Live Active security incident? Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-9544: Shenzhen Sixun Software Sixun Shanghui Group Business Management System PayConfig sql injection

A vulnerability was found in Shenzhen Sixun Software Sixun Shanghui Group Business Management System 10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /api/Dinner/PayConfig. Performing a manipulation of the argument tableno results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listed Updated
Glexia's Take high

Analyst readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE is a remotely reachable SQL injection in Shenzhen Sixun Software Sixun Shanghui Group Business Management System 10. An attacker may be able to interfere with backend database queries through the PayConfig API. Public exploit information is reported, but the provided sources do not show confirmed active exploitation.

Executive priority

Prioritize assessment for any exposed Sixun version 10 deployment. The combination of remote unauthenticated reachability, database impact, and public exploit availability makes this a high-priority vulnerability, even without confirmed active exploitation.

Technical view

The issue affects /api/Dinner/PayConfig, where manipulation of the tableno argument can result in SQL injection. CVSS 2.0 is 7.5 with network access, low complexity, and no authentication. The record maps to CWE-89 and CWE-74. No vendor response or patch is identified in the supplied sources.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running Sixun Shanghui Group Business Management System version 10, especially if the affected API is reachable from untrusted networks. The sources do not confirm other versions, hosted variants, or deployment patterns.

Exploitation context

The source bundle says an exploit has been made public and could be used. CISA KEV status is false, and no supplied source confirms active exploitation. Treat public-facing systems as higher risk because the vulnerability is remote and unauthenticated per the CVSS vector.

Researcher notes

Evidence is concentrated in VulDB/CVE-style disclosures. The affected function is described as unknown beyond the PayConfig endpoint and tableno parameter. Vendor non-response and unclear remediation reduce confidence in patch status. Avoid assuming affected versions beyond version 10.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory deployments and confirm whether version 10 is present.
  • Check Shenzhen Sixun Software and VulDB for vendor fix or advisory updates.
  • Restrict external access to the PayConfig API path where operationally feasible.
  • Monitor database and web logs for suspicious PayConfig requests.
  • Prioritize compensating controls if no vendor patch is available.

Validation and detection

  • Search asset inventory for Sixun Shanghui Group Business Management System version 10.
  • Confirm whether /api/Dinner/PayConfig is reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review WAF, proxy, and application logs for unusual tableno activity.
  • Track CVE and VulDB updates for patch or exploitation changes.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Based on public source material and reviewed before publication.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-74: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-9544 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profile CVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4 CVSS vectors
6 Timeline events
0 ADP providers
5 Source links

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

Score Version Severity Vector Exploit Impact Source
7.5 CVSS 2.0 High AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR 10 6.4 VulDB
7.3 CVSS 3.1 High CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R 3.9 3.4 VulDB
7.3 CVSS 3.0 High CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R 3.9 3.4 VulDB
6.9 CVSS 4.0 Medium CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

6.9 Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-9544 Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timeline VulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timeline VulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reserved CVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timeline VulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE published CVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updated CVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

Vendor Product Version / package Status
Shenzhen Sixun Software Sixun Shanghui Group Business Management System 10 Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-74 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-89 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.