M1056: Pre-compromise
Pre-compromise mitigations involve proactive measures and defenses implemented to prevent adversaries from successfully identifying and exploiting weaknesses during the Reconnaissance and Resource Development phases of an attack. These activities focus on reducing an organization's attack surface, identify adversarial preparation efforts, and increase the difficulty for attackers to conduct successful operations. This mitigation can be implemented through the following measures:
Limit Information Exposure:
- Regularly audit and sanitize publicly available data, including job posts, websites, and social media. - Use tools like OSINT monitoring platforms (e.g., SpiderFoot, Recon-ng) to identify leaked information.
Protect Domain and DNS Infrastructure:
- Enable DNSSEC and use WHOIS privacy protection. - Monitor for domain hijacking or lookalike domains using services like RiskIQ or DomainTools.
External Monitoring:
- Use tools like Shodan, Censys to monitor your external attack surface. - Deploy external vulnerability scanners to proactively address weaknesses.
Threat Intelligence:
- Leverage platforms like MISP, Recorded Future, or Anomali to track adversarial infrastructure, tools, and activity.
Content and Email Protections:
- Use email security solutions like Proofpoint, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, or Mimecast. - Enforce SPF/DKIM/DMARC policies to protect against email spoofing.
Training and Awareness:
- Educate employees on identifying phishing attempts, securing their social media, and avoiding information leaks.
Analyst context for executives and security teams
Pre-compromise mitigation is about reducing what adversaries can learn, register, impersonate, or abuse before an intrusion begins. For leaders, its value is early risk reduction: public information hygiene, domain/DNS protection, external attack-surface monitoring, threat intelligence, email authentication, and awareness programs can make reconnaissance and resource development harder before the SOC is handling an incident.
Executive priority
Treat this as a resilience and readiness control family, not a single tool. It supports budget decisions around external attack-surface management, domain protection, email trust controls, threat intelligence, and employee awareness. The key business question is whether the organization can show evidence that exposed assets, leaked public information, spoofable domains, lookalike domains, and pre-attack infrastructure signals are being reviewed and acted on before they become incident drivers.
Technical view
ATT&CK provides no specific detection text for M1056, so validation should focus on whether preventive and monitoring processes exist for the related Resource Development behaviors. The relationship set emphasizes adversary acquisition or compromise of infrastructure, domains, DNS servers, VPS/server/serverless resources, botnets, web services, network devices, and social/email/cloud accounts. SOC, threat intel, and IR teams should confirm that external-facing assets, domain/DNS changes, brand/domain abuse, email authentication posture, exposed services, and relevant threat-intelligence indicators are visible, triaged, and linked to escalation playbooks.
Likely telemetry
- Public web, job posting, social media, and other OSINT exposure review records
- External attack-surface monitoring results from internet-facing asset discovery and scanning
- External vulnerability scan findings and remediation status
- DNS, registrar, WHOIS/privacy, DNSSEC, and domain-change records
- Lookalike domain, domain hijacking, and brand-abuse monitoring alerts
Detection direction
- Do not assume conventional endpoint or network detection will cover this mitigation area; much of the activity occurs before compromise and outside owned infrastructure.
- Validate alerting and review workflows for newly exposed services, vulnerable internet-facing assets, suspicious domain registrations, DNS changes, and email authentication failures.
- Tune external monitoring to reduce noise from benign internet scanning and legitimate business-created domains while preserving escalation paths for high-risk findings.
- Use the relationship context to prioritize monitoring around domains, DNS, VPS/server/serverless infrastructure, web services, botnets, network devices, and social/email/cloud accounts used for targeting preparation.
- Confirm that threat-intelligence findings are operationalized into SOC watchlists, blocking decisions, IR leads, or risk-acceptance records rather than remaining standalone reports.
Mitigation priorities
- Start with information exposure reduction: regularly review and sanitize public websites, job postings, social media, and other externally visible data.
- Protect domain and DNS infrastructure through DNSSEC where appropriate, WHOIS privacy, registrar governance, and monitoring for hijacking or lookalike domains.
- Maintain external attack-surface discovery and vulnerability scanning for internet-facing assets, with ownership and remediation tracking.
- Use threat intelligence to watch for adversary infrastructure, tools, and activity relevant to the organization’s exposed footprint and brand.
- Strengthen content and email protections, including SPF, DKIM, and DMARC policies to reduce spoofing risk.
Analyst notes and limits
M1056 is a broad mitigation that maps to many Resource Development techniques, especially infrastructure and account preparation. Its decision value is in governance and evidence: who owns public exposure, who owns domains/DNS, who reviews external findings, and how pre-compromise intelligence becomes action.
The supplied ATT&CK object does not specify platforms, tactics for the mitigation itself, or official detection guidance. Local asset inventory, domain ownership, cloud usage, public exposure, and monitoring capabilities are required to assess actual coverage.
Pre-compromise
Pre-compromise mitigations involve proactive measures and defenses implemented to prevent adversaries from successfully identifying and exploiting weaknesses during the Reconnaissance and Resource Development phases of an attack. These activities focus on reducing an organization's attack surface, identify adversarial preparation efforts, and increase the difficulty for attackers to conduct successful operations. This mitigation can be implemented through the following measures:
Limit Information Exposure:
- Regularly audit and sanitize publicly available data, including job posts, websites, and social media. - Use tools like OSINT monitoring platforms (e.g., SpiderFoot, Recon-ng) to identify leaked information.
Protect Domain and DNS Infrastructure:
- Enable DNSSEC and use WHOIS privacy protection. - Monitor for domain hijacking or lookalike domains using services like RiskIQ or DomainTools.
External Monitoring:
- Use tools like Shodan, Censys to monitor your external attack surface. - Deploy external vulnerability scanners to proactively address weaknesses.
Threat Intelligence:
- Leverage platforms like MISP, Recorded Future, or Anomali to track adversarial infrastructure, tools, and activity.
Content and Email Protections:
- Use email security solutions like Proofpoint, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, or Mimecast. - Enforce SPF/DKIM/DMARC policies to protect against email spoofing.
Training and Awareness:
- Educate employees on identifying phishing attempts, securing their social media, and avoiding information leaks.
How security teams should use this page
Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.
Techniques used
This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.
| Domain | ID | Name | Relationship / procedure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | T1595 | Active Scanning | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1591 | Gather Victim Org Information | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1585.003 | Cloud Accounts Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1588.006 | Vulnerabilities Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1588.007 | Artificial Intelligence Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1588.004 | Digital Certificates Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1583.002 | DNS Server Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1583.004 | Server Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1683.002 | Audio-Visual Content Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on designing defenses that are not reliant on atomic indicators. |
| Enterprise | T1587.002 | Code Signing Certificates Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1590.006 | Network Security Appliances Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1590.003 | Network Trust Dependencies Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1596.001 | DNS/Passive DNS Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1587 | Develop Capabilities | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1584.004 | Server Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1589.001 | Credentials Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1592.002 | Software Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1588.002 | Tool Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1584.001 | Domains Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1595.003 | Wordlist Scanning Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1683 | Generate Content | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on designing defenses that are not reliant on atomic indicators. |
| Enterprise | T1584.007 | Serverless Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1591.003 | Identify Business Tempo Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1683.001 | Written Content Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on designing defenses that are not reliant on atomic indicators. |
| Enterprise | T1588.003 | Code Signing Certificates Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1589 | Gather Victim Identity Information | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1596 | Search Open Technical Databases | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1585 | Establish Accounts | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1590.005 | IP Addresses Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1586.001 | Social Media Accounts Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1589.003 | Employee Names Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1594 | Search Victim-Owned Websites | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1682 | Query Public AI Services | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on designing defenses that are not reliant on atomic indicators. |
| Enterprise | T1608.006 | SEO Poisoning Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1587.003 | Digital Certificates Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1597.001 | Threat Intel Vendors Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1585.001 | Social Media Accounts Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1589.002 | Email Addresses Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1593.002 | Search Engines Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1583.007 | Serverless Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1587.001 | Malware Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1608.001 | Upload Malware Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1586.002 | Email Accounts Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1590 | Gather Victim Network Information | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1681 | Search Threat Vendor Data | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on designing defenses that are not reliant on atomic indicators. |
| Enterprise | T1608.004 | Drive-by Target Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1583.005 | Botnet Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1596.004 | CDNs Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1597 | Search Closed Sources | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1591.001 | Determine Physical Locations Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1583.006 | Web Services Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1584.005 | Botnet Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1595.001 | Scanning IP Blocks Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1584.003 | Virtual Private Server Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1597.002 | Purchase Technical Data Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1592.004 | Client Configurations Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1592 | Gather Victim Host Information | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1585.002 | Email Accounts Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1595.002 | Vulnerability Scanning Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1583 | Acquire Infrastructure | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1591.002 | Business Relationships Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1592.001 | Hardware Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1584.002 | DNS Server Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1584.006 | Web Services Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1590.004 | Network Topology Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1586.003 | Cloud Accounts Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1583.001 | Domains Sub-technique | Organizations may intentionally register similar domains to their own to deter adversaries from creating typosquatting domains. Other facets of this technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1590.001 | Domain Properties Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1608.003 | Install Digital Certificate Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1583.003 | Virtual Private Server Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1587.004 | Exploits Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1588.001 | Malware Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1586 | Compromise Accounts | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1588 | Obtain Capabilities | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1596.003 | Digital Certificates Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1592.003 | Firmware Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1583.008 | Malvertising Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should be focused on initial access activities, such as drive by compromise where ad blocking adblockers can help prevent malicious code from executing. |
| Enterprise | T1608.005 | Link Target Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
| Enterprise | T1596.002 | WHOIS Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. Efforts should focus on minimizing the amount and sensitivity of data available to external parties. |
| Enterprise | T1588.005 | Exploits Sub-technique | This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls. |
All related ATT&CK context
Object version and sync metadata
The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates .
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases (1)
| Release | Bundle imported | Object version | Modified | Status | Raw hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.1 | 1.1 | Current bundle | 1a6993b05ca6… |
Mirrored ATT&CK source object
The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.
External references and citations
MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.
-
[1]
mitre-attack M1056Open source URL
Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.