LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2018-6347: An issue in the Proxygen handling of HTTP2 parsing of headers/trailers can lead to a denial-of-service attack.

An issue in the Proxygen handling of HTTP2 parsing of headers/trailers can lead to a denial-of-service attack. This affects Proxygen prior to v2018.12.31.00.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2018-6347 is a denial-of-service flaw in Facebook Proxygen's HTTP/2 header and trailer parsing. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could cause service availability impact. The CVE rates it high because exploitation is network reachable, low complexity, and affects availability, not data confidentiality or integrity.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for public or business-critical Proxygen-backed services because the risk is service disruption. Data theft is not indicated by the CVE, but downtime can still affect customers and operations.

Technical view

Proxygen versions before v2018.12.31.00 mishandle HTTP/2 parsing of headers or trailers, mapped to CWE-400 resource management. The CVSS 3.1 vector is AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H. The supplied sources identify a related upstream commit but do not provide detailed exploit conditions.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to services directly using Facebook Proxygen before v2018.12.31.00, especially where HTTP/2 traffic reaches the Proxygen component over the network.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited active exploitation. Treat exploitation status as unconfirmed while prioritizing internet-facing or high-availability Proxygen deployments.

Researcher notes

Evidence is concise: CVE description, CVSS, CWE-400, affected version boundary, and one GitHub commit. No source in the bundle confirms active exploitation, broad product embedding, or detailed mitigations beyond updating past the affected range.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Proxygen to v2018.12.31.00 or later.
  • Review the referenced upstream commit and vendor guidance.
  • Prioritize internet-facing HTTP/2 Proxygen services.
  • Apply availability monitoring during rollout.
  • Document any compensating controls if upgrade is delayed.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory services and dependencies using Facebook Proxygen.
  • Confirm deployed Proxygen versions are not before v2018.12.31.00.
  • Identify whether HTTP/2 reaches Proxygen in production paths.
  • Review logs and monitoring for unexplained availability degradation.
  • Track remediation evidence in vulnerability management records.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-400: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2018-6347 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2018-6347Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FacebookProxygenv2018.12.31.00, unspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-400 · source CWE mapping

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.