T1072: Software Deployment Tools
Adversaries may gain access to and use centralized software suites installed within an enterprise to execute commands and move laterally through the network. Configuration management and software deployment applications may be used in an enterprise network or cloud environment for routine administration purposes. These systems may also be integrated into CI/CD pipelines. Examples of such solutions include: SCCM, HBSS, Altiris, AWS Systems Manager, Microsoft Intune, Azure Arc, and GCP Deployment Manager.
Access to network-wide or enterprise-wide endpoint management software may enable an adversary to achieve remote code execution on all connected systems. The access may be used to laterally move to other systems, gather information, or cause a specific effect, such as wiping the hard drives on all endpoints.
SaaS-based configuration management services may allow for broad Cloud Administration Command on cloud-hosted instances, as well as the execution of arbitrary commands on on-premises endpoints. For example, Microsoft Configuration Manager allows Global or Intune Administrators to run scripts as SYSTEM on on-premises devices joined to Entra ID.[1] Such services may also utilize Web Protocols to communicate back to adversary owned infrastructure.[2]
Network infrastructure devices may also have configuration management tools that can be similarly abused by adversaries.[3]
The permissions required for this action vary by system configuration; local credentials may be sufficient with direct access to the third-party system, or specific domain credentials may be required. However, the system may require an administrative account to log in or to access specific functionality.
Analyst context for executives and security teams
Software deployment and configuration management tools are high-leverage administrative systems: if an adversary gains access, the same mechanisms used to manage endpoints, cloud instances, SaaS-connected devices, CI/CD-linked systems, or network infrastructure can be abused for execution and lateral movement at enterprise scale. For leaders, this technique matters because compromise of one management plane can quickly become a business-wide incident affecting many Windows, Linux, macOS, SaaS, cloud, or network-device environments.
Executive priority
Treat software deployment platforms as tier-zero or near-tier-zero assets. The priority is not only patching the tools, but proving who can administer them, what they can execute, where they can reach, and whether actions are logged outside the managed endpoints. This technique should drive budget and control decisions around privileged access, MFA, segmentation, centralized logging, and incident response playbooks for mass remote execution or destructive activity.
Technical view
T1072 sits under execution and lateral movement. SOC, detection engineering, and IR teams should inventory enterprise software deployment and configuration management systems such as SCCM, HBSS, Altiris, AWS Systems Manager, Microsoft Intune, Azure Arc, GCP Deployment Manager, and comparable network-device management tooling where present. Validate administrative role assignments, script/package execution paths, cloud-to-on-prem management links, SYSTEM/root-level execution behavior, and whether management actions can be correlated to authenticated users and source locations. The related detection strategy DET0223 indicates ATT&CK recognizes a specific detection approach for adversary abuse of these tools, but the supplied object does not include official detection logic.
Likely telemetry
- Administrative login and role-assignment logs from software deployment, endpoint management, configuration management, SaaS administration, and cloud management platforms
- Script, package, command, job, runbook, or deployment execution records, including target systems and initiating account
- Endpoint process creation and service execution telemetry showing commands launched by management agents
- Cloud administration and systems manager activity logs for command execution on cloud-hosted or on-premises endpoints
- Identity provider and Active Directory authentication logs for privileged accounts used to access management consoles
Detection direction
- Baseline normal deployment activity by tool, administrator, target group, schedule, and command type; alert on unusual mass execution, unusual target scope, or execution outside maintenance windows.
- Correlate management-console actions with identity telemetry so commands are tied to named accounts, MFA status, role membership, and source location.
- Tune for legitimate administrative activity: software rollouts, patching, and emergency operations can resemble this behavior, so detections need change-ticket, maintenance-window, and administrator-context enrichment.
- Prioritize visibility into cloud-to-on-prem management paths, because the object notes SaaS-based configuration management can enable cloud administration commands and arbitrary command execution on on-premises endpoints.
- Look for blind spots where endpoint agents execute as SYSTEM/root but do not preserve the initiating user, command source, or deployment job metadata.
Mitigation priorities
- Classify deployment and configuration management platforms as highly privileged systems and restrict access using least privilege, privileged account management, and user account management.
- Require MFA for administrative access to critical management consoles and associated identity providers where supported.
- Harden Active Directory and identity configurations that govern administrator rights, group membership, logon policies, and access to deployment functionality.
- Segment management servers, agents, and administrative access paths to limit lateral movement and restrict which systems can receive commands from which management planes.
- Limit unauthorized software installation and control who can create, approve, or push packages, scripts, or configuration changes.
Analyst notes and limits
The most important local validation question is whether the organization can reconstruct: who accessed the management tool, what they executed, which assets were targeted, and whether the action was approved. Relationship context shows this technique is used by multiple ATT&CK groups, one campaign, and Wiper software, which reinforces that abuse of deployment tooling is relevant across espionage, financially motivated, ransomware, and destructive scenarios. Those relationships should be used for prioritization and hunting context, not as proof of current activity in any environment.
The official ATT&CK object provides no detection text, so detection guidance here is derived from the technique description, supported platforms, tactics, external references, and listed relationships only. Specific log names, event IDs, product detections, and control implementation details must be validated against the organization’s actual tools and architecture. The presence of related groups, campaign, or software does not imply active exploitation or exposure in a given environment.
Software Deployment Tools
Adversaries may gain access to and use centralized software suites installed within an enterprise to execute commands and move laterally through the network. Configuration management and software deployment applications may be used in an enterprise network or cloud environment for routine administration purposes. These systems may also be integrated into CI/CD pipelines. Examples of such solutions include: SCCM, HBSS, Altiris, AWS Systems Manager, Microsoft Intune, Azure Arc, and GCP Deployment Manager.
Access to network-wide or enterprise-wide endpoint management software may enable an adversary to achieve remote code execution on all connected systems. The access may be used to laterally move to other systems, gather information, or cause a specific effect, such as wiping the hard drives on all endpoints.
SaaS-based configuration management services may allow for broad Cloud Administration Command on cloud-hosted instances, as well as the execution of arbitrary commands on on-premises endpoints. For example, Microsoft Configuration Manager allows Global or Intune Administrators to run scripts as SYSTEM on on-premises devices joined to Entra ID.[1] Such services may also utilize Web Protocols to communicate back to adversary owned infrastructure.[2]
Network infrastructure devices may also have configuration management tools that can be similarly abused by adversaries.[3]
The permissions required for this action vary by system configuration; local credentials may be sufficient with direct access to the third-party system, or specific domain credentials may be required. However, the system may require an administrative account to log in or to access specific functionality.
How security teams should use this page
Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.
Related techniques
This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.
| Domain | ID | Name | Relationship / procedure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | T1017 | Application Deployment Software | Application Deployment Software revoked by this object. |
Groups, software, and campaigns
G0050: APT32
APT32 is a suspected Vietnam-based threat group that has been active since at least 2014. The group has targeted multiple private sector industries as well as foreign governments, dissidents, and journalists with a strong focus on Southeast Asian countries like Vietnam, the Philippines, Laos, and Cambodia. They have extensively used strategic web compromises to compromise victims.[1][2][3]
G0034: Sandworm Team
Sandworm Team is a destructive threat group that has been attributed to Russia's General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) Main Center for Special Technologies (GTsST) military unit 74455.[1][2] This group has been active since at least 2009.[3][4][5][6]
In October 2020, the US indicted six GRU Unit 74455 officers associated with Sandworm Team for the following cyber operations: the 2015 and 2016 attacks against Ukrainian electrical companies and government organizations, the 2017 worldwide NotPetya attack, targeting of the 2017 French presidential campaign, the 2018 Olympic Destroyer attack against the Winter Olympic Games, the 2018 operation against the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, and attacks against the country of Georgia in 2018 and 2019.[1][2] Some of these were conducted with the assistance of GRU Unit 26165, which is also referred to as APT28.[7]
G0129: Mustang Panda
Mustang Panda is a China-based cyber espionage threat actor that has been conducting operations since at least 2012. Mustang Panda has been known to use tailored phishing lures and decoy documents to deliver malicious payloads. Mustang Panda has targeted government, diplomatic, and non-governmental organizations, including think tanks, religious institutions, and research entities, across the United States, Europe, and Asia, with notable activity in Russia, Mongolia, Myanmar, Pakistan, and Vietnam. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]
G1055: VOID MANTICORE
VOID MANTICORE is a threat group assessed to operate on behalf of Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS).[1] Active since at least mid-2022, VOID MANTICORE has targeted government entities, critical infrastructure, and private sector organizations across Albania, Israel, and the United States.[1][2] VOID MANTICORE conducts destructive cyber operations, combining wiper attacks with hack-and-leak campaigns. The group has operated under multiple public-facing personas, including HomeLand Justice in operations against Albania, Karma and Karma Below in campaigns targeting Israeli organizations, and Handala Hack, its current primary persona, which has claimed activity against Israeli and U.S. entities, including a March 2026 attack against Stryker Corporation.[1][3] VOID MANTICORE has been observed collaborating with Scarred Manticore, which has been linked to initial access operations preceding VOID MANTICORE’s activity.[4]
G0091: Silence
Silence is a financially motivated threat actor targeting financial institutions in different countries. The group was first seen in June 2016. Their main targets reside in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Azerbaijan, Poland and Kazakhstan. They compromised various banking systems, including the Russian Central Bank's Automated Workstation Client, ATMs, and card processing.[1][2]
G0028: Threat Group-1314
Threat Group-1314 is an unattributed threat group that has used compromised credentials to log into a victim's remote access infrastructure. [1]
G1051: Medusa Group
Medusa Group has been active since at least 2021 and was initially operated as a closed ransomware group before evolving into a Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) operation. Some reporting indicates that certain attacks may still be conducted directly by the ransomware’s core developers. Public sources have also referred to the group as “Spearwing” or “Medusa Actors.” [1] [2] Medusa Group employs living-off-the-land techniques, frequently leveraging publicly available tools and common remote management software to conduct operations. The group engages in double extortion tactics, exfiltrating data prior to encryption and threatening to publish stolen information if ransom demands are not met. [3] For initial access, Medusa Group has exploited publicly known vulnerabilities, conducted phishing campaigns, and used credentials or access purchased from Initial Access Brokers (IABs). The group is opportunistic and has targeted a wide range of sectors globally. [4]
S0041: Wiper
C0018: C0018
C0018 was a month-long ransomware intrusion that successfully deployed AvosLocker onto a compromised network. The unidentified actors gained initial access to the victim network through an exposed server and used a variety of open-source tools prior to executing AvosLocker.[1][2]
All related ATT&CK context
Mitigation direction
Object version and sync metadata
The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates .
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases (1)
| Release | Bundle imported | Object version | Modified | Status | Raw hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.1 | 3.2 | Current bundle | d2ed358b10a5… |
Mirrored ATT&CK source object
The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.
External references and citations
MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.
-
[1]
SpecterOps Lateral Movement from Azure to On-Prem AD 2020
Andy Robbins. (2020, August 17). Death from Above: Lateral Movement from Azure to On-Prem AD. Retrieved March 13, 2023.
Open source URL -
[2]
Mitiga Security Advisory: SSM Agent as Remote Access Trojan
Ariel Szarf, Or Aspir. (n.d.). Mitiga Security Advisory: Abusing the SSM Agent as a Remote Access Trojan. Retrieved January 31, 2024.
Open source URL -
[3]
Fortinet Zero-Day and Custom Malware Used by Suspected Chinese Actor in Espionage Operation
ALEXANDER MARVI, BRAD SLAYBAUGH, DAN EBREO, TUFAIL AHMED, MUHAMMAD UMAIR, TINA JOHNSON. (2023, March 16). Fortinet Zero-Day and Custom Malware Used by Suspected Chinese Actor in Espionage Operation. Retrieved May 15, 2023.
Open source URL -
[4]
mitre-attack T1072Open source URL
Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.