LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-32436: AutoGPT has a DoS vulnerability in AddAudioToVideoBlock

AutoGPT is a workflow automation platform for creating, deploying, and managing continuous artificial intelligence agents. Prior to 0.6.63, `AddAudioToVideoBlock` will download and store the video and audio in a temporary directory without deleting before all noded are done. `StepThroughItemsBlock` can be used to iterate `MediaDurationBlock` multiple times. `StepThroughItemsBlock` does not limit the number of loops. In addition, `AddAudioToVideoBlock` does not limit the amount of disk space consumed in the current working directory and does not delete the video after outputing the result. When a malicious user chooses to screen shot many web pages, the disk space will eventually run out, causing a DoS. Version 0.6.63 patches the issue.

HighCVSS 7.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

AutoGPT versions before 0.6.63 can let a low-privileged user exhaust server disk space through media workflow behavior. The result is denial of service: agents or the host may stop working because temporary video and audio files are not adequately cleaned up or bounded.

Executive priority

Treat this as a near-term availability risk for any shared or production AutoGPT deployment. Prioritize upgrade during the next maintenance window, sooner for internet-facing or multi-user agent platforms.

Technical view

The issue affects Significant-Gravitas AutoGPT before 0.6.63. AddAudioToVideoBlock stores downloaded video and audio in a temporary directory and does not adequately delete or limit disk usage. StepThroughItemsBlock can iterate related media processing without loop limits, enabling resource exhaustion. CVSS 4.0 score is 7.1.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely where AutoGPT before 0.6.63 is deployed and users can create or run workflows using the affected media and iteration blocks. Shared automation platforms, hosted agent environments, and disk-constrained workers have higher operational risk.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not cite active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked KEV. Exploitation requires low privileges and no user interaction, with impact focused on availability through disk exhaustion rather than data theft or code execution.

Researcher notes

The root weakness maps to CWE-400: uncontrolled resource consumption. Evidence supports disk-space exhaustion through unbounded looping and incomplete temporary file cleanup. The source bundle names version 0.6.63 as patched but does not provide further exploit telemetry.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade AutoGPT to version 0.6.63 or later.
  • Review the GitHub advisory for vendor-confirmed remediation details.
  • Restrict untrusted workflow execution until upgraded.
  • Monitor worker disk usage and temporary media directories.
  • Apply operational disk quotas where supported by your deployment platform.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory AutoGPT deployments and confirm versions are at least 0.6.63.
  • Identify workflows using AddAudioToVideoBlock, StepThroughItemsBlock, or MediaDurationBlock.
  • Check recent logs for abnormal media workflow repetition or disk growth.
  • Confirm temporary media files are cleaned after benign workflow completion.
  • Verify monitoring alerts cover low disk space on AutoGPT workers.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-400: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-32436 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.1 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.1CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:LGitHub_M

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

7.1High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-32436Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Significant-GravitasAutoGPT< 0.6.63Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-400 · source CWE mapping

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.