LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-32611: G_variant_byteswap() can take a long time with some non-normal inputs

A flaw was found in GLib. GVariant deserialization is vulnerable to a slowdown issue where a crafted GVariant can cause excessive processing, leading to denial of service.

MediumCVSS 5.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a denial-of-service flaw in GLib, a common Linux library. A crafted GVariant input can make affected software spend excessive time processing data. The disclosed impact is availability loss, not data theft or system takeover.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate availability risk. Patch through normal OS and dependency maintenance, with faster action for shared workstations, desktop fleets, or services that process untrusted local content using GLib.

Technical view

The issue affects GVariant deserialization and G_variant_byteswap() handling of some non-normal inputs. CVSS is 5.5 with local attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, required user interaction, and high availability impact. Affected sources name glib2 across RHEL 8/9 and Fedora packages, with other vendor advisories referenced.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant on systems or applications using GLib/glib2 that deserialize GVariant data from files, IPC, or other inputs that may be attacker-influenced. The bundle does not provide exact vulnerable version ranges.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates local access and user interaction are required, reducing remote mass-exploitation likelihood but leaving denial-of-service risk where crafted inputs are processed.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports a resource-consumption flaw, CWE-400, in GLib GVariant processing. Public details in the bundle are limited: no exploit status, no universal version range, and no source-level fix summary are provided here.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply vendor-provided GLib/glib2 updates for affected distributions and products.
  • Check Red Hat, Debian, Gentoo, Fedora, and NetApp guidance for fixed packages.
  • Prioritize systems processing untrusted GVariant data or user-supplied local files.
  • Avoid accepting untrusted serialized GVariant inputs where practical until patched.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory installed GLib/glib2 packages and dependent applications.
  • Compare package versions against vendor advisory status and fixed builds.
  • Identify software paths that deserialize GVariant data from untrusted sources.
  • Confirm remediation through package manager or vendor asset reports.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-400: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-32611 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H1.83.6redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-32611Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/aglib2See advisoryaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6glib2unknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7glib2unknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8glib2affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9glib2affected
FedoraExtra Packages for Enterprise Linuxglibaffected
FedoraFedora 38mingw-glib2affected
FedoraFedora 37mingw-glib2affected
FedoraFedora 37glib2affected
FedoraFedora 38glib2affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-400 · source CWE mapping

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.