LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2019-19118: Django 2.1 before 2.1.15 and 2.2 before 2.2.8 allows unintended model editing.

Django 2.1 before 2.1.15 and 2.2 before 2.2.8 allows unintended model editing. A Django model admin displaying inline related models, where the user has view-only permissions to a parent model but edit permissions to the inline model, would be presented with an editing UI, allowing POST requests, for updating the inline model. Directly editing the view-only parent model was not possible, but the parent model's save() method was called, triggering potential side effects, and causing pre and post-save signal handlers to be invoked. (To resolve this, the Django admin is adjusted to require edit permissions on the parent model in order for inline models to be editable.)

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

This flaw affects Django admin sites with a specific permission split. A staff user who could only view a parent record, but could edit an inline related record, was wrongly shown editing controls. That could change related data and trigger parent save side effects, without directly editing the parent object. Exposure is limited to applications using affected Django versions, Django admin, inline related model admin views, and staff users with view-only parent permissions plus edit rights on the inline model. Public anonymous exploitation is not indicated by the supplied sources. Treat this as a targeted administrative privilege issue, not a broad internet-facing remote exploit based on the supplied evidence. Prioritize upgrades where Django admin is enabled for many staff users or where model save side effects can trigger operational, financial, or access-control changes. Mitigation focus: Upgrade Django 2.1 deployments to 2.1.15 or later.; Upgrade Django 2.2 deployments to 2.2.8 or later.; Review OS or appliance vendor advisories for packaged Django fixes..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2019-19118 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
7Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.