LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CWE Reference

CWE-587: Assignment of a Fixed Address to a Pointer | Glexia

CWE-587 (Assignment of a Fixed Address to a Pointer) weakness overview with consequences, detection methods, mitigations, related CVEs and MITRE ATT&CK context.

Release 4.20weaknessDraft

Glexia's Take · Automated analysis

CWE-587: Assignment of a Fixed Address to a Pointer

Assignment of a Fixed Address to a Pointer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

Executive Impact

  • Integrity Confidentiality Availability: Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands: If one executes code at a known location, an attacker might be able to inject code there beforehand.
  • Availability: DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart Reduce Maintainability Reduce Reliability: If the code is ported to another platform or environment, the pointer is likely to be invalid and cause a crash.
  • Confidentiality Integrity: Read Memory Modify Memory: The data at a known pointer location can be easily read or influenced by an attacker.

Developer Pattern

CWE-587 is the kind of defect developers can usually prevent with explicit validation, safer framework defaults, and tests that exercise hostile input or unsafe state transitions.

Automation confidence

high confidence from CWE-587, 4.20.

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Official CWE Definition

CWE-587: Assignment of a Fixed Address to a Pointer

The product sets a pointer to a specific address other than NULL or 0.

Using a fixed address is not portable, because that address will probably not be valid in all environments or platforms.

Type
weakness
Abstraction
Variant
Status
Draft
Source
MITRE CWE definition

Developer And Remediation Guidance

How teams prevent and detect this weakness

Causes

  • This code assumes a particular function will always be found at a particular address. It assigns a pointer to that address and calls the function. The same function may not always be found at the same memory address. This could lead to a crash, or an attacker may alter the memory at the expected address, leading to arbitrary code execution.

Remediation

  • Implementation: Never set a pointer to a fixed address.

Detection

  • Automated Static Analysis: Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
  • Automated Dynamic Analysis: Use tools that are integrated during compilation to insert runtime error-checking mechanisms related to memory safety errors, such as AddressSanitizer (ASan) for C/C++ [REF-1518].

Mappings

Related CVEs, CWEs, and ATT&CK context

Related CWEs

Related CVEs

Related CVE mappings appear after CVE records are cross-indexed.

Open CWE CVE mapping

ATT&CK Relevance

ATT&CK relevance is shown only when reviewed or responsibly inferred.