LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-19726: An issue was discovered in binutils libbfd.c 2.36 relating to the auxiliary symbol data allows attackers to...

An issue was discovered in binutils libbfd.c 2.36 relating to the auxiliary symbol data allows attackers to read or write to system memory or cause a denial of service.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-19726 describes a flaw in binutils libbfd.c 2.36 involving auxiliary symbol data. The public record says attackers may read or write system memory or cause denial of service. The provided sources do not identify active exploitation, a CVSS score, specific downstream products, or a named fixed version.

Executive priority

Track and remediate through normal vulnerability management unless affected tooling processes untrusted files at scale. Elevate priority for build farms, security scanners, malware labs, or public-facing file-analysis services because memory corruption and denial of service can affect reliability and containment.

Technical view

The CVE record points to binutils libbfd.c 2.36 and auxiliary symbol data handling. Reported impact is memory read, memory write, or denial of service. Affected product metadata is incomplete in the bundle, listing vendor and product as n/a, so downstream package exposure must be validated per environment.

Likely exposure

Likely exposure is systems or build, analysis, and security pipelines that use affected binutils/libbfd to process files. The bundle does not enumerate distributions, packages, appliances, or applications embedding libbfd, so exposure cannot be confirmed from CVE metadata alone.

Exploitation context

The source bundle marks KEV as false and provides no cited evidence of active exploitation. It also does not provide exploit availability, prerequisites, or a reliable remote/local access path. Treat exploitation context as incomplete until upstream or vendor advisories are reviewed.

Researcher notes

The public bundle is thin: no CVSS vector, no complete affected-product list, and no named fix. Sourceware bug links are the main technical references. Any deeper assessment should distinguish upstream binutils exposure from downstream packaged or embedded libbfd usage.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory binutils and libbfd versions, especially 2.36.
  • Check Sourceware bugs 26240 and 26241 for upstream guidance.
  • Check operating-system vendor advisories for fixed binutils packages.
  • Avoid processing untrusted binary inputs with affected tooling where practical.
  • Prioritize updates in build, malware-analysis, and file-inspection systems.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed binutils package versions on relevant systems.
  • Identify tools or services linked against libbfd.
  • Review CI, build, and analysis workflows processing external files.
  • Check vendor changelogs for references to CVE-2020-19726 or the Sourceware bugs.
  • Document systems where package metadata cannot confirm libbfd exposure.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-400: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-19726 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-400 · source CWE mapping

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.