LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-1968: Raccoon attack

The Raccoon attack exploits a flaw in the TLS specification which can lead to an attacker being able to compute the pre-master secret in connections which have used a Diffie-Hellman (DH) based ciphersuite. In such a case this would result in the attacker being able to eavesdrop on all encrypted communications sent over that TLS connection. The attack can only be exploited if an implementation re-uses a DH secret across multiple TLS connections. Note that this issue only impacts DH ciphersuites and not ECDH ciphersuites. This issue affects OpenSSL 1.0.2 which is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. OpenSSL 1.1.1 is not vulnerable to this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2w (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2v).

LowCVSS 3.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-1968 is a low-severity TLS confidentiality issue affecting OpenSSL 1.0.2 through 1.0.2v when DH cipher suites are used and DH secrets are reused. In the right conditions, an attacker could eavesdrop on a TLS connection. OpenSSL 1.1.1 is listed as not vulnerable.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted legacy-risk cleanup, not an emergency response item. Prioritize internet-facing, regulated, or high-sensitivity systems still running unsupported OpenSSL 1.0.2 or vendor products listed in advisories.

Technical view

The issue is tied to a TLS specification flaw and OpenSSL 1.0.2 DH behavior. It can expose the pre-master secret for DH-based cipher suites if a DH secret is reused across multiple TLS connections. It does not affect ECDH cipher suites. The CVSS 3.1 score is 3.7 with high attack complexity.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in legacy systems, embedded products, appliances, or vendor platforms still using OpenSSL 1.0.2-1.0.2v with DH cipher suites enabled. Modern OpenSSL 1.1.1 deployments are not identified as vulnerable in the source bundle.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. Exploitation requires specific TLS conditions, including DH secret reuse across multiple connections, which raises practical difficulty.

Researcher notes

Key constraints are important: DH cipher suites only, not ECDH; OpenSSL 1.1.1 is not vulnerable; exploitation depends on DH secret reuse. Evidence supports confidentiality impact only, with no integrity or availability impact in the provided CVSS vector.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected OpenSSL 1.0.2 deployments to vendor-fixed packages or OpenSSL 1.0.2w where applicable.
  • Move legacy systems to supported OpenSSL branches where vendor guidance allows.
  • Review vendor advisories for appliances and bundled OpenSSL dependencies.
  • Prefer configurations that avoid affected DH cipher suites where operationally supported.
  • Track unsupported OpenSSL 1.0.2 use as technical debt requiring retirement.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory internet-facing and internal services using OpenSSL 1.0.2 through 1.0.2v.
  • Confirm whether TLS configurations allow DH-based cipher suites.
  • Check vendor firmware, appliance, and OS advisories for embedded OpenSSL exposure.
  • Verify OpenSSL 1.1.1 systems are not incorrectly flagged as affected.
  • Document any compensating controls for systems that cannot be upgraded promptly.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-203: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-1968 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
3.7 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
11Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
3.7CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N2.21.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

3.7Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-1968Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
OpenSSLOpenSSLFixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2w (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2v)Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-203 · source CWE mapping

Observable Discrepancy

Observable Discrepancy represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.