T1020: Automated Exfiltration
Adversaries may exfiltrate data, such as sensitive documents, through the use of automated processing after being gathered during Collection.[1]
When automated exfiltration is used, other exfiltration techniques likely apply as well to transfer the information out of the network, such as Exfiltration Over C2 Channel and Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol.
Analyst context for executives and security teams
Automated Exfiltration matters because it turns data theft from a manual action into a repeatable process after Collection. For leaders, the risk is not only that sensitive documents leave the environment, but that the theft can continue until the automation, transfer path, or compromised host/network device is found. ATT&CK notes that other exfiltration methods, such as exfiltration over a C2 channel or alternative protocol, often apply as the actual transfer mechanism.
Executive priority
Prioritize this as a resilience and evidence issue: can the organization prove it would notice repeated or scheduled movement of sensitive data from Windows, Linux, macOS, or network-device environments? This technique is especially relevant to SOC readiness, incident response scoping, data-loss investigation, and control validation around outbound traffic and sensitive-data handling. The relationship to Traffic Duplication also makes network-device and cloud/IaaS monitoring governance important where those environments exist.
Technical view
SOC and IR teams should validate detection around automated, repeated, or policy-violating outbound data transfer after suspected Collection activity. Because MITRE provides no official detection text for T1020, coverage should be tested against the related detection strategy DET0397 and against adjacent exfiltration paths named by ATT&CK, especially C2-channel and alternative-protocol transfer. For network devices, review whether traffic mirroring or forwarding configuration changes could create automated exfiltration paths, as represented by sub-technique T1020.001 Traffic Duplication.
Likely telemetry
- Outbound network flow and session metadata from endpoints, servers, and network devices
- Proxy, firewall, and secure web gateway records showing repeated or unusual external transfers
- C2-channel or alternative-protocol transfer evidence where such monitoring exists
- Endpoint file access, staging, compression, or process activity associated with gathered sensitive documents
- Network-device configuration and audit logs, especially for traffic mirroring or forwarding behavior
Detection direction
- Do not treat a single large transfer as the only signal; validate analytics for recurring, automated, or scheduled exfiltration patterns.
- Correlate outbound transfer behavior with prior Collection activity and access to sensitive document stores.
- Tune for expected business automation such as backups, replication, and monitoring pipelines to reduce false positives.
- Review network-device and IaaS traffic mirroring controls because legitimate analysis features can become exfiltration paths under T1020.001.
- Use the existence of DET0397 as a pointer to detection strategy coverage, but verify local telemetry and rule logic because the ATT&CK object itself provides no official detection guidance.
Mitigation priorities
- Establish visibility first: confirm collection of outbound network, endpoint, and network-device configuration telemetry across the supported platforms in scope.
- Restrict and monitor outbound transfer paths, including C2-like channels and alternative protocols, according to business need.
- Apply governance and change control to traffic mirroring, forwarding, and duplication features on network devices and IaaS environments.
- Protect sensitive document repositories with access controls and logging so Collection-to-exfiltration sequences can be reconstructed.
- Exercise IR playbooks for suspected automated data theft, including containment of transfer paths and scoping of previously gathered data.
Analyst notes and limits
The relationship set shows this behavior across multiple campaigns, groups, and software entries, including espionage-oriented tools and campaigns as well as a Salesforce data exfiltration campaign. That breadth supports treating T1020 as a cross-environment detection and response concern rather than a single malware signature. However, local relevance depends on the organization’s platforms, sensitive-data locations, network architecture, and logging maturity.
MITRE does not provide official detection text for this object. Telemetry and control recommendations are defensive validation directions derived from the ATT&CK description, platforms, tactic, cited related techniques, and relationships; they are not proof of active exploitation or guaranteed detection coverage.
Automated Exfiltration
Adversaries may exfiltrate data, such as sensitive documents, through the use of automated processing after being gathered during Collection.[1]
When automated exfiltration is used, other exfiltration techniques likely apply as well to transfer the information out of the network, such as Exfiltration Over C2 Channel and Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol.
How security teams should use this page
Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.
Related techniques
This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.
| Domain | ID | Name | Relationship / procedure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | T1020.001 | Traffic Duplication Sub-technique | Traffic Duplication subtechnique of this object. |
Groups, software, and campaigns
G0094: Kimsuky
Kimsuky is a Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK)-based cyber espionage group that has been active since at least 2012. The group initially targeted South Korean government agencies, think tanks, and subject-matter experts in various fields. Its operations expanded to include the United Nations and organizations in the government, education, business services, and manufacturing sectors across the United States, Japan, Russia, and Europe. Kimsuky has focused collection on foreign policy and national security issues tied to the Korean Peninsula, nuclear policy, and sanctions. Kimsuky operations have overlapped with those of other North Korean state-sponsored cyber espionage actors as a result of ad hoc collaborations or other limited resource sharing.[1][2][3][4][5][6]
Kimsuky was assessed to be responsible for the 2014 Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co. compromise; other notable campaigns include Operation STOLEN PENCIL (2018), Operation Kabar Cobra (2019), and Operation Smoke Screen (2019).[7][8][9] In 2023, Kimsuky was observed using commercial large language models (LLMs) to assist with vulnerability research, scripting, social engineering and reconnaissance.[10]
DPRK threat actor cluster boundaries overlap in open source reporting, with some security researchers consolidating all attributed North Korean state-sponsored cyber activity under Lazarus Group, rather than tracking operationally distinct subgroups.
G0121: Sidewinder
Sidewinder is a suspected Indian threat actor group that has been active since at least 2012. They have been observed targeting government, military, and business entities throughout Asia, primarily focusing on Pakistan, China, Nepal, and Afghanistan.[1][2][3]
G0004: Ke3chang
G1039: RedCurl
RedCurl is a threat actor active since 2018 notable for corporate espionage targeting a variety of locations, including Ukraine, Canada and the United Kingdom, and a variety of industries, including but not limited to travel agencies, insurance companies, and banks.[1] RedCurl is allegedly a Russian-speaking threat actor.[1][2] The group’s operations typically start with spearphishing emails to gain initial access, then the group executes discovery and collection commands and scripts to find corporate data. The group concludes operations by exfiltrating files to the C2 servers.
G1035: Winter Vivern
Winter Vivern is a group linked to Russian and Belorussian interests active since at least 2020 targeting various European government and NGO entities, along with sporadic targeting of Indian and US victims. The group leverages a combination of document-based phishing activity and server-side exploitation for initial access, leveraging adversary-controlled and -created infrastructure for follow-on command and control.[1][2][3][4][5]
G0081: Tropic Trooper
Tropic Trooper is an unaffiliated threat group that has led targeted campaigns against targets in Taiwan, the Philippines, and Hong Kong. Tropic Trooper focuses on targeting government, healthcare, transportation, and high-tech industries and has been active since 2011.[1][2][3]
G0047: Gamaredon Group
Gamaredon Group is a suspected Russian cyber espionage group that has targeted military, law enforcement, judiciary, non-profit, and non-governmental organizations in Ukraine since at least 2013. The name Gamaredon Group derives from a misspelling of the word "Armageddon," found in early campaigns.[1][2][3][4][5]
In November 2021, the Ukrainian government publicly attributed Gamaredon Group to Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) Center 18, an assessment later supported by multiple independent cybersecurity researchers. [6][5]
S0491: StrongPity
StrongPity is an information stealing malware used by PROMETHIUM.[1][2]
S0395: LightNeuron
LightNeuron is a sophisticated backdoor that has targeted Microsoft Exchange servers since at least 2014. LightNeuron has been used by Turla to target diplomatic and foreign affairs-related organizations. The presence of certain strings in the malware suggests a Linux variant of LightNeuron exists.[1]
S0363: Empire
Empire is an open-source, cross-platform remote administration and post-exploitation framework that is publicly available on GitHub. While the tool itself is primarily written in Python, the post-exploitation agents are written in pure PowerShell for Windows and Python for Linux/macOS. Empire was one of five tools singled out by a joint report on public hacking tools being widely used by adversaries.[1][2][3]
S0600: Doki
S0090: Rover
S1017: OutSteel
OutSteel is a file uploader and document stealer developed with the scripting language AutoIT that has been used by Saint Bear since at least March 2021.[1]
S0643: Peppy
S0409: Machete
S0377: Ebury
Ebury is an OpenSSH backdoor and credential stealer targeting Linux servers and container hosts developed by Windigo. Ebury is primarily installed through modifying shared libraries (`.so` files) executed by the legitimate OpenSSH program. First seen in 2009, Ebury has been used to maintain a botnet of servers, deploy additional malware, and steal cryptocurrency wallets, credentials, and credit card details.[1][2][3][4]
S1148: Raccoon Stealer
Raccoon Stealer is an information stealer malware family active since at least 2019 as a malware-as-a-service offering sold in underground forums. Raccoon Stealer has experienced two periods of activity across two variants, from 2019 to March 2022, then resurfacing in a revised version in June 2022.[1][2]
S1166: Solar
Solar is a C#/.NET backdoor that was used by OilRig during the Outer Space campaign to download, execute, and exfiltrate files.[1]
S1211: Hannotog
Hannotog is a type of backdoor malware uniquely assoicated with Lotus Blossom operations since at least 2022.[1]
C0001: Frankenstein
Frankenstein was described by security researchers as a highly-targeted campaign conducted by moderately sophisticated and highly resourceful threat actors in early 2019. The unidentified actors primarily relied on open source tools, including Empire. The campaign name refers to the actors' ability to piece together several unrelated open-source tool components.[1]
C0046: ArcaneDoor
ArcaneDoor is a campaign targeting networking devices from Cisco and other vendors between July 2023 and April 2024, primarily focused on government and critical infrastructure networks. ArcaneDoor is associated with the deployment of the custom backdoors Line Runner and Line Dancer. ArcaneDoor is attributed to a group referred to as UAT4356 or STORM-1849, and is assessed to be a state-sponsored campaign.[1][2]
C0059: Salesforce Data Exfiltration
The Salesforce Data Exfiltration campaign began in October 2024 with financially-motivated threat actor UNC6040 using Spearphishing Voice (vishing) to compromise corporate Salesforce instances for large-scale data theft and extortion. Following the initial data theft, victim organizations received extortion demands from a separate threat actor, UNC6240, who claimed to be the “ShinyHunters” group. The observed infrastructure and TTPs used during the Salesforce Data Exfiltration campaign overlap with those used by threat groups with suspected ties to the broader collective known as "The Com.” These overlaps could plausibly be the result of associated actors operating within the same communities and are not necessarily an indication of a direct operational relationship.[1][2]
All related ATT&CK context
Object version and sync metadata
The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates .
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases (1)
| Release | Bundle imported | Object version | Modified | Status | Raw hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.1 | 1.3 | Current bundle | 83d908f9d63e… |
Mirrored ATT&CK source object
The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.
External references and citations
MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.
-
[1]
ESET Gamaredon June 2020
Boutin, J. (2020, June 11). Gamaredon group grows its game. Retrieved June 16, 2020.
Open source URL -
[2]
mitre-attack T1020Open source URL
Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.