LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-95675: D-Link DAP-1360 6.14 Unauthenticated RCE via Web Management Interface

D-Link DAP-1360 firmware version 6.14 and earlier contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands as root by sending crafted requests to the device's web management interface without valid credentials. Attackers can fully compromise the device to persistently modify its configuration and use it as a pivot point into the local network.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

The supplied record describes a critical flaw in D-Link DAP-1360 firmware 6.14 and earlier. An attacker who can reach the device’s web management interface could take full control without logging in. This could allow configuration changes, service disruption, and use of the device to reach other systems on the local network.

Executive priority

Prioritize immediate exposure assessment and containment for matching devices, especially those with internet-accessible management interfaces. Full device control creates potential network intrusion and operational disruption risks. The bundle names no patch and labels a vendor reference as an EOL acknowledgement, making support verification and potential replacement planning urgent.

Technical view

CVE-2026-95675 is described as unauthenticated OS command injection (CWE-78) through the web management interface, allowing arbitrary commands as root. The supplied CVSS 3.1 score is 9.8, indicating network access, low complexity, no privileges or user interaction, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts. The narrative firmware range conflicts with ambiguous structured affected-version metadata.

Likely exposure

Potential exposure concerns D-Link DAP-1360 devices running firmware 6.14 or earlier, according to the description. Exploitability depends on access to the web management interface; internet exposure is not established. Internally reachable interfaces may also present risk. Hardware revision coverage and the precise affected range require confirmation because the structured metadata lists version '0' and defaultStatus 'unaffected'.

Exploitation context

The bundle marks KEV as false and provides no evidence of active exploitation. A reporter reference is tagged 'exploit', but its contents are not supplied, so exploit availability and reliability cannot be assessed. The described vulnerability requires neither credentials nor user interaction.

Researcher notes

This assessment uses only the supplied bundle; linked pages were not inspected. No patch, vendor-approved workaround, hardware revision scope, or active exploitation evidence is supplied. The affected array’s version '0' and defaultStatus 'unaffected' do not clearly encode the description’s '6.14 and earlier' range. Treat that range as provisional until reconciled with authoritative guidance.

Mitigation direction

  • Check the referenced vendor advisory for confirmed affected hardware, firmware, support status, and any remediation guidance.
  • As precautionary containment, restrict management-interface access to trusted administrative systems and remove internet exposure where present.
  • If the vendor confirms end-of-life status without remediation, prioritize replacement and isolate the device pending retirement.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory DAP-1360 devices and record hardware revisions and installed firmware versions.
  • Review firewall rules and management settings to determine which networks can reach each device’s web interface.
  • Reconcile the narrative firmware range with vendor guidance and the conflicting structured affected-version metadata.
  • Review available logs and configuration records for unexplained changes; absence of findings does not establish that compromise never occurred.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-95675 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9VulnCheck
9.3CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-95675Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
D-LINKDAP-13600unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.