LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE archive

December 2019

Browse CVE records published in December 2019, with severity, affected products, CWE, KEV, and source-backed vulnerability context.

Showing 50 of 1489 matching CVEs · Page 11 of 30.

Unknown · CVSS Not scored

CVE-2019-19374: An issue was discovered in core/assets/form/form_question_types/form_question_type_file_upload/form_questio...

An issue was discovered in core/assets/form/form_question_types/form_question_type_file_upload/form_question_type_file_upload.inc in Squiz Matrix CMS 5.5.0 prior to 5.5.0.3, 5.5.1 prior to 5.5.1.8, 5.5.2 prior to 5.5.2.4, and 5.5.3 prior to 5.5.3.3 where a user can delete arbitrary files from the server during interaction with the File Upload field type, when a custom form exists. (This is related to an information disclosure issue within the File Upload field type that allows users to view the full path to uploaded files, including the product's web root directory.)

Published Dec 11, 2019 · Updated Aug 5, 2024

Unknown · CVSS Not scored

CVE-2019-19448: In the Linux kernel 5.0.21 and 5.3.11, mounting a crafted btrfs filesystem image, performing some operation...

In the Linux kernel 5.0.21 and 5.3.11, mounting a crafted btrfs filesystem image, performing some operations, and then making a syncfs system call can lead to a use-after-free in try_merge_free_space in fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c because the pointer to a left data structure can be the same as the pointer to a right data structure.

Published Dec 8, 2019 · Updated Aug 5, 2024

Unknown · CVSS Not scored

CVE-2019-19364: A weak malicious user can escalate its privilege whenever CatalystProductionSuite.2019.1.exe (version 1.1.0...

A weak malicious user can escalate its privilege whenever CatalystProductionSuite.2019.1.exe (version 1.1.0.21) and CatalystBrowseSuite.2019.1.exe (version 1.1.0.21) installers run. The vulnerability is in the form of DLL Hijacking. The installers try to load DLLs that don’t exist from its current directory; by doing so, an attacker can quickly escalate its privileges.

Published Dec 4, 2019 · Updated Aug 5, 2024

Medium · CVSS 5.3

CVE-2019-19342: A flaw was found in Ansible Tower, versions 3.6.x before 3.6.2 and 3.5.x before 3.5.4, when /websocket is r...

A flaw was found in Ansible Tower, versions 3.6.x before 3.6.2 and 3.5.x before 3.5.4, when /websocket is requested and the password contains the '#' character. This request would cause a socket error in RabbitMQ when parsing the password and an HTTP error code 500 and partial password disclose will occur in plaintext. An attacker could easily guess some predictable passwords or brute force the password.

Published Dec 19, 2019 · Updated Aug 5, 2024

Medium · CVSS 4.3

CVE-2019-19362: An issue was discovered in the Chat functionality of the TeamViewer desktop application 14.3.4730 on Windows.

An issue was discovered in the Chat functionality of the TeamViewer desktop application 14.3.4730 on Windows. (The vendor states that it was later fixed.) Upon login, every communication is saved within Windows main memory. When a user logs out or deletes conversation history (but does not exit the application), this data is not wiped from main memory, and therefore could be read by a local user with the same or greater privileges.

Published Dec 2, 2019 · Updated Aug 5, 2024

High · CVSS 8.2

CVE-2019-19340: A flaw was found in Ansible Tower, versions 3.6.x before 3.6.2 and 3.5.x before 3.5.3, where enabling Rabbi...

A flaw was found in Ansible Tower, versions 3.6.x before 3.6.2 and 3.5.x before 3.5.3, where enabling RabbitMQ manager by setting it with '-e rabbitmq_enable_manager=true' exposes the RabbitMQ management interface publicly, as expected. If the default admin user is still active, an attacker could guess the password and gain access to the system.

Published Dec 19, 2019 · Updated Aug 5, 2024

High · CVSS 8.1

CVE-2019-19334: In all versions of libyang before 1.0-r5, a stack-based buffer overflow was discovered in the way libyang p...

In all versions of libyang before 1.0-r5, a stack-based buffer overflow was discovered in the way libyang parses YANG files with a leaf of type "identityref". An application that uses libyang to parse untrusted YANG files may be vulnerable to this flaw, which would allow an attacker to cause a denial of service or possibly gain code execution.

Published Dec 6, 2019 · Updated Aug 5, 2024

Medium · CVSS 5.9

CVE-2019-19341: A flaw was found in Ansible Tower, versions 3.6.x before 3.6.2, where files in '/var/backup/tower' are left...

A flaw was found in Ansible Tower, versions 3.6.x before 3.6.2, where files in '/var/backup/tower' are left world-readable. These files include both the SECRET_KEY and the database backup. Any user with access to the Tower server, and knowledge of when a backup is run, could retrieve every credential stored in Tower. Access to data is the highest threat with this vulnerability.

Published Dec 19, 2019 · Updated Aug 5, 2024

High · CVSS 7.5

CVE-2019-19331: knot-resolver before version 4.3.0 is vulnerable to denial of service through high CPU utilization.

knot-resolver before version 4.3.0 is vulnerable to denial of service through high CPU utilization. DNS replies with very many resource records might be processed very inefficiently, in extreme cases taking even several CPU seconds for each such uncached message. For example, a few thousand A records can be squashed into one DNS message (limit is 64kB).

Published Dec 16, 2019 · Updated Aug 5, 2024

High · CVSS 8.1

CVE-2019-19333: In all versions of libyang before 1.0-r5, a stack-based buffer overflow was discovered in the way libyang p...

In all versions of libyang before 1.0-r5, a stack-based buffer overflow was discovered in the way libyang parses YANG files with a leaf of type "bits". An application that uses libyang to parse untrusted YANG files may be vulnerable to this flaw, which would allow an attacker to cause a denial of service or possibly gain code execution.

Published Dec 6, 2019 · Updated Aug 5, 2024

Unknown · CVSS Not scored

CVE-2019-19284: A vulnerability has been identified in XHQ (All Versions < 6.1).

A vulnerability has been identified in XHQ (All Versions < 6.1). The web interface could allow Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks if an attacker is able to modify content of particular web pages, causing the application to behave in unexpected ways for legitimate users.

Published Dec 14, 2020 · Updated Aug 5, 2024

Unknown · CVSS Not scored

CVE-2019-19232: In Sudo through 1.8.29, an attacker with access to a Runas ALL sudoer account can impersonate a nonexistent...

In Sudo through 1.8.29, an attacker with access to a Runas ALL sudoer account can impersonate a nonexistent user by invoking sudo with a numeric uid that is not associated with any user. NOTE: The software maintainer believes that this is not a vulnerability because running a command via sudo as a user not present in the local password database is an intentional feature. Because this behavior surprised some users, sudo 1.8.30 introduced an option to enable/disable this behavior with the default being disabled. However, this does not change the fact that sudo was behaving as intended, and as documented, in earlier versions

Published Dec 19, 2019 · Updated Aug 5, 2024

Unknown · CVSS Not scored

CVE-2019-19241: In the Linux kernel before 5.4.2, the io_uring feature leads to requests that inadvertently have UID 0 and...

In the Linux kernel before 5.4.2, the io_uring feature leads to requests that inadvertently have UID 0 and full capabilities, aka CID-181e448d8709. This is related to fs/io-wq.c, fs/io_uring.c, and net/socket.c. For example, an attacker can bypass intended restrictions on adding an IPv4 address to the loopback interface. This occurs because IORING_OP_SENDMSG operations, although requested in the context of an unprivileged user, are sometimes performed by a kernel worker thread without considering that context.

Published Dec 17, 2019 · Updated Aug 5, 2024

Unknown · CVSS Not scored

CVE-2019-19234: In Sudo through 1.8.29, the fact that a user has been blocked (e.g., by using the !

In Sudo through 1.8.29, the fact that a user has been blocked (e.g., by using the ! character in the shadow file instead of a password hash) is not considered, allowing an attacker (who has access to a Runas ALL sudoer account) to impersonate any blocked user. NOTE: The software maintainer believes that this CVE is not valid. Disabling local password authentication for a user is not the same as disabling all access to that user--the user may still be able to login via other means (ssh key, kerberos, etc). Both the Linux shadow(5) and passwd(1) manuals are clear on this. Indeed it is a valid use case to have local accounts that are _only_ accessible via sudo and that cannot be logged into with a password. Sudo 1.8.30 added an optional setting to check the _shell_ of the target user (not the encrypted password!) against the contents of /etc/shells but that is not the same thing as preventing access to users with an invalid password hash

Published Dec 19, 2019 · Updated Aug 5, 2024

Unknown · CVSS Not scored

CVE-2019-19141: The Camera Upload functionality in Plex Media Server through 1.18.2.2029 allows remote authenticated users...

The Camera Upload functionality in Plex Media Server through 1.18.2.2029 allows remote authenticated users to write files anywhere the user account running the Plex Media Server has permissions. This allows remote code execution via a variety of methods, such as (on a default Ubuntu installation) creating a .ssh folder in the plex user's home directory via directory traversal, uploading an SSH authorized_keys file there, and logging into the host as the Plex user via SSH.

Published Dec 19, 2019 · Updated Aug 5, 2024

Unknown · CVSS Not scored

CVE-2019-19133: The CSS Hero plugin through 4.0.3 for WordPress is prone to reflected XSS via the URI in a csshero_action=e...

The CSS Hero plugin through 4.0.3 for WordPress is prone to reflected XSS via the URI in a csshero_action=edit_page request because it fails to sufficiently sanitize user-supplied input. An attacker may leverage this issue to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the browser of an unsuspecting user in the context of the affected site. This may allow the attacker to steal cookies or launch other attacks.

Published Dec 4, 2019 · Updated Aug 5, 2024

Unknown · CVSS Not scored

CVE-2019-19118: Django 2.1 before 2.1.15 and 2.2 before 2.2.8 allows unintended model editing.

Django 2.1 before 2.1.15 and 2.2 before 2.2.8 allows unintended model editing. A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. (To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable.)

Published Dec 2, 2019 · Updated Aug 5, 2024

Unknown · CVSS Not scored

CVE-2019-19151: On BIG-IP versions 15.0.0-15.1.0, 14.0.0-14.1.2.3, 13.1.0-13.1.3.2, 12.1.0-12.1.5, and 11.5.2-11.6.5.1, BIG...

On BIG-IP versions 15.0.0-15.1.0, 14.0.0-14.1.2.3, 13.1.0-13.1.3.2, 12.1.0-12.1.5, and 11.5.2-11.6.5.1, BIG-IQ versions 7.0.0, 6.0.0-6.1.0, and 5.0.0-5.4.0, iWorkflow version 2.3.0, and Enterprise Manager version 3.1.1, authenticated users granted TMOS Shell (tmsh) privileges are able access objects on the file system which would normally be disallowed by tmsh restrictions. This allows for authenticated, low privileged attackers to access objects on the file system which would not normally be allowed.

Published Dec 23, 2019 · Updated Aug 5, 2024

Unknown · CVSS Not scored

CVE-2019-19019: An issue was discovered in TitanHQ WebTitan before 5.18.

An issue was discovered in TitanHQ WebTitan before 5.18. It contains a Remote Code Execution issue through which an attacker can execute arbitrary code as root. The issue stems from the hotfix download mechanism, which downloads a shell script via HTTP, and then executes it as root. This is analogous to CVE-2019-6800 but for a different product.

Published Dec 2, 2019 · Updated Aug 5, 2024