LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-54365: Traefik - Denial of Service via HTTP/2 Request Handling

Traefik before 2.10.5 and 3.0.0-beta4 is affected by a denial-of-service vulnerability in HTTP/2 request handling inherited from the Go standard library's HTTP/2 implementation (CVE-2023-44487 / CVE-2023-39325, the 'Rapid Reset' technique). A remote attacker can rapidly create and cancel HTTP/2 streams to exhaust server resources and cause service unavailability.

HighCVSS 8.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a service-availability risk in Traefik. A remote attacker can abuse HTTP/2 request handling by rapidly opening and canceling streams, consuming resources and making services behind Traefik unavailable. The source bundle identifies fixed Traefik versions as 2.10.5 and 3.0.0-beta4.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for public-facing Traefik because the impact is service outage, not data theft. The attack is remote and unauthenticated, so business risk depends mainly on where vulnerable Traefik instances sit in the traffic path and whether HTTP/2 is exposed.

Technical view

Traefik versions before 2.10.5 and 3.0.0-beta4 inherit HTTP/2 denial-of-service behavior from Go's HTTP/2 implementation, associated with CVE-2023-44487 and CVE-2023-39325. The issue maps to uncontrolled resource consumption and allocation limits, with high availability impact and network, unauthenticated attack conditions.

Likely exposure

Most relevant exposure is internet-facing Traefik deployments that accept HTTP/2 traffic and run versions older than 2.10.5, or 3.0.0 beta builds older than beta4. Internal Traefik deployments may still matter if reachable by untrusted tenants or compromised hosts.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation for this Traefik-specific CVE. It describes the Rapid Reset technique and remote unauthenticated denial-of-service conditions. Treat exploitability as credible, but do not claim observed exploitation from these sources alone.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strongest for version exposure, attack class, and availability impact. The source bundle links the issue to Go HTTP/2 Rapid Reset behavior and CWE-400/CWE-770. It does not provide Traefik-specific proof of active exploitation, detailed package status, or alternative mitigations beyond fixed versions and vendor guidance.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Traefik 2.x deployments to 2.10.5 or later.
  • Upgrade Traefik 3.0.0 beta deployments to beta4 or later.
  • Review the Traefik advisory for deployment-specific guidance.
  • Prioritize public HTTP/2 entry points before internal-only instances.
  • If upgrade is delayed, check vendor guidance for temporary exposure reduction.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Traefik versions across ingress, proxy, and edge deployments.
  • Identify which Traefik entry points accept HTTP/2 traffic.
  • Confirm patched versions are deployed in production and staging.
  • Review monitoring for resource exhaustion and unexplained availability drops.
  • Track vendor and distribution advisories for packaging status.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-400: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-770: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-54365 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.7 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

3CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

3 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6VulnCheck
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2023-54365Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPgithub.com/traefik/traefik: net/http2: Traefik: Denial of Service via HTTP/2 Rapid Reset technique
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-06-23T13:01:50.400Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-06-23T12:12:51.853Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
TraefikTraefik0, 2.10.5unaffected
TraefikTraefik3.0.0-beta1, 3.0.0-beta4unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-400 · source CWE mapping

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-770 · source CWE mapping

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.