LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-3305: Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software and Firepower Threat Defense Software BGP Denial of Service Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the implementation of the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) module in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to incorrect processing of certain BGP packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted BGP packet. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a DoS condition on the affected device.

MediumCVSS 6.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw can let a remote unauthenticated attacker crash or disrupt affected Cisco ASA or Firepower Threat Defense devices by sending specially crafted BGP traffic. The business risk is service interruption on security edge devices, not data theft or privilege gain based on the provided sources.

Executive priority

Handle as a moderate availability risk. Prioritize devices supporting critical connectivity or perimeter routing, because successful exploitation could interrupt network security and routing services even though confidentiality and integrity impacts are not described.

Technical view

CVE-2020-3305 is a BGP module denial-of-service issue caused by incorrect processing of certain BGP packets in Cisco ASA Software and Cisco FTD Software. CVSS 3.0 is 6.8 with network attack vector, high attack complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Cisco ASA or FTD devices run BGP and can receive BGP packets from reachable network peers. The provided bundle does not identify exact vulnerable versions, configurations, or fixed releases.

Exploitation context

The source bundle describes crafted BGP packets causing DoS. It does not cite public exploitation, proof-of-concept availability, or CISA KEV listing. Treat active exploitation as unconfirmed from the supplied evidence.

Researcher notes

The key evidence gap is version and fix detail: the bundle names Cisco ASA and FTD but only lists ASA in the affected array and provides no version matrix. Use the Cisco advisory as the authoritative source for affected releases and remediation.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco’s advisory for affected releases and vendor-approved fixed software.
  • Inventory Cisco ASA and FTD devices that run BGP.
  • Prioritize remediation for internet-edge or business-critical routing paths.
  • Remove unnecessary BGP exposure using existing approved network controls.
  • Monitor vendor guidance if fixed-version details are unclear locally.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether each ASA or FTD device has BGP enabled.
  • Compare running software versions against Cisco’s advisory.
  • Review logs for unexplained BGP resets or device reloads.
  • Verify business-critical paths have failover during remediation.
  • Document devices not running BGP as lower exposure.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-400: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-3305 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.8 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.8CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H2.24Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

6.8Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2020-3305Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Softwaren/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-400 · source CWE mapping

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.