LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-9802: Keycloak: keycloak: unauthorized account access via replayed refresh tokens after cluster restart

A flaw was found in Keycloak. When revokeRefreshToken=true is enabled and persistent session storage is in use, a server restart can reset internal timing mechanisms. This allows a remote attacker, who has previously captured a user's refresh token, to replay that token even after it has been revoked. Successful exploitation grants the attacker unauthorized access to the victim's account, potentially leading to information disclosure or privilege escalation.

MediumCVSS 6.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This Keycloak flaw can let a previously stolen refresh token work again after a server or cluster restart, even if it was revoked. It affects certain Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 and 26.6 packages when refresh-token revocation and persistent session storage are used.

Executive priority

Treat as a priority identity-platform update, especially for production SSO handling sensitive systems. The flaw is not reported as actively exploited, but stolen tokens could regain value after restarts in affected configurations.

Technical view

CVE-2026-9802 is a CWE-613 session expiration issue. With revokeRefreshToken=true and persistent session storage, restart behavior can reset internal timing, allowing replay of a captured revoked refresh token. CVSS 3.1 is 6.8, with high confidentiality and integrity impact, no privileges required, high attack complexity, and user interaction required.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant for organizations running affected Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 or 26.6 in clustered or restarted environments with persistent session storage and refresh-token revocation enabled.

Exploitation context

No provided source or KEV listing indicates active exploitation. Abuse requires a previously captured user refresh token plus the vulnerable configuration and restart condition. Successful exploitation may allow unauthorized account access, information disclosure, or privilege escalation through the victim account.

Researcher notes

The source data lists affected package entries and separate unaffected product-version entries for 26.4.13 and 26.6.3. Confirm exact fixed builds through the RHSA pages before closure. Do not assume all upstream Keycloak versions are affected from this record alone.

Mitigation direction

  • Review the Red Hat advisories linked for affected packages and fixed guidance.
  • Update affected Red Hat build of Keycloak packages per Red Hat guidance.
  • Confirm whether revokeRefreshToken=true and persistent session storage are in use.
  • Prioritize environments where Keycloak protects privileged or sensitive applications.
  • Handle known token theft events as potentially higher risk until remediated.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 and 26.6 deployments.
  • Compare installed packages against Red Hat advisory affected and unaffected entries.
  • Check Keycloak configuration for refresh-token revocation and persistent session storage.
  • Review restart windows against suspicious refresh-token or session activity.
  • Confirm remediation status using Red Hat errata and vendor tooling.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
8

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-613: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-9802 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.8CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N1.65.2redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.8Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-9802Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  2. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  3. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle, 26.4.13-1affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4rhbk/keycloak-rhel9, 26.4-19affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator, 26.4-19affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.13rhbk/keycloak-rhel9unaffected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.6rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle, 26.6.3-3affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.6rhbk/keycloak-rhel9, 26.6-6affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.6rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator, 26.6-6affected
Red HatRed Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.3rhbk/keycloak-rhel9unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-613 · source CWE mapping

Insufficient Session Expiration

Insufficient Session Expiration represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.