LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-65891: A GPU device-ID validation flaw in OneFlow v0.9.0 allows attackers to trigger a Denial of Dervice (DoS) by...

A GPU device-ID validation flaw in OneFlow v0.9.0 allows attackers to trigger a Denial of Dervice (DoS) by invoking flow.cuda.get_device_properties() with an invalid or negative device index.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE describes a denial-of-service risk in OneFlow v0.9.0. If an attacker can influence a GPU device index passed to flow.cuda.get_device_properties(), an invalid or negative value may crash or disrupt availability. The source bundle does not identify data theft or code execution.

Executive priority

Prioritize if OneFlow v0.9.0 supports customer-facing or shared GPU workloads. Availability loss is the reported impact, not confidentiality or integrity compromise.

Technical view

The reported flaw is improper GPU device-ID validation in OneFlow v0.9.0, mapped to CWE-400. The CVSS 3.1 score is 7.5 with availability impact only. The affected metadata is incomplete, but the description and references identify OneFlow and the get_device_properties CUDA path.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to deployments using OneFlow v0.9.0 with CUDA/GPU functionality where untrusted input can reach GPU device-index handling.

Exploitation context

The bundle marks KEV as false and provides no evidence of active exploitation. Public references include the OneFlow repository and a GitHub issue, but no confirmed patch details are included.

Researcher notes

Affected vendor/product fields are listed as n/a, creating attribution uncertainty. The description identifies OneFlow v0.9.0, but the bundle does not provide fixed versions, vendor advisory details, or active exploitation evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Check OneFlow vendor guidance and issue 10661 for fixed release information.
  • Restrict untrusted access to services calling OneFlow CUDA device-property APIs.
  • Validate GPU device indices before calling OneFlow APIs.
  • Block negative or out-of-range device IDs at application boundaries.
  • Monitor affected services for crashes tied to CUDA device-property lookups.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory systems running OneFlow and confirm exact versions.
  • Identify code paths calling flow.cuda.get_device_properties().
  • Check whether user-controlled input can influence device index values.
  • Confirm wrapper validation rejects invalid GPU device IDs.
  • Review service logs for crashes around CUDA device-property requests.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-400: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-65891 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-65891Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-400 · source CWE mapping

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.