LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-3560: Cisco Aironet Access Points UDP Flooding Denial of Service Vulnerability

A vulnerability in Cisco Aironet Access Points (APs) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper resource management while processing specific packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a series of crafted UDP packets to a specific port on an affected device. A successful exploit could either allow the attacker to tear down the connection between the AP and the wireless LAN controller, resulting in the affected device not being able to process client traffic, or cause the vulnerable device to reload, triggering a DoS condition. After the attack, the affected device should automatically recover its normal functions without manual intervention.

HighCVSS 8.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw can let an unauthenticated attacker disrupt Cisco Aironet access points by causing controller disconnects or device reloads. The main business risk is wireless outage, not data theft. The source bundle says devices should recover automatically after the attack, but repeated traffic could still interrupt client connectivity.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority availability risk for sites dependent on Cisco Aironet wireless. Prioritize confirmation and remediation for production, guest, campus, healthcare, warehouse, or operational areas where wireless downtime directly affects work.

Technical view

CVE-2020-3560 is a Cisco Aironet AP software resource-management issue when processing specific UDP packets. Network-adjacent or remote attackers need no credentials or user interaction. Successful exploitation can prevent client traffic processing, tear down AP-to-controller connectivity, or trigger AP reloads, producing high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Organizations using Cisco Aironet Access Point Software. Exposure is more likely where APs can receive UDP traffic from untrusted networks or broad internal segments. Exact affected versions are not provided in the bundle, so confirm exposure against Cisco's advisory and asset inventory.

Exploitation context

The CVE describes unauthenticated remote denial of service via crafted UDP traffic. The bundle marks KEV as false, and no provided source states active exploitation. The practical impact is wireless service disruption through AP reloads or controller disconnects, with automatic recovery expected after the attack stops.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports a network-reachable, unauthenticated DoS caused by improper resource management, mapped to CWE-400. The bundle does not include affected version ranges, fixed release names, proof-of-concept status, or active exploitation evidence. Avoid assuming broader Cisco wireless products are affected.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco's advisory for affected and fixed software details.
  • Inventory Cisco Aironet AP models and installed software versions.
  • Apply Cisco-recommended fixed software if your versions are affected.
  • Restrict untrusted UDP reachability to AP management and control interfaces where possible.
  • Monitor wireless controller logs for AP disconnects and reload patterns.

Validation and detection

  • Compare AP software versions against Cisco's advisory.
  • Confirm APs are not exposed to unnecessary untrusted UDP traffic.
  • Review WLC logs for unexplained disconnects, reloads, or client traffic loss.
  • Check monitoring for recurring wireless outages matching AP reload events.
  • Document compensating controls if patch status cannot be confirmed.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-400: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-3560 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.6 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.6CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H3.94Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

8.6High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2020-3560Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Aironet Access Point Softwaren/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-400 · source CWE mapping

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.