier access.
- Enforce mobile device compliance policies for OS version, patch level, and device integrity before allowing access to business resources.
- Restrict or remove rooted/jailbroken devices from sensitive workflows, especially for iOS where root access materially changes feasibility.
- Maintain application governance through approved app sources, app inventory, and review of apps requesting sensitive or unusual capabilities.
- Ensure incident response playbooks include mobile evidence collection, application triage, and decisions for containment or device re-enrollment.
Analyst notes and limits
This technique is a discovery behavior, so its value is usually in context: which app performed it, on what platform and OS version, whether the device was rooted or jailbroken, and what happened before or after. The relationship set includes Android and iOS malware/software examples, a campaign relationship, a detection strategy relationship, a mitigation relationship, and two subtechniques, which supports prioritizing mobile telemetry correlation rather than single-signal alerting.
ATT&CK does not provide official detection text or tactics for this object in the supplied fields. The available fields support Android and iOS platform discussion, Android API considerations, Android 10+ telephony identifier restrictions, and iOS root-access constraints, but they do not establish customer exposure, active exploitation, or guaranteed detection coverage. Local MDM, mobile EDR, application, and network evidence is required to assess risk and coverage.
System Network Configuration Discovery
Adversaries may look for details about the network configuration and settings, such as IP and/or MAC addresses, of devices they access or through information discovery of remote systems.
Adversaries may use the information from System Network Configuration Discovery during automated discovery to shape follow-on behaviors, including determining certain access within the target network and what actions to do next.
On Android, details of onboard network interfaces are accessible to apps through the `java.net.NetworkInterface` class.[1] Previously, the Android `TelephonyManager` class could be used to gather telephony-related device identifiers, information such as the IMSI, IMEI, and phone number. However, starting with Android 10, only preloaded, carrier, the default SMS, or device and profile owner applications can access the telephony-related device identifiers.[2]
On iOS, gathering network configuration information is not possible without root access.
Adversaries may use the information from System Network Configuration Discovery during automated discovery to shape follow-on behaviors, including determining certain access within the target network and what actions to do next.
How security teams should use this page
Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.
Related techniques
This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.
| Domain | ID | Name | Relationship / procedure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | T1422.002 | Wi-Fi Discovery Sub-technique | Wi-Fi Discovery subtechnique of this object. |
| Mobile | T1422.001 | Internet Connection Discovery Sub-technique | Internet Connection Discovery subtechnique of this object. |
Groups, software, and campaigns
G1028: APT-C-23
S0509: FakeSpy
S1082: Sunbird
S0403: Riltok
S1077: Hornbill
S0427: TrickMo
S1061: AbstractEmu
AbstractEmu is mobile malware that was first seen in Google Play and other third-party stores in October 2021. It was discovered in 19 Android applications, of which at least 7 abused known Android exploits for obtaining root permissions. AbstractEmu was observed primarily impacting users in the United States, however victims are believed to be across a total of 17 countries.[1]
S0489: WolfRAT
S0311: YiSpecter
S0313: RuMMS
S0490: XLoader for iOS
XLoader for iOS is a malicious iOS application that is capable of gathering system information.[1] It is tracked separately from the XLoader for Android.
S0329: Tangelo
Tangelo is iOS malware that is believed to be from the same developers as the Stealth Mango Android malware. It is not a mobile application, but rather a Debian package that can only run on jailbroken iOS devices. [1]
S9005: DocSwap
DocSwap is an Android malware first identified in 2025, and attributed to Kimsuky. DocSwap’s name is a combination of its Korean name “문서열람 인증 앱” (Document Viewing Authentication App) and a phishing page masquerading as CoinSwap at the C2 address. Based on DocSwap’s name and Korean-language strings, DocSwap potentially targets mobile device users in South Korea. Several variants of DocSwap exist; one of the latest samples indicates that the adversary added a native decryption function that decrypts an internal APK.[1][2]
C0054: Operation Triangulation
Operation Triangulation is a mobile campaign targeting iOS devices.[1] The unidentified actors used zero-click exploits in iMessage attachments to gain Initial Access, then executed exploits and validators, such as Binary Validator before finally executing the TriangleDB implant.
All related ATT&CK context
Mitigation direction
Object version and sync metadata
The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates .
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases (1)
| Release | Bundle imported | Object version | Modified | Status | Raw hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.1 | 2.4 | Current bundle | 6b96df9aa400… |
Mirrored ATT&CK source object
The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.
External references and citations
MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.
-
[1]
NetworkInterface
Android. (n.d.). NetworkInterface. Retrieved December 21, 2016.
Open source URL -
[2]
TelephonyManager
Android. (n.d.). TelephonyManager. Retrieved December 21, 2016.
Open source URL -
[3]
mitre-attack T1422Open source URL
Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.