G0009: Deep Panda
Deep Panda is a suspected Chinese threat group known to target many industries, including government, defense, financial, and telecommunications. [1] The intrusion into healthcare company Anthem has been attributed to Deep Panda. [2] This group is also known as Shell Crew, WebMasters, KungFu Kittens, and PinkPanther. [3] Deep Panda also appears to be known as Black Vine based on the attribution of both group names to the Anthem intrusion. [4] Some analysts track Deep Panda and APT19 as the same group, but it is unclear from open source information if the groups are the same. [5]
Analyst context for executives and security teams
Deep Panda is an ATT&CK intrusion set associated in public reporting with targeting across government, defense, financial, telecommunications, and healthcare contexts. The practical value for leaders is not the name alone, but the behavior cluster: use of Windows administration utilities, discovery activity, SMB-based lateral movement, WMI/PowerShell execution, web shells, persistence mechanisms, and malware/backdoors referenced by ATT&CK relationships. These behaviors matter because they map to long-dwell intrusions where identity misuse, endpoint visibility, server exposure, and incident response readiness determine how quickly an organization can contain spread and preserve evidence.
Executive priority
Treat this object as a planning reference for espionage-style intrusion readiness rather than proof of current targeting. Security leaders should ask whether high-value environments have defensible coverage for lateral movement, administrative-tool abuse, web server persistence, and credential-enabled access over SMB. For audit and risk discussions, the priority is demonstrating that SOC monitoring, endpoint logging, web server integrity review, and privileged access controls can detect or constrain the techniques ATT&CK associates with this group.
Technical view
ATT&CK provides no group-level detection text or platforms, so defenders should validate coverage through the related software and techniques. The strongest relationship-driven focus is Windows-heavy activity: Net, Tasklist, WMI, PowerShell, Regsvr32, SMB/Windows Admin Shares, Accessibility Features, Hidden Window, Sakula, Mivast, and StreamEx. Derusbi has Windows and Linux variants, and web shell persistence may affect Windows, Linux, macOS, and network-device-hosted web services. SOC and IR teams should test whether they can reconstruct remote discovery, process enumeration, administrative share access, remote execution, suspicious script execution, web shell placement/use, and persistence changes without relying only on malware signatures.
Likely telemetry
- Endpoint process creation with command line arguments for net, tasklist, ping, PowerShell, WMI-related processes, and regsvr32.exe
- Windows authentication and logon events, especially remote logons and privileged account use
- SMB/admin share access logs and file write activity to remote systems
- PowerShell script block/module logging where enabled
- WMI operational logs and remote management activity
Detection direction
- Do not build detections only around the Deep Panda name or aliases; prioritize the ATT&CK-linked behaviors and software relationships.
- Tune for suspicious use of legitimate administration utilities in unusual user, host, time, or remote-access contexts; these tools have high administrative false-positive potential.
- Correlate discovery commands with later SMB access, WMI execution, PowerShell execution, or web server changes to reduce noise and improve incident confidence.
- Validate that web shell monitoring covers internet-facing and internally accessible web servers, including script creation in web-accessible directories and abnormal command execution from web service accounts.
- Review whether allowlisting or trust in Microsoft-signed binaries creates blind spots for regsvr32.exe, PowerShell, and WMI abuse.
Mitigation priorities
- Prioritize privileged access hygiene and least privilege for accounts that can use SMB, WMI, PowerShell remoting, and administrative shares.
- Harden and monitor Windows administrative tooling rather than attempting to block all legitimate utilities outright.
- Reduce lateral movement paths by limiting administrative shares, segmenting high-value systems, and enforcing strong authentication controls for remote administration.
- Apply web server hardening, patching, file integrity monitoring, and restricted write permissions to reduce web shell persistence opportunities.
- Enable and retain endpoint, PowerShell, WMI, authentication, SMB, and web server logs at levels sufficient for incident reconstruction.
Analyst notes and limits
Deep Panda has multiple aliases in ATT&CK, including Shell Crew, WebMasters, KungFu Kittens, PinkPanther, and Black Vine. ATT&CK notes uncertainty in open-source reporting about whether Deep Panda and APT19 are the same group, so analysis should avoid over-merging identities without independent evidence. The Anthem intrusion is cited in the official description, but this take does not infer current targeting or exposure for any organization.
The group object does not specify platforms, tactics, or official detection guidance. Platform and technique discussion is derived from the supplied ATT&CK relationships, not from a group-level platform declaration. Local asset inventory, identity architecture, exposed web services, logging configuration, and business-critical system mapping are required to turn this into a defensible control assessment.
Deep Panda
Deep Panda is a suspected Chinese threat group known to target many industries, including government, defense, financial, and telecommunications. [1] The intrusion into healthcare company Anthem has been attributed to Deep Panda. [2] This group is also known as Shell Crew, WebMasters, KungFu Kittens, and PinkPanther. [3] Deep Panda also appears to be known as Black Vine based on the attribution of both group names to the Anthem intrusion. [4] Some analysts track Deep Panda and APT19 as the same group, but it is unclear from open source information if the groups are the same. [5]
How security teams should use this page
Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.
Techniques used
This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.
| Domain | ID | Name | Relationship / procedure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | T1057 | Process Discovery | Deep Panda uses the Microsoft Tasklist utility to list processes running on systems.CitationAlperovitch 2014 |
| Enterprise | T1018 | Remote System Discovery | Deep Panda has used ping to identify other machines of interest.CitationAlperovitch 2014 |
| Enterprise | T1505.003 | Web Shell Sub-technique | Deep Panda uses Web shells on publicly accessible Web servers to access victim networks.CitationCrowdStrike Deep Panda Web Shells |
| Enterprise | T1027.005 | Indicator Removal from Tools Sub-technique | Deep Panda has updated and modified its malware, resulting in different hash values that evade detection.CitationSymantec Black Vine |
| Enterprise | T1218.010 | Regsvr32 Sub-technique | Deep Panda has used regsvr32.exe to execute a server variant of Derusbi in victim networks.CitationRSA Shell Crew |
| Enterprise | T1564.003 | Hidden Window Sub-technique | Deep Panda has used |
| Enterprise | T1059.001 | PowerShell Sub-technique | Deep Panda has used PowerShell scripts to download and execute programs in memory, without writing to disk.CitationAlperovitch 2014 |
| Enterprise | T1546.008 | Accessibility Features Sub-technique | Deep Panda has used the sticky-keys technique to bypass the RDP login screen on remote systems during intrusions.CitationRSA Shell Crew |
| Enterprise | T1047 | Windows Management Instrumentation | The Deep Panda group is known to utilize WMI for lateral movement.CitationAlperovitch 2014 |
| Enterprise | T1021.002 | SMB/Windows Admin Shares Sub-technique | Deep Panda uses net.exe to connect to network shares using |
Groups, software, and campaigns
S0080: Mivast
Mivast is a backdoor that has been used by Deep Panda. It was reportedly used in the Anthem breach. [1]
S0097: Ping
S0039: Net
The Net utility is a component of the Windows operating system. It is used in command-line operations for control of users, groups, services, and network connections. [1]
Net has a great deal of functionality, [2] much of which is useful for an adversary, such as gathering system and network information for Discovery, moving laterally through SMB/Windows Admin Shares using net use commands, and interacting with services. The net1.exe utility is executed for certain functionality when net.exe is run and can be used directly in commands such as net1 user.
S0142: StreamEx
StreamEx is a malware family that has been used by Deep Panda since at least 2015. In 2016, it was distributed via legitimate compromised Korean websites. [1]
S0074: Sakula
S0057: Tasklist
S0021: Derusbi
All related ATT&CK context
Object version and sync metadata
The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates .
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases (1)
| Release | Bundle imported | Object version | Modified | Status | Raw hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.1 | 1.2 | Current bundle | 85f7871f6ad8… |
Mirrored ATT&CK source object
The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.
External references and citations
MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.
-
[1]
Alperovitch 2014
Alperovitch, D. (2014, July 7). Deep in Thought: Chinese Targeting of National Security Think Tanks. Retrieved November 12, 2014.
Open source URL -
[2]
ThreatConnect Anthem
ThreatConnect Research Team. (2015, February 27). The Anthem Hack: All Roads Lead to China. Retrieved January 26, 2016.
Open source URL -
[3]
RSA Shell Crew
RSA Incident Response. (2014, January). RSA Incident Response Emerging Threat Profile: Shell Crew. Retrieved January 14, 2016.
Open source URL -
[4]
Symantec Black Vine
DiMaggio, J.. (2015, August 6). The Black Vine cyberespionage group. Retrieved January 26, 2016.
Open source URL -
[5]
ICIT China's Espionage Jul 2016
Scott, J. and Spaniel, D. (2016, July 28). ICIT Brief - China’s Espionage Dynasty: Economic Death by a Thousand Cuts. Retrieved June 7, 2018.
Open source URL -
[6]
Black Vine
(Citation: Symantec Black Vine)
-
[7]
Deep Panda
(Citation: Alperovitch 2014)
-
[8]
KungFu Kittens
(Citation: RSA Shell Crew)
-
[9]
PinkPanther
(Citation: RSA Shell Crew)
-
[10]
Shell Crew
(Citation: RSA Shell Crew)
-
[11]
WebMasters
(Citation: RSA Shell Crew)
-
[12]
mitre-attack G0009Open source URL
Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.