Live Active security incident? Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-9828: Logback deserialization whitelist bypass for java.lang and java.util

Deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability in QOS.CH Sarl logback logback-core (HardenedObjectInputStream (logback-core) modules) allows Object Injection albeit heavily restricted. More precisely, an attacker able to influence serialized data sent to SimpleSocketServer or SimpleSSLSocketServer can instantiate objects from classes in the java.lang and java.util packages that are not explicitly blocked. Although deserialization is heavily restricted by HardenedObjectInputStream and no practical way to achieve remote code execution or significant privilege escalation has been identified, this issue constitutes a bypass of the intended security restrictions. This issue affects logback: through 1.5.32 inclusive.

LowCVSS 2.9Not KEV-listed Updated
Glexia's Take low

Analyst readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Logback has a low-severity weakness in a restricted deserialization path. If an attacker can send crafted serialized data to Logback's SimpleSocketServer or SimpleSSLSocketServer, they may bypass intended class restrictions. Sources state no practical remote-code-execution or significant privilege-escalation path has been identified.

Executive priority

Treat this as routine patch management unless the affected logging socket servers are exposed to untrusted networks. The public evidence describes a security-control bypass, not a proven high-impact compromise path.

Technical view

CVE-2026-9828 affects logback-core through 1.5.32 inclusive, specifically HardenedObjectInputStream used with SimpleSocketServer and SimpleSSLSocketServer. The whitelist can be bypassed enough to instantiate unblocked java.lang and java.util classes. The issue is CWE-502 with CVSS 4.0 score 2.9 and high attack complexity.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to Java applications using vulnerable logback-core versions and accepting serialized logging events through SimpleSocketServer or SimpleSSLSocketServer. Applications that do not expose these components to untrusted input are less likely to be meaningfully exposed.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV, and the provided sources do not report active exploitation. Exploitation requires the attacker to influence serialized data sent to the affected socket server components, and the reported impact remains restricted.

Researcher notes

The key research question is reachability of SimpleSocketServer or SimpleSSLSocketServer and whether untrusted serialized input can reach HardenedObjectInputStream. The source explicitly says no practical RCE or significant privilege escalation has been identified, so avoid overstating impact.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory applications using logback-core through 1.5.32 inclusive.
  • Review the Logback 1.5.33 vendor guidance and update accordingly.
  • Disable SimpleSocketServer or SimpleSSLSocketServer where not required.
  • Restrict network access to logging socket servers to trusted sources only.
  • Monitor QOS.CH advisories for any updated mitigation details.

Validation and detection

  • Check dependency manifests for logback-core versions through 1.5.32.
  • Identify whether SimpleSocketServer or SimpleSSLSocketServer is configured or reachable.
  • Confirm logging socket endpoints are not exposed to untrusted networks.
  • Review deployment firewalls and service bindings for affected components.
  • Document compensating controls if immediate update is not possible.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Based on public source material and reviewed before publication.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-502: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-9828 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profile CVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
2.9 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:P/RE:L/U:Green

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1 CVSS vectors
3 Timeline events
1 ADP providers
2 Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADP CISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

Score Version Severity Vector Exploit Impact Source
2.9 CVSS 4.0 Low CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:P/RE:L/U:Green NCSC.ch

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

2.9 Low
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-9828 Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:P/RE:L/U:Green

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reserved CVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE published CVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updated CVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADP CISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

Vendor Product Version / package Status
QOS.CH Sarl logback logback-core, 0, 1.5.33 unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-502 · source CWE mapping

Deserialization of Untrusted Data

Deserialization of Untrusted Data represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.