CVE-2026-37459: An integer underflow in FRRouting (FRR) stable/10.0 to stable/10.6 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Se...
An integer underflow in FRRouting (FRR) stable/10.0 to stable/10.6 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via supplying a crafted BGP UPDATE message.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
FRRouting can be crashed by a specially formed BGP update. The issue affects FRR stable/10.0 through stable/10.6 according to the CVE description. The business impact is routing service disruption, not data theft. No source in the bundle states active exploitation.
Executive priority
Prioritize patching on production routing infrastructure and exposed BGP peers. The main risk is network availability loss, which can affect customer connectivity and internal routing stability. No evidence provided indicates data compromise or confirmed exploitation.
Technical view
CVE-2026-37459 is an integer underflow in FRRouting BGP UPDATE handling that can trigger denial of service. CVSS 3.1 is 7.5: network reachable, low complexity, no privileges or user interaction, with high availability impact only. CWE mappings are CWE-191 and CWE-400.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely on systems running FRRouting with BGP enabled, especially routers or route servers accepting BGP UPDATE messages from peers. The bundle does not identify specific distributions beyond Red Hat advisories and upstream FRR stable/10.0 to stable/10.6.
Exploitation context
The vulnerability is remotely reachable over BGP in affected FRR deployments, but the provided sources do not show public exploit use, KEV listing, or weaponized details. Treat internet-facing or broadly peered BGP services as higher operational risk.
Researcher notes
The bundle names an upstream FRR commit and Red Hat advisories, but does not provide fixed version details or affected CPEs. Analysis should stay focused on BGP UPDATE parsing paths and availability impact. Avoid assuming exploit maturity beyond the CVE description.
Mitigation direction
Apply relevant FRRouting or operating-system vendor updates as they become available.
Review Red Hat advisories RHSA-2026:24347 and RHSA-2026:24370 if using Red Hat packages.
Restrict BGP peering to trusted, expected neighbors wherever operationally possible.
Use routing policy and control-plane protections to reduce untrusted BGP message exposure.
Monitor FRR/BGP daemon restarts until patched.
Validation and detection
Inventory systems running FRRouting and record package or branch versions.
Identify FRR deployments with BGP enabled and active peers.
Prioritize versions matching stable/10.0 through stable/10.6.
Confirm applicable vendor advisory packages are installed.
Review logs for unexpected BGP daemon crashes or restarts.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-191: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.