S0313: RuMMS
Analyst context for executives and security teams
RuMMS is identified by ATT&CK as an Android malware family. The business significance is not the name itself, but the mobile behaviors ATT&CK associates with it: collecting device and network information, accessing SMS messages, and communicating over web protocols. For organizations with managed Android fleets or mobile access to business systems, this is a reminder to validate whether mobile security monitoring can show what an app can read, what device details it collects, and where it communicates.
Executive priority
Treat this as a mobile security readiness check rather than a single-malware alarm. Leaders should ask whether Android devices that access corporate email, identity systems, collaboration tools, or operational workflows are covered by enforceable app governance, SMS-permission oversight, and network visibility. Because ATT&CK provides no detection guidance for RuMMS and no object-level tactics or platforms beyond the Android malware description, control assurance should come from local telemetry, mobile device management evidence, and incident response playbooks.
Technical view
SOC, detection, and IR teams should validate coverage around the related ATT&CK behaviors: System Network Configuration Discovery, System Information Discovery, Web Protocols, and SMS Messages. Practical validation should focus on Android app inventory, permission requests and grants involving SMS access, collection of device or network configuration data where observable, and outbound HTTP/HTTPS communications from mobile devices or mobile apps. Since official detection text is not provided, detections should be behavior-led and tuned against approved mobile apps that legitimately use SMS, device metadata, or web communications.
Likely telemetry
- MDM/UEM inventory for Android devices and installed applications
- Android application permission state, especially SMS-related permissions where available
- Mobile threat defense or endpoint-mobile security alerts, if deployed
- Network, DNS, proxy, or secure web gateway records for mobile device HTTP/HTTPS activity
- Device metadata collected through management tooling, including OS version and hardware details
Detection direction
- Confirm whether managed Android devices are enrolled and reporting enough telemetry to investigate suspicious apps.
- Review apps requesting or using SMS access, especially when SMS access is not required for business function.
- Baseline normal mobile web traffic so HTTP/HTTPS command-and-control-like behavior is not hidden inside generic web protocol usage.
- Correlate mobile app installation time, permission grants, SMS access, and outbound network activity rather than relying on a single indicator.
- Account for false positives from legitimate messaging, authentication, carrier, and device-management applications.
Mitigation priorities
- Prioritize mobile device enrollment and enforce minimum controls for Android devices that access corporate resources.
- Restrict untrusted app installation paths and maintain an approved-app policy for business-access devices.
- Limit SMS permissions to applications with a documented business need and review exceptions regularly.
- Use network egress controls and monitoring for managed mobile devices where feasible, especially for web protocol traffic.
- Prepare mobile IR procedures for isolating a device, preserving relevant evidence, removing malicious apps, and validating account access after a suspected compromise.
Analyst notes and limits
The supplied ATT&CK object is sparse: it identifies RuMMS as an Android malware family and provides relationships to four mobile techniques, but it does not provide official detection logic, tactics, aliases, labels, or object-level platforms. The FireEye external reference title indicates reporting about SMS phishing in Russia, but this take does not assert current activity, attribution, or customer exposure.
Assessment confidence is constrained by absent ATT&CK detection guidance and limited object metadata. Local decisions require organization-specific evidence about Android device ownership models, MDM/UEM coverage, app permission visibility, mobile network logging, and whether SMS-capable devices are used for business workflows.
RuMMS
How security teams should use this page
Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.
Techniques used
This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.
| Domain | ID | Name | Relationship / procedure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | T1636.004 | SMS Messages Sub-technique | RuMMS uploads incoming SMS messages to a remote command and control server.CitationFireEye-RuMMS |
| Mobile | T1422 | System Network Configuration Discovery | RuMMS gathers the device phone number and IMEI and transmits them to a command and control server.CitationFireEye-RuMMS |
| Mobile | T1437.001 | Web Protocols Sub-technique | RuMMS uses HTTP for command and control.CitationFireEye-RuMMS |
| Mobile | T1426 | System Information Discovery | RuMMS gathers device model and operating system version information and transmits it to a command and control server.CitationFireEye-RuMMS |
All related ATT&CK context
Object version and sync metadata
The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates .
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases (1)
| Release | Bundle imported | Object version | Modified | Status | Raw hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.1 | 1.0 | Current bundle | 75af75535237… |
Mirrored ATT&CK source object
The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.
External references and citations
MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.
-
[1]
FireEye-RuMMS
Wu Zhou, Deyu Hu, Jimmy Su, Yong Kang. (2016, April 26). RUMMS: THE LATEST FAMILY OF ANDROID MALWARE ATTACKING USERS IN RUSSIA VIA SMS PHISHING. Retrieved February 6, 2017.
Open source URL -
[2]
RuMMS
(Citation: FireEye-RuMMS)
-
[3]
mitre-attack S0313Open source URL
Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.