LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-36421: An issue was discovered in Arm Mbed TLS before 2.23.0.

An issue was discovered in Arm Mbed TLS before 2.23.0. Because of a side channel in modular exponentiation, an RSA private key used in a secure enclave could be disclosed.

MediumCVSS 5.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-36421 is a side-channel weakness in Arm Mbed TLS before 2.23.0. Under the described condition, RSA private keys used inside a secure enclave could be disclosed. The business concern is confidentiality of private keys in embedded, appliance, or application environments that embed vulnerable Mbed TLS versions.

Executive priority

Treat as a targeted confidentiality risk, not an emergency mass-exploitation issue based on current evidence. Prioritize environments protecting long-lived RSA private keys, embedded products, and customer-facing systems with bundled Mbed TLS.

Technical view

The issue is tied to modular exponentiation behavior and is classified as CWE-203. The CVSS 3.1 score is 5.3, with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and confidentiality-only impact. Public bundle data identifies Mbed TLS before 2.23.0 and references Arm release and issue materials.

Likely exposure

Most likely exposure is software, firmware, appliances, or services bundling Arm Mbed TLS before 2.23.0, especially where RSA private-key operations occur in secure enclave contexts. The source bundle does not enumerate specific affected products or CPEs.

Exploitation context

CISA KEV status is false, and the provided sources do not state active exploitation. The available evidence describes a side-channel disclosure risk, but does not provide exploit maturity, public exploitation, or product-specific attack scenarios.

Researcher notes

The source bundle gives the vulnerability class, version boundary, CVSS vector, and references, but does not include detailed affected CPEs, exploit status, or operational prerequisites beyond secure-enclave RSA private-key use. Validate exposure through dependency and firmware analysis.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected Mbed TLS deployments using Arm release guidance, including version 2.23.0 or later where applicable.
  • For 2.16 LTS users, review Arm Mbed TLS v2.16.7 release guidance.
  • Apply distribution security updates where Mbed TLS is supplied by the OS vendor.
  • Inventory statically linked applications and firmware that may bundle vulnerable Mbed TLS.
  • Rotate exposed RSA keys if investigation suggests enclave key disclosure may have occurred.

Validation and detection

  • Identify all deployed Mbed TLS versions, including vendored source and static links.
  • Check SBOMs, firmware manifests, and package inventories for Mbed TLS before 2.23.0.
  • Confirm whether affected systems perform RSA private-key operations in secure enclave contexts.
  • Verify OS packages include relevant Debian, Gentoo, or vendor security updates.
  • Document compensating controls if immediate upgrade is not possible.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-203: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-36421 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N3.91.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-36421Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-203 · source CWE mapping

Observable Discrepancy

Observable Discrepancy represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.