Live Active security incident? Get immediate response
CWE Reference

CWE-459: Incomplete Cleanup

Official CWE-459 CWE context with Glexia analysis, remediation guidance, related CVEs, and ATT&CK context.

Release 4.20weaknessDraft

Glexia's Take

CWE-459: Insufficient Cleanup

Incomplete Cleanup represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

Executive Impact

  • Other,Confidentiality,Integrity: Other,Read Application Data,Modify Application Data,DoS: Resource Consumption (Other): It is possible to overflow the number of temporary files because directories typically have limits on the number of files allowed. This could create a denial of service problem.

Developer Pattern

CWE-459 is the kind of defect developers can usually prevent with explicit validation, safer framework defaults, and tests that exercise hostile input or unsafe state transitions.

Confidence

high confidence from CWE-459, 4.20.

Official CWE Definition

CWE-459: Incomplete Cleanup

The product does not properly "clean up" and remove temporary or supporting resources after they have been used.

Type
weakness
Abstraction
Base
Status
Draft
Source
MITRE CWE definition

Developer And Remediation Guidance

How teams prevent and detect this weakness

Causes

  • Stream resources in a Java application should be released in a finally block, otherwise an exception thrown before the call to close() would result in an unreleased I/O resource. In the example below, the close() method is called in the try block (incorrect).

Remediation

  • Architecture and Design,Implementation: Temporary files and other supporting resources should be deleted/released immediately after they are no longer needed.

Detection

  • Automated Static Analysis: Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

Mappings

Related CVEs, CWEs, and ATT&CK context