Live Active security incident? Get immediate response
CWE Reference

CWE-925: Improper Verification of Intent by Broadcast Receiver

Official CWE-925 CWE context with Glexia analysis, remediation guidance, related CVEs, and ATT&CK context.

Release 4.20weaknessIncomplete

Glexia's Take

CWE-925: Intent Spoofing

Improper Verification of Intent by Broadcast Receiver represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

Executive Impact

  • Integrity: Gain Privileges or Assume Identity: Another application can impersonate the operating system and cause the software to perform an unintended action.

Developer Pattern

CWE-925 is the kind of defect developers can usually prevent with explicit validation, safer framework defaults, and tests that exercise hostile input or unsafe state transitions.

Confidence

high confidence from CWE-925, 4.20.

Official CWE Definition

CWE-925: Improper Verification of Intent by Broadcast Receiver

The Android application uses a Broadcast Receiver that receives an Intent but does not properly verify that the Intent came from an authorized source.

Certain types of Intents, identified by action string, can only be broadcast by the operating system itself, not by third-party applications. However, when an application registers to receive these implicit system intents, it is also registered to receive any explicit intents. While a malicious application cannot send an implicit system intent, it can send an explicit intent to the target application, which may assume that any received intent is a valid implicit system intent and not an explicit intent from another application. This may lead to unintended behavior.

Type
weakness
Abstraction
Variant
Status
Incomplete
Source
MITRE CWE definition

Developer And Remediation Guidance

How teams prevent and detect this weakness

Causes

  • The following example demonstrates the weakness. The ShutdownReceiver class will handle the intent:,Because the method does not confirm that the intent action is the expected system intent, any received intent will trigger the shutdown procedure, as shown here:,An attacker can use this behavior to cause a denial of service.

Remediation

  • Architecture and Design: Before acting on the Intent, check the Intent Action to make sure it matches the expected System action.

Detection

  • Automated Static Analysis: Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

Mappings

Related CVEs, CWEs, and ATT&CK context

Related CWEs

Related CVEs

Related CVE mappings appear after CVE records are cross-indexed.

Open CWE CVE mapping

ATT&CK Relevance

ATT&CK relevance is shown only when reviewed or responsibly inferred.