Live Active security incident? Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-9541: Squirrel Cnut File sqobject.cpp ReadObject heap-based overflow

A security flaw has been discovered in Squirrel up to 3.2. Impacted is the function ReadObject of the file squirrel/sqobject.cpp of the component Cnut File Handler. Performing a manipulation results in heap-based buffer overflow. The attack is only possible with local access. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

MediumCVSS 5.3Not KEV-listed Updated
Glexia's Take moderate

Analyst readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-9541 is a heap-based buffer overflow in Squirrel 3.0 through 3.2 when handling Cnut files. The stated attack path requires local access and low privileges, so broad remote compromise is not supported by the sources. Public exploit material exists, and the project reportedly has not responded.

Executive priority

Treat this as a medium-priority local-exposure issue. Prioritize environments where Squirrel is embedded in products used by multiple local users or where untrusted local files are processed. Do not treat it as an internet-scale emergency based on the provided evidence.

Technical view

The flaw affects ReadObject in squirrel/sqobject.cpp within the Cnut File Handler. Manipulated input can trigger heap memory corruption, mapped to CWE-119 and CWE-122. The CVSS 3.1 score is 5.3 with local attack vector, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and limited confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where applications embed Squirrel 3.0, 3.1, or 3.2 and allow local users or local workflows to load Cnut files. Internet-facing exposure is not supported by the provided sources. Embedded copies may be harder to identify than standalone installations.

Exploitation context

The source bundle says exploit code has been released publicly and may be used for attacks. It does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Because the attack requires local access and privileges, risk is higher on shared systems, developer workstations, and products processing local scripts or assets.

Researcher notes

Evidence indicates public exploit availability but no confirmed active exploitation. The vendor response and fixed version are unclear in the provided sources. Validation should focus on version discovery, embedded library identification, and whether Cnut parsing is reachable from untrusted local input.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory standalone and embedded Squirrel versions across products and build dependencies.
  • Restrict Cnut file loading to trusted local users and trusted file sources.
  • Disable or isolate Cnut file handling where it is not required.
  • Monitor the upstream GitHub issue and CVE sources for vendor guidance.
  • Apply vendor or maintainer fixes when they become available.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether deployed software uses Squirrel 3.0, 3.1, or 3.2.
  • Identify workflows that load Cnut files from local users or untrusted sources.
  • Review crash reports for heap corruption near ReadObject or Cnut parsing.
  • Check whether embedded Squirrel copies differ from upstream source versions.
  • Track the public issue and advisory records for updated remediation details.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Based on public source material and reviewed before publication.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-122: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-9541 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profile CVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4 CVSS vectors
6 Timeline events
1 ADP providers
6 Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADP CISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

Score Version Severity Vector Exploit Impact Source
5.3 CVSS 3.1 Medium CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R 1.8 3.4 VulDB
5.3 CVSS 3.0 Medium CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R 1.8 3.4 VulDB
4.8 CVSS 4.0 Medium CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P VulDB
4.3 CVSS 2.0 Medium AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR 3.1 6.4 VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

4.8 Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-9541 Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timeline VulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timeline VulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reserved CVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timeline VulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE published CVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updated CVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADP CISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

Vendor Product Version / package Status
n/a Squirrel 3.0, 3.1, 3.2 Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-122 · source CWE mapping

Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Heap-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.