CVE-2026-45294: FreeScout: User Account Enumeration via Password Reset Response Differentiation
FreeScout is a free help desk and shared inbox built with PHP's Laravel framework. Prior to 1.8.219, the password reset endpoint returns visually distinct responses depending on whether the submitted email address belongs to an existing user account, allowing unauthenticated attackers to enumerate valid helpdesk agent email addresses. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.219.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
FreeScout versions before 1.8.219 can reveal whether a submitted email belongs to a helpdesk agent during password reset. This does not grant access by itself, but it can help attackers build accurate target lists for phishing, credential attacks, or social engineering.
Executive priority
Treat as a moderate-priority hardening issue. It is not a direct takeover vulnerability, but it can improve attacker targeting against support staff. Upgrade promptly, especially for internet-facing helpdesk systems.
Technical view
The password reset endpoint returns visually different responses for valid and invalid user emails. An unauthenticated network attacker can infer account existence. The issue maps to CWE-203 and CWE-204, has CVSS 3.1 score 5.3, and is fixed in FreeScout 1.8.219.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to FreeScout deployments before 1.8.219 where the password reset flow is reachable by unauthenticated users, especially public helpdesk portals. The bundle does not identify affected hosting platforms or default exposure conditions beyond the product version.
Exploitation context
The provided sources do not report active exploitation, and KEV status is false. The realistic impact is reconnaissance: identifying valid agent email addresses that may support later phishing, password guessing, or credential stuffing attempts.
Researcher notes
Evidence is clear for the affected version range, vulnerability class, CVSS, and fixed release. The bundle does not provide exploit examples, telemetry, or deployment-specific exposure details, so avoid assuming active exploitation or broader product impact.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade FreeScout to version 1.8.219 or later.
Review the GitHub advisory for current vendor guidance.
Reduce unnecessary public exposure of affected FreeScout instances.
Monitor password reset activity for repeated enumeration-like behavior.
Strengthen phishing and credential-attack controls for helpdesk agents.
Validation and detection
Inventory FreeScout deployments and record current versions.
Confirm all instances are running 1.8.219 or later.
Verify password reset responses no longer reveal account existence.
Review authentication and reset logs for unusual repeated submissions.
Confirm exposed helpdesk routes match intended business access.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-203: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup
Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-203 · source CWE mapping
Observable Discrepancy
Observable Discrepancy represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
Observable Response Discrepancy represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.